House of Commons Hansard #66 of the 37th Parliament, 1st Session. (The original version is on Parliament's site.) The word of the day was c-7.
International Child AbductionPrivate Members' Business
The Acting Speaker (Mr. Bélair)
Pursuant to order made on Friday, May 18, 2001, the House will now proceed to the taking of the deferred recorded division on Motion No. 219 under private members' business.
Call in the members.
(The House divided on the motion, which was agreed to on the following division:)
Division No. 101Private Members' Business
The Acting Speaker (Mr. Bélair)
I declare the motion carried.
The House resumed consideration of Bill C-7, an act in respect of criminal justice for young persons and to amend and repeal other acts, as reported (with amendment) from the committee.
Youth Criminal Justice ActGovernment Orders
The Acting Speaker (Mr. Bélair)
The House will now proceed to the taking of the deferred recorded divisions on the report stage of Bill C-7. The question is on Motion No. 1, as amended. A vote on this motion also applies to Motion No. 3.
(The House divided on Motion No. 1, which was negatived on the following division:)
Rob Anders Canadian Alliance Calgary West, AB
Mr. Speaker, I rise on a point of order. I voted in opposition to the motion but I would like to have my vote reflect that I voted in favour of it. I made a mistake when I was standing before.
Division No. 102Government Orders
The Acting Speaker (Mr. Bélair)
I declare Motion No. 1 lost. I therefore declare Motion No. 3 lost.
The next question is on Motion No. 2.
Marlene Catterall Liberal Ottawa West—Nepean, ON
Mr. Speaker, I think you would find consent that members who voted on the previous motion be recorded as voting on the motion now before the House, with Liberal members voting no, with the exception of the member from Huron—Bruce.
Division No. 102Government Orders
The Acting Speaker (Mr. Bélair)
Is there consent to proceed in this fashion?
Dick Harris Canadian Alliance Prince George—Bulkley Valley, BC
Mr. Speaker, Canadian Alliance members will be voting yes on this motion.
Michel Guimond Bloc Beauport—Montmorency—Côte-De- Beaupré—Île-D'Orléans, QC
Mr. Speaker, the members of the Bloc Quebecois will vote against this motion.
Rick Borotsik Progressive Conservative Brandon—Souris, MB
Mr. Speaker, the members of the Progressive Conservative Party will vote in favour of the motion, in French.
(The House divided on Motion No. 2, which was negatived on the following division:)
Division No. 103Government Orders
The Acting Speaker (Mr. Bélair)
I declare Motion No. 2 lost.
Anne McLellan LiberalMinister of Justice and Attorney General of Canada
moved that the bill, as amended, be concurred in.
Marlene Catterall Liberal Ottawa West—Nepean, ON
Mr. Speaker, I rise on a point of order. I believe you would find unanimous consent that members who voted on the previous motion be recorded as voting on the motion now before the House, with Liberal members including the member for Huron—Bruce voting yes.
Division No. 103Government Orders
The Acting Speaker (Mr. Bélair)
Is there unanimous consent to proceed in such a fashion?
Dick Harris Canadian Alliance Prince George—Bulkley Valley, BC
Mr. Speaker, Canadian Alliance members will be voting no to the motion.
Michel Guimond Bloc Beauport—Montmorency—Côte-De- Beaupré—Île-D'Orléans, QC
Mr. Speaker, the members of the Bloc Quebecois will vote against this motion.
Yvon Godin NDP Acadie—Bathurst, NB
Mr. Speaker, members of the NDP present will be voting no to the motion.
Rick Borotsik Progressive Conservative Brandon—Souris, MB
Mr. Speaker, members of the Progressive Conservative Party will be voting no to the motion.
(The House divided on the motion, which was agreed to on the following division:)
Division No. 104Government Orders
The Acting Speaker (Mr. Bélair)
I declare the motion carried.
A motion to adjourn the House under Standing Order 38 deemed to have been moved.
Bill Casey Progressive Conservative Cumberland—Colchester, NS
Mr. Speaker, I am pleased to rise on a question I asked originally on April 3 about softwood lumber. At the time I pointed out to the minister that everyone involved with the softwood lumber issue, even the United States industry, had acknowledged that Atlantic Canada should be exempt from countervail duties. The actual petition said:
Petitioners do not allege the softwood lumber production in the Atlantic provinces benefits from countervailable subsidies. This portion of Canadian production should be treated the same as it was in 1991-92.
The minister was very vague in the answer. He has not given us an answer. We want the maritime accord reinstated.
We have repeatedly asked the minister to bring the industry together, the CEOs, consultants and all other parties involved, and week after week the parliamentary secretary and the minister stand and say they are not ready to bring them together.
I now understand that the minister has extended invitations to the industry to come together on Wednesday at the meeting of the deputy ministers from all the provinces, the CEOs and the consultants, just as we have been asking for.
We would like the minister or the parliamentary secretary to confirm both the meeting and what is on the agenda. Are we going to get the maritime accord reinstated?
Pat O'Brien LiberalParliamentary Secretary to Minister for International Trade
Mr. Speaker, first of all let us be clear that the minister and the government share the member's concern for wanting an extension or a new exemption for Atlantic Canada.
The minister is working very diligently toward that end. Of course that is part of a larger solution, which should be free trade for softwood lumber from coast to coast to coast.
I am afraid that my colleague will have to speak with the minister directly vis-à-vis the agenda for such a meeting. I can tell him that for some time now the minister has been holding open the idea of calling the stakeholders together but that there has not been a consensus among the stakeholders themselves that the time was right. If we are at that point this week—