House of Commons Hansard #355 of the 44th Parliament, 1st Session. (The original version is on Parliament's site.) The word of the day was leader.

Topics

RCMP Allegations Concerning Foreign Interference from the Government of IndiaEmergency Debate

11:15 p.m.

Liberal

Parm Bains Liberal Steveston—Richmond East, BC

Mr. Speaker, I am pretty surprised. I did not talk about the Leader of the Opposition at all. The funny thing is that, now that the member has mentioned it, I will actually respond with this: Richard Fadden, the former CSIS director, said, “The whole objective of the security clearance process at the level of the federal government is to make sure that classified information is not passed on, except to people with security clearances.”

The short answer to the question that was posed to him is that there is no way of doing it. He needs a security clearance. The Prime Minister was correct, I think, when he explained at some length that being a privy councillor does not give one access to information. He was right. The member needs security clearance to be given that information.

RCMP Allegations Concerning Foreign Interference from the Government of IndiaEmergency Debate

11:15 p.m.

Liberal

Iqwinder Gaheer Liberal Mississauga—Malton, ON

Mr. Speaker, I would like to ask my hon. colleague for his thoughts on the misinformation and disinformation campaign that seems to be emanating from the Government of India. It is very coordinated. I am sure he has seen an uptick in bots on Twitter as well, and I wanted to get his thoughts on that.

RCMP Allegations Concerning Foreign Interference from the Government of IndiaEmergency Debate

11:15 p.m.

Liberal

Parm Bains Liberal Steveston—Richmond East, BC

Mr. Speaker, we have seen not just one instance of media; we have seen a former Indian army official who literally stated that $100 million should be spent to elect a Conservative government. It is clear that we have not heard the Conservatives really talk today about how we are going to tackle these issues they raise. They were talking about our Prime Minister and what he is not doing, when the Liberals are doing these things, with Bill C-70 and making arrests; the RCMP is actively engaged; and quite frankly, we have uncovered some of the most nefarious incidents we could ever think of.

RCMP Allegations Concerning Foreign Interference from the Government of IndiaEmergency Debate

11:20 p.m.

Liberal

Ruby Sahota Liberal Brampton North, ON

Mr. Speaker, I stand in this House as the member of Parliament for Brampton North, a riding in this country that has one of the largest South Asian populations, the largest part being the Sikh community. These constituents are proud Canadians, and they cherish Canada for its constitutionally provided rights, the Charter of Rights and Freedoms, our independent policing bodies and some of the highest standards for human rights in the world.

From a very young age, I have been an outspoken advocate, campaigning and advocating for many local issues, but one issue that shook me to my core at a very young age was an international issue. In 1995, I met a man by the name of Jaswant Singh Khalra on a trip to Canada. He was a human rights activist who had garnered global attention for his research concerning 25,000 illegal killings and cremations involving Indian policing agencies. His advocacy work led to his abduction and murder shortly after his return from Canada, which later led to the Central Bureau of Investigation in India prosecuting and sentencing nine police officers.

It was during the time of his abduction that it really hit me as to what we have in Canada. As a Canadian, I have always felt free to speak my mind without fear of persecution, although that is not the case in many places around the world, as we know.

However, as of late, that sense of security is no longer there, and I have heard those sentiments from the community as well. I have realized that the current Indian government and its diplomats will not let borders get in the way. It was the realization I came to last year when the PM stood in this House and spoke about the credible links connecting the murder of Hardeep Singh Nijjar to the Government of India and then again, on October 14, just last week, when the RCMP addressed Canadians directly because of the significant threat to public safety in our country.

The RCMP commissioner called this an extraordinary situation, which compelled the RCMP to speak about what they discovered in their multiple ongoing investigations into the involvement of agents of the Government of India in serious criminal activity in Canada. It is not their normal process to publicly disclose information about ongoing investigations, in an effort to preserve the integrity of investigations. However, they felt in this instance it was necessary to do so at this time in order to dismantle and disrupt the network that had been unleashed on Canadians by hiring criminal gangsters, with a trail leading to Indian diplomats ordered at the high levels of the Indian government.

Over the last year, the RCMP created a multidisciplinary team to investigate and coordinate efforts to combat this threat. The team has learned a significant amount of information about the breadth and depth of criminal activity orchestrated by agents of the Government of India, and consequential threats to the safety of Canadians and individuals living in Canada.

This is outrageous. It is shocking. I have heard first-hand from constituents about these threats. Although there was suspicion at the time, that suspicion has been brought to light by the RCMP.

An example that the RCMP gave that day was that 22 arrests had been made by different policing agencies across the country that were linked to an extortion that linked back to the Indian diplomats, and eight arrests were made that were linked to murder on Canadian soil.

When we scan the newspapers of the last year, we will also find other investigations, such as ones happening in Edmonton, that refer to 27 events, including five extortions, 15 arson offences and seven firearms offences, all linked to a scheme orchestrated in India and executed by people here in Canada. Despite law enforcement action, the harm has continued, posing a serious threat to our public safety. The RCMP reached a point where officers felt it was imperative to confront the Government of India and inform the public about some very serious findings that they have uncovered through all of these investigations.

Although attempts have been made to co-operate and work with the Government of India to ask the diplomats who served here in Canada to co-operate with the Canadian agencies in their investigations, we have not been met with any co-operation from the other side. It is very unfortunate that these attempts have been unsuccessful, which resulted in the Government of Canada's having to consider six diplomats from India as persona non grata.

Through the national task force and other investigative efforts, the RCMP has obtained evidence that demonstrates four serious issues. It is really important that I point out these four issues: one, violent extremists impacting both countries; two, links tying agents of the Government of India to homicides and violent abilities; three, the use of organized crime creating the perception of unsafe environments, targeting the South Asian community in Canada and, in particular, the Sikh community; and, four, interference in democratic processes. I have heard from many of my constituents who have been targeted in these different cases, and they too are shocked and maybe even more worried that the links are not just to local gangs and organizations, but that they go back to foreign governments.

As Canadians, I hope we can all agree that this is the most egregious type of foreign interference Canada has ever seen in its history. This deserves the serious attention of all parties in the House and it starts with the leaders of all parties. It is shameful that the Conservative leader is the only one burying his head in the sand and refusing to get a security clearance so that he can better understand the issue and how his party and leadership race have been compromised by foreign interference. I believe it is on all of us to do the work that is necessary to protect Canadians. This is one of the most serious things I have ever heard of, and I believe that all members in the House could agree on that.

RCMP Allegations Concerning Foreign Interference from the Government of IndiaEmergency Debate

11:25 p.m.

NDP

Heather McPherson NDP Edmonton Strathcona, AB

Mr. Speaker, one of the things that I am quite worried about when we hear about the foreign interference is the implications of what Canadians will feel about our democracy. I am also very worried about what Canada's role should be in protecting human rights around the world.

We have called on the government to ban entry to BJP officials from India who have called for racist and genocidal violence against minority groups. We have called for the government to stop sending arms to India because we know that they might be used against these minority groups with the Modi government. I am wondering if the member would agree with me that banning and sanctioning Modi and his government is an appropriate response to their behaviour toward minority groups.

RCMP Allegations Concerning Foreign Interference from the Government of IndiaEmergency Debate

11:25 p.m.

Liberal

Ruby Sahota Liberal Brampton North, ON

Mr. Speaker, I do agree that security clearances should be undertaken for all those who travel to Canada, especially those who are in places such as security agencies, policing, military and government. Those who are in violation of human rights should not be let into this country. Canada takes that very seriously. I would also encourage our authorities to make sure that those checks are in place and that we do not allow people like that into Canada.

RCMP Allegations Concerning Foreign Interference from the Government of IndiaEmergency Debate

11:30 p.m.

Conservative

Tim Uppal Conservative Edmonton Mill Woods, AB

Mr. Speaker, in her speech, my hon. colleague mentioned that the RCMP made very serious allegations. Some of them extend to Indian agents, through either money or possibly coercion, using Canadians or people on Canadian soil to conduct extortion. I know that is happening right across the country, but I have heard that a lot of extortion is happening in the Brampton area. There are very serious situations, with shootings at homes and businesses.

Would it not make sense, if foreign interference is happening and Canadians or at least people on Canadian soil are being used in this way, to give the police more tools? The police should have laws in their hands that they can use to not only prosecute criminals and keep them in jail longer, but work with them to find out more about who is involved in these criminal organizations. Right now, there are no mandatory minimum penalties, but the member voted against such legislation. Why?

RCMP Allegations Concerning Foreign Interference from the Government of IndiaEmergency Debate

11:30 p.m.

Liberal

Ruby Sahota Liberal Brampton North, ON

Mr. Speaker, I want to take this opportunity, first and foremost, to thank our policing agencies. The RCMP and all local police across this country have been doing exceptional work to make several arrests in the complicated scheme that has been taking place all over North America. We have our allies across the pond looking into similar occurrences happening on their soil as well. This is due to the co-operation taking place among our policing agencies.

We have five- to seven-year minimum sentences and have life imprisonment in this country for extortion. If life imprisonment does not stop extortionists because they are getting paid by foreign governments, what will?

RCMP Allegations Concerning Foreign Interference from the Government of IndiaEmergency Debate

11:30 p.m.

Brampton East Ontario

Liberal

Maninder Sidhu LiberalParliamentary Secretary to the Minister of Export Promotion

Mr. Speaker, in this chamber, four of the five leaders either have a security clearance or are in the process of getting a security clearance. A lot of residents of Brampton are wondering why the Leader of the Opposition is not getting his security clearance. Is there something he does not want to know? Maybe the member can speak to that.

RCMP Allegations Concerning Foreign Interference from the Government of IndiaEmergency Debate

11:30 p.m.

Liberal

Ruby Sahota Liberal Brampton North, ON

Mr. Speaker, there have been allegations of interference when it comes to the leadership race of the leader of the Conservative Party of Canada. I think we should take these allegations very seriously and make sure that all party leaders are informed.

I encourage the leader of the Conservative Party of Canada to get his clearance, because it is not as simple as some of his members allude to and the Prime Minister cannot whisper this in his ear. He should get his clearance, find out what is happening in his party and take immediate action.

RCMP Allegations Concerning Foreign Interference from the Government of IndiaEmergency Debate

11:30 p.m.

NDP

Heather McPherson NDP Edmonton Strathcona, AB

Mr. Speaker, it is an honour to stand tonight to speak to this very serious topic.

Last year, we learned that a Canadian citizen was killed on Canadian soil by a foreign government. Very few things are more serious for the House of Commons to deal with. Then, of course, last week, we learned from the RCMP that the Government of India is allegedly intimidating members of the South Asian community, committing violent criminal activity and interfering in Canada's democratic process, which are shocking allegations. They are allegations that Canadians from coast to coast to coast heard on Thanksgiving Monday, and we are reeling from them as we think about the attacks on our democracy, the attacks on Canadian citizens the impact this has particularly on the South Asian diaspora.

No role for the federal government is more important than ensuring justice for Canadian citizens and ensuring that foreign governments that interfere in our country are held accountable. We need to ensure that the Government of India is held accountable for the actions that have taken place. Any involvement of a foreign government in the murder of a Canadian citizen on Canadian soil is an attack on the sovereignty of Canada. Many Canadians across the country are living in fear of threats from foreign governments like India's. We must hear their voices.

I sit as a permanent member on the Canada-China committee, and we have heard from those in the Chinese community for a number of years. For over 30 years, they have been saying that the influence and interference by the Chinese government have threatened them. We have heard from Canadians that the Russian government has actively impacted our democracy and that the Iranian government is actively causing disorder and misinformation and making threats against Canadians in our country. Now, of course, we know that India is also doing that.

However, that is not all; there are others. I want to make it very clear that, while tonight we are talking about Indian attacks on the sovereignty of Canada and the Modi government's alleged murder of a Canadian citizen on Canadian soil, it is important to recognize that foreign interference needs to be dealt with across the board. The New Democrats have been pushing for a very long time to ensure that all foreign interference is addressed and that we are looking at all bad actors attempting to harm our democracy and harm the citizens of Canada.

Tonight, as I stand here, I cannot help but think about members of the South Asian community who have been raising these concerns for years and who have not felt safe in their communities for years. I think about the fact that the South Asian diaspora helped build this country, yet they do not feel safe in their communities right now.

I listened to a radio program earlier this week where members of the South Asian community said they did not know how to talk to their children about the fact that they could be killed at any time on Canadian soil by a foreign government. They did not know how to talk to their spouses about the fact that they could be killed by a foreign government on Canadian soil.

We have heard that the violence that people are feeling, the extortion and threats of physical violence, is something that is not new in this community. We have heard tonight about the extortions and arson that have taken place in my city of Edmonton. That is deeply concerning. We have not dealt with this problem effectively. This has not been taken care of effectively. I am glad we are having this debate right now in the House of Commons, but we need to have an Canada-India committee, so we can look at this issue in greater detail.

We need to do everything possible to protect the South Asian community in this country. Some of my colleagues tonight have brought up the fact that this is not an issue of Sikh or Muslim against Hindu. This is a Canadian issue. It does not matter which faith or background people come from or what their views are. The idea that there cannot be a foreign government influencing our democracy or threatening Canadian citizens is something that we all have to get behind. We all have to push and fight for it, yet we have seen that, despite the fact that community members from various diaspora have brought this up for decades, very little has been done by either Liberal or Conservative governments.

In my opinion, the Liberals have been slow to act. They voted against our foreign interference commission. They also voted today against a Canada-India committee.

The Conservatives, of course, are compromised. The Conservative leader refuses to get a security clearance, even though we all know that the Conservative leadership race was interfered in by the Government of India. It is incomprehensible that the leader would not take the steps necessary to get information about how the Government of India interfered in the Conservative Party leadership race.

The fact that we have not heard a single Conservative today condemn the human rights abuses by the Modi government, along with the fact that the Leader of the Opposition, who is on social media quite regularly, has basically been silent, gone missing and refused to comment on this, is so shocking. Canadians are watching, and there can only be one rational explanation. It must be that the leader is afraid of what he will find, or perhaps afraid of whether he would even pass the security clearance screening. It has been months since the NSICOP report pointed out to Canadians that India interfered in the potential election of a Conservative leader.

Members will not be surprised to hear that I am also interested in talking a little about human rights. I speak about human rights a great deal in this place. I am the foreign affairs critic for the NDP. For years, I have expressed concerns in this place about the Modi government and its attack on minority groups in India. We have raised the alarm within the NDP about the violations that the Modi government has brought forward, and we have not heard an adequate response from the Liberals or the Conservatives.

In 2022, the New Democrats called the Liberal government to ban entry to BJP officials from India who have called for racist and genocidal violence against Muslims, Sikhs and other minorities in India. We have also called on the Canadian government to boycott G20 events in India's Kashmir region. The Liberal government ignored both of those calls. I do not want this to just be me talking about the human rights abuses that I worry about with the Modi government.

Here is a 2023 report from Amnesty International on human rights in India.

National financial and investigation agencies were weaponized against civil society, human rights defenders, activists, journalists and critics, further shrinking civic space. Government officials, political leaders, and supporters of the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP)—the ruling political party at the federal level—advocated hatred and violence against religious minorities with impunity, particularly Muslims, marking a rise in hate crimes. Punitive demolitions of largely Muslim properties—including homes, businesses and places of worship—resulting in mass forced evictions after episodes of communal violence, were commonplace and went unpunished. India continued to impose arbitrary and blanket internet restrictions including internet shutdowns. The government withheld the Twitter (now known as X) accounts of journalists and civil society organizations without due process. Dalits, Adivasis and other marginalized groups continued to face violence and entrenched discrimination, with women and girls facing specific attacks on their right to bodily autonomy.

Attacks on women and girls are something that Canada, with a feminist international assistance policy and a purported feminist foreign policy, should be very vocal against.

Human Rights Watch says that during the 2024 presidential campaign:

Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s 2024 electoral campaign frequently used hate speech against Muslims and other minorities, inciting discrimination, hostility, and violence.

Inflammatory speeches, amid a decade of attacks and discrimination against minorities under the Modi administration, have normalized abuses against Muslims, Christians, and others.

The new Modi government needs to reverse its discriminatory policies, act on violence against minorities, and ensure justice for those affected.

Clearly, that has not happened.

I also want to talk a little about the fact that, right now, Canada continues to send arms to the Modi government. Canada's fourth-largest destination for arms exports in 2022 was India, with the highest-ever total of $54.8 million. These items were designed for military use. They include ground vehicles, aircraft, firearms, ammunition, imaging equipment, software and parts. That goes against our Arms Trade Treaty.

In 2023, the Minister of Foreign Affairs issued 38 permits for military goods and technology to India. We do not know what goods these export permits were for. Canadians deserve to have that information and to have that transparency.

We have called on the Canadian government to be more transparent. In fact, in the foreign affairs committee, I have called for a study on Canada's relationship with India, specifically regarding human rights and arms exports.

We know from past cases, including Saudi Arabia and Israel, that the Canadian government has not taken into account repeated human rights violations by those governments. We can only assume that this is the same case with India.

It should not need to be said, because it is in fact Canadian law, but the Canadian government should not be sending arms to any country that violates the human rights of its citizens.

What are our next steps? What do we do now? The NDP is calling for a complete review of India's diplomatic presence in Canada, with further diplomatic sanctions, if necessary. The NDP is calling for a ban of the extremist RSS network. The NDP is calling to establish a new Canada-India committee to help spur a dialogue and research into ways that we can protect Canada, Canadian sovereignty and Canadian citizens.

We want urgent action that will protect Canadians now.

It is too long to wait. It is too much to ask. We need to take these steps now. We need the reviews. We need the work to be done. I urge the Liberal government to reverse their objection to this committee and to let us have a space where these meaningful conversations can happen.

It is important that, as parliamentarians, we do everything possible to protect Canadian citizens and Canadian sovereignty. We want to ensure for Canadians that they can be confident in the democracy in our country, that they can be confident that India is not forcing its will upon the people of Canada or our democracy or other countries and that Canadians are safe in their communities to live, work and practice their faith as they wish. These are the values and the principles of being a Canadian.

South Asian Canadians deserve this. All Canadians deserve this, and when we do not provide that safety and security, we have failed as parliamentarians. We are a country of rule-based international order. We are a country that believes in justice, in human rights and in peace. However, those beliefs are not enough if we are not willing to do the hard work to ensure that every single Canadian has the ability to live a life free of violence and threat, in peace, with a sovereign and strong democracy.

RCMP Allegations Concerning Foreign Interference from the Government of IndiaEmergency Debate

11:45 p.m.

Liberal

Iqwinder Gaheer Liberal Mississauga—Malton, ON

Mr. Speaker, I would like to thank my hon. colleague for her consistent work on human rights. The leader of the NDP has top secret security clearance, and he has done a fine job speaking on this issue. What are her thoughts on the fact that the leader of the official opposition claims he will be silenced if he receives top secret security clearance?

RCMP Allegations Concerning Foreign Interference from the Government of IndiaEmergency Debate

11:50 p.m.

NDP

Heather McPherson NDP Edmonton Strathcona, AB

Mr. Speaker, I think many members have spoken about how disappointing and shocking it is that the Leader of the Opposition refuses to get the security clearance that would give him access to the information he would require to be able to do his job. However, I also want to say that it was disappointing for me to be in the debate all night tonight and to listen to members of the Conservative Party provide some pretty questionable information on how the process would work.

We have heard from the RCMP and CSIS that the best, the smartest and the most effective way for the Leader of the Opposition to get this information is to get his security clearance. Frankly, just getting his security clearance would answer some questions for Canadians, even if he did not look at those documents.

Can he not get his security clearance? Is that the problem? I would like to at least know that the man who wants to be the next prime minister of this country could pass a security clearance. At this point, Canadians do not have that assurance.

RCMP Allegations Concerning Foreign Interference from the Government of IndiaEmergency Debate

11:50 p.m.

Conservative

Tim Uppal Conservative Edmonton Mill Woods, AB

Mr. Speaker, I will note that the hon. member listed a number of issues on which she felt very disappointed that the Liberal government has failed Canadians. I would actually agree with her on those points, yet she and her leader are the ones who continue to support and prop up the government. On that note, she mentioned that the NDP tried to strike a committee to deal with Canada-India relations today, yet the Liberals voted against it. The Liberals did not let that committee move forward. Why does she think the Liberals voted against the idea of striking an India-Canada relations committee?

RCMP Allegations Concerning Foreign Interference from the Government of IndiaEmergency Debate

11:50 p.m.

NDP

Heather McPherson NDP Edmonton Strathcona, AB

Mr. Speaker, I would like to say that Edmonton is well represented today in the chamber. A number of us from Edmonton are here.

I agree with my colleague. I find it very disappointing that the Liberals shut down unanimous consent to put in place a committee to look at the Canada-India relationship. Knowing how difficult it is, knowing how dangerous this is and knowing that the Indian government has potentially taken the life of a Canadian citizen on Canadian soil, I think it is urgent that this committee be struck. We will continue to try to work with all members of the House to ensure that this committee does come forward. I think it is vital, and I am disappointed.

One thing I would also say is that, tonight, we have heard member after member of the Liberal Party stand up and say that they did not oppose it. That is not really how it works. If the Liberal Party opposes it, unfortunately, those members really do need to have a serious conversation with whoever it was within the Liberal Party who actually shut down that committee; they need to convince their colleagues to finally support such work.

RCMP Allegations Concerning Foreign Interference from the Government of IndiaEmergency Debate

11:50 p.m.

NDP

Jenny Kwan NDP Vancouver East, BC

Mr. Speaker, we heard over and over again from the Conservatives in the debate tonight that there is a simple way for the leader of the Conservative Party to get the information. They suggest that all that has to be done is for the Prime Minister to walk across the aisle and whisper in the Conservative leader's ear to tel him who might be implicated in wittingly or semi-wittingly compromising Canada's democratic institutions and democratic processes on behalf of foreign actors.

I have to ask if that even makes sense to the member. Would a leader not want to look at the documents to verify this information, as opposed to hearing it from an adversary, someone the Conservatives consistently say they cannot trust? The Conservative leader simply says he does not need to go through a security clearance or look at the CSIS documents; he wants the Prime Minister to whisper names in his ear, and he will believe him. Does that even make sense to the member?

What sort of nonsense does the member think the Conservatives are trying to pull?

RCMP Allegations Concerning Foreign Interference from the Government of IndiaEmergency Debate

11:55 p.m.

NDP

Heather McPherson NDP Edmonton Strathcona, AB

Mr. Speaker, I want to take a moment to thank my colleague for the incredible work she has done in combatting foreign interference in this country. She has been a tireless voice and has actively pushed the government to make fundamental changes to ensure that our democracy is protected. I am very grateful that I get to work with her.

Of course, it does not make any sense at all. Is this how we are going to handle national security now? Are we going to have some sort of game of telephone within the House of Commons and whisper to each other? Is that how we are going to handle national security? It is absurd. Every Canadian must understand that is a kids' party game. This is not how national security works.

The deep lack of seriousness of the Conservative plan of having a game of telephone to deal with the murder of a Canadian citizen on Canadian soil by a foreign government is utterly appalling.

RCMP Allegations Concerning Foreign Interference from the Government of IndiaEmergency Debate

11:55 p.m.

Conservative

Larry Maguire Conservative Brandon—Souris, MB

Mr. Speaker, I am very disappointed in a way. I have been here pretty well all night listening to the debate because of the interest in this very important discussion. The emergency debate was brought forth in this House by a Liberal backbencher and the leader of the NDP, but once they both spoke, they have never been back.

I wonder if they have any kind of—

RCMP Allegations Concerning Foreign Interference from the Government of IndiaEmergency Debate

11:55 p.m.

Conservative

The Deputy Speaker Conservative Chris d'Entremont

The hon. member cannot say whether someone is here or not.

The hon. member for Brandon—Souris.

RCMP Allegations Concerning Foreign Interference from the Government of IndiaEmergency Debate

11:55 p.m.

Conservative

Larry Maguire Conservative Brandon—Souris, MB

Mr. Speaker, I wonder if there is any indication of what these two parties, the Liberals and the NDP, will do in terms of the coalition they still seem to have going, with regard to how they are going to deal with this type of RCMP investigation down the road.

RCMP Allegations Concerning Foreign Interference from the Government of IndiaEmergency Debate

11:55 p.m.

NDP

Heather McPherson NDP Edmonton Strathcona, AB

Mr. Speaker, this intervention by the Conservative member is interesting, because it gives me, obviously, an opportunity to point out that the leader of the official opposition has not said a single thing on social media. He has not said a single thing in the House. He has not commented at all about this. The fact is that a Canadian citizen was murdered by a foreign government on Canadian soil, and the Leader of the Opposition not only will not get his security check done, will not even find out the information about how that foreign government may be infiltrating his own party, but he will not even stand up in the House and say a single word about it during the debate.

Absolutely, I am extraordinarily proud of my leader for bringing this emergency debate forward. I am extraordinarily proud of the speech my leader gave. If anyone would like to go online, I am sure they can see it there. They can find that speech and see exactly how strongly my leader feels about foreign interference and the attacks on our democracy and on Canadian citizens.

Why have we not heard one word from the leader of the official opposition?

RCMP Allegations Concerning Foreign Interference from the Government of IndiaEmergency Debate

11:55 p.m.

Green

Elizabeth May Green Saanich—Gulf Islands, BC

Mr. Speaker, I want to underscore once again my admiration for the member for Edmonton Strathcona's consistent work in human rights and peace. I benefit from working with her.

I support the bullet points she has put forward for what we must do to take on the right-wing populist, Hindu nationalist approach fomenting violence against minority groups within India, and regarding the Modi government and the RSS ban.

I want to ask the member one specific question on the special committee on Canada-India, which the Greens support. Would she support allowing a Green Party member of Parliament to have a seat on that committee?

RCMP Allegations Concerning Foreign Interference from the Government of IndiaEmergency Debate

11:55 p.m.

NDP

Heather McPherson NDP Edmonton Strathcona, AB

Mr. Speaker, yes.

RCMP Allegations Concerning Foreign Interference from the Government of IndiaEmergency Debate

11:55 p.m.

Conservative

The Deputy Speaker Conservative Chris d'Entremont

It being midnight, I declare the motion carried.

(Motion agreed to)

Accordingly, the House stands adjourned until later this day at 10 a.m. pursuant to Standing Order 24(1).

(The House adjourned at 12 a.m.)