House of Commons Hansard #247 of the 44th Parliament, 1st session. (The original version is on Parliament's site.) The word of the day was foreign.
This summary is computer-generated. Usually it’s accurate, but every now and then it’ll contain inaccuracies or total fabrications.
Lowering Prices for Canadians Act Second reading of Bill C-352. The bill aims to amend the Competition Act to address high prices and lack of competition. It seeks to strengthen the Competition Bureau and prioritize consumers in merger reviews, which the NDP argues will curb corporate greed. Liberals cite their own bill C-56 and other measures. Conservatives blame government policies and the carbon tax, stating the act protects monopolies. The Bloc supports reforming the competition regime and helping small businesses. 8100 words, 1 hour.
Bill C-34—Time Allocation Motion Members debate a government motion to limit further debate on Bill C-34, An Act to amend the Investment Canada Act. The government argues it's time to vote, citing extensive debate and committee support, while opposition parties criticize closure and raise concerns about provisions like ministerial discretion and the economic review threshold. 4900 words, 35 minutes.
National Security Review of Investments Modernization Act Report stage of Bill C-34. The bill updates the Investment Canada Act to strengthen national security reviews and protect intangible assets. It introduces pre-implementation filing and allows the minister more flexibility. Conservatives criticize the government's past record and argue the bill is insufficient, opposing the removal of mandatory cabinet review for security decisions. They cite concerns about state-owned enterprises from authoritarian states. The NDP supports the bill as a step but sought further amendments, including reviewing state-owned enterprise acquisitions and IP protection. Bloc Québécois questions the high net benefit review threshold. 26900 words, 3 hours in 2 segments: 1 2.
Alleged Unparliamentary Gesture in the House Members debate points of order concerning an alleged rude gesture by a Liberal MP during a vote, the Speaker's handling of the issue, heckling during votes, microphone usage, and a member's social media conduct. 1000 words, 15 minutes.
Yvan Baker Liberal Etobicoke Centre, ON
Mr. Speaker, today is a special day for me because my father was in the gallery for the first time, watching question period. I attempted to take a photo of him. To the extent that I broke the rules, I apologize to all members of the House.
Public SafetyOral Questions
The Speaker Greg Fergus
Colleagues, I would like to thank the member for Battle River—Crowfoot and other members who rose on the same issue. I would like to thank the hon. member for Etobicoke Centre for rising to apologize.
This is a good opportunity for me to remind all members that, while the House is in session, we are not to use our devices for phone calls or for recording. These rules are important for all of us, so we can freely exercise our roles as members of Parliament. As we know, we have very clear rules in terms of how the cameras provided by CPAC are used in this place. With the advent of new technologies, we have to be very mindful, so I thank all members for that.
I see the hon. whip for the official opposition rising on the same point of order.
Kerry-Lynne Findlay Conservative South Surrey—White Rock, BC
Mr. Speaker, with respect, it is not enough for the member to just apologize. He must delete what he recorded, because it is against the standing rules.
Public SafetyOral Questions
The Speaker Greg Fergus
I am certain that all members, who are listening carefully to the Chair, will take it upon themselves to act honourably. I think what the hon. member has raised is an important issue, and I would trust that, when the member presented his apology, he also took corrective action to that effect.
The House resumed from November 2 consideration of the motion.
Opposition Motion—Carbon Tax Pause on Home HeatingBusiness of SupplyGovernment Orders
The Speaker Greg Fergus
It being 3:22 p.m., the House will now proceed to the taking of the deferred recorded division on the motion of the member for Carleton relating to the business of supply.
Call in the members.
Kerry-Lynne Findlay Conservative South Surrey—White Rock, BC
Mr. Speaker, we just had a very important vote for Canadians, and the member for Avalon literally gave the finger to Canadians as he stood to vote for our motion to give them a reprieve on home heating costs. He gave the finger to the senior choosing between heating and eating. He gave the finger to all those struggling to make ends meet in an unaffordable Canada. He gave the finger to all Canadians—
Alleged Unparliamentary Gesture in the HousePoints of OrderGovernment Orders
The Speaker Greg Fergus
We are getting close to debate.
I see the hon. member for Avalon rising in response to the point of order.
Ken McDonald Liberal Avalon, NL
Mr. Speaker, I scratched the side of my head with two fingers. If they think it was one finger, that is up to them. They can take it how they like.
Alleged Unparliamentary Gesture in the HousePoints of OrderGovernment Orders
Alleged Unparliamentary Gesture in the HousePoints of OrderGovernment Orders
November 6th, 2023 / 3:35 p.m.
Conservative
Kerry-Lynne Findlay Conservative South Surrey—White Rock, BC
Mr. Speaker, I would comment that it is very unusual to scratch the side of one's head with one's middle finger as one is voting, and this is the second time I have had to rise in this place when a member of the government party has used that finger motion—
Alleged Unparliamentary Gesture in the HousePoints of OrderGovernment Orders
Some hon. members
Oh, oh!
Alleged Unparliamentary Gesture in the HousePoints of OrderGovernment Orders
The Speaker Greg Fergus
Colleagues, we had a point of order raising a very serious issue of comportment, decorum and respect in the House. The member to whom it was directed rose and indicated that this was not done on purpose.
I am placed in a very difficult situation. If hon. colleagues will allow me, I will take a look at this issue, but let me say this. When members are offered an opportunity to explain their actions and they do, usually the matter is closed.
This has raised some disorder in the House. I will take a look at it, and if necessary, I will come back to the House. I hope this will be the end of the points of order on this particular issue.
The hon. member for South Shore—St. Margarets is rising on a point of order.
Rick Perkins Conservative South Shore—St. Margarets, NS
Mr. Speaker, as a point of clarification, as a witness—
Alleged Unparliamentary Gesture in the HousePoints of OrderGovernment Orders
The Speaker Greg Fergus
I just indicated to all members of the House that I am going to take a look at the video and will come back to members if it is necessary.
The hon. member for Northumberland—Peterborough South is rising on a point of order.
Philip Lawrence Conservative Northumberland—Peterborough South, ON
Mr. Speaker, the chief whip of our party should be given the appropriate time to give full merit to the situation, as is customary—
Alleged Unparliamentary Gesture in the HousePoints of OrderGovernment Orders
The Speaker Greg Fergus
I heard the point raised by the hon. member. It is a very serious point. The hon. member it concerned rose to offer an explanation. I am going to review the video on this and come back to the House if necessary.
The hon. member for Gatineau.
Steven MacKinnon Liberal Gatineau, QC
Mr. Speaker, I rise on a different point of order. I would put to you that during the vote, the catcalls and the very oppressive screaming from the other side are an intimidation and bullying tactic by members of the opposition to all members of this place—
Alleged Unparliamentary Gesture in the HousePoints of OrderGovernment Orders
The Speaker Greg Fergus
That strikes me as being on the same matter, and I have already explained to this House what I am going to do on it. If there are no related points of order on this, I am going to suggest that we move on to the business of the House.
I recognize the hon. member for Battle River—Crowfoot and hope he heard my statement.
Damien Kurek Conservative Battle River—Crowfoot, AB
Mr. Speaker, I think if you look throughout the Standing Orders, you will see very clearly that when concerns are brought forward in this House, specifically when the chief opposition whip brings forward a concern, it is absolutely essential for and incumbent upon the Chair to ensure that the evidence being presented is heard in its entirety, as that is key to ensuring we can perform our parliamentary duties in this place. Whether the governing party or other parties like it or not, it is incumbent upon the Chair to ensure that the chief opposition whip has a chance to be heard.
Alleged Unparliamentary Gesture in the HousePoints of OrderGovernment Orders
The Speaker Greg Fergus
Let me assure all members that I understood very clearly the substance of what was raised and the act that was raised. I offered the member who was accused of doing the act an opportunity to explain it to the House and present his apologies. The member gave an explanation.
I am going to take this matter back. There is no more reason for us to dispute this matter, aside from holding up the affairs of this House. Let me reassure all members that I look at all of their interventions very carefully, but at this point, I have not heard a new point of order being raised.
The hon. member for Grande Prairie—Mackenzie.
Chris Warkentin Conservative Grande Prairie—Mackenzie, AB
Mr. Speaker, I think it is important for us to consider what has just happened in this House. A member, the chief opposition whip, brought forward very compelling proof, with video evidence—
Alleged Unparliamentary Gesture in the HousePoints of OrderGovernment Orders
The Speaker Greg Fergus
I am going to ask the hon. member for Grande Prairie—Mackenzie to get right to the point so we can move on with the affairs of the House.