House of Commons Hansard #363 of the 44th Parliament, 1st Session. (The original version is on Parliament's site.) The word of the day was maid.

Topics

Reference to Standing Committee on Procedure and House AffairsPrivilegeOrders of the Day

5:20 p.m.

Conservative

Brad Vis Conservative Mission—Matsqui—Fraser Canyon, BC

Madam Speaker, I was on the industry committee, so I heard the testimony of Annette Verschuren. She refused to answer any basic questions. I also heard the testimony of former industry minister Mr. Bains, who, I believe, now works for Rogers Communications. They were indifferent about the cost of living crisis that is impacting Canada. The government seems to only care about one thing: protecting Liberal friends and insiders from their duty to serve Canadians. Time and time again, we have asked and pleaded with the government to come clean with Canadians about its corruption and criminal activity as it relates to the $400 million in the SDTC, or green slush fund. The Liberals refuse to do so because they are afraid of accountability and are hiding behind a cloak of false constitutional arguments to protect their friends and insiders.

Reference to Standing Committee on Procedure and House AffairsPrivilegeOrders of the Day

5:20 p.m.

Liberal

Kevin Lamoureux Liberal Winnipeg North, MB

Madam Speaker, allow me to be crystal clear: The current leader of the Conservative Party is abusing the power of Parliament. This is becoming very well established. He continues to refuse to get the security clearance, which is not in the best interest of Canadians, and it is unacceptable that he is putting his personal interests ahead of the interests of Canadians. The leader of the Conservative Party needs to step up to the plate and do the honourable thing: not only get the security clearance, but also stop the game he is playing. I would argue it is abuse of parliamentary privilege.

Reference to Standing Committee on Procedure and House AffairsPrivilegeOrders of the Day

5:20 p.m.

An hon. member

Oh, oh!

Reference to Standing Committee on Procedure and House AffairsPrivilegeOrders of the Day

5:20 p.m.

The Assistant Deputy Speaker Carol Hughes

Order. The hon. member for South Shore—St. Margarets does not have the floor. I would ask him to hold off on his comment.

The hon. member for Mission—Matsqui—Fraser Canyon.

Reference to Standing Committee on Procedure and House AffairsPrivilegeOrders of the Day

5:20 p.m.

Conservative

Brad Vis Conservative Mission—Matsqui—Fraser Canyon, BC

Madam Speaker, the hon. member for Winnipeg North has forgotten my quote from page 239 of Parliamentary Privilege in Canada:

Disobedience to rules or orders represents an affront to the dignity of the House, and accordingly the House could take action, not simply for satisfaction but to ensure that the House of Commons is held in the respect necessary for its authority to be vindicated.

That is what the loyal official opposition is doing. We are standing up for the rights of all parliamentarians, for the rights of Canadians to have accountability with their taxpayer money that the government abused and does not care about. While they suffer at the food bank, Liberals rest knowing they are obfuscating the House and the well-being and interests of Canadian citizens who just want to get ahead and live their lives accordingly.

Reference to Standing Committee on Procedure and House AffairsPrivilegeOrders of the Day

5:25 p.m.

Conservative

Jacques Gourde Conservative Lévis—Lotbinière, QC

Madam Speaker, Halloween is a great opportunity to rise in the House and tell scary stories about the Liberals and all their close friends who have been collecting candy since 2015. Trust me, there are a lot of them.

Over the past nine years, we have dug many skeletons out of Liberal closets and gone on witch hunts to unmask all the Liberal “ghouls”. From the sponsorship scandal to the green fund scandal we are talking about today, it all comes back to the man behind the mask, the Liberal Prime Minister.

It is always a privilege for me to stand in the House and proudly represent the interests of the people of Lévis—Lotbinière, no matter what their needs are, and to do justice to the hard-working Canadians of this country. They do not deserve to have their hard-earned money used for partisan purposes or used to grease the palms of some Liberal Party of Canada donors, as we have all too often caught it doing. Let us not forget all those who have been granted privileged access to ministers to talk about their projects. All too often, those projects have served only to line their own pockets, to the detriment of citizens and the future of our country.

This intervention on the privilege motion concerns the green fund scandal. The crux of the problem has not changed: The Liberal government still refuses to send unredacted documents to the police so that they can do their job and determine the scope of the corruption observed in this matter by the Auditor General. What saddens me so deeply about all of this is that, once again, Liberal Party members and the Prime Minister are dashing the dreams, trust, respect and hopes of Canadians.

Let me review the facts. The Auditor General identified irregularities in the procedure used to allocate money to businesses through the green fund, which was intended to help businesses develop solutions for reducing greenhouse gas emissions. We in the Conservative Party believe that technology is the best way to reduce our environmental footprint. Technology offers Canada a pathway forward into the future, unlike the punitive anti-economic measures, like the carbon tax, that are being implemented on the backs of Canadian workers and families.

However, Sustainable Development Technology Canada, or SDTC, funnelled much of its funding to companies owned by the members of its board of directors, who were also long-time Liberal insiders. The selection process was rigorous and merit-based, but it was overridden and used in an arbitrary way in order to favour Liberal cronies. So much for fairness, because with the Liberals, friends come first.

In fact, it is the profusion of arbitrary actions taken by this Liberal government that is undermining public trust in this government. This includes gifts to certain corporations over others, favouritism, punitive taxes imposed on certain sectors and the capital gains tax, which creates tax bias. Those are all the ingredients of the Liberal magic potion. If the price of a photo-op government were just a bit of fun now and then, we could live with that. Like any good masquerade ball, it always comes to an end and the secrecy ends with it.

The bill for the Liberals' systematic incompetence has led to the worst consequences in the history of our country, which is practically unrecognizable because it has changed so much in the past nine years. Right now, more than two million people are lining up at food banks because of failed Liberal policies. That is a record number in our country's history. That is a 90% increase from 2019. As former finance minister Bill Morneau said in his memoirs, the Prime Minister tosses aside good public policy in favour of scoring political points.

His golden image is now tarnished in the eyes of his own troops, and many are asking the same question: Is he standing up for Canadians or for himself? As a legislator since 2006, I can say that if he were really standing up for the interests of Canadians, he would call an election, not refuse to comply with the order of the House and to hand over the green fund documents to the appropriate authorities. This is the cause of our current state of paralysis, which is justified and perfectly legitimate.

Like many sneaks, our Bloc friends were once again left high and dry. They are playing the victim card, claiming that they want to work for real this time. However, when the time comes to vote on the side of common sense, their opportunism and hypocrisy always get the better of them, because they want to have their cake and eat it too. Ultimately, the “Liberal Bloc” and the “NDP Liberals” are the same. They are shakedown artists. We have the ultimate proof that, even with a minority government in place, a party like the Bloc Québécois is incapable of making gains for Quebeckers and Canadians and carries no weight whatsoever. At most, the Bloc Québécois is good at taking credit for the work and results achieved by others, when in fact they are all talk and no action.

Everywhere in my riding, there is one word on everyone's lips: “election”. When will the election be called? My constituents are fed up with this slapdash Prime Minister. They are telling me they want an election as soon as possible so that this minority government can be held accountable for everything it has done. House prices have more than doubled, and the dream of home ownership is gone for an entire generation. In the Canada I once knew, it was normal for anyone in the country who had a decent salary and a decent job to be able to buy a home and live in dignity. Today, this foundational pillar of our society is in jeopardy because of Liberal mismanagement. The Liberal government broke its promise to build homes to keep pace with the country's demographic growth. The immigration floodgates were opened wide, with no regard for the government's ability to provide services. These crazy policies have undermined the Canadian consensus on immigration. Canadians are the most welcoming people on the planet, but ending common-sense immigration policies like those introduced by the previous Conservative government has led to a few skirmishes in this country. It is so bad that even the Liberals had to reverse their infinitely ideological opposition by announcing earlier this week, to everyone's surprise, that they would be reducing the thresholds by about 20%. Unfortunately, it is probably too little, too late.

I dream of being able to go back to the days of the Right Hon. Stephen Harper's government, in which I had the honour of serving. In those days, the issue of immigration levels was a matter of consensus, not a matter that divides Canadians rather than uniting them. However, it is not too late for the government to do what the Conservatives want and adopt a common-sense measure that ties the number of people entering the country to housing construction. The Conservative Party will develop a mathematical formula to respect this rule, which will enable us to lower prices. This formula will make the number of doctors and jobs grow faster than the population. That is the exact opposite of the out-of-control immigration that has taken place under this Liberal government.

As I read recently in an article by Boucar Diouf in La Presse, “history will unfortunately remember [the reign of Justin Trudeau] as the reign under which intolerance significantly increased in Canada”.

Mr. Diouf adds: “his naive vision of immigration and harmonious co-existence pushed Canada even further toward intolerance”.

The Prime Minister has also had the nerve to attack Quebec even more by making all sort of comments about it since 2015, even though the latest polls show that Quebec is more open to immigration than anywhere else in Canada.

This same Prime Minister forced two women out of his caucus. Although Jody Wilson‑Raybould and Celina Caesar‑Chavannes did not belong to the Conservative party, they were both fine examples of competent and politically courageous people.

In an interview this week, Ms. Caesar‑Chavannes recalled how little consideration the Prime Minister had for his colleagues and how hard he was to work with. She described multiple incidents she had to deal with involving the person she was serving as parliamentary secretary, who tried to influence her to change the date when she would leave caucus, saying that he could not afford to lose two women on the same day. That type of comment proves he cared more about his image than about the people we represent.

The former MP for Whitby also said that while she was meeting with the Prime Minister to try to work out their differences, he approached her with such contempt and hatred that she had never been so scared in her life to be alone in a room with someone. He would later apologize to her in the House of Commons, which she described as cowardice.

I think it is necessary to look back on this kind of incident to see what a phony the Prime Minister is. For weeks now, his refusal to comply with the House's order has gotten us nowhere. It makes me wonder just how much the Prime Minister is trying to hide. I have to wonder how much political pressure MPs must be under to hide certain information and push certain secret agendas, the same way that Ms. Jody Wilson-Raybould was pressured in the SNC-Lavalin affair.

Considering how many people from his own party have left because of undue pressure, and considering that 24 MPs from his own political party are now calling for his resignation by trying to hold a secret ballot, this Prime Minister's time is clearly up.

The time has come to return to normalcy, both in terms of the transparency that Parliament should show to MPs, but also on the economic front, where powerful paycheques give everyone a chance to live with dignity, without compromising future generations through out-of-control spending that generates insurmountable debt and runaway inflation.

Oddly enough, the Liberals have dug the idea of a high-speed train out of the mothballs in a blatant campaign-style announcement. We will wait and see how much that will cost. It is always strange to see the Liberals pretend they can make everyone's dreams come true as their term winds down. Do they really intend to move forward with this? If they did, I think they would have made it a priority back in 2015, instead of making a last-minute announcement like this, while they are awash in panic and scandals.

It looks like the only ones who still believe in this Liberal government are the NDP. They are like an ex who just cannot let go, even though it is supposed to be over. What is the NDP's problem, anyway? Virtually all Canadians are wondering why the NDP is systematically supporting this dying government. Is it because the NDP leader wants to lock in his pension come February 2025? Is it because the party does not have enough money to run an election campaign? Does it have problems with organizing, volunteers or election sign vendors who want to get paid? It is very hard to know what is going on in the minds of New Democrats right now. One thing we do know is that they are more terrified of an election than they are of Halloween.

Meanwhile, the “Liberal Bloc” had a rude awakening when the deadline for its attempted hostage-taking expired. The Bloc Québécois leader looked like a schoolchild on the Liberals' playground.

The sovereignist party tried to hold a federalist party hostage, and it sure looked silly when its ultimatum did not pan out. The Senate is now under no obligation to move forward and pass Bill C‑282 on supply management.

The Bloc Québécois was so focused on scoring political points that it compromised farmers' legitimate demands. The failed schemes of the leader of the Bloc Québécois show the limitations of that party, which has not been able to accomplish anything significant since its inception.

What did the Bloc Québécois get in return for supporting this government 188 times and preventing it from being defeated? It got absolutely nothing. What is more, the Bloc Québécois's support for more than $500 billion in Liberal government spending shows that it was complicit in leading Canada into its current situation. The leader of the Bloc Québécois has systematically supported Justin Trudeau' measures, which have increased crime and violence—

Reference to Standing Committee on Procedure and House AffairsPrivilegeOrders of the Day

5:40 p.m.

Liberal

Sherry Romanado Liberal Longueuil—Charles-LeMoyne, QC

Mr. Speaker, I rise on a point of order.

The member from the opposition party knows full well that we cannot name members.

Reference to Standing Committee on Procedure and House AffairsPrivilegeOrders of the Day

5:40 p.m.

The Deputy Speaker Chris d'Entremont

The hon. member knows that. He mentioned the name of the Prime Minister. We will keep a close eye on that.

The hon. member for Lévis—Lotbinière.

Reference to Standing Committee on Procedure and House AffairsPrivilegeOrders of the Day

5:40 p.m.

Conservative

Jacques Gourde Conservative Lévis—Lotbinière, QC

Mr. Speaker, if I did something wrong, I apologize. I am sure that my colleague feels so ill at ease in her party that she has the Prime Minister's name ringing in her ears. I will continue.

The leader of the Bloc Québécois systematically supported the Prime Minister's measures. This ended up—

Reference to Standing Committee on Procedure and House AffairsPrivilegeOrders of the Day

5:40 p.m.

Bloc

Denis Trudel Bloc Longueuil—Saint-Hubert, QC

Mr. Speaker, I rise on a point of order.

For a month now, the House has been studying a motion of privilege that we are sick of hearing about. However, my colleague is not talking about it at all. He has been talking about the NDP, the Bloc Québécois, the Liberals, about this and that. He is not talking at all about the question of privilege raised by his party. I understand that he too is sick of hearing about it. It has been a month and he can no longer stand to hear his colleagues talk about it, but—

Reference to Standing Committee on Procedure and House AffairsPrivilegeOrders of the Day

5:40 p.m.

The Deputy Speaker Chris d'Entremont

I thank the member for raising that issue, but this is debate. I am not sure it is relevant.

The hon. member for Lévis—Lotbinière.

Reference to Standing Committee on Procedure and House AffairsPrivilegeOrders of the Day

October 31st, 2024 / 5:40 p.m.

Conservative

Jacques Gourde Conservative Lévis—Lotbinière, QC

Mr. Speaker, my colleague just has to think back to what I said at the beginning of my speech. I spoke about that then, and I will likely speak about it again at the end.

Today, street gangs are distributing drugs in high schools across the province and the country with impunity. I had the misfortune of learning that this phenomenon is also occurring in my riding of Lévis-Lotbinière. The Lévis police were forced to increase their presence when a criminal gang tried to recruit in several of the city's schools. Fortunately, additional prevention services have been made available to students by the police, who are not ruling out increasing their numbers to solve the problem.

Drug quantities have increased dramatically. According to journalist Jessica Nadeau's latest report in Le Devoir, over 28 kilograms of cannabis were seized in Quebec high schools in the past five years. Here is a list of other drugs that were seized: 802 methamphetamine and speed tablets, 498 prescription drug tablets, 264 opioid tablets, 51 ecstasy tablets; 219 grams of magic mushrooms, 137 grams of cocaine, 35 grams of crystal meth and 27 grams of crack.

Worst of all, this is only the tip of the iceberg. There are countless incidents of teenagers suddenly dying after using drugs. Then there is the lifelong damage to those lucky enough to survive. An entire generation is being poisoned, and parents are left inconsolable. These drugs have never been so dangerously addictive and deadly.

What is the Bloc Québécois leader doing in the meantime? He does not seem to be making this a priority at all. He supports the Prime Minister most of the time and he is soft on crime. We rarely hear the Bloc Québécois leader speak out against the Liberal measures that led to this public disorder. The Bloc Québécois leader supported Bill C‑5 which, under the guise of helping drug addicts and people in our communities, eliminates a number of mandatory minimum sentences for very serious crimes.

This allows drug traffickers and producers to get off scot-free. Impunity reigns. The leader of the Bloc Québécois takes the same naive approach as the Liberals called harm reduction.

The Conservatives' approach is one of understanding the victims of drugs and promoting the associated treatment to help men and women overcome it, but never at the expense of law and order, not at the expense of innocent lives, victims who made the mistake of trying the drug once and ending up hooked on it.

Traffickers are no longer afraid of the government, just as the Prime Minister is not afraid of the leader of the Bloc Québécois one bit. No more slaps on the wrist, no more Netflix sentences. When young people in a country are affected, it is time to restore justice.

In conclusion, the Prime Minister still has a chance to dress up as Superman if the Liberals stop being arrogant, obey the House, comply with the Chair's orders and hand over the documents to the police. The Liberals have handed out so much candy to their friends that they had to create a national dental care plan to fill the cavities. Happy Halloween.

Reference to Standing Committee on Procedure and House AffairsPrivilegeOrders of the Day

5:45 p.m.

Sherbrooke Québec

Liberal

Élisabeth Brière LiberalParliamentary Secretary to the Minister of Families

Mr. Speaker, I am amazed by the winding roads some people take to reach their destination.

We know that the Leader of the Opposition does not want to obtain security clearance for national security matters. What does my colleague think of the fact that the Royal Canadian Mounted Police, the Auditor General and legal advisors have said that it is precisely for security reasons that documents should not be turned over this way?

Reference to Standing Committee on Procedure and House AffairsPrivilegeOrders of the Day

5:45 p.m.

Conservative

Jacques Gourde Conservative Lévis—Lotbinière, QC

Mr. Speaker, on the subject of safety, I would like to know why this government, which my colleague currently represents, has not worked on the safety of our children for some time. Our schools are under attack by street gangs. They are infiltrated by people who want to sell drugs and destroy the lives of children, parents and our society as a whole. Something must be done.

Will this government finally do its part?

Reference to Standing Committee on Procedure and House AffairsPrivilegeOrders of the Day

5:45 p.m.

NDP

Lori Idlout NDP Nunavut, NU

Uqaqtittiji, I know that my constituents are starting to go trick-or-treating. I hope that all Canadians this evening, while trick-or-treating, are safe and that parents check their candies before they give them to their children.

During this filibuster, we have been treated with a lot of tricks. I think we have a lot of tricking going on in the filibuster, including giving figures like what the NDP leader's pension is. We have heard it is $910,000, whereas the Leader of the Opposition's, once he gets his pension, will be $3.4 million. I wonder if the member can do some math for us and tell us what the difference will be in their pensions and share whether we should get back to representing our constituents' needs and moving this on to committee so we can address urgent matters.

Reference to Standing Committee on Procedure and House AffairsPrivilegeOrders of the Day

5:45 p.m.

Conservative

Jacques Gourde Conservative Lévis—Lotbinière, QC

Mr. Speaker, everyone here in the House, or at least, the members on this side and possibly some on the other side, would like to get back to working for the interests of Canadians.

Unfortunately, the only way to work for the interests of Canadians is to let Canadians choose their government. We have reached the end of a minority government. Its time is up. Politically speaking, the Prime Minister is on his last legs.

Will the NDP finally vote with us to give Canadians hope?

Reference to Standing Committee on Procedure and House AffairsPrivilegeOrders of the Day

5:50 p.m.

Bloc

Denis Trudel Bloc Longueuil—Saint-Hubert, QC

Mr. Speaker, unfortunately, I am forced to say that I sincerely think my colleague is a hypocrite. He gave a 20-minute speech in which he accused the Liberals of being responsible for all the world's ills, and we agree. We, the Bloc, and the NDP—

Reference to Standing Committee on Procedure and House AffairsPrivilegeOrders of the Day

5:50 p.m.

The Deputy Speaker Chris d'Entremont

Calling someone a hypocrite is unparliamentary. I invite the hon. member to ask his question in a different way.

The hon. member for Longueuil—Saint‑Hubert.

Reference to Standing Committee on Procedure and House AffairsPrivilegeOrders of the Day

5:50 p.m.

Bloc

Denis Trudel Bloc Longueuil—Saint-Hubert, QC

Mr. Speaker, I would say that he is a liar. Okay, fine, I will withdraw the words “hypocrite” and “liar”. We will see where I am going with that. For 20 minutes, the member gave a seemingly endless speech in which he insulted everyone in the House and said that the Conservatives were ready to form the government, except that they are not. They are not really ready to do that. They like that the Liberals are in power. They really like that.

We are asking them to move a non-confidence motion. We are now ready to vote in favour of such a motion. They are not ready at all. They have been doing nothing but talk for a month. They are wasting our time. We are not taking care of Canadians' problems. We are wasting time because of them. When will they decide to let this motion go and move a non-confidence motion? We are ready to bring down this government.

Reference to Standing Committee on Procedure and House AffairsPrivilegeOrders of the Day

5:50 p.m.

Conservative

Jacques Gourde Conservative Lévis—Lotbinière, QC

Mr. Speaker, I would like to remind my colleague of how much time has been wasted because of the Bloc Québécois. Since 1993, the Bloc Québécois has passed three bills, changed the names of two ridings and declared a national day. That is the Bloc Québécois's record since 1993.

Reference to Standing Committee on Procedure and House AffairsPrivilegeOrders of the Day

5:50 p.m.

Conservative

Bernard Généreux Conservative Montmagny—L'Islet—Kamouraska—Rivière-du-Loup, QC

Mr. Speaker, that was a great answer. He could have added to that list and talked about the things that the Bloc members have not done. My Bloc Québécois colleague says he is ready to take action, but the Bloc members dropped the ball on two votes recently. They just wasted 30 days in the House of Commons.

The question I would like to ask my colleague is the following.

The cost of living is going up, the use of food banks is going up, the carbon tax is going up and housing taxes are going up. In short, everything is going up in Canada. This is causing problems for all Canadians and Quebeckers. Everyone is struggling to eat, keep a roof over their heads and heat their homes. These are all realities that the people in our ridings are experiencing. This is not only happening somewhere else; it is happening everywhere.

We are currently dealing with a government that does not want to hand over documents related to a $400-million scandal. Do members know what we can do with that kind of money? I would like my colleague to tell me what we could actually do with $400 million.

Reference to Standing Committee on Procedure and House AffairsPrivilegeOrders of the Day

5:50 p.m.

Conservative

Jacques Gourde Conservative Lévis—Lotbinière, QC

Mr. Speaker, I thank my colleague for his excellent question. This member is doing a great job for his region. He has become a legend.

We would have to take that $400 million and use it to feed Canadians. Since this government came to power, food banks have been struggling to meet demand. Every month, two million Canadians use food banks. It would take a lot more than that $400 million to feed them. Canadians need steady jobs and more money in their pockets. Taxes are too high. The carbon tax alone has doubled the cost of living in every way across Canada. We are going to eliminate these excessive taxes forced on Canadians.

We are asking for an election to be called as soon as possible.

Reference to Standing Committee on Procedure and House AffairsPrivilegeOrders of the Day

5:50 p.m.

Winnipeg North Manitoba

Liberal

Kevin Lamoureux LiberalParliamentary Secretary to the Leader of the Government in the House of Commons

Mr. Speaker, first and foremost, happy birthday. Rumour has it you are 55 years old, or something like that, today. If I could sing happy birthday, I would.

I want to quote Steven Chaplin from a story in The Hill Times. Here is a homework assignment for the Conservative members: to read the article. If they understand the article, they will understand what they are doing wrong and why they should not be supporting the leader of the Conservative Party's initiative.

This is the essence of the article: “It is time for the House to admit its overreach before the matter inevitably finds it way to the courts which do have the ability to determine and limit the House’s powers, often beyond what the House may like.” Steven Chaplin is an individual whom members need to take note of.

The leader of the Conservative Party believes he can use his abusive powers to override Parliament, much like when he was the parliamentary secretary to Stephen Harper, who was found in contempt of Parliament. I would suggest something to my Conservative friends across the way, while they ask and beg their leader to do what is right on getting the security clearance and putting Canadians ahead of his own personal leadership in the Conservative Party: Let us put Canadians ahead. Get the security clearance. Let us stop the game and stop the abuse we are seeing on the floor of the House of Commons.

Reference to Standing Committee on Procedure and House AffairsPrivilegeOrders of the Day

5:55 p.m.

Conservative

Jacques Gourde Conservative Lévis—Lotbinière, QC

Mr. Speaker, I would also like to quote a Mr. Chaplin, one whose first name was Charlie. However, since he was a silent film star, it will be hard for me to quote him.

He was as silent as my Liberal colleague has been about this government and all the scandals it has managed to cause over the past nine years. We never heard my colleague denounce the sponsorship scandal. We never heard my colleague denounce the scandal involving the green slush fund at Sustainable Development Technology Canada. We never heard my colleague talk about SNC-Lavalin or WE Charity. No, none of that happened. My colleague is both mute and blind.

Reference to Standing Committee on Procedure and House AffairsPrivilegeOrders of the Day

5:55 p.m.

Conservative

Bernard Généreux Conservative Montmagny—L'Islet—Kamouraska—Rivière-du-Loup, QC

Mr. Speaker, it is a real pleasure to rise in the House today and speak to this question of privilege, which has been going on for a month now. Nevertheless, I rise with a deep sense of frustration over the fact that today, as always, we are again discussing a scandal of alarming proportions.

It is a scandal that once again highlights the Liberal government's irresponsibility, corruption, and contempt for the people of this land. It has paralyzed the House of Commons for a month now. It is the scandal involving Sustainable Development Technology Canada, or SDTC.

Once again, the Liberal government has broken trust with Canadians by misappropriating nearly $400 million of public funds for its cronies, only to later try to sweep its mistakes under the rug, as usual. Those days are over. There will be no more cover-ups. We will not allow it to carry on with utter impunity and disdain for Canadians, for all my colleagues here, and for the House.

The House ordered that the documents be produced in order to expose all of SDTC's practices. All of us, including the Speaker, demanded that essential documents be handed over so that the RCMP can thoroughly investigate the current Liberal government's questionable activities. We are not asking the Liberals to do us a favour. We are not asking them to do this out of the goodness of their hearts. We are simply asking them to respect Canadians and the authority of the House, especially that of the chair, and to respect the authority of all the Canadians we represent. It is a demand that is part of the legitimate and necessary exercise of the powers of the House. It is a demand that represents the interests of Canadians.

What is this Liberal government doing in response? It is doing what it does best, what it always does: It is shirking its responsibilities and trying to circumvent decisions that make it uncomfortable. It refuses to provide the RCMP with the documents in their entirety, meaning unredacted. That is essentially what we are asking. It is not complicated. This is a serious breach of parliamentary privilege. More than a breach, it is a real shattering of our privilege. It is a direct affront to our democratic institution. It is an attack, a threat, a disgrace.

What is important to understand about SDTC is that we are not talking about a few omissions or administrative errors. What we are seeing is a deliberate strategy, a finely tuned pattern of manipulation to protect all those profiting from this corruption at the expense of honest Canadians.

Let me digress for a moment. This is not the first time I have spoken on this issue in the past month. I am a member of the Standing Committee on Industry and Technology, where my colleagues and I heard a wide range of testimony. I know that some of my colleagues on other committees have also heard testimony. Just yesterday, we heard from the former industry minister, who was responsible at the time for this fund, a so-called “independent” organization. The current minister was forced to shut down the fund last June because the scandal had broken and all the corruption had been uncovered. Inevitably, thanks to us, the minister had no choice. The Liberals say that the fund is independent, but in reality, it was the minister who made the decision to shut it down. They obviously do have a responsibility.

I want to recap the facts so everyone can fully grasp the scale of this scandal. This is not a recent affair, nor is it an isolated event. The Auditor General's report published last June reveals damning details. SDTC gave hundreds of millions of dollars to projects that either were ineligible or represented a conflict of interest. The ineligible projects were those that demonstrated no environmental benefit. SDTC is a program that has been around for a very long time. Its goal was to use new technologies to find—

Mr. Speaker, someone's telephone is ringing. It is not mine.