House of Commons Hansard #192 of the 44th Parliament, 1st session. (The original version is on Parliament's site.) The word of the day was interference.

Topics

line drawing of robot

This summary is computer-generated. Usually it’s accurate, but every now and then it’ll contain inaccuracies or total fabrications.

Food Day in Canada Act Third reading of Bill S-227. The bill establishes Food Day in Canada on the first Saturday in August to celebrate local food and the agricultural sector. Members from various parties support the bill, emphasizing the importance of food security, local producers, and sustainable farming practices, while also highlighting the need to address food insecurity and educate Canadians on food production. 8300 words, 1 hour.

Foreign Interference and Alleged Intimidation of Member Conservative MP Andrew Scheer debates a question of privilege regarding alleged threats by a "Communist dictatorship" against an MP and their family, reportedly confirmed by a CSIS report. Scheer counters the government House leader's arguments that the report was uncorroborated and the matter wasn't raised promptly, urging the Speaker to find a prima facie case and refer the issue to committee for investigation. 1800 words, 10 minutes.

Government Business No. 25—Proceedings on Bill C-21 Members debate a Liberal motion to expedite Bill C-21 (firearms) through committee and expand its scope. Liberals argue it addresses ghost guns and assault-style firearms, and is necessary due to Conservative obstruction. Conservatives oppose limiting debate, alleging it bypasses democratic process and is part of a "true agenda" to ban hunting rifles, while criticizing the government for not tackling violent crime or bail reform. 17600 words, 1 hour.

Statements by Members

Question Period

The Conservatives demand the government expel a Beijing agent for threatening an MP's family, accusing the Prime Minister of covering up for two years and misleading Canadians. They also criticize inflationary deficits, high cost of living, and the Prime Minister's luxury vacations, alongside criticizing gun control measures that target legal gun owners instead of criminals.
The Liberals defend their fiscal record, highlighting economic growth and job creation and a "prudent fiscal plan". They emphasize protecting democratic institutions from foreign interference, citing actions like summoning ambassadors and supporting MPs, and call for unity against politicization. The party also discusses strengthening gun control, supporting Alberta wildfire efforts, and increasing francophone immigration targets.
The Bloc criticizes the government for seemingly adopting Century Initiative immigration targets that prioritize economic interests without public debate or considering the future of French. They also condemn attempts to stop media reporting on Chinese interference, demanding an independent public inquiry.
The NDP raise concerns about foreign interference targeting MPs, demand transparency on new GMOs in food, and urge federal support for Alberta wildfire recovery. They also highlight the nursing crisis and criticize the government for ignoring its obligations under Jordan's principle.
The Greens advocate for a national citizens' assembly to build consensus, despite the Prime Minister's opposition to the idea.

Foreign Interference and Alleged Intimidation of Member—Speaker's Ruling The Speaker finds a prima facie question of privilege regarding alleged intimidation of the member for Wellington—Halton Hills and his family by a Chinese diplomat in retaliation for parliamentary duties, deeming it serious enough for priority debate. 1300 words.

Reference to Standing Committee on Procedure and House Affairs Members debate referring a prima facie contempt concerning an intimidation campaign by a Chinese diplomat against MP Michael Chong and other members to the Standing Committee on Procedure and House Affairs. Conservatives criticize the government's alleged two-year delay in acting and call for a public inquiry, a foreign agent registry, and the closure of Chinese police stations. Liberals acknowledge the seriousness, noting their actions against foreign interference, which they state is a broad issue involving multiple countries. NDP and Bloc members also support an independent public inquiry and additional measures. 62300 words, 8 hours.

Adjournment Debates

Base Petawawa heating outage Cheryl Gallant questions why soldiers at Garrison Petawawa were left without heat or hot water. Bryan May responds that the identification of essential staff was negotiated with unions, and additional facilities were opened. Gallant says May didn't answer the question. May discusses support for military personnel.
Transit operational funding Bonita Zarrillo argues that operational funding for transit is essential for accessibility, safety and growth. She shares local examples from her riding. Bryan May says the government has provided billions in transit funding since 2015, and continues to support projects through the permanent public transit program.
Was this summary helpful and accurate?

Immigration, Refugees and CitizenshipOral Questions

2:45 p.m.

Central Nova Nova Scotia

Liberal

Sean Fraser LiberalMinister of Immigration

Mr. Speaker, as the member knows, it is not up to me to defend the Century Initiative's decisions. However, it is up to me to put forward ideas for our government. I am the one who decides on the targets set out in the federal government's immigration plan. Those targets take into account economic and social factors, particularly the decision to increase the number of francophone newcomers.

Last year, for the first time in Canada's history, we reached the target of 4.4% francophone newcomers. That is a good thing. I will continue to protect the French language.

Immigration, Refugees and CitizenshipOral Questions

2:45 p.m.

Bloc

Alexis Brunelle-Duceppe Bloc Lac-Saint-Jean, QC

Mr. Speaker, they are congratulating themselves on reaching their target once in 20 years. That speaks volumes.

It is unthinkable to triple the population to 100 million without public debate. Doing so would mean fundamentally changing Canada and Quebec behind closed doors with input only from economic circles.

Immigration policies are not a virtue contest, they are public choices with real consequences that should be democratic. No one has asked Quebeckers or Canadians what they think. No one has asked workers, community organizations, groups dedicated to delivering services to the public what they think.

Why would economic circles have the first, last and only say on this?

Immigration, Refugees and CitizenshipOral Questions

2:45 p.m.

Central Nova Nova Scotia

Liberal

Sean Fraser LiberalMinister of Immigration

Mr. Speaker, my friend is totally missing the mark. In reality, it is up to the Government of Quebec to set immigration thresholds for that province.

If members from the Bloc Québécois want the federal government to establish these thresholds for the Province of Quebec, then I invite them to appeal to my counterpart, Minister Fréchette. It would be interesting to hear how that conversation goes.

I have respected Quebec's jurisdictions. I have respected the terms of the agreement with Quebec and I increased the number of newcomers in general, in order to protect the French language while increasing the demographic weight of francophones.

Democratic InstitutionsOral Questions

2:45 p.m.

Conservative

Ryan Williams Conservative Bay of Quinte, ON

Mr. Speaker, the current government has failed Canadians when it comes to foreign interference from Beijing. At least eight police stations have been set up to monitor Canadians on their own soil. Eleven MPs have had interference in either their nomination or election. Two years ago, a sitting MP had his family intimidated by a Beijing operative in Toronto. With all the inaction, the very least Canadians can expect is to have that operative kicked out of Canada. When will he be?

Democratic InstitutionsOral Questions

2:45 p.m.

Don Valley West Ontario

Liberal

Rob Oliphant LiberalParliamentary Secretary to the Minister of Foreign Affairs

Mr. Speaker, I want to assure every member of the House that we take this situation extremely seriously, as we have been doing with foreign interference for many years. We will continue to look at the situation as we have heard it. We will continue to do due diligence, and the minister will act with the right decision at the right time. This House needs to hear that.

Democratic InstitutionsOral Questions

2:45 p.m.

Conservative

Ryan Williams Conservative Bay of Quinte, ON

Mr. Speaker, perhaps the minister should convene some courage.

I misspoke. I mentioned one MP whose family was intimidated. The Globe and Mail actually reported that it was MPs, plural. This should shake every MP in this House to the core. In sports, there is this saying: “Leaders anticipate, and losers react.” The current government is not even reacting. This is so much the case that the agents in Beijing wrote that they do not even care about the repercussions because there will not be any. Canadians deserve a government that will stand up for them. When will they get it?

Democratic InstitutionsOral Questions

2:45 p.m.

Don Valley West Ontario

Liberal

Rob Oliphant LiberalParliamentary Secretary to the Minister of Foreign Affairs

Mr. Speaker, again, let me assure every member of this House that there are always repercussions if anybody breaks a law and if anybody goes outside their Vienna Convention responsibilities. Canada will continue to work to ensure that Canadians and members of this Parliament are safe.

Democratic InstitutionsOral Questions

2:45 p.m.

Conservative

Doug Shipley Conservative Barrie—Springwater—Oro-Medonte, ON

Mr. Speaker, two years ago, the Canadian Security Intelligence Service detected that a member of Parliament and his family were being targeted by an operative from Beijing in response to a vote in this House of Commons. We know that CSIS informed the national security adviser to the Prime Minister and the relevant departments at least two years ago. The Liberal government is now blaming CSIS for the government's own failure and inaction, and it has yet to expel any diplomats from Canada. Why is the Prime Minister allowing this Beijing operative to continue his interference campaign on Canadian soil?

Democratic InstitutionsOral Questions

2:45 p.m.

University—Rosedale Ontario

Liberal

Chrystia Freeland LiberalDeputy Prime Minister and Minister of Finance

Mr. Speaker, our government has always stood up for democracy in Canada and around the world, and it always will. We stood up for democracy when we supported the brave people of Ukraine with Operation Unifier. We stood up for democracy when we expelled four Russian diplomats after the deplorable nerve agent attack in the U.K. We stood up for democracy when we honoured our extradition treaty with the U.S. and detained Meng Wanzhou, despite unacceptable bullying by the government of China.

We will always stand up for democracy on this side.

Disaster AssistanceOral Questions

2:50 p.m.

NDP

Heather McPherson NDP Edmonton Strathcona, AB

Mr. Speaker, more than 30,000 Albertans have been forced from their homes because of wildfires, and there is a serious lack of information about where they can get help and when.

In the absence of provincial leadership, can the Minister of Emergency Preparedness reassure the thousands of Albertans, particularly indigenous and Métis communities that have been affected by wildfires, that the federal government will be there to help with the recovery and rebuilding for as long as necessary?

Disaster AssistanceOral Questions

2:50 p.m.

Scarborough Southwest Ontario

Liberal

Bill Blair LiberalPresident of the King’s Privy Council for Canada and Minister of Emergency Preparedness

Mr. Speaker, there are literally thousands of Albertans who have been significantly impacted by the wildfires. However, I also want to say that, throughout the past weekend, I have been in regular contact with my counterpart in the Alberta provincial government, Minister Ellis. The Prime Minister and the premier spoke earlier today, and about an hour ago, we received a request for federal assistance from the Province of Alberta. Everybody is working to help those people and to make sure that the supports that are needed are there for them to keep them safe and to make sure that we help them through this very difficult time.

I will take this opportunity as well to offer my very sincere thanks to all the first responders and firefighters, who are doing an extraordinary job.

HealthOral Questions

2:50 p.m.

NDP

Don Davies NDP Vancouver Kingsway, BC

Mr. Speaker, during National Nursing Week, we recognize the critical role nurses play in our communities.

Last weekend, I travelled to Newfoundland and Labrador for important discussions on health care. I learned that there are 750 vacant nursing positions in that province. Ninety per cent of nurses experience burnout, and 85% believe that understaffing is creating unsafe conditions for patients.

Nurses called on the government to include an emergency retention fund in this year's budget, but no help was delivered. When will the Liberals finally provide this crucial support for Canada's nurses?

HealthOral Questions

2:50 p.m.

Milton Ontario

Liberal

Adam van Koeverden LiberalParliamentary Secretary to the Minister of Health and to the Minister of Sport

Mr. Speaker, we recognize that Canadians are proud of our health care system, but it is not meeting expectations these days. That is why we made a $198.6-billion investment in our health care system back on February 7, and we expect that is going to help with things like the human resources and health care challenges that my colleague and friend has articulated so well.

I am glad that the member is meeting with nurses; I have been too. We recognize that it is a very challenging role in the health care system, and we have to do more to make sure that they are supported. This includes retention and better recruitment; we also have to take care of those who are working in that sector. We recognize, especially now that it is Mental Health Week, that there are repercussions for them.

Small BusinessOral Questions

2:50 p.m.

Liberal

Iqra Khalid Liberal Mississauga—Erin Mills, ON

Mr. Speaker, in my riding of Mississauga—Erin Mills, I have heard from many constituents and small businesses about the need for urgent financial support.

Can the Minister of Tourism and Associate Minister of Finance please update the House on how budget 2023 is going to help Canadians in my riding of Mississauga—Erin Mills and across Canada with reduced credit card fees for small businesses, incentives to build a greener economy and support for student loan interest?

Small BusinessOral Questions

2:50 p.m.

Edmonton Centre Alberta

Liberal

Randy Boissonnault LiberalMinister of Tourism and Associate Minister of Finance

Mr. Speaker, I want to thank the member for Mississauga—Erin Mills for all her hard work on behalf of the residents of Mississauga.

Our budget presents a prudent fiscal plan that supports Canadians and Canadian businesses, lowers costs, increases tax deductions and lays the foundation for a prosperous economic future for generations to come. That is great news for Canadians. However, disappointingly, the Conservatives voted against this just last week. While their priority is on partisan games, our priority will be on supporting Canadians.

Democratic InstitutionsOral Questions

2:50 p.m.

Conservative

Michael Cooper Conservative St. Albert—Edmonton, AB

Mr. Speaker, the Prime Minister is spreading misinformation, saying that the member for Wellington—Halton Hills was briefed by CSIS two years ago about his family being targeted by a Beijing diplomat.

The Prime Minister knows this to be untrue. In fact, it was the Prime Minister who knew about it for two years, did nothing and kept the member in the dark. Now that he is resorting to victim blaming, how much lower can the Prime Minister go?

Democratic InstitutionsOral Questions

2:50 p.m.

Eglinton—Lawrence Ontario

Liberal

Marco Mendicino LiberalMinister of Public Safety

Mr. Speaker, in this chamber, it never ceases to amaze me how absurd the suggestions can be from the Conservative Party on this issue.

Of course we have regard for the member for Wellington—Halton Hills. Of course we have regard for the safety and security of all members in this chamber, so that we can exercise our constitutional responsibilities by representing our constituents and doing so free and clear from any foreign interference.

That is why we are putting in place all the authorities and the transparency that are necessary to do that. It is far past the time at which the Conservatives need to abandon their rhetoric on this. They need to roll up their sleeves and get behind the hard work, so that we can defend our democracy.

Democratic InstitutionsOral Questions

May 8th, 2023 / 2:55 p.m.

Conservative

Michael Cooper Conservative St. Albert—Edmonton, AB

Mr. Speaker, for two years, the Prime Minister covered up that a Beijing diplomat targeted the family of the member for Wellington—Halton Hills.

Then, when it became public, he falsely claimed that he knew nothing about it. Now the Prime Minister is spreading misinformation in a disgraceful attempt to impugn the character of the member, who is a victim of the Prime Minister's inaction.

Will the Prime Minister show any level of decency? Will he apologize to the member and Canadians for this disgusting display?

Democratic InstitutionsOral Questions

2:55 p.m.

Eglinton—Lawrence Ontario

Liberal

Marco Mendicino LiberalMinister of Public Safety

Mr. Speaker, the Conservatives can shout all they want, but that will not detract from the work that the government is doing to defend our democracy. It will not detract from the work we have done in setting up a committee of parliamentarians, which the Conservatives continue to play Jekyll and Hyde in. One week they sit on it; the next week they do not.

The Conservatives need to abandon these types of political tactics and do the hard work, roll up their sleeves and make sure that we protect this chamber as a place that is sacred, where we can have debates in the interest of all Canadians. That is what the Conservatives need to do, not continue along the lines of this hopped-up rhetoric.

Democratic InstitutionsOral Questions

2:55 p.m.

Conservative

Brad Vis Conservative Mission—Matsqui—Fraser Canyon, BC

Mr. Speaker, rather than expel a diplomat who targeted an MP's family, the Liberal government did nothing for two years.

Last week, the Prime Minister peddled a narrative that it was the member for Wellington—Halton Hills who in fact knew and said nothing. Nobody in this chamber is debating that a Beijing official engaged in threats against a sitting member of this House.

When will the Prime Minister stop misleading Canadians to cover up for his failures, and expel the Beijing diplomat today?

Democratic InstitutionsOral Questions

2:55 p.m.

Don Valley West Ontario

Liberal

Rob Oliphant LiberalParliamentary Secretary to the Minister of Foreign Affairs

Mr. Speaker, it is really important to say that no one is misleading the House in this matter.

There are steps that need to be taken, always, if we are going to expel a diplomat. It is due process. Conservatives might say that we do not need to follow the rule of law. They do not need to say that, on that side of the House.

On this side of the House, we will always do due diligence, follow the evidence, follow the rule of law and make the right decision at the right time. The House can rest assured of that.

Democratic InstitutionsOral Questions

2:55 p.m.

Conservative

Gérard Deltell Conservative Louis-Saint-Laurent, QC

Mr. Speaker, on the weekend, two former senior Liberal ministers stated that many people in Ottawa knew what was happening with the Conservative member and China, and yet the Prime Minister keeps saying that he did not know. All of Ottawa knew, except the Prime Minister.

As members know, the Standing Orders prevent me from saying what I think of the Prime Minister's attitude, but the one thing I can do is ask questions.

When will this government take action in the interest of all Canadians by expelling this so-called Beijing diplomat?

Democratic InstitutionsOral Questions

2:55 p.m.

Beauséjour New Brunswick

Liberal

Dominic LeBlanc LiberalMinister of Intergovernmental Affairs

Mr. Speaker, my hon. colleague knows full well that we will make the necessary decisions at the right time.

It is also important to remember that we are the only government that has taken the threat of foreign interference seriously. We put in place measures and strengthened them for the 2021 election.

We are obviously concerned about the situation of our colleague from Wellington—Halton Hills. That is exactly why we gave intelligence agencies further instructions.

Democratic InstitutionsOral Questions

2:55 p.m.

Bloc

René Villemure Bloc Trois-Rivières, QC

Mr. Speaker, at their convention, the Liberals came up with a solution to the Chinese interference issue: stop the media from reporting on it. This was literally one of the resolutions that the Liberals passed last weekend.

As they see it, the problem is not that China helped or threatened members and their families; the problem is that the media talks about it. It is disgraceful.

To slough off the burden of dealing with Chinese interference, the Liberals have proposed a solution worthy of the Chinese Communist party.

Can they assure that House that any consideration of this solution is out of the question?

Democratic InstitutionsOral Questions

2:55 p.m.

St. Catharines Ontario

Liberal

Chris Bittle LiberalParliamentary Secretary to the Minister of Canadian Heritage

Mr. Speaker, the thing about the Liberal Party is that its members can disagree on things. Our government has always respected, and will always respect, the independence of the press. Journalists need to be able to freely report the news as they see it. They need to be able to ask the tough questions and report on the facts as they see them. A free and independent press is fundamental to our democracy and is guaranteed by the Charter of Rights and Freedoms. It is also the best defence against disinformation.