moved:
Motion No. 153
That Bill C-20 be amended by adding after line 28 on page 5 the following new clause:
“4. This Act comes into force three years after it is assented to.”
House of Commons Hansard #63 of the 36th Parliament, 2nd Session. (The original version is on Parliament's site.) The word of the day was yea.
An Act To Give Effect To The Requirement For Clarity As Set Out In The Opinion Of The Supreme Court Of Canada In The Quebec Secession ReferenceGovernment Orders
Bloc
Paul Mercier Bloc Terrebonne—Blainville, QC
moved:
Motion No. 153
That Bill C-20 be amended by adding after line 28 on page 5 the following new clause:
“4. This Act comes into force three years after it is assented to.”
An Act To Give Effect To The Requirement For Clarity As Set Out In The Opinion Of The Supreme Court Of Canada In The Quebec Secession ReferenceGovernment Orders
Bloc
Gérard Asselin Bloc Charlevoix, QC
moved:
Motion No. 154
That Bill C-20 be amended by adding after line 28 on page 5 the following new clause:
“4. This Act comes into force four years after it is assented to.”
An Act To Give Effect To The Requirement For Clarity As Set Out In The Opinion Of The Supreme Court Of Canada In The Quebec Secession ReferenceGovernment Orders
Bloc
Michel Guimond Bloc Beauport—Montmorency—Orléans, QC
moved:
Motion No. 155
That Bill C-20 be amended by adding after line 28 on page 5 the following new clause:
“4. This Act comes into force five years after it is assented to.”
An Act To Give Effect To The Requirement For Clarity As Set Out In The Opinion Of The Supreme Court Of Canada In The Quebec Secession ReferenceGovernment Orders
Bloc
Louis Plamondon Bloc Richelieu, QC
moved:
Motion No. 156
That Bill C-20 be amended by adding after line 28 on page 5 the following new clause:
“4. This Act comes into force on a day to be fixed by order of the Governor in Council which day shall not be earlier than March 31, 2006.”
An Act To Give Effect To The Requirement For Clarity As Set Out In The Opinion Of The Supreme Court Of Canada In The Quebec Secession ReferenceGovernment Orders
Bloc
Pierre De Savoye Bloc Portneuf, QC
moved:
Motion No. 157
That Bill C-20 be amended by adding after line 28 on page 5 the following new clause:
“4. This Act comes into force six years after it is assented to.”
An Act To Give Effect To The Requirement For Clarity As Set Out In The Opinion Of The Supreme Court Of Canada In The Quebec Secession ReferenceGovernment Orders
Bloc
Hélène Alarie Bloc Louis-Hébert, QC
moved:
Motion No. 158
That Bill C-20 be amended by adding after line 28 on page 5 the following new clause:
“4. This Act comes into force on a day to be fixed by order of the Governor in Council which day shall not be earlier than March 31, 2007.”
An Act To Give Effect To The Requirement For Clarity As Set Out In The Opinion Of The Supreme Court Of Canada In The Quebec Secession ReferenceGovernment Orders
Bloc
René Laurin Bloc Joliette, QC
moved:
Motion No. 159
That Bill C-20 be amended by adding after line 28 on page 5 the following new clause:
“4. This Act comes into force seven years after it is assented to.”
An Act To Give Effect To The Requirement For Clarity As Set Out In The Opinion Of The Supreme Court Of Canada In The Quebec Secession ReferenceGovernment Orders
Bloc
René Canuel Bloc Matapédia—Matane, QC
moved:
Motion No. 160
That Bill C-20 be amended by adding after line 28 on page 5 the following new clause:
“4. This Act comes into force eight years after it is assented to.”
An Act To Give Effect To The Requirement For Clarity As Set Out In The Opinion Of The Supreme Court Of Canada In The Quebec Secession ReferenceGovernment Orders
Bloc
Pierrette Venne Bloc Saint-Bruno—Saint-Hubert, QC
moved:
Motion No. 161
That Bill C-20 be amended by adding after line 28 on page 5 the following new clause:
“4. This Act comes into force on a day to be fixed by order of the Governor in Council which day shall not be earlier than March 31, 2008.”
An Act To Give Effect To The Requirement For Clarity As Set Out In The Opinion Of The Supreme Court Of Canada In The Quebec Secession ReferenceGovernment Orders
Bloc
Gilles-A. Perron Bloc Saint-Eustache—Sainte-Thérèse, QC
moved:
Motion No. 162
That Bill C-20 be amended by adding after line 28 on page 5 the following new clause:
“4. This Act comes into force nine years after it is assented to.”
An Act To Give Effect To The Requirement For Clarity As Set Out In The Opinion Of The Supreme Court Of Canada In The Quebec Secession ReferenceGovernment Orders
Bloc
Yvan Bernier Bloc Bonaventure—Gaspé—Îles-De-La-Madeleine—Pabok, QC
moved:
Motion No. 163
That Bill C-20 be amended by adding after line 28 on page 5 the following new clause:
“4. This Act comes into force on a day to be fixed by order of the Governor in Council which day shall not be earlier than March 31, 2009.”
An Act To Give Effect To The Requirement For Clarity As Set Out In The Opinion Of The Supreme Court Of Canada In The Quebec Secession ReferenceGovernment Orders
Bloc
Maurice Godin Bloc Châteauguay, QC
moved:
Motion No. 164
That Bill C-20 be amended by adding after line 28 on page 5 the following new clause:
“4. This Act comes into force on a day to be fixed by order of the Governor in Council which day shall not be earlier than March 31, 2010.”
An Act To Give Effect To The Requirement For Clarity As Set Out In The Opinion Of The Supreme Court Of Canada In The Quebec Secession ReferenceGovernment Orders
Bloc
Jocelyne Girard-Bujold Bloc Jonquière, QC
moved:
Motion No. 165
That Bill C-20 be amended by adding after line 28 on page 5 the following new clause:
“4. This Act comes into force ten years after it is assented to.”
An Act To Give Effect To The Requirement For Clarity As Set Out In The Opinion Of The Supreme Court Of Canada In The Quebec Secession ReferenceGovernment Orders
Bloc
Richard Marceau Bloc Charlesbourg, QC
moved:
Motion No. 166
That Bill C-20 be amended by adding after line 28 on page 5 the following new clause:
“4. This Act comes into force on a day to be fixed by order of the Governor in Council which day shall not be earlier than March 31, 2011.”
An Act To Give Effect To The Requirement For Clarity As Set Out In The Opinion Of The Supreme Court Of Canada In The Quebec Secession ReferenceGovernment Orders
Bloc
Claude Bachand Bloc Saint-Jean, QC
moved:
Motion No. 167
That Bill C-20 be amended by adding after line 28 on page 5 the following new clause:
“4. This Act comes into force on a day to be fixed by order of the Governor in Council which day shall not be earlier than March 31, 2012.”
An Act To Give Effect To The Requirement For Clarity As Set Out In The Opinion Of The Supreme Court Of Canada In The Quebec Secession ReferenceGovernment Orders
Bloc
Serge Cardin Bloc Sherbrooke, QC
moved:
Motion No. 168
That Bill C-20 be amended by adding after line 28 on page 5 the following new clause:
“4. This Act comes into force on a day to be fixed by order of the Governor in Council which day shall not be earlier than March 31, 2013.”
An Act To Give Effect To The Requirement For Clarity As Set Out In The Opinion Of The Supreme Court Of Canada In The Quebec Secession ReferenceGovernment Orders
Bloc
Ghislain Lebel Bloc Chambly, QC
moved:
Motion No. 169
That Bill C-20 be amended by adding after line 28 on page 5 the following new clause:
“4. This Act comes into force twelve years after it is assented to.”
An Act To Give Effect To The Requirement For Clarity As Set Out In The Opinion Of The Supreme Court Of Canada In The Quebec Secession ReferenceGovernment Orders
Bloc
Antoine Dubé Bloc Lévis, QC
moved:
Motion No. 170
That Bill C-20 be amended by adding after line 28 on page 5 the following new clause:
“4. (1) Two years after this Act comes into force, and every two years thereafter, the Minister of Intergovernmental Affairs shall cause a review to be made of the provisions and the administration of this Act.
(2) Within one year after the review is undertaken, the Minister of Intergovernmental Affairs shall submit to Parliament a report on the review.
(3) The report shall be reviewed by a committee of the House of Commons that may be designated or established for the purpose of reviewing the report.”
An Act To Give Effect To The Requirement For Clarity As Set Out In The Opinion Of The Supreme Court Of Canada In The Quebec Secession ReferenceGovernment Orders
Bloc
Ghislain Fournier Bloc Manicouagan, QC
moved:
Motion No. 171
That Bill C-20 be amended by adding after line 28 on page 5 the following new clause:
“4. (1) Two years after this Act comes into force, and every three years thereafter, the Minister of Intergovernmental Affairs shall cause a review to be made of the provisions and the administration of this Act.
(2) Within one year after the review is undertaken, the Minister of Intergovernmental Affairs shall submit to Parliament a report on the review.
(3) The report shall be reviewed by a committee of the House of Commons that may be designated or established for the purpose of reviewing the report.”
An Act To Give Effect To The Requirement For Clarity As Set Out In The Opinion Of The Supreme Court Of Canada In The Quebec Secession ReferenceGovernment Orders
Bloc
René Canuel Bloc Matapédia—Matane, QC
moved:
Motion No. 172
That Bill C-20 be amended by adding after line 28 on page 5 the following new clause:
“4. Section 1 comes into force on a day to be fixed by order of the Minister of Justice which day shall be after January 1, 2006, and sections 2 and 3 come into force on a day to be fixed by order of the Governor in Council which day shall be after January 1, 2007.”
An Act To Give Effect To The Requirement For Clarity As Set Out In The Opinion Of The Supreme Court Of Canada In The Quebec Secession ReferenceGovernment Orders
Bloc
Maurice Dumas Bloc Argenteuil—Papineau, QC
moved:
Motion No. 173
That Bill C-20 be amended by adding after line 28 on page 5 the following new clause:
“4. (1) Two years after this Act comes into force, and every four years thereafter, the Minister of Intergovernmental Affairs shall cause a review to be made of the provisions and the administration of this Act.
(2) Within one year after the review is undertaken, the Minister of Intergovernmental Affairs shall submit to Parliament a report on the review.
(3) The report shall be reviewed by a committee of the House of Commons that may be designated or established for the purpose of reviewing the report.”
An Act To Give Effect To The Requirement For Clarity As Set Out In The Opinion Of The Supreme Court Of Canada In The Quebec Secession ReferenceGovernment Orders
Bloc
Maurice Godin Bloc Châteauguay, QC
moved:
Motion No. 174
That Bill C-20 be amended by adding after line 28 on page 5 the following new clause:
“4. Section 1 comes into force on a day to be fixed by order of the Minister of Justice which day shall be after January 1, 2005, and sections 2 and 3 come into force on a day to be fixed by order of the President of the Privy Council which day shall be after January 1, 2006.”
An Act To Give Effect To The Requirement For Clarity As Set Out In The Opinion Of The Supreme Court Of Canada In The Quebec Secession ReferenceGovernment Orders
Bloc
Yves Rocheleau Bloc Trois-Rivières, QC
moved:
Motion No. 175
That Bill C-20 be amended by adding after line 28 on page 5 the following new clause:
“4. (1) Two years after this Act comes into force, and every five years thereafter, the Minister of Intergovernmental Affairs shall cause a review to be made of the provisions and the administration of this Act.
(2) Within one year after the review is undertaken, the Minister of Intergovernmental Affairs shall submit to Parliament a report on the review.
(3) The report shall be reviewed by a committee of the House of Commons that may be designated or established for the purpose of reviewing the report.”
An Act To Give Effect To The Requirement For Clarity As Set Out In The Opinion Of The Supreme Court Of Canada In The Quebec Secession ReferenceGovernment Orders
Bloc
Ghislain Lebel Bloc Chambly, QC
moved:
Motion No. 176
That Bill C-20 be amended by adding after line 28 on page 5 the following new clause:
“4. Section 2 comes into force on a day to be fixed by order of the Minister of Justice which day shall be after January 1, 2007, and sections 1 and 3 come into force on a day to be fixed by order of the Governor in Council which day shall be after January 1, 2006.”
An Act To Give Effect To The Requirement For Clarity As Set Out In The Opinion Of The Supreme Court Of Canada In The Quebec Secession ReferenceGovernment Orders
Bloc
Jocelyne Girard-Bujold Bloc Jonquière, QC
moved:
Motion No. 177
That Bill C-20 be amended by adding after line 28 on page 5 the following new clause:
“4. Section 2 comes into force on a day to be fixed by order of the Minister of Justice which day shall be after January 1, 2006, and sections 1 and 3 come into force on a day to be fixed by order of the President of the Privy Council which day shall be after January 1, 2007.”