House of Commons Hansard #205 of the 44th Parliament, 1st session. (The original version is on Parliament's site.) The word of the day was point.

Topics

line drawing of robot

This summary is computer-generated. Usually it’s accurate, but every now and then it’ll contain inaccuracies or total fabrications.

Request to Consider Motions in Amendment Members debate the admissibility of amendments for Bill C-47 at report stage. Conservative MPs argue that committee proceedings were abnormal, limiting their ability to submit amendments, and urge the Speaker to select their motions. Liberal MPs contend that these oral arguments are inappropriate before a Speaker's ruling, suggesting members should have corresponded in writing and are filibustering. 2700 words, 20 minutes.

Alleged Breach of Privilege at Committee Conservative MP Garnett Genuis raises a question of privilege regarding the process of Bill C-47. He alleges multiple violations of members' privileges during committee proceedings, including limitations on the ability to move sub-amendments, raise points of order, and vote. He also cites issues with timely access to legislative drafting services for report stage amendments. Other Members argue the process was proper and the claims are delaying tactics. 3800 words, 30 minutes.

Statements by Members

Question Period

The Conservatives heavily criticized the government's handling of foreign interference, demanding a public inquiry and accountability for Beijing targeting an MP. They also attacked the rising cost of living, blaming multiple carbon taxes and government overspending for inflation. Concerns were also raised about violent crime and the bail system.
The Liberals heavily defend their handling of foreign interference, criticizing Conservatives for playing politics and refusing security briefings. They address the impact of climate change, including wildfires, and highlight the climate action rebate, while also promoting bail reform (Bill C-48), the Online News Act, and EI modernization.
The NDP raised concerns about the impact of climate change, including wildfires and floods, on communities and home insurance. They also pushed for a national auto policy to protect jobs and addressed unaffordable rents and renovictions.
The Bloc urged federal support for forest fire efforts and a public inquiry into foreign interference. They also criticized the government for delaying EI reform and its failure to adequately respect French in federal services.
The Greens pressed the government to urgently pass Bill C-22, the Canada disability benefit act, for Canadians with disabilities.

Technical Issues Raised During the Taking of Recorded Division Members debate technical difficulties during a virtual vote, with NDP and Liberals alleging intentional obstruction by Conservatives, while Conservatives cite practical challenges. The Speaker will investigate the disruptions, which caused the vote to become moot. 600 words, 10 minutes.

Alleged Breach of Privilege at Committee Members debate a question of privilege concerning a member's ability to move subamendments, a missed committee vote, and drafting report stage amendments, with an NDP MP arguing the claims are unfounded or self-inflicted. 1200 words.

Parliament of Canada Act Second reading of Bill S-202. The bill proposes creating a Parliamentary Visual Artist Laureate to promote Canadian arts and culture and advise the Library of Parliament. While supported by all parties, the Conservatives question its timing amid why the government would use a Senate public bill to advance such a matter, and the NDP contrasts it with more urgent issues like universal pharmacare. Proponents highlight art's role as a reflection of our Canadian identity and the Canadian soul and supporting the arts sector, particularly post-COVID. 3900 words, 25 minutes.

Was this summary helpful and accurate?

Employment InsuranceOral Questions

11:40 a.m.

Bloc

Louise Chabot Bloc Thérèse-De Blainville, QC

Madam Speaker, corrections will need to be made, but what I wanted to say is that this is not the only anniversary to mark when it comes to Liberal dishonesty.

Let us not forget that the Prime Minister himself ordered an EI reform by the summer of 2022. The hot weather we have been having over the past few days reminds us that it has already been a year and the Liberals have done nothing. Two years after promising this reform and a year after the date set by the Prime Minister, nothing has changed.

Keeping one's word is the most basic sign of respect.

When the Liberals—

Employment InsuranceOral Questions

11:40 a.m.

The Assistant Deputy Speaker Carol Hughes

The hon. Minister of Sport.

Employment InsuranceOral Questions

11:40 a.m.

Brome—Missisquoi Québec

Liberal

Pascale St-Onge LiberalMinister of Sport and Minister responsible for the Economic Development Agency of Canada for the Regions of Quebec

Madam Speaker, I am very proud that during the pandemic our government supported workers who were not covered by employment insurance. We made sure that self-employed workers, just as an example, had some money coming in, so they could continue to feed their families.

As for EI reform, we prioritized things in the budget to make life more affordable and to provide health transfers, but we have also held consultations, and the work continues.

The EconomyOral Questions

11:40 a.m.

Conservative

Dan Albas Conservative Central Okanagan—Similkameen—Nicola, BC

Madam Speaker, Canadians are not just hungry, they are hangry at the price of groceries. The Minister of Finance is pouring an additional $60 billion over the inflationary fire. The Food Professor says that overspending by government is to blame. He said, “when a government injects more money into the economy, the excess liquidity can drive up demand for goods, including food, which, in turn, can lead to higher prices.”

Does the Minister of Finance feel guilty that her large deficits are hurting Canadians' ability to feed themselves or is she secretly trying to start a national weight loss challenge?

The EconomyOral Questions

11:40 a.m.

Edmonton Centre Alberta

Liberal

Randy Boissonnault LiberalMinister of Tourism and Associate Minister of Finance

Madam Speaker, I know personally that I could maybe lose five or 10, but when it comes to that member's question if they really want to help Canadians they would stop the filibuster in this chamber today. They could show up for work and make sure that the budget implementation act passes and that supports get to Canadians who need them.

The hypocrisy on that side is making things smell in this House. It is not just the heat, it is the Conservatives who are blocking this Parliament.

The EconomyOral Questions

11:40 a.m.

Some hon. members

Oh, oh!

The EconomyOral Questions

11:40 a.m.

The Assistant Deputy Speaker Carol Hughes

We were doing not too bad. All of a sudden it just picked up. I would ask members to please keep it down because we would not want to have to change the speaking order.

The hon. member for Central Okanagan—Similkameen—Nicola.

The EconomyOral Questions

11:40 a.m.

Conservative

Dan Albas Conservative Central Okanagan—Similkameen—Nicola, BC

Madam Speaker, the minister is clearly misinformed. The committee has already passed the bill and there is no filibuster.

On the topic, inflation is like a bad houseguest that just will not leave. No matter how many hints the Conservatives, economists and even the Governor of the Bank of Canada drop to stop spending so much, the Minister of Finance is pumping another $60 billion on top of last year's record deficit, which only increases inflation, the houseguest, to stay and make an even bigger mess to the economy.

Will the Minister of Finance finally take a hint and reduce spending, or is she so tired of her job that she wants voters to show her and her unwanted houseguest the door?

The EconomyOral Questions

11:40 a.m.

Edmonton Centre Alberta

Liberal

Randy Boissonnault LiberalMinister of Tourism and Associate Minister of Finance

Madam Speaker, if the Conservatives read the budget, they would see that there are measures to make sure that we reduce spending by $15 billion over the next years.

Also, in the budget implementation act, we would be able to make sure that Canada worker benefits go to Canadians faster. It would improve the education savings plans and it would lower the tax burden for tradespeople.

The Conservatives do not like that we stabilized health care for a generation, that we are making historic investments to grow the economy and that we are also helping those Canadians who need it the most.

They want to use dilatory tactics. We are going to keep delivering for Canadians.

Carbon PricingOral Questions

11:45 a.m.

Conservative

Anna Roberts Conservative King—Vaughan, ON

Madam Speaker, our national holiday, Canada Day, will be observed by Canadians in less than one month. This is a day when we all gather to celebrate our nation. However, most Canadians are more concerned with the high cost of living. If the first carbon tax was not harsh enough, the Liberals' birthday gift to Canadians is a second carbon tax, which will intend to destroy Canada Day festivities.

Will the government show some compassion and give all Canadians the gift they deserve and axe this costly carbon tax?

Carbon PricingOral Questions

June 2nd, 2023 / 11:45 a.m.

Winnipeg South Manitoba

Liberal

Terry Duguid LiberalParliamentary Secretary to the Minister of Environment and Climate Change

Madam Speaker, yes, July 1 is a great day to celebrate in Canada. There is another reason to celebrate, because that is the day when the climate action rebate will come out. Those payments will come quarterly. In my home province, it is $1,000 a year, $250 a quarter. It is going to fight climate change. It is going to support affordability and it is going to be a great day for Canadians indeed.

Carbon PricingOral Questions

11:45 a.m.

Conservative

Cathay Wagantall Conservative Yorkton—Melville, SK

Madam Speaker, this Liberal government has no shortage of imagination when it comes to making life miserable for those who drive their car to work or take a summer road trip with their family.

They have already imposed a carbon tax that adds 41¢ to a litre a gas and now carbon tax 2 will add another 17¢ to that same litre of gas. Compounded with GST, that is an extra 61¢ per litre during the worst cost of living crisis since Pierre Elliott Trudeau.

When will these Liberals show some decency and scrap both of these punitive carbon taxes?

Carbon PricingOral Questions

11:45 a.m.

Winnipeg South Manitoba

Liberal

Terry Duguid LiberalParliamentary Secretary to the Minister of Environment and Climate Change

Madam Speaker, it is indeed puzzling that every single person on that side of the aisle supported putting a price on pollution in the 2021 campaign. The member for Wellington—Halton Hills, much admired in this chamber, made it the centrepiece of his Conservative leadership campaign in 2017.

Get this, the MP for Pitt Meadows—Maple Ridge actually introduced the first carbon tax in North America.

I have a good report. It was a success. The economy grew and more money was put into B.C. pockets.

HousingOral Questions

11:45 a.m.

NDP

Lindsay Mathyssen NDP London—Fanshawe, ON

Madam Speaker, the NDP leader and I just joined a rally for Webster Street tenants last week. After living in their apartments for years, they are facing renovictions by a new corporate landlord. When the tenants organized, the owner threatened to tag and tow their cars for not paying a new $200 parking fee.

This Liberal government has allowed corporate landlords to drive up London rents. The average cost for a one-bedroom is up 28% in a single year.

Will this government create a housing acquisition fund to make rent affordable in London?

HousingOral Questions

11:45 a.m.

York South—Weston Ontario

Liberal

Ahmed Hussen LiberalMinister of Housing and Diversity and Inclusion

Madam Speaker, I agree with the hon. member that we need to take action to support renters. That is precisely why our government introduced the Canada housing benefit, which is delivering rent supports to tens of thousands of families right across our country.

This Canada housing benefit is now live in every province and territory in Canada. In addition to that, we had a top-up to the Canada housing benefit. In addition to that, we are building more affordable rental housing.

I would urge the hon. member to also contact the provincial government, which is responsible for rent control.

HousingOral Questions

11:45 a.m.

NDP

Richard Cannings NDP South Okanagan—West Kootenay, BC

Madam Speaker, natural disasters, including wildfires and floods, fuelled by climate change are making it difficult to get home insurance. Canadians cannot buy a home when there is an active wildfire within 50 kilometres and that covers most of the summer in B.C., and 10% of Canadians cannot get flood insurance. Canada is the only major country where the government does not have a backstop for earthquake insurance.

Canadians cannot afford to wait while their homes and businesses are destroyed.

Will the Liberals act to make sure Canadians have the insurance protection they need?

HousingOral Questions

11:45 a.m.

Argenteuil—La Petite-Nation Québec

Liberal

Stéphane Lauzon LiberalParliamentary Secretary to the Minister of Rural Economic Development

Madam Speaker, I thank my colleague for raising that point.

All parliamentarians in the House should be taking the risks posed by climate change very seriously. Our government is here, as always, to support all affected Canadians and indigenous communities so as to better prepare them for future threats. That includes insurance.

We are well aware that the insurability of some neighbourhoods, homes and villages is becoming increasingly difficult. We will be there to support Canadians who live in places that are no longer insurable.

FirearmsOral Questions

11:50 a.m.

Liberal

Majid Jowhari Liberal Richmond Hill, ON

Madam Speaker, gun violence poses a real threat to the safety of our communities. Canadians expect to be able to take their kids to school, ride transit and visit places of worship without fear. People from my riding of Richmond Hill, like Canadians across the country, have been very clear. They want us to take strong action to prevent gun violence and keep their loved ones safe.

How is the government taking action to deliver on safety for Canadians?

FirearmsOral Questions

11:50 a.m.

Niagara Centre Ontario

Liberal

Vance Badawey LiberalParliamentary Secretary to the Minister of Indigenous Services

Madam Speaker, gun violence has no place in our communities. We are taking the strongest action in a generation to keep our communities safe.

Today, on June 2, we are marking the first National Day Against Gun Violence here in the great nation of Canada. Going forward, on the first Friday of June, we will raise awareness around the tragedies caused by gun violence, and remember the victims and the survivors. This is another part of our plan to get firearms off our streets and invest in prevention.

Tourism IndustryOral Questions

11:50 a.m.

Conservative

Tony Baldinelli Conservative Niagara Falls, ON

Madam Speaker, Canada's tourism sector, and Canadians who enjoy travelling, are under attack by the Liberal government's out-of-control spending and tax hikes.

A recent Ipsos report found that six in 10 Canadians are now planning to scale back on their summer vacation plans, yet the Liberal government continues to hike taxes, like adding a second carbon tax to the price of gas, which will add 17¢ per litre.

Does the government not realize its taxes add up and will ultimately hurt Canada's tourism industry and our chances of achieving a full tourism recovery?

Tourism IndustryOral Questions

11:50 a.m.

Edmonton Centre Alberta

Liberal

Randy Boissonnault LiberalMinister of Tourism and Associate Minister of Finance

Madam Speaker, I respect the hon. member, who is my tourism critic, but something does not add up. He voted against supporting the tourism industry in the budget, yet he voted for pricing on carbon in the last campaign. I do not know what they drink in Niagara, but I know—

Tourism IndustryOral Questions

11:50 a.m.

The Assistant Deputy Speaker Carol Hughes

I cannot hear the answer, and I am sure the hon. member wants to hear the answer because he will probably want to pose another question. I would ask members to hold off on allowing their thoughts to be said out loud.

The hon. Minister of Tourism.

Tourism IndustryOral Questions

11:50 a.m.

Liberal

Randy Boissonnault Liberal Edmonton Centre, AB

Madam Speaker, I find it a little odd that the tourism critic for the Conservatives voted against supporting the tourism industry in the budget, yet he voted for a price on pollution when he ran in the last election. I am going to let him explain that to his constituents.

I was at Rendez-vous Canada in Quebec City this week, and the tourism sector in this country is going to be back, not in 2026, not in 2025 and not in 2024, but at the end of 2023. This is thanks to Canadians, thanks to what we have to offer and thanks to the international community for knowing that Canada is back and that people want to come to see us.

Tourism IndustryOral Questions

11:50 a.m.

Conservative

Tony Baldinelli Conservative Niagara Falls, ON

Madam Speaker, that is an interesting response. Surely our tourism minister knows that travel is a discretionary activity. Adding 41¢ a litre to gas through the first carbon tax will not help. A second Liberal carbon tax of 17¢ will hurt as well. If we add GST to that, we have a tax on a tax on a tax. Canadians need tax relief, not another tax.

When will the Liberal government axe the tax and help the tourism sector recovery fully this year?

Tourism IndustryOral Questions

11:50 a.m.

Edmonton Centre Alberta

Liberal

Randy Boissonnault LiberalMinister of Tourism and Associate Minister of Finance

Madam Speaker, it is so nice to have so many friends from the blue team from Alberta in the chamber on a Friday.

I can say to my colleague from Niagara Falls that, in this budget, $158 million is directly going to the tourism sector, and $1.8 billion will do exactly what he said, which is to get more people to come to Canada for CATSA and for modernization of the airports.

How did the member and the entire Conservative caucus vote? They voted against the tourism sector, against airports and against getting people to our country. “Shame on them”, I say.