No.
House of Commons Hansard #121 of the 37th Parliament, 2nd Session. (The original version is on Parliament's site.) The word of the day was boundaries.
House of Commons Hansard #121 of the 37th Parliament, 2nd Session. (The original version is on Parliament's site.) The word of the day was boundaries.
The House resumed from June 11 consideration of Bill C-250, an act to amend the Criminal Code (hate propaganda), as reported (without amendment) from the committee, and of the motions in Group No. 1.
Criminal CodePrivate Members' Business
The Speaker
The House will now proceed to the taking of the deferred recorded divisions on the report stage of Bill C-250.
The question is on Motion No. 2.
After the taking of the vote:
Alan Tonks Liberal York South—Weston, ON
Mr. Speaker, I would like to be recorded as voting in the negative on the last vote.
Sarkis Assadourian Liberal Brampton Centre, ON
Mr. Speaker, I would like to oppose Motion No. 2 also.
John Cannis Liberal Scarborough Centre, ON
I voted in favour, Mr. Speaker.
The House divided on Motion No. 2, which was negatived on the following division:)
Criminal CodePrivate Members' Business
The Speaker
I declare Motion No. 2 lost.
The next division is on Motion No. 3.
The House divided on Motion No. 3, which was negatived on the following division:)
Svend Robinson NDP Burnaby—Douglas, BC
moved that the bill, as amended, be concurred in.
Criminal CodePrivate Members' Business
The Speaker
Is it the pleasure of the House to adopt the motion?
Criminal CodePrivate Members' Business
The Speaker
All those in favour of the motion will please say yea.
Criminal CodePrivate Members' Business
The Speaker
In my opinion the nays have it.
And more than five members having risen:
(The House divided on the motion, which was agreed to on the following division:)
Criminal CodePrivate Members' Business
The Speaker
I declare the motion carried.
When shall the bill be read the third time? By leave, now?
Svend Robinson NDP Burnaby—Douglas, BC
moved that the bill be read the third time and passed.
Marlene Catterall Liberal Ottawa West—Nepean, ON
Mr. Speaker, I realize this is unusual during private members' business, but I have had some requests from both sides of the House to see whether there might be consent, given this is now the report on third reading, to apply the vote from the previous vote.
Criminal CodePrivate Members' Business
The Speaker
Is there consent to proceed in this way?
Criminal CodePrivate Members' Business
The Speaker
The question is on the motion. Is it the pleasure of the House to adopt the motion?