House of Commons Hansard #71 of the 38th Parliament, 1st Session. (The original version is on Parliament's site.) The word of the day was religious.

Topics

PetitionsRoutine Proceedings

3:20 p.m.

Conservative

Werner Schmidt Conservative Kelowna, BC

Mr. Speaker, pursuant to Standing Order 36, I wish to present a petition. The petitioners ask Parliament to amend the Canada Health Act and corresponding regulations to include IBI-ABA therapy for children with autism as a medically necessary treatment, to require that all provinces provide or fund this essential treatment for autism and to contribute to the creation of academic chairs at a university in each province to teach IBI-ABA treatment.

PetitionsRoutine Proceedings

3:20 p.m.

Bloc

Marc Lemay Bloc Abitibi—Témiscamingue, QC

Mr. Speaker, I have the honour to table in this House a petition signed by constituents in my riding on Bill C-38, now under consideration. These people oppose changing the definition of marriage.

PetitionsRoutine Proceedings

3:20 p.m.

NDP

Peter Stoffer NDP Sackville—Eastern Shore, NS

Mr. Speaker, I have a petition I wish to present on behalf of a very good friend and a wonderful person named Laurel Gibbons.

The petitioners ask Parliament to amend the Canada Health Act and corresponding regulations to include IBI and ABA therapy for children with autism as a medically necessary treatment and to require that all provinces provide funding for this essential treatment for autism.

Also, the petitioners encourage the federal government to work very closely with the provinces and territories to provide the necessary funds for all children and families who go through this terrible disease

PetitionsRoutine Proceedings

3:20 p.m.

Liberal

Charles Hubbard Liberal Miramichi, NB

Mr. Speaker, pursuant to Standing Order 36 I would like to present a petition on the veterans independence program, a program that has been very effective for veterans since 1981. It has been extended recently to the widows of those veterans.

We do have a considerable number of widows whose husbands died prior to 1981. They feel they should also be part of this program.

PetitionsRoutine Proceedings

3:20 p.m.

Conservative

Jason Kenney Conservative Calgary Southeast, AB

Mr. Speaker, it is my pleasure to rise to table a petition from some 25 residents of British Columbia calling upon Parliament to support a motion calling for a woman's right to know with respect to the practice of abortion.

PetitionsRoutine Proceedings

3:20 p.m.

Conservative

Jason Kenney Conservative Calgary Southeast, AB

Mr. Speaker, I am further pleased to table a petition from some several hundred constituents of Calgary Southeast, principally members of the Saint Albert the Great Roman Catholic parish. The petitioners call upon Parliament to take all measures necessary to ensure that the possession of child pornography remains a serious criminal offence, and that the age of sexual consent be raised to 18.

PetitionsRoutine Proceedings

3:20 p.m.

Conservative

Jason Kenney Conservative Calgary Southeast, AB

Mr. Speaker, I am also pleased to table a petition signed by some 250 residents of British Columbia. The petitioners call upon the Minister of Justice and Parliament to maintain the criminal prohibition against assisted suicide and to respect innocent human life for the elderly and the inform.

PetitionsRoutine Proceedings

3:20 p.m.

Conservative

Mark Warawa Conservative Langley, BC

Mr. Speaker, I present another petition to the House on marriage. Residents of the Fraser Valley ask Parliament to use all possible legislative measures to preserve and protect the current definition of marriage as being between one man and one woman to the exclusion of all others.

PetitionsRoutine Proceedings

3:20 p.m.

Liberal

Dominic LeBlanc Liberal Beauséjour, NB

Mr. Speaker, pursuant to Standing Order 36, I am very happy to present a petition signed by a number of residents from southeastern New Brunswick, the communities in and around Shediac and in fact all over New Brunswick.

These people call upon Parliament to make important improvements to the Food and Drugs Act and to provide Canadians with greater access to non-drug, preventive and medicinal options.

PetitionsRoutine Proceedings

3:20 p.m.

Conservative

Joe Preston Conservative Elgin—Middlesex—London, ON

Mr. Speaker, I rise today to present a petition from members of my constituency of Elgin—Middlesex—London. The petitioners ask that Parliament define marriage in federal law as being the lifelong union of one man and one woman to the exclusion of all others.

PetitionsRoutine Proceedings

3:20 p.m.

Conservative

Nina Grewal Conservative Fleetwood—Port Kells, BC

Mr. Speaker, I am very pleased to rise on behalf of the constituents of Fleetwood—Port Kells to present these petitions calling upon Parliament to use all possible legislative and administrative measures to preserve and protect the current definition of marriage as being a lifelong union of one man and one woman to the exclusion of all others and to recognize that marriage is the best foundation for families and for the raising of children.

PetitionsRoutine Proceedings

3:25 p.m.

Conservative

Gurmant Grewal Conservative Newton—North Delta, BC

Mr. Speaker, I rise today on behalf of the constituents of Newton—North Delta to present several petitions calling upon Parliament to use all possible legislative and administrative measures to preserve and protect the current definition of marriage as being a lifelong union of a man and a woman to the exclusion of all others and to recognize that marriage is the best foundation for families and for the raising of children.

PetitionsRoutine Proceedings

3:25 p.m.

Conservative

Ken Epp Conservative Edmonton—Sherwood Park, AB

Mr. Speaker, it is my honour to present a petition today signed by residents in a number of ridings in British Columbia. This petition adds another 201 names to all those who have asked Parliament to respond to their plea to recognize the institution of marriage as being the union of one man and one woman to the exclusion of all others.

Questions on the Order PaperRoutine Proceedings

3:25 p.m.

Beauséjour New Brunswick

Liberal

Dominic LeBlanc LiberalParliamentary Secretary to the Leader of the Government in the House of Commons

Mr. Speaker, the following questions will be answered today: Nos. 60 and 70.

Question No. 60Routine Proceedings

March 21st, 2005 / 3:25 p.m.

Conservative

James Rajotte Conservative Edmonton—Leduc, AB

With respect to the Auditor General's report of November 2004 concerning Order Paper questions: ( a ) has the government asked Canada Post for an answer with respect to Question 37; ( b ) have all public declarations been certified as suggested by the Auditor General and if not, what is the deadline for certification; ( c ) when will the internal audit on the Order Paper question reforms announced by the government take place and will that report be made public; ( d ) how is the government clarifying under what circumstances Crown corporations should be compelled to provide information of a commercially sensitive nature in response to an Order Paper question; and ( e ) what is the status of including an appendix of instructions with all answers to Order Paper questions?

Question No. 60Routine Proceedings

3:25 p.m.

Beauséjour New Brunswick

Liberal

Dominic LeBlanc LiberalParliamentary Secretary to the Leader of the Government in the House of Commons

Mr. Speaker, the response is as follows: a) Canada Post Corporation provided a response to Question No. 37. As noted in the government’s response to the Auditor General on order paper questions, the government is considering under what circumstances crown corporations can or should be compelled to provide information of a commercially sensitive nature in response to order paper questions. More information on the issue is outlined in the response to part d) below.

b) The Ethics Commissioner is charged with this responsibility and as an officer of Parliament has responded directly to the member of Parliament on this element of the question.

c) The government will ensure that an audit is undertaken after the changes to the order paper questions process announced in February 2004 and the Auditor General’s recommendations of November 2004 have been in place for a sufficient period of time to produce valid audit results. The audit would therefore likely be performed in the summer of 2006. In keeping with government practice, once the internal audit is completed, it will be posted on the appropriate government web site.

d) The government has studied this matter in the context of the review of the governance framework for Canada’s crown corporations. It recognizes the need to strike a balance between making relevant information more readily accessible to parliamentarians and the general public, and the protection of critical interests of crown corporations including commercially sensitive information holdings.

The report on the “Review of the Governance Framework for Canada’s Crown Corporations”, which the President of the Treasury Board tabled in the House of Commons on February 17, 2005, committed the government to take action to improve the disclosure of information by crown corporations. This includes: the requirement that crown corporations hold annual public meetings; guidance to crown corporations to increase disclosure of non-financial information in annual reports; formal certification of financial statements by the chief executive officers of crown corporations; and amendments to relevant legislation to allow the Auditor General to audit and conduct special examinations in all crown corporations.

The Access to Information Act is built on the principle that Canadians have a right of access to government information. In the report on the “Review of the Governance Framework for Canada’s Crown Corporations”, the government announced its intention to extend the application of the act to10 of the 18 crown corporations currently not covered by the act, bringing the total to 38 out of 46 crown corporations. The government indicated that seven more will be brought under the act once appropriate amendments are developed. The eighth crown corporation, the Canada Pension Plan Investment Board, is not included at this time as its inclusion under the Access to Information Act will require provincial consent. As a result, all crown corporations will soon be subject to an established, fair, standardized disclosure regime with built in appeal mechanisms that already applies to government departments and agencies.

e) Officials from the Office for the Coordination of Parliamentary Returns, Privy Council Office, have met with officials from the Journals Branch of the House of Commons to determine the appropriate way to include the appendix of instructions provided to government organizations in the overall government response to written order paper questions. The government agrees that when the Office for the Coordination of Parliamentary Returns issues instructions to government organizations to assist them to interpret a question in a consistent manner, these instructions will be tabled along with the government’s response for written questions placed on the notice paper beginning on April 4, 2005.

Question No. 70Routine Proceedings

3:25 p.m.

Conservative

Joe Preston Conservative Elgin—Middlesex—London, ON

With regard to the government’s appointment process for chief excecutive officers, directors, and chairs of Crown corporations: ( a ) what action, if any, has the government taken or does it contemplate taking to create a new set of appointment rules; and ( b ) if created, when will the government be tabling these new guidelines?

Question No. 70Routine Proceedings

3:25 p.m.

Beauce Québec

Liberal

Claude Drouin LiberalParliamentary Secretary to the Prime Minister (Rural Communities)

Mr. Speaker, on February 17, 2005, the President of the Treasury Board tabled in the House of Commons a report entitled “Review of the Governance Framework for Canada's Crown Corporations”. The review set out the government's modifications to the appointments process for chief executive officers, directors and chairpersons of crown corporations. These changes are designed to ensure that the appointments process is not only competency-based, professional and transparent, but is also consistent with the ability of the government to exercise its responsibilities as owner.

Specific measures announced in the review that relate to appointments are as follows:

Measure No. 16

Selection criteria for chairs and board profiles will be made public by the government. Similarly, crown corporations will make CEO selection criteria available to the public.

Measure No. 17

The government will develop a central website to solicit potential candidates for director and chair positions.

Measure No. 18

The selection process for the CEO will be determined by the board of directors and will include, at minimum, advertising in either or both the Canada Gazette and the corporation's website.

Measure No. 19

The government will obtain references on all candidates for appointment as director or chair. In the case of CEOs, the board's nominating committee will be required to do the same for any candidate it submits to the government for appointment. In addition, the government will continue to conduct background checks and ensure that candidates are not in a conflict of interest, prior to making any appointment.

Measure No. 20

The government will work closely with parliamentary committees to ensure a workable appointment review process that will not unduly delay necessary appointments.

Questions Passed as Orders for ReturnsRoutine Proceedings

3:25 p.m.

Beauséjour New Brunswick

Liberal

Dominic LeBlanc LiberalParliamentary Secretary to the Leader of the Government in the House of Commons

Mr. Speaker, if Question Nos. 39, 69, 72, 74, 76 and 77 could be made orders for returns, the returns would be tabled immediately.

Questions Passed as Orders for ReturnsRoutine Proceedings

3:25 p.m.

The Speaker

Is that agreed?

Questions Passed as Orders for ReturnsRoutine Proceedings

3:25 p.m.

Some hon. members

Agreed.

Question No. 39Routine Proceedings

3:25 p.m.

Conservative

John Williams Conservative Edmonton—St. Albert, AB

With regard to public opinion polling and research conducted for government departments, agencies and Crown corporations: ( a ) what was the total cost of polling and research commissioned for each department, agency and Crown corporation in fiscal years 2002-2003 and 2003-2004; and ( b ) in each case where polling or research was contracted for or requested, (i) which department, agency or Crown corporation requested the polling or research, (ii) what was the name and location of the company to do the polling or research, (iii) what was the title of the poll or research conducted, (iv) what was the cost of the poll or research, and (v) which department, agency or Crown corporation paid for the polling or research?

(Return tabled)

Question No. 69Routine Proceedings

3:25 p.m.

Conservative

Scott Reid Conservative Lanark—Frontenac—Lennox and Addington, ON

With regard to the motion adopted unanimously by the House of Commons on October 24, 2002, which requested that the Prime Minister raise with President Jiang Zemin of China the issue of the imprisonment in China of 13 Falun Gong practitioners who have close family ties to Canada, since that time, what concrete measures have been taken by the Prime Minister, by Canadian officials at Canada's embassies and consulates in China, and by officials at Immigration Canada to ensure compliance with this motion, and in particular to ensure that all 13 of the individuals named in this resolution be granted visas to enter Canada if they so requested?

(Return tabled)

Question No. 72Routine Proceedings

3:25 p.m.

Conservative

Joe Preston Conservative Elgin—Middlesex—London, ON

With respect to the travel and activities of the Governor General: ( a ) what is the detailed breakdown of costs of all international travel since 1993; ( b ) since 1993, were travel funds allotted to the Governor General from any government departments and, if so what were the amounts; and ( c ) did the Departments of Foreign Affairs, Canadian Heritage and National Defence, and the National Capital Commission allot any funds to the Governor General’s activities during the last five years and, if so, what were the amounts?

(Return tabled)

Question No. 74Routine Proceedings

3:25 p.m.

Bloc

Marcel Gagnon Bloc Saint-Maurice—Champlain, QC

With respect to persons eligible for the Guaranteed Income Supplement who are not receiving it, persons eligible for a survivor allowance who are not receiving it, and persons eligible for a spouse’s allowance who are not receiving it: ( a ) what has the government done, and how often, to try to trace these people; ( b ) how many letters have been sent out by Human Resources and Skills Development Canada and the Canada Revenue Agency; ( c ) how many people have been reached by phone; ( d ) how many forms have been mailed out; ( e ) how many providers of services to seniors have been contacted; ( f ) how many information inserts have been mailed out; ( g ) how many renewal applications forms have been sent out when someone no longer submits an income tax return; ( h ) what kind of publicity for these benefits is done in major centres, and how often; and ( i ) what else has been done?

(Return tabled)