Mr. Speaker, of course they do. The government has said that it does and has taken great pains to ensure that those issues are addressed.
Again, I would like to quote the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of Canada, who said:
The factors considered in making the decision on an exemption must include evidence, if any, of the impact of such a facility on crime rates....
It must obviously mean that there are things that we must consider with that in mind. To that was added:
...indicating a need for such a supervised injection site...
We must then have some input and some facts to say that it should be needed here, or that it may not be needed in downtown Vancouver. That might be different somewhere else. She continued by adding:
....the regulatory structure in place to support the facility...
Is it there, or is it not? She also included the following:
...the resources available to support its maintenance, and expression of community support or opposition.
These are the words of the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of Canada, who said that we must consider these things when we are coming to some conclusion. Therefore, it is only reasonable that the legislation would deal with each of those aspects and say here is the framework, and here is the codification of how we might do that.
I find that very reasonable.