House of Commons Hansard #54 of the 36th Parliament, 2nd session. (The original version is on Parliament's site.) The word of the day was following.
Canada Elections ActGovernment Orders
The Speaker
It is possible that we will have a long series of votes. I would urge all members to be patient. We will go through them systematically. As always, if members wish to rest they may go to the lobbies. That is where they will be able to eat and drink tea, et cetera.
The first question is on Motion No. 1 in Group No. 1.
(The House divided on Motion No. 1, which was negatived on the following division:)
Division No. 693Government Orders
The Speaker
I declare Motion No. 1 lost.
The next question is on Motion No. 87. The vote on this motion also applies to Motions Nos. 89, 91 and 95 to 99 in Group No. 2.
(The House divided on Motion No. 87, which was negatived on the following division:)
Division No. 694Government Orders
The Speaker
I declare Motion No. 87 lost. I therefore declare Motions Nos. 89, 91 and 95 to 99 lost.
Naturally we take all hon. members at their word. After I have begun to read whatever we will vote on then members should not vote if they are not in their seats when I start. Members should remain until the end of the vote so that we do not make any mistakes.
The next question is on Motion No. 88. Is it the pleasure of the House to adopt the motion?
Division No. 694Government Orders
The Speaker
All those in favour of the motion will please say yea.
Division No. 694Government Orders
The Speaker
In my opinion the nays have it.
And more than five members having risen:
(The House divided on Motion No. 88, which was negatived on the following division:)
Division No. 695Government Orders
The Speaker
I declare Motion No. 88 lost. The next question is on Motion No. 92. A vote on this motion also applies to Motion No. 93. Is it the pleasure of the House to adopt the motion?
Division No. 695Government Orders
The Speaker
All those in favour of the motion will please say yea.
Division No. 695Government Orders
The Speaker
In my opinion the nays have it.
And more than five members having risen:
(The House divided on Motion No. 92, which was negatived on the following division:)
Division No. 696Government Orders
The Speaker
I declare Motion No. 92 lost. I therefore declare Motion No. 93 lost.
The next question is on Motion No. 100.
The vote on this motion applies as well to Motions Nos. 112, 115, 117, 119, 132 and 134.
(The House divided on Motion No. 100, which was negatived on the following division:)
Division No. 697Government Orders
The Speaker
I declare Motion No. 100 lost. I therefore declare Motions Nos. 112, 115, 117, 119, 132 and 134 lost.
The next question is on Motion No. 101. Is it the pleasure of the House to adopt the motion?
Division No. 697Government Orders
The Speaker
All those in favour of the motion will please say yea.