Madam Speaker, I thank my colleague for his speech. I agree with him on some things, but not so much on others.
I think that the Conservatives have hit the nail on the head with this motion in that Quebeckers and Canadians have had enough, particularly with the yo-yoing on some measures. They are frustrated and fed up, and that is understandable.
However, I find the wording of the motion rather ideological and close-minded, and it seems as though the conclusion has been written in advance. Could the motion not have stated that some restrictions might have to remain in place longer than others based on the science and public health recommendations?
We get the impression that the Conservatives want to lift all the restrictions at once when a more nuanced approach is needed.