Mr. Speaker, I will go back to the response that the member for Medicine Hat—Cardston—Warner gave to the member for Scarborough—Guildwood. He raised a question that was for the arguments to be made on the original motion that the House has already pronounced on. The ship has sailed as to whether Parliament should receive the documents. The question is now around contempt and the government's refusal to comply with an order of Parliament, not whether it should.
Could the member get us back to the actual debate around the fact that the government has refused an order of Parliament, not whether the government should comply with it?