Mr. Speaker, how interesting to hear from the minister. It is unbelievable. He was here. He heard all of the problems and lapses that were observed during that briefing. That is not an option, and the minister has to understand that. It is not optional even if someone might be able to speak English or French. The member clearly told the minister that some questions were asked in just one language and that the answers were given in just one language. Both francophones and anglophones observed that.
The minister said that the departmental officials were bilingual, so that makes everything okay. That is completely irresponsible. That is not an option for him. Frankly, this is not the first time the government has done this kind of thing.
MPs cannot do their work if they do not understand the language. There is confusion not only with respect to the briefing on this bill, but also about the bill itself, which is not written properly.
It is unbelievable that the minister thinks it is optional for him to give information to members here in the House of Commons. Imagine if the anglophones here were given a briefing entirely in French, with questions and answers in French, and imagine the minister saying that is okay, it is not a problem.
Some francophone journalists commented on it, and that is enough. It is unbelievable. This minister seems unable to understand the rules. This kind of thing is not optional.
I had hoped the minister would have a good answer for us, or maybe an apology or an explanation about problems getting interpreters for the briefing or some other kind of problem for members, but here he is saying that there was no problem. This minister does not believe in bilingualism in the House or in government. Judging from his bill, he does not believe in this country's democracy either.