moved:
Motion No. 330
That Bill C-20 be amended by adding after line 28 on page 5 the following new clause:
“4. This Act shall come into force on April 1, 2006.”
House of Commons Hansard #63 of the 36th Parliament, 2nd Session. (The original version is on Parliament's site.) The word of the day was yea.
An Act To Give Effect To The Requirement For Clarity As Set Out In The Opinion Of The Supreme Court Of Canada In The Quebec Secession ReferenceGovernment Orders
Bloc
Yvan Bernier Bloc Bonaventure—Gaspé—Îles-De-La-Madeleine—Pabok, QC
moved:
Motion No. 330
That Bill C-20 be amended by adding after line 28 on page 5 the following new clause:
“4. This Act shall come into force on April 1, 2006.”
An Act To Give Effect To The Requirement For Clarity As Set Out In The Opinion Of The Supreme Court Of Canada In The Quebec Secession ReferenceGovernment Orders
Bloc
Maud Debien Bloc Laval East, QC
moved:
Motion No. 331
That Bill C-20 be amended by adding after line 28 on page 5 the following new clause:
“4. This Act shall come into force on May 1, 2006.”
An Act To Give Effect To The Requirement For Clarity As Set Out In The Opinion Of The Supreme Court Of Canada In The Quebec Secession ReferenceGovernment Orders
Bloc
Louis Plamondon Bloc Richelieu, QC
moved:
Motion No. 332
That Bill C-20 be amended by adding after line 28 on page 5 the following new clause:
“4. This Act shall come into force on June 1, 2006.”
An Act To Give Effect To The Requirement For Clarity As Set Out In The Opinion Of The Supreme Court Of Canada In The Quebec Secession ReferenceGovernment Orders
Bloc
Hélène Alarie Bloc Louis-Hébert, QC
moved:
Motion No. 333
That Bill C-20 be amended by adding after line 28 on page 5 the following new clause:
“4. This Act shall come into force on July 1, 2006.”
An Act To Give Effect To The Requirement For Clarity As Set Out In The Opinion Of The Supreme Court Of Canada In The Quebec Secession ReferenceGovernment Orders
Bloc
Maurice Godin Bloc Châteauguay, QC
moved:
Motion No. 334
That Bill C-20 be amended by adding after line 28 on page 5 the following new clause:
“4. This Act shall come into force on August 1, 2006.”
An Act To Give Effect To The Requirement For Clarity As Set Out In The Opinion Of The Supreme Court Of Canada In The Quebec Secession ReferenceGovernment Orders
Bloc
Claude Bachand Bloc Saint-Jean, QC
moved:
Motion No. 335
That Bill C-20 be amended by adding after line 28 on page 5 the following new clause:
“4. This Act shall come into force on September 1, 2006.”
An Act To Give Effect To The Requirement For Clarity As Set Out In The Opinion Of The Supreme Court Of Canada In The Quebec Secession ReferenceGovernment Orders
Bloc
René Canuel Bloc Matapédia—Matane, QC
moved:
Motion No. 336
That Bill C-20 be amended by adding after line 28 on page 5 the following new clause:
“4. This Act shall come into force on October 1, 2006.”
An Act To Give Effect To The Requirement For Clarity As Set Out In The Opinion Of The Supreme Court Of Canada In The Quebec Secession ReferenceGovernment Orders
Bloc
Ghislain Lebel Bloc Chambly, QC
moved:
Motion No. 337
That Bill C-20 be amended by adding after line 28 on page 5 the following new clause:
“4. This Act shall come into force on November 1, 2006.”
An Act To Give Effect To The Requirement For Clarity As Set Out In The Opinion Of The Supreme Court Of Canada In The Quebec Secession ReferenceGovernment Orders
Bloc
Jocelyne Girard-Bujold Bloc Jonquière, QC
moved:
Motion No. 338
That Bill C-20 be amended by adding after line 28 on page 5 the following new clause:
“4. This Act shall come into force on December 1, 2006.”
An Act To Give Effect To The Requirement For Clarity As Set Out In The Opinion Of The Supreme Court Of Canada In The Quebec Secession ReferenceGovernment Orders
Bloc
Pierre De Savoye Bloc Portneuf, QC
moved:
Motion No. 339
That Bill C-20 be amended by adding after line 28 on page 5 the following new clause:
“4. This Act shall come into force on January 1, 2007.”
An Act To Give Effect To The Requirement For Clarity As Set Out In The Opinion Of The Supreme Court Of Canada In The Quebec Secession ReferenceGovernment Orders
Bloc
Gilles-A. Perron Bloc Saint-Eustache—Sainte-Thérèse, QC
moved:
Motion No. 340
That Bill C-20 be amended by adding after line 28 on page 5 the following new clause:
“4. This Act shall come into force on February 1, 2007.”
An Act To Give Effect To The Requirement For Clarity As Set Out In The Opinion Of The Supreme Court Of Canada In The Quebec Secession ReferenceGovernment Orders
Bloc
René Laurin Bloc Joliette, QC
moved:
Motion No. 341
That Bill C-20 be amended by adding after line 28 on page 5 the following new clause:
“4. This Act shall come into force on March 1, 2007.”
An Act To Give Effect To The Requirement For Clarity As Set Out In The Opinion Of The Supreme Court Of Canada In The Quebec Secession ReferenceGovernment Orders
Bloc
Pauline Picard Bloc Drummond, QC
moved:
Motion No. 342
That Bill C-20 be amended by adding after line 28 on page 5 the following new clause:
“4. This Act shall come into force on April 1, 2007.”
An Act To Give Effect To The Requirement For Clarity As Set Out In The Opinion Of The Supreme Court Of Canada In The Quebec Secession ReferenceGovernment Orders
Bloc
Michel Guimond Bloc Beauport—Montmorency—Orléans, QC
moved:
Motion No. 343
That Bill C-20 be amended by adding after line 28 on page 5 the following new clause:
“4. This Act shall come into force on May 1, 2007.”
An Act To Give Effect To The Requirement For Clarity As Set Out In The Opinion Of The Supreme Court Of Canada In The Quebec Secession ReferenceGovernment Orders
Bloc
Gérard Asselin Bloc Charlevoix, QC
moved:
Motion No. 344
That Bill C-20 be amended by adding after line 28 on page 5 the following new clause:
“4. This Act shall come into force on June 1, 2007.”
An Act To Give Effect To The Requirement For Clarity As Set Out In The Opinion Of The Supreme Court Of Canada In The Quebec Secession ReferenceGovernment Orders
Bloc
Jean-Guy Chrétien Bloc Frontenac—Mégantic, QC
moved:
Motion No. 345
That Bill C-20 be amended by adding after line 28 on page 5 the following new clause:
“4. This Act shall come into force on July 1, 2007.”
An Act To Give Effect To The Requirement For Clarity As Set Out In The Opinion Of The Supreme Court Of Canada In The Quebec Secession ReferenceGovernment Orders
Bloc
Benoît Sauvageau Bloc Repentigny, QC
moved:
Motion No. 346
That Bill C-20 be amended by adding after line 28 on page 5 the following new clause:
“4. This Act shall come into force on August 1, 2007.”
An Act To Give Effect To The Requirement For Clarity As Set Out In The Opinion Of The Supreme Court Of Canada In The Quebec Secession ReferenceGovernment Orders
Bloc
Paul Mercier Bloc Terrebonne—Blainville, QC
moved:
Motion No. 347
That Bill C-20 be amended by adding after line 28 on page 5 the following new clause:
“4. This Act shall come into force on September 1, 2007.”
An Act To Give Effect To The Requirement For Clarity As Set Out In The Opinion Of The Supreme Court Of Canada In The Quebec Secession ReferenceGovernment Orders
Bloc
Yves Rocheleau Bloc Trois-Rivières, QC
moved:
Motion No. 348
That Bill C-20 be amended by adding after line 28 on page 5 the following new clause:
“4. This Act shall come into force on October 1, 2007.”
An Act To Give Effect To The Requirement For Clarity As Set Out In The Opinion Of The Supreme Court Of Canada In The Quebec Secession ReferenceGovernment Orders
Bloc
Ghislain Lebel Bloc Chambly, QC
moved:
Motion No. 349
That Bill C-20 be amended by adding after line 28 on page 5 the following new clause:
“4. This Act shall come into force on November 1, 2007.”
An Act To Give Effect To The Requirement For Clarity As Set Out In The Opinion Of The Supreme Court Of Canada In The Quebec Secession ReferenceGovernment Orders
Bloc
Christiane Gagnon Bloc Québec, QC
moved:
Motion No. 350
That Bill C-20 be amended by adding after line 28 on page 5 the following new clause:
“4. This Act shall come into force on December 1, 2007.”
An Act To Give Effect To The Requirement For Clarity As Set Out In The Opinion Of The Supreme Court Of Canada In The Quebec Secession ReferenceGovernment Orders
Bloc
Serge Cardin Bloc Sherbrooke, QC
moved:
Motion No. 351
That Bill C-20 be amended by adding after line 28 on page 5 the following new clause:
“4. This Act shall come into force on October 1, 2008.”
An Act To Give Effect To The Requirement For Clarity As Set Out In The Opinion Of The Supreme Court Of Canada In The Quebec Secession ReferenceGovernment Orders
Bloc
Réal Ménard Bloc Hochelaga—Maisonneuve, QC
moved:
Motion No. 352
That Bill C-20 be amended by adding after line 28 on page 5 the following new clause:
“4. This Act shall come into force on January 1, 2008.”
An Act To Give Effect To The Requirement For Clarity As Set Out In The Opinion Of The Supreme Court Of Canada In The Quebec Secession ReferenceGovernment Orders
Bloc
Hélène Alarie Bloc Louis-Hébert, QC
moved:
Motion No. 353
That Bill C-20 be amended by adding after line 28 on page 5 the following new clause:
“4. This Act shall come into force on November 1, 2008.”
An Act To Give Effect To The Requirement For Clarity As Set Out In The Opinion Of The Supreme Court Of Canada In The Quebec Secession ReferenceGovernment Orders
Bloc
Ghislain Fournier Bloc Manicouagan, QC
moved:
Motion No. 354
That Bill C-20 be amended by adding after line 28 on page 5 the following new clause:
“4. This Act shall come into force on February 1, 2008.”