Mr. Speaker, I would like to thank my colleague for, as usual, setting the global context in very environmentally sensitive terms.
I have a very specific question because the member appears to have read the Ecojustice summary that I have not yet had the chance to read.
There is one provision in the bill where it says the Governor in Council cannot make regulations that “...provide that the loss of non-use value”, which the member has already said means environmental damage, “...in relation to damages to the environment caused...is a loss for which the [pipeline claims] Tribunal may award compensation”.
It seems that it is saying that the pipeline claims tribunal cannot be charged with assigning compensation for non-use value damage. Is that a correct reading, or is there something else going on here to her knowledge?