The general policy is that whenever a member is referencing or reading from either a newspaper article or a letter,--and we have to keep this in mind--that in the House we cannot do indirectly what we might not be able to do directly. That is why I rose a few moments ago in terms of a member's name being used.
I understood that it was an omission. Certainly, we have to recognize one another either by the name of the riding or by the portfolio that anyone might carry.
In terms of a word, a text, or an expression being unparliamentary, there is no greater liberty in doing things indirectly than there would be doing directly.
The Chair will continue to be attentive; however, I must confess that in the past few weeks there has been a great latitude. I hope members on both sides of the House will understand and remain judicious when they do have the floor.