House of Commons Hansard #274 of the 42nd Parliament, 1st Session. (The original version is on Parliament's site.) The word of the day was agreed.
Concurrence in Vote 1—Civilian Review and Complaints Commission for the Royal Canadian Mounted PoliceGovernment Orders
Liberal
Bardish Chagger Liberal Waterloo, ON
moved:
That Vote 1, in the amount of $2,416,995, under Civilian Review and Complaints Commission for the Royal Canadian Mounted Police — Program expenditures, in the Interim Estimates for the fiscal year ending March 31, 2019, be concurred in.
Concurrence in Vote 1—Civilian Review and Complaints Commission for the Royal Canadian Mounted PoliceGovernment Orders
The Assistant Deputy Speaker Carol Hughes
The question is on Motion No. 39. Is it the pleasure of the House to adopt the motion?
Concurrence in Vote 1—Civilian Review and Complaints Commission for the Royal Canadian Mounted PoliceGovernment Orders
Some hon. members
Agreed.
No.
Concurrence in Vote 1—Civilian Review and Complaints Commission for the Royal Canadian Mounted PoliceGovernment Orders
Concurrence in Vote 1—Civilian Review and Complaints Commission for the Royal Canadian Mounted PoliceGovernment Orders
Some hon. members
Yea.
Concurrence in Vote 1—Civilian Review and Complaints Commission for the Royal Canadian Mounted PoliceGovernment Orders
Concurrence in Vote 1—Civilian Review and Complaints Commission for the Royal Canadian Mounted PoliceGovernment Orders
Some hon. members
Nay.
Concurrence in Vote 1—Civilian Review and Complaints Commission for the Royal Canadian Mounted PoliceGovernment Orders
The Assistant Deputy Speaker Carol Hughes
In my opinion the yeas have it.
And five or more members having risen:
Concurrence in Vote 1— Communications Security EstablishmentGovernment Orders
Liberal
Bardish Chagger Liberal Waterloo, ON
moved:
That Vote 1, in the amount of $146,970,323, under Communications Security Establishment—Program expenditures, in the Interim Estimates for the fiscal year ending March 31, 2019, be concurred in.
Concurrence in Vote 1— Communications Security EstablishmentGovernment Orders
The Assistant Deputy Speaker Carol Hughes
The question is on Motion No. 40. Is it the pleasure of the House to adopt the motion?
Concurrence in Vote 1— Communications Security EstablishmentGovernment Orders
Some hon. members
Agreed.
No.
Concurrence in Vote 1— Communications Security EstablishmentGovernment Orders
Concurrence in Vote 1— Communications Security EstablishmentGovernment Orders
Some hon. members
Yea.
Concurrence in Vote 1— Communications Security EstablishmentGovernment Orders
Concurrence in Vote 1— Communications Security EstablishmentGovernment Orders
Some hon. members
Nay.
Concurrence in Vote 1— Communications Security EstablishmentGovernment Orders
The Assistant Deputy Speaker Carol Hughes
In my opinion the yeas have it.
And five or more members having risen:
Bardish Chagger Liberal Waterloo, ON
moved:
That Vote 1, in the amount of $755,618, under Copyright Board — Program expenditures, in the Interim Estimates for the fiscal year ending March 31, 2019, be concurred in.
Concurrence in Vote 1—Copyright BoardGovernment Orders
The Assistant Deputy Speaker Carol Hughes
The question is on Motion No. 41. Is it the pleasure of the House to adopt the motion?
Concurrence in Vote 1—Copyright BoardGovernment Orders
Some hon. members
Agreed.
No.
Concurrence in Vote 1—Copyright BoardGovernment Orders