House of Commons Hansard #256 of the 44th Parliament, 1st session. (The original version is on Parliament's site.) The word of the day was labour.
This summary is computer-generated. Usually it’s accurate, but every now and then it’ll contain inaccuracies or total fabrications.
Criminal Code Second reading of Bill C-273. The bill aims to repeal section 43 of the Criminal Code, which allows parents and teachers to use reasonable force for correction. Supporters argue it implements a Truth and Reconciliation Commission call to action and protects children. Opponents raise concerns about criminalizing parents/teachers for minor physical contact or self-defence, and the impact on parental rights. 8000 words, 1 hour.
Canada Labour Code Second reading of Bill C-58. The bill C-58 amends the Canada Labour Code to ban the use of replacement workers in federally regulated private sectors and modify the maintenance of activities process. Supporters, including the Bloc Québécois and NDP, argue it restores balance in collective bargaining and protects the right to strike, citing Quebec's 1977 law as a model. They push to shorten the proposed 18-month implementation delay. Conservatives question why it excludes the federal public service and express concerns about economic impact and the use of foreign replacement workers in subsidized projects. 35300 words, 5 hours in 2 segments: 1 2.
Public Accounts Conservative MP Kelly McCauley presents a dissenting report on emergency management in First Nations communities, criticizing government failures, spending on response over preparedness, and recommending personnel changes and infrastructure improvements. 600 words.
National Defence Members debate a report on Arctic security and sovereignty. Discussions cover threats from Russia, China, and foreign investment, alongside the critical impact of climate change (/debates/2023/11/27/lindsay-mathyssen-6/). Members emphasize the need for investment in Arctic communities (/debates/2023/11/27/lori-idlout-3/), infrastructure, Canadian Rangers, and military capabilities, citing concerns about readiness and equipment gaps (/debates/2023/11/27/james-bezan-6/). 11800 words, 1 hour.
National DefenceCommittees of the HouseOrders of the Day
London North Centre Ontario
Liberal
Peter Fragiskatos LiberalParliamentary Secretary to the Minister of Housing
Madam Speaker, I do not know the hon. member that well, but I do know him to be someone focused on a range of different policy issues, and tonight is no different. He raised the matter of defence and looked at Arctic sovereignty, obviously relating to the concurrence debate here.
I wonder if he could tell us his view on the 2% ask of NATO and what his views are on that and, rather, what his party's views are. Would a future Conservative government commit to fulfilling that 2% ask?
Bob Zimmer Conservative Prince George—Peace River—Northern Rockies, BC
Madam Speaker, I have made my views very clear about NATO and NORAD tonight. The member has heard our views from this side about NORAD and the need to modernize in order to protect our northern front. It is unequivocal that it needs to happen.
The former defence minister made the announcement of modernizing NORAD. I think it was $4.95 billion at the time. I applauded her for making that announcement. The sad part is what I referred to in my speech, which is that with that big promise made, only $45 million has been spent to date. Again, actions speak louder than words. Let us see some action.
Alex Ruff Conservative Bruce—Grey—Owen Sound, ON
Madam Speaker, recommendation 15 talks about the need to increase primary reserve capability in all three territories in order to upkeep our Arctic sovereignty and defence. In 2013, there was the master implementation directive to actually get a number of reserve units up from an infrastructure and equipment standpoint. When I talk to former colleagues of mine in the reserves, they tell me that they are sitting with snowmobiles that do not have the infrastructure to store them. They are rotting outside, and this is a decade later.
Does the member have any idea why the government has failed to actually provide the necessary support and resources to our primary reserves specifically when it comes to the Arctic?
Bob Zimmer Conservative Prince George—Peace River—Northern Rockies, BC
Madam Speaker, I must say I do not know. We talked to Canadian Rangers who go out with their own snowmobile equipment and their own gear, which gets damaged and takes months to get repaired. These are snowmobiles they use for their sustenance to go get caribou and the like. It is a sad story we have heard many times. I have been up there many times and spoken directly with Rangers, as well as some service members.
Again, it is not something we like to bring up. I am sure my colleague from Bruce—Grey—Owen Sound would be pleased if he would not have had to ask that question. All we want to see is members in uniforms, our Canadian Rangers, given the resources they desperately need to keep us safe. I wish the government would just simply do what it promised.
Alex Ruff Conservative Bruce—Grey—Owen Sound, ON
Madam Speaker, what really scares me about the Arctic is not the territorial threat. It is not the threat from Russia or China coming across the Arctic Circle or coming into our north. It is actually about their investments and takeover of our natural resources or critical minerals. What more does this member think needs to be done, as outlined I believe in recommendation 18 of the report, to actually put a stop to this malign foreign takeover of critical capabilities and natural resources in the Arctic?
Bob Zimmer Conservative Prince George—Peace River—Northern Rockies, BC
Madam Speaker, the article I quoted before was “CSIS warning Inuit leaders about covert foreign investment in Arctic, documents show". What can we do about it? There is a lot we can do about it.
Again, the example I think about is one of those sad things I had to announce when I was up in Yellowknife speaking. A company the Prime Minister was at, the one rare earth minerals project he cut the ribbon at, was going into bankruptcy. Why? It is because we have a regulatory regime that is so burdensome it pushes those local investors out. Guess who has a way in? Foreign investment then comes in because of that desperation, as Natan Obed said in this article. We are just inviting this foreign investment in. We are in a sad state. Meanwhile, we have elements and materials we could be bringing to the world. We are one of the most green countries on the planet. Canada could be offering solutions around the globe, but yet here we are.
National DefenceCommittees of the HouseOrders of the Day
The Assistant Deputy Speaker Carol Hughes
Since no other member wishes to speak, pursuant to order made earlier today, the question is deemed put and a recorded division deemed requested.
Pursuant to Standing Order 66, the division stands deferred until Wednesday, November 29, at the expiry of the time provided for Oral Questions.
The hon. member for Courtenay—Alberni not being present to raise during the Adjournment Proceedings the matter for which notice has been given, the notice is deemed withdrawn.
The motion that the House do now adjourn is deemed to have been adopted. It being 7:58 p.m., this House stands adjourned until tomorrow at 10 a.m., pursuant to Standing Order 24(1).
(The House adjourned at 7:58 p.m.)