House of Commons Hansard #358 of the 44th Parliament, 1st Session. (The original version is on Parliament's site.) The word of the day was documents.

Topics

Canadian HeritageCommittees of the HouseRoutine Proceedings

11 a.m.

Liberal

Adam van Koeverden Liberal Milton, ON

Mr. Speaker, that is absurd. It is false and it is defamatory. I am disgusted that, in the House, I would be accused of something like that. I attended the committee meetings as a participant to ensure that we were listening to survivors' voices. This is challenging for all of us. It is challenging for somebody who has been a part of the sport system, although I recognize that it has had its challenges. I want to be part of a process that improves it.

The CEOs of multiple national sport organizations have been dismissed. That is what needed to happen. We needed leadership change. We needed the reviews to take place and we needed sunlight to cleanse the system. However, accusing each other of such things is disgusting.

Canadian HeritageCommittees of the HouseRoutine Proceedings

11 a.m.

Conservative

Anna Roberts Conservative King—Vaughan, ON

Are you saying it's not true?

Canadian HeritageCommittees of the HouseRoutine Proceedings

11 a.m.

Liberal

Adam van Koeverden Liberal Milton, ON

Mr. Speaker, I will not stand for it. I refute those allegations, if the member wants to call them that. She made them up.

Canadian HeritageCommittees of the HouseRoutine Proceedings

11 a.m.

Conservative

Anna Roberts Conservative King—Vaughan, ON

No, I did not.

Canadian HeritageCommittees of the HouseRoutine Proceedings

October 24th, 2024 / 11 a.m.

Liberal

Adam van Koeverden Liberal Milton, ON

Mr. Speaker, frankly it is beneath the member to be accusing me of such things.

Canadian HeritageCommittees of the HouseRoutine Proceedings

11 a.m.

NDP

Niki Ashton NDP Churchill—Keewatinook Aski, MB

Mr. Speaker, the parliamentary secretary speaks of the Liberal government's commitment to integrity in sport. We can all say that integrity is critical to sport, yet this week the Liberals voted against my motion to have public testimony on their soccer drone scandal that took place at the Paris Olympics this summer, a scandal that did a disservice to our women soccer players and a scandal that tarnished Canada's reputation when it comes to soccer and sport on the world stage.

What are the Liberals hiding? Why did the Liberals vote against public accountability? Why did they vote against, to use the parliamentary secretary's own phrase, bringing sunlight to a scandal that has rocked our soccer and sport world? Our athletes deserve better.

Why did the Liberals vote against my motion?

Canadian HeritageCommittees of the HouseRoutine Proceedings

11 a.m.

Liberal

Adam van Koeverden Liberal Milton, ON

Mr. Speaker, an investigation is under way in the very concerning case that my colleague has referenced. It is unacceptable. That form of cheating is absolutely unacceptable. Our Minister of Sport rescinded funding and demanded an immediate investigation with Canada Soccer, which is currently under way.

Performing a concurrent study in committee would be a distraction to that important independent investigation of Canada Soccer. It is important that we let that process remain with its integrity and not add this sort of committee business as a distraction to that very important independent investigation.

Canadian HeritageCommittees of the HouseRoutine Proceedings

11:05 a.m.

Liberal

Mark Gerretsen Liberal Kingston and the Islands, ON

Mr. Speaker, the parliamentary secretary, given his history in sport in Canada, certainly would have a lot of insight into issues such as these. I know that he talked about some of his personal experiences, about when he had to complete various testing or educational opportunities prior to participating in sport.

Could he talk about the importance of those and what he sees the true value is not just for individuals but for the sport community as a whole?

Canadian HeritageCommittees of the HouseRoutine Proceedings

11:05 a.m.

Liberal

Adam van Koeverden Liberal Milton, ON

Mr. Speaker, it is a personal ambition of mine. It is a professional obsession, in fact. I love sport. I love community sport, high-performance sport and international sport, summer, winter.

Yesterday, I was the keynote speaker at the Ottawa Special Olympics Festival Breakfast and I had a great time. The athletes there were amazing, as always. They were articulate, kind and generous. They wore their medals. The Ottawa police and the Ottawa fire were there. My message to everybody was about participation.

Participation is key. Whether it is in democracy or in sport, we have to stand up for each other and ensure we show up, whether it is to hand out medals or to do a little talk, to coach or to hand out sliced oranges. Whatever it is, sport requires participation. It makes our communities healthier and more active.

The survey that my friend and colleague pointed to was a great step forward for Canada. It is an educational tool. It is another layer of accountability to ensure that people are undertaking those reminders on a regular basis.

Despite having worked on the policy and having contributed, I still learned something from that survey, and that is remarkable. I am so proud of the work we have done. I am proud that it has been remarkably non-partisan despite some accusations in the House. I am so proud that the government has taken action on protecting young athletes, ensuring that high-performance athletes, Olympics and Paralympic athletes, have access to services, additional funding and supports. I am also proud that the community sport for all initiative has funded organizations like Spirit North in western Canada, the North American Indigenous Games in eastern Canada, just recently, and so many little community sport opportunities that I have visited, from free basketball games to cricket in Mississauga. It has been a fantastic thing and I hope it continues.

Canadian HeritageCommittees of the HouseRoutine Proceedings

11:05 a.m.

Bloc

Sébastien Lemire Bloc Abitibi—Témiscamingue, QC

Mr. Speaker, I am hoping my colleague, who would have made a good minister of sport and physical activity, can tell us about the current Minister of Sport and Physical Activity, who has been a key player for the past 30 years.

What impact has she had on safeguarding the Canadian Olympic movement from foreign interests in Canada? As an insider and the mastermind behind the sport system, the Minister of Sport and Physical Activity has protected it. Those directly involved abused their positions and used her public office to maintain the current system, at the expense of athletes' safety.

Does my colleague think it is odd that the Office of the Sport Integrity Commissioner was transferred from one agency to another without a tender? What was this intended to cover up? Certain friends' incompetence? We do not know. However, by being wilfully blind, the current Minister of Sport and Physical Activity eliminated duty of care and the UN principle of human rights from her governmental responsibility. She did so in order to protect friends and serve the foreign interests of the International Olympic Committee, or IOC, in managing Canada. This puts athletes at risk. She helped maintain the status quo.

Does my colleague think that she will be rewarded by sport leaders when she leaves the Liberal cabinet and Canadian politics? Does he think that she will transition to an international career in sports, perhaps at the IOC or in the Paralympic movement? We know that steps have already been taken.

Canadian HeritageCommittees of the HouseRoutine Proceedings

11:05 a.m.

Liberal

Adam van Koeverden Liberal Milton, ON

Mr. Speaker, I would like to thank three incredible women: the member for Etobicoke North, who was in the House this week after a prolonged time away; the member for Delta, who recently announced she would not be re-offering, which is a hit to the House. The House is stronger when we have representation, and the member for Delta is a strong representative for various organizations. As a Paralympic medallist. I look up to her very much, both professionally and athletically. I would also like to thank the current Minister of Heritage, the member for Brome—Missisquoi. These three women have been steadfast advocates for safe sport over the last little while.

I would also thank the current Minister of Environment and Climate Change who served.

The sport community is well served by this government, and I am proud of that.

Canadian HeritageCommittees of the HouseRoutine Proceedings

11:10 a.m.

Conservative

Damien Kurek Conservative Battle River—Crowfoot, AB

Mr. Speaker, as always, it is an honour to stand in this place and talk to issues that are so important to Canadians.

It is interesting that the previous Liberal member spoke a lot about how his experience of an athlete has informed policy. I wish the Liberals would take that same approach when it comes to some of the expertise offered by, for example, farmers in this place to help inform things like agriculture and environmental policy.

Before I jump into my speech, Mr. Speaker, I will be splitting my time with the fantastic member forHastings—Lennox and Addington.

I rise to address an important issue, safe sport, and the need to ensure that Canadians have trust within the institutions, whether it is a parent dropping their kids off with an athletic organization or our athletes going on an international trip to compete. Over the last number of years, dating back to 2018 in specific instances, and throughout history, we have seen examples where people have taken advantage of that trust and have abused and hurt athletes. It is unacceptable and it needs to stop. We cannot overstate how important it is to ensure that we have those very real and honest conversations.

When it comes down to it, Canadians and our country should and can be proud of much of what we have accomplished in sport, whether it be the things that make it onto television or minor sport associations. Unlike what the previous Liberal member thinks, I am very proud of a professional and amateur rodeo circuit, a sport of which we can be proud.

I also am very proud of my two boys, who had their first year of baseball this past year. I had a fantastic time learning some of those key and formational skills of teamwork and the discipline associated with team sport. I am sure each member of the House, either directly or one or two steps removed, has a story, whether it be themselves, or their children or a family member, of being involved in various levels of sport.

We cannot understate how important it is that we are able to trust those in authority, especially when it can be in vulnerable situations. There is a power structure in the way sports organizations are run, and we see how abuse has taken place, and that is absolutely egregious.

I appreciate my colleague from Quebec moving this concurrence motion, because it gives us the opportunity to not only talk about these issues, but also to ensure that action is taken so we can, as a nation, demand there be excellence and trust within the existing structures. As parliamentarians, looking at national sport organizations all the way down to the parents dropping their young kids off for those minor sports, there has to be trust throughout. When that trust breaks down, it leads to absolutely tragic situations.

We heard about a number of those scenarios in relation to Hockey Canada and gymnastics in hearings at the status of women committee. Parliament has heard about tragic stories where action should have been taken but was not. Words are not enough, and the result is that lives are broken and destroyed.

The idea of sport is an important one. This is not lost on me. As I mentioned, my kids started organized sport at a young age. Sport has an impact in building a resilient workforce and a capable structure. With the Olympics and the Paralympics this summer, we saw national pride expressed through sport.

To reference rodeo again, my personal favourite sport, a number of local athletes from Battle River—Crowfoot competed in the Canadian Finals Rodeo a number of weeks ago. I am very proud that a high school friend of mine will be going to the National Finals Rodeo in a couple of weeks.

We talk about sport and international competitions as being a point of pride. They give us something to believe in, including when times are tough.

I remember watching the gold medal game in the 2020 Olympics at a professor's house. It was incredible, a moment of intense national pride when Canada scored that winning goal. At the foundational level, when it comes to the role the government plays, it has to ensure that these national sport organizations and the leadership they provide in sport in this country can be trusted every step of the way.

I want to highlight a number of things that Conservatives, who were proud to participate in the report we are debating concurrence in today, put forward in addition to the work the committee put into the overall report. A number of additional recommendations were submitted in a dissenting report to ensure we can have that trust restored, as I referenced before.

The first one is at the very foundation of everything we are talking about: Sport Canada must hold national sports organizations accountable. There has to be accountability throughout the entire system, from leadership at the top all the way through our sports organizations. I have heard examples from constituents where that has not been the case, where there is erosion of trust and an inability by different organizations to have the clear accountability structure that is required to ensure that happens.

The second recommendation Conservatives highlighted in the dissenting report is that the Office of the Sport Integrity Commissioner must investigate complaints in a timely and impartial fashion and enforce consequences for non-compliance. It is great to have an office with an idea, but I have heard from other members of civil society who have been through various ombudsman processes and whatnot that an office needs teeth to ensure there can be investigations and an actual resolution of concerns that are brought forward. It may look nice on paper and may even have a nice office in a downtown building somewhere, but if it cannot result in action, then one truly has to ask what the point is. It comes back to that fundamental concept of trust. We have to be able to trust the process, investigate in an impartial fashion, investigate complaints in a timely manner and enforce consequences for non-compliance.

The third recommendation the dissenting report put forward was that Sport Canada must work with provincial and territorial governments to ensure provincial and post-secondary sport organizations are held accountable. It goes without saying that sport does not start and end in the nation's capital. I am sure we all have stories, whether it is our children, ourselves or high school sports team members all the way up to professional athletes. We have to ensure a team Canada approach, so to speak, that goes across governments and different levels of organizations to ensure accountability, again coming back to that fundamental principle of trust.

I would note the fourth recommendation in the dissenting report is that Sport Canada must establish a public registry. I want to dive into this very briefly. This is fundamentally important. As we heard in testimony before the status of women committee, there has to be the ability for athletes, coaches, parents and others involved in organizations to know that the person they are entrusting with either their lives, their athletes' lives or their children's lives can be trusted, to ensure they are going in with eyes wide open. That full accountability and trust needs to be there.

When it comes to the government's response, I found it interesting that the previous speaker talked about how great the government has been doing, yet it knew about allegations at Sport Canada for four years and did nothing. Action needs to be taken, trust needs to be restored and this debate today is an important step. However, without action, it is just words.

Canadian HeritageCommittees of the HouseRoutine Proceedings

11:20 a.m.

Bloc

Sébastien Lemire Bloc Abitibi—Témiscamingue, QC

Mr. Speaker, I thank my colleague from Battle River—Crowfoot for his question and his compassion on such an important issue. He talks about concrete action. I would be curious to know what concrete action he thinks a future Conservative government would take.

It is highly likely that some of the very concrete recommendations will be implemented not by the Liberals, but by the Conservatives. Does my colleague promise that if his party forms government, it will call an independent public inquiry, in accordance with recommendation 20 of the report?

Canadian HeritageCommittees of the HouseRoutine Proceedings

11:20 a.m.

Conservative

Damien Kurek Conservative Battle River—Crowfoot, AB

Mr. Speaker, I appreciate that little change in attitude with the Bloc acknowledging there could be, in fact, a Conservative government at some point in the future. I certainly hope that is sooner than later.

When it comes to concrete and tangible actions, the foundation of my speech was to articulate exactly that. It is one thing to talk, to have nice press releases and announcements and even training systems and questionnaires that have to be answered. Tangible action, and the results that follow that tangible action being quantified and accountability being enforced, is something that needs to happen, especially when it comes to an issue as important as ensuring our children, our athletes, are kept safe in this country. Tangible action is absolutely required. It is why Conservatives put forward a dissenting report. We will take that action when we have the opportunity to make the changes needed in this country.

Canadian HeritageCommittees of the HouseRoutine Proceedings

11:20 a.m.

Winnipeg North Manitoba

Liberal

Kevin Lamoureux LiberalParliamentary Secretary to the Leader of the Government in the House of Commons

Mr. Speaker, I believe the member; the Conservatives would take action on this file if they were in government. The first question the Conservative Party asked on this issue was about how it would get rid of Sport Canada. I should not say that came as a surprise, because I am used to the Conservatives talking about cuts, whether it is about cutting the CBC or cutting the dental program. They have those big scissors and they are prepared to do all the cutting their little hearts desire. However, I was surprised by how eager the member's colleague was to get on the record that the Conservatives would cut Sport Canada.

Does the member support his colleague's comment that the Conservatives would cut Sport Canada?

Canadian HeritageCommittees of the HouseRoutine Proceedings

11:20 a.m.

Conservative

Damien Kurek Conservative Battle River—Crowfoot, AB

Mr. Speaker, for four years under the watch of the current government, Sport Canada sat on serious allegations, and that member and the government he supports did nothing. I find it rich that that member would suggest tangible action should not be taken, especially when it was that member who, on Monday, denied a unanimous consent motion brought forward to this place. Some of his constituents probably have some questions about the politics he is playing in that regard.

Canadian HeritageCommittees of the HouseRoutine Proceedings

11:20 a.m.

NDP

Niki Ashton NDP Churchill—Keewatinook Aski, MB

Mr. Speaker, obviously much of this morning's discussion has been focused on the need for ethics and fair play in sport, an end to a culture of lack of accountability and the full range of cases where the well-being of athletes was ignored time and time again by sports organizations and the federal government.

This week in the heritage committee, I put forward a motion to seek public accountability for the soccer drone scandal that threw our women soccer players under the bus and deeply affected Canada's reputation when it comes to soccer and sport on the world stage. I would like to ask my colleague why he and his colleagues supported this motion and about how troubling it is that the Liberals, along with the Bloc, are seeking to cover up a scandal that rocked our country on the world stage.

Canadian HeritageCommittees of the HouseRoutine Proceedings

11:25 a.m.

Conservative

Damien Kurek Conservative Battle River—Crowfoot, AB

Mr. Speaker, being a member of the heritage committee and having the honour of fulfilling the shadow minister role during this time, I was shocked when the Liberals, along with the Bloc Québécois, rejected the motion the member brought forward asking for some accountability and answers on a sports scandal that truly shocked the world and put Canada and its athletes at a disadvantage when there should have been a coming together of our nation. It was the leadership and just simply being able to demand answers. I do not understand why for the Liberals at every turn, whether it is sports, corruption or the fiscal status of the country, their default answer to everything seems to be to bury their heads in the sand, cover it up and hide the real answers from Canadians.

Canadian HeritageCommittees of the HouseRoutine Proceedings

11:25 a.m.

Conservative

Shelby Kramp-Neuman Conservative Hastings—Lennox and Addington, ON

Mr. Speaker, there was screaming, insulting, body shaming, ridiculing, isolating, humiliating, manipulating, controlling, comparing, berating, grooming and touching.

Those who know me recognize I will often be the optimistic one in the room and focus on the good. In reference to sport and youth, I would love to be speaking on the benefits and life lessons acquired through sport, such as healthy communication, commitment, concentration, competition, confidence, control and self-respect. However, today I am speaking to a report regarding safe sport in Canada that was tabled in the House by the Standing Committee on Canadian Heritage in June 2024.

To provide some context, this report covers the study of abuse in organized sport in Canada, mostly hockey and soccer. This study was triggered by reporting that Hockey Canada had reached an out-of-court settlement with a woman who alleged she had been sexually assaulted by members of the national junior hockey team. This was later found to be a deeper issue within Hockey Canada and the study was expanded in September 2022 to include all organized sport, on ice, on fields, in gyms and on spring floors.

The key findings included abuse experienced by athletes, testimony concerning junior hockey, racism, issues faced by indigenous athletes, issues specific to minors, culture within the Canadian sport system, fear of retribution, jurisdictional issues and suggestions to amend best practices.

I am not a member of the Standing Committee on Canadian Heritage; I never have been. However, I chair the status of women committee, previously sat on the national defence committee and currently serve as the shadow minister for women, gender equality and youth. This may seem a rather scattered membership that would not tie into this report, but it does. In every one of these areas, we have dealt with predation by people in power positions on vulnerable Canadians, be they women, especially indigenous women, children or persons in abusive relationships, and with institutions that just do not care about what is happening unless it makes the headlines. This is true for resource extraction companies, the Canadian Armed Forces, the federal public service and apparently some of our sport associations here in Canada.

It seems wherever I turn in my political career, sexual, physical, emotional and mental abuse rears its ugly head. My most relevant role in all of this is my most important job and biggest privilege, which is to be the mother of two gifted athletes. I have two daughters. My youngest, Reese, is a club volleyball player with the U16 Peterborough Thunder, and my eldest, Tori, plays south of the border with the U19 Connecticut Junior Rangers. Watching our girls in competitive sport is what I love, alongside watching my nieces and nephews, who all love to compete and do it well.

I was raised with sport my entire life. I have seen, and continue to see, outstanding, motivating and firm but fair coaches and teammates along the way. However, it is disturbing to acknowledge how the twisted and dark stories of some can stain the very fabric of sport in Canada. Small rural communities like those in Hastings—Lennox and Addington are home to thousands of athletes, from house league to high performance. We play, we cheer, we win, we lose and we learn. Small communities rally together to support our own and can only hope they are experiencing safe, inclusive and fun sport cultures. Sadly, this is not always the case.

For the report itself, the testimony was harrowing but so essential in helping us, as legislators, try to address the systemic issues plaguing organized sports in Canada. The report itself was very thorough, but there are a few areas where additional action could be taken. In the dissenting report presented by the Conservatives, four particular areas were laid out.

The first was that Sport Canada must hold national sports organizations accountable. The report goes on to cite the revolting actions by Hockey Canada in establishing a hush fund for the survivors of rape and sexual misconduct by its players. To be very clear, Hockey Canada was complicit in covering up and, quite frankly, promoting and enabling the sexual harassment of women.

Before I was elected as a member of Parliament, I would have asked myself how this was possible. Now I know better. This is possible because these institutions often exist, in part, to protect and enable themselves, to the point where they are willing to cover up rape because some particular young athlete has outstanding talent or is a star on their team. This is the exact same issue plaguing the armed forces.

There needs to be buy-in from the government to bring the hammer down on these organizations when the issues are made so obvious. It should not have taken 10 months for Sport Canada to intervene, as it did in the Hockey Canada case. We should be teaching our children that respect, consideration and justice are more valuable than a trophy.

Similarly, point two says that the Office of the Sport Integrity Commissioner needs to be fully independent from the sporting community. Far too often, victims and survivors feel that they will not get a fair shake with the OSIC because it is populated by people with a vested interest in sport. Again, this is a similar to the complaint heard in CAF, where many survivors feel isolated from justice because they need to go through the chain of command, which often involves an associate of the perpetrator, if not the perpetrator themselves. The government is moving to rectify that by reforming the military justice system, but that needs to continue. Sport Canada should take a long, hard look at both the pitfalls of populating the review board with people involved in the industry and what steps the government is taking to rectify that and apply those lessons to sport in Canada.

The third point was on co-operation between the provincial, federal and territorial governments to ensure that provincial organizations and post-secondary sport organizations are being held accountable. The federal government needs to be exceptionally clear on what is expected from provincial and territorial counterparts, and leading by example would be an excellent start.

Lastly, we need transparency for the parents and young athletes who are making that transition into the next level of organized sport. We need a public, accessible, searchable registry of all coaches who have been found to have been in violation of the universal code of conduct to prevent and address maltreatment in sport, regardless of the type of violation. This registry should be detailed and include the name of the offender, the number of complaints, the number of arrests and the number of convictions. This would not only help ensure that our kids are kept safe from predators but also provide ease of mind to athletes and parents alike, who would know that the history of the person they are trusting is clean and issue-free.

Provocative testimony of allegations of sexual assault and secretive, unaccountable organizations have been covered up. While the committee was waiting for a response to this very report, the Minister of Sport claimed that it was her mandate to repair the erosion of trust within the sport system in Canada. Is this happening?

Sports is a significant part of who we are. The Liberal government must take responsibility, ensure that the toxic culture is eliminated and make sure that protecting our athletes who have been victimized takes precedence over protecting bullies, abusers and government officials. Crossing the line is never okay. Having athletes feel threatened and uncomfortable should never be tolerated or ignored.

I would like to acknowledge, in the last part of my speech, that earlier today we heard comments regarding intimidation towards witnesses. More specifically, they were conversations that members had with other members. I will speak more clearly to that and share acknowledgement from a member who wrote to me to say that they were sorry. They said they let their emotions surrounding the safe sport conversation get the better of them, and that, in one instance, they reacted in an unprofessional manner and called integrity into question. This was directed at a member, not a witness. Most importantly, we cannot turn a blind eye, or we will be jeopardizing the future of sport in Canada.

Canadian HeritageCommittees of the HouseRoutine Proceedings

11:35 a.m.

Bloc

Sébastien Lemire Bloc Abitibi—Témiscamingue, QC

Mr. Speaker, I thank my Conservative colleague for being so sensitive toward victims of abuse. Her sensitivity came through very clearly in her speech.

I think that our parliamentary privilege also comes with institutions that protect these victims and that compels organizations to produce documents.

Take, for example, motions in the House of Commons, like the one on SDTC or the one on Sport Canada and Hockey Canada. It is very clear that such motions are one way to bring the truth to light and achieve greater justice in our society. They make it possible to go further and to stop people who have no business continuing to hold the positions that they do.

In short, does my colleague agree that a voluntary commission does not do enough to protect victims and that an independent public inquiry would give them the standing to share their stories and be heard in order to bring about real change in society?

Canadian HeritageCommittees of the HouseRoutine Proceedings

11:35 a.m.

Conservative

Shelby Kramp-Neuman Conservative Hastings—Lennox and Addington, ON

Mr. Speaker, the bottom line is that the government has failed athletes. Our victims need to be protected. If, at any point, either of my daughters were to home and share a concern, there would be zero tolerance, and we would move forward. The government needs to do the same.

Canadian HeritageCommittees of the HouseRoutine Proceedings

11:35 a.m.

Milton Ontario

Liberal

Adam van Koeverden LiberalParliamentary Secretary to the Minister of Environment and Climate Change and to the Minister of Sport and Physical Activity

Mr. Speaker, I deeply respect the member opposite and her work on the status of women committee and in various other important conversations in the House.

I would like to ask for clarity on the question of whether or not the system of sport in Canada requires strong institutions, which require resources, expertise, regular funding, personnel and documents, such as the universal code of conduct for the maltreatment in sport.

Does the member not agree with me and the vast majority of Canadians that institutions, such as the Canadian Centre for Ethics in Sport, the Canadian Centre for Child Protection and the Office of the Sport Integrity Commissioner, are worthwhile and important organizations to protect, uphold and fund to ensure they have the resources necessary to do their work?

Canadian HeritageCommittees of the HouseRoutine Proceedings

11:35 a.m.

Conservative

Shelby Kramp-Neuman Conservative Hastings—Lennox and Addington, ON

Mr. Speaker, I would like to share a quote: “Every day without that action is another day that the brave survivors...must find even more strength against a system that has failed to protect...and threatens to leave the next generation at risk of horrific abuse.”

We have so much to celebrate with sport in Canada, but the voices of athletes are much too loud to be ignored. Action must be taken.

Canadian HeritageCommittees of the HouseRoutine Proceedings

11:35 a.m.

Conservative

Robert Gordon Kitchen Conservative Souris—Moose Mountain, SK

Mr. Speaker, I have been involved, over the past two and a half years, in the development of this documentation. Over time, I have been at many different meetings on this issue and have listened to many of the witnesses. Oftentimes, witnesses had major concerns about accountability.

The report basically addresses the issue of expressing accountability through the OSIC, the Office of the Sport Integrity Commissioner. The question I have for my colleague is as follows as a lot of the concerns that we heard from the witnesses were around the fact that they do not trust the OSIC.

How are we to be accountable for those who are supposed to be accountable? I am wondering if she has any comments on how we might help assure these witnesses that the avenues being taken to protect them are being taken appropriately.

Canadian HeritageCommittees of the HouseRoutine Proceedings

11:35 a.m.

Conservative

Shelby Kramp-Neuman Conservative Hastings—Lennox and Addington, ON

Mr. Speaker, I would first like to acknowledge and thank the witnesses that provided testimony for the vulnerability they showed. It is extraordinarily difficult.

Most important is trust in our institutions, and that trust in our institutions is lacking. What more does it take to spur action? Stories, testimony and heartfelt trauma are being ignored. Government is sitting for three or four years. What does it take to spur political action for our youth in sport? It is not good enough.