This week, I changed much of the tech behind this site. If you see anything that looks like a bug, please let me know!

House of Commons Hansard #115 of the 36th Parliament, 2nd Session. (The original version is on Parliament's site.) The word of the day was federal.

Topics

Criminal CodeGovernment Orders

9:50 p.m.

Bloc

Stéphane Bergeron Bloc Verchères, QC

Mr. Speaker, I am very unhappy to have to end this evening and this session on a resounding no to this motion.

Criminal CodeGovernment Orders

9:50 p.m.

NDP

Yvon Godin NDP Acadie—Bathurst, NB

Mr. Speaker, members of the New Democratic Party present this evening will vote yes on this motion.

Criminal CodeGovernment Orders

9:50 p.m.

Progressive Conservative

Norman E. Doyle Progressive Conservative St. John's East, NL

Mr. Speaker, the Progressive Conservative members will vote in favour of this motion.

Criminal CodeGovernment Orders

9:50 p.m.

Reform

Jake Hoeppner Reform Portage—Lisgar, MB

Mr. Speaker, Portage—Lisgar votes yes.

Criminal CodeGovernment Orders

9:50 p.m.

Liberal

Larry McCormick Liberal Hastings—Frontenac—Lennox And Addington, ON

Mr. Speaker, I rise on a point of order. Following Private Members' Business, could I add my name back on the list to vote with the government, please?

Criminal CodeGovernment Orders

9:50 p.m.

Liberal

Andy Mitchell Liberal Parry Sound—Muskoka, ON

Mr. Speaker, I would like to have my name recorded with the government on this vote.

Criminal CodeGovernment Orders

9:50 p.m.

Liberal

Bob Nault Liberal Kenora—Rainy River, ON

Mr. Speaker, I would like to have my name recorded as having voted with the government on this motion.

Criminal CodeGovernment Orders

9:50 p.m.

Liberal

Joe Jordan Liberal Leeds—Grenville, ON

Mr. Speaker, I would like to have my vote recorded as being in favour of this motion.

Criminal CodeGovernment Orders

9:50 p.m.

The Deputy Speaker

Perhaps it might assist the table officers if the chief government whip—and I think the other whips would agree—would state that the vote that we are applying is the one that was taken on the third reading of the supply bill. I think it would be clearer and it might assist in avoiding these different counts, subject to the people who might not have been here for that vote.

Criminal CodeGovernment Orders

9:50 p.m.

Liberal

Bob Kilger Liberal Stormont—Dundas, ON

Mr. Speaker, in the spirit of clarity, I totally agree with your suggestion and will conform.

Criminal CodeGovernment Orders

9:50 p.m.

The Deputy Speaker

It will shorten the proceedings a little. Is that agreed?

Criminal CodeGovernment Orders

9:50 p.m.

Some hon. members

Agreed.

(The House divided on the motion, which was agreed to on the following division:)

Division No. 1385Government Orders

June 15th, 2000 / 9:50 p.m.

The Deputy Speaker

I declare the motion carried.

(Bill read the third time and passed)

Division No. 1385Government Orders

9:50 p.m.

The Deputy Speaker

It being 9.55 p.m., pursuant to order made earlier today, the House stands adjourned until Monday, September 18, 2000 at 11 a.m., pursuant to Standing Orders 28(2) and 24(1).

(The House adjourned at 9.51 p.m.)