House of Commons Hansard #254 of the 44th Parliament, 1st session. (The original version is on Parliament's site.) The word of the day was conservative.

Topics

line drawing of robot

This summary is computer-generated. Usually it’s accurate, but every now and then it’ll contain inaccuracies or total fabrications.

Motion That Debate Be Not Further Adjourned Members debate a motion to limit further debate on Bill C-56. Liberals argue the bill is urgent to address housing and affordability and increase competition, accusing Conservatives of being the "block everything" party. Conservatives criticize the government's economic record and debt servicing costs, questioning the bill's effectiveness and the government's delay in acting. 4800 words, 30 minutes.

Consideration of Government Business No. 30 Members debate Bill C-56, which proposes removing the GST on new rental housing and strengthening the Competition Act to address affordability and competition issues, particularly in the grocery sector. Liberals argue the bill is substantial and necessary, while Conservatives criticize it as insufficient and blame government spending and the carbon tax for high costs and the housing crisis. The debate also touches on the Conservative vote against the Canada-Ukraine trade agreement and the government's use of time allocation for the bill. 16200 words, 2 hours.

Statements by Members

Question Period

The Conservatives criticize the government's economic mismanagement, highlighting rising prices, rent, and mortgage costs due to inflation and deficits. They note high debt interest payments and call for ending deficit spending. Concerns are raised about the carbon tax, $15-billion battery plant subsidies, and alleged foreign replacement workers, demanding the contract be released. They also point to scandals and a cover-up coalition.
The Liberals strongly criticize the Conservatives for voting against the Canada-Ukraine free trade agreement and labelling them a risk. They highlight their economic plan focused on investing in housing, strengthening competition to stabilize prices, noting strong fiscal fundamentals and foreign investment, and addressing climate change.
The Bloc criticize federal encroachment on Quebec's jurisdiction over labour, health care (demanding French language), and unreimbursed asylum seeker costs. They also question the delay in capping oil and gas emissions before COP28.
The NDP criticize government inaction on high food prices and delayed funding for affordable homes. They raise concerns about MMIWG and the infrastructure gap facing First Nations, also addressing unparliamentary language.
The Green Party questions the government's failure to call for a ceasefire amidst intensified bombing and the death of children in Gaza.

Government Business No. 30—Proceedings on Bill C-56 Members debate Bill C-56, the "affordable housing and groceries act," and a motion limiting debate. The bill proposes removing the GST on new rental housing and strengthening the Competition Act. Members discuss the ongoing affordability crisis, including rising housing and grocery costs. Parties attribute the crisis to different factors like government spending, carbon tax, or corporate profits, debating the bill's effectiveness and the pace of government action. 30300 words, 5 hours in 2 segments: 1 2.

Protecting Young Persons from Exposure to Pornography Act Second reading of Bill S-210. The bill aims to restrict young persons’ online access to sexually explicit material by requiring age verification on pornographic websites. MPs discussed the harmful impact of pornography on youth mental health and development, the need for effective verification methods that protect privacy, and challenges like VPNs. Multiple parties support the goal of protecting children. 8200 words, 1 hour.

Affordable Housing and Groceries Act Second reading of Bill C-56. The bill C-56] amends the Excise Tax Act and the Competition Act. It proposes a [GST exemption on purpose-built rentals for new construction to boost supply. It also reforms competition law to strengthen the Competition Bureau's powers, broaden prohibited anti-competitive practices, and make mergers more difficult. Liberals say it will help build housing and bring relief. Conservatives claim it copies their ideas, is delayed, and won't lower grocery prices, blaming government spending for affordability issues. The Bloc and NDP support the competition changes but criticize the bill's limited scope on housing affordability and the use of a closure motion. 17900 words, 3 hours.

Was this summary helpful and accurate?

HealthOral Questions

3:10 p.m.

Conservative

Len Webber Conservative Calgary Confederation, AB

Mr. Speaker, a couple of years ago, this House unanimously passed my private member's bill that allowed for the annual tax form to be used to ask a simple question on organ and tissue donation. Both Ontario and Nunavut opted to have this question included in their tax forms last year, and I am hoping that other provinces will participate in the future.

Can the minister tell us how many taxpayers in Ontario and Nunavut indicated through their tax returns their intent to become life-saving organ and tissue donors?

HealthOral Questions

3:10 p.m.

Compton—Stanstead Québec

Liberal

Marie-Claude Bibeau LiberalMinister of National Revenue

Mr. Speaker, the member for Calgary Confederation has worked hard to help Canadians waiting for transplants. I was happy, along with members from all parties, to support his bill. It shows we can do great things when we work together.

The impact of this change is significant, and I am pleased to say it has been very successful already. The most recent numbers we have indicate that 2.45 million people used their tax returns to indicate they want to be donors. This is very promising.

International TradeOral Questions

3:10 p.m.

Liberal

Peter Fonseca Liberal Mississauga East—Cooksville, ON

Mr. Speaker, my question is for the Minister of International Trade and is regarding the important Canada-Ukraine Free Trade Agreement and Conservatives' concerns of our government's unequivocal support for Ukraine. They were right about one thing, that support for Ukraine on this side of the House is unequivocal. Clearly, the same cannot be said for the Conservative Party of Canada as the Conservatives made the shameful decision to appease their far-right, anti-Ukraine extreme base.

Can the minister tell us what the Ukrainians, our friends, have said about this agreement?

International TradeOral Questions

3:10 p.m.

Markham—Thornhill Ontario

Liberal

Mary Ng LiberalMinister of Export Promotion

Mr. Speaker, President Zelenskyy himself asked for Canada to negotiate a progressive, strong, excellent free trade agreement. We have modernized it, and we have done that. The only party in this House that voted against Ukraine is the Conservative Party of Canada.

On this side of the House, we stand with Ukraine in what we say, in what we do and certainly in how we vote. This side has voted for Ukraine.

Indigenous AffairsOral Questions

3:15 p.m.

NDP

Niki Ashton NDP Churchill—Keewatinook Aski, MB

Mr. Speaker, we now have an accurate picture of the infrastructure gap facing first nations, and the numbers are truly vile: $350 billion.

This is first nations like Shamattawa facing a housing crisis. It is the long-term boil water advisory in Pukatawagan and 27 other first nations. It is crumbling schools, like the one in Tataskweyak Cree Nation. It is the forced isolation of communities, like Wasagamack and Pauingassi, that desperately need an airport.

It is unacceptable, but what is the government's solution? It is cuts to Indigenous Services. Why are the Liberals punishing first nations for Liberal failures?

Indigenous AffairsOral Questions

3:15 p.m.

Fredericton New Brunswick

Liberal

Jenica Atwin LiberalParliamentary Secretary to the Minister of Indigenous Services

Mr. Speaker, I really appreciate my hon. colleague's passion in this matter.

I am proud to be part of a government that has done more than any other to close the infrastructure gap. We are investing in and working with first nations, Métis and Inuit to build healthy, resilient and prosperous communities for the long term. That is why we are supporting over 9,000 infrastructure projects, including indigenous-led Watay Power, which is connecting 17 diesel-dependent first nations communities to the Ontario power grid.

We are going to continue following indigenous leadership to address the infrastructure priorities from coast to coast to coast. We know there is more work that needs to be done. We are committed to building this work with first nations, Inuit and Métis partners.

Foreign AffairsOral Questions

3:15 p.m.

Green

Mike Morrice Green Kitchener Centre, ON

Mr. Speaker, while a four-day pause is delayed by a day, Israel has only intensified its bombing of the Gaza Strip. For six weeks now, the government has been unequivocal in demanding hostages be returned, as the government should be, and yet the government cannot even seem to bring itself to say the word “ceasefire”.

An estimated 5,500 children have now died in the Gaza Strip alone in recent weeks. Therefore, I ask again: How many children need to die before the government calls for a ceasefire?

Foreign AffairsOral Questions

November 23rd, 2023 / 3:15 p.m.

Ahuntsic-Cartierville Québec

Liberal

Mélanie Joly LiberalMinister of Foreign Affairs

Mr. Speaker, of course, we condemn the October 7 terrorist attack by Hamas. We are extremely preoccupied with what is happening in Gaza. I have said it many times. It is one of the worst places, if not the worst place, to live in the world, and too many women and children have died. That is why we welcome the humanitarian pause that will be happening, starting tomorrow, that has been agreed to between Israel and Hamas and brokered by Qatar.

We will continue to support the fact that Canadians need to get out of Gaza. Civilians must be protected. Humanitarian aid must go. Hostages need to be released.

Presence in GalleryOral Questions

3:15 p.m.

The Speaker Greg Fergus

I would like draw to members' attention the presence in the gallery of the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada 2023 Impact Awards winners.

Presence in GalleryOral Questions

3:15 p.m.

Some hon. members

Hear, hear!

Oral QuestionsPoints of OrderOral Questions

3:15 p.m.

The Speaker Greg Fergus

I see a number of points of order on the floor.

I will recognize the hon. member for Edmonton Strathcona.

Oral QuestionsPoints of OrderOral Questions

3:15 p.m.

NDP

Heather McPherson NDP Edmonton Strathcona, AB

Mr. Speaker, today during question period, the member for Miramichi—Grand Lake used extraordinarily unparliamentary language. It was slanderous. I bring this to your attention, because it is not the first time the member has spoken in that manner. The member used hateful language throughout question period multiple times this week.

Today, he said a very slanderous thing, which I can say with all certainty is a slander because it was directed at me. The idea that the New Democratic Party and I would not condemn in the strongest possible terms the terrorist attack by Hamas is absolutely slanderous. The fact that we have called for a ceasefire and the Conservatives refused to call for that is something very—

Oral QuestionsPoints of OrderOral Questions

3:15 p.m.

Some hon. members

Oh, oh!

Oral QuestionsPoints of OrderOral Questions

3:15 p.m.

The Speaker Greg Fergus

I see the member for St. Catharines rising on the same point of order. I would ask the member to be very brief and to the point.

The hon. member.

Oral QuestionsPoints of OrderOral Questions

3:15 p.m.

St. Catharines Ontario

Liberal

Chris Bittle LiberalParliamentary Secretary to the Minister of Housing

Mr. Speaker, I would like to confirm that I did hear that from the member for Miramichi—Grand Lake. When questioned on it by a member on that side, he said he was here for the facts.

I think in this place we can be parliamentary. However, accusing another member of supporting a terrorist organization in this country is way out of line, and I hope, Mr. Speaker, that you will look into this.

Oral QuestionsPoints of OrderOral Questions

3:20 p.m.

The Speaker Greg Fergus

I thank the hon. member for St. Catharines for his comments.

I see that the member for Miramichi—Grand Lake would like to get up. I do hope the member will be brief and succinct.

The hon. member for Miramichi—Grand Lake.

Oral QuestionsPoints of OrderOral Questions

3:20 p.m.

Conservative

Jake Stewart Conservative Miramichi—Grand Lake, NB

Mr. Speaker, can I ask what the exact thing is that I am being accused of? It is unclear to me. I need to know the exact words, and then I will talk.

Oral QuestionsPoints of OrderOral Questions

3:20 p.m.

Some hon. members

Oh, oh!

Oral QuestionsPoints of OrderOral Questions

3:20 p.m.

The Speaker Greg Fergus

I will ask members for their patience for a second.

Colleagues, I am not inclined to repeat unparliamentary language in this House. I will review the tapes.

If the hon. member for Miramichi—Grand Lake would like to get up, I would be happy to recognize him.

The hon. member for Miramichi—Grand Lake.

Oral QuestionsPoints of OrderOral Questions

3:20 p.m.

Conservative

Jake Stewart Conservative Miramichi—Grand Lake, NB

Mr. Speaker, I will gladly rise. I still have not been told completely what—

Oral QuestionsPoints of OrderOral Questions

3:20 p.m.

Some hon. members

Oh, oh!

Oral QuestionsPoints of OrderOral Questions

3:20 p.m.

The Speaker Greg Fergus

Order. I ask all members to please allow the hon. member for Miramichi—Grand Lake to respond.

The hon. member for Miramichi—Grand Lake.

Oral QuestionsPoints of OrderOral Questions

3:20 p.m.

Conservative

Jake Stewart Conservative Miramichi—Grand Lake, NB

Mr. Speaker, number one, I directed nothing at the member who is over here in the corner. My exact words, and I know the NDP is not going to like it, are I said that they were Hamas supporters, and they are.

Oral QuestionsPoints of OrderOral Questions

3:20 p.m.

Some hon. members

Oh, oh!

Oral QuestionsPoints of OrderOral Questions

3:20 p.m.

The Speaker Greg Fergus

Colleagues, we are not doing ourselves any favours as members of Parliament in terms of the use of unparliamentary language. Especially if it is directed to an individual, it is clearly unparliamentary. To make statements which create disorder in the House is also unparliamentary.

The Speaker is going to review the tapes and return to the House on this matter.

On another point of order, I recognize the member of Parliament for Leeds—Grenville—Thousand Islands and Rideau Lakes.