House of Commons Hansard #366 of the 44th Parliament, 1st Session. (The original version is on Parliament's site.) The word of the day was documents.

Topics

North Atlantic Treaty OrganizationPetitionsRoutine Proceedings

1:15 p.m.

Liberal

Bardish Chagger Liberal Waterloo, ON

Mr. Speaker, I appreciate the comments the member just made, because members of Parliament present them on behalf of their constituents regardless of what a member's position is.

The constituents from across the country who have signed this petition note that Canada was a founding member of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization, NATO, in 1949 and has participated in every NATO intervention. They note that NATO has failed to uphold article 1 of its charter “to settle any international dispute in which they may be involved by peaceful means in such a manner that international peace and security...are not endangered”.

The petitioners note that according to a NATO defence expenditures report, Canada's military spending increased from $20 billion in 2014 to $39 billion in 2023. They also note that throughout the year, NATO engages in exercises and operations that involve thousands of soldiers and vehicles that adversely impact the climate and environment, among other things.

The petitioners are calling on the government, as well as the House of Commons, to withdraw from NATO, remove Canadian troops from Latvia, reduce military spending and conduct public consultations on new foreign policy based on peace and international co-operation.

Some 628 Canadians have signed petition e-4979. The person advancing this petition lives in the riding of Waterloo. My job is to represent the diversity of views and perspectives within that constituency and it is an honour and privilege to do so.

Questions on the Order PaperRoutine Proceedings

November 5th, 2024 / 1:20 p.m.

Winnipeg North Manitoba

Liberal

Kevin Lamoureux LiberalParliamentary Secretary to the Leader of the Government in the House of Commons

Mr. Speaker, I would ask that all questions be allowed to stand.

Questions on the Order PaperRoutine Proceedings

1:20 p.m.

Conservative

The Deputy Speaker Conservative Chris d'Entremont

Is that agreed?

Questions on the Order PaperRoutine Proceedings

1:20 p.m.

Some hon. members

Agreed.

The House resumed from November 4 consideration of the motion, of the amendment and of the amendment to the amendment.

Reference to Standing Committee on Procedure and House AffairsPrivilegeOrders of the Day

1:20 p.m.

Conservative

Tim Uppal Conservative Edmonton Mill Woods, AB

Mr. Speaker, after nine years under the Prime Minister, Canadians face a buffet of corruption scandals, with each new revelation showing just how entrenched corruption has become under the Liberal government. The latest is the green slush fund, a $400-million scandal that the Liberals are scrambling to keep hidden from Canadians. Unfortunately, that is why we are here today.

The Auditor General uncovered that Liberal appointees funnelled hundreds of millions of hard-earned taxpayer money to companies that the appointees themselves owned, setting off no fewer than 186 glaring conflict of interest violations. What did Canadians get from the government? Instead of transparency, Canadians got a government openly refusing a House order to turn over key documents for an investigation. This refusal to co-operate led the Speaker of the House to rule that the Liberals have violated a direct order of Parliament. Canadians want to know why the government is refusing to turn over these documents. They have a right to know. What is so damning in those documents that the government is refusing a House order to hand them over?

At a time when Canadians continue to shoulder soaring costs for food, housing and basic necessities, the government's cover-up has not only wasted hundreds of millions of dollars in taxpayer money, but also paralyzed Parliament, not allowing members of the House to continue crucial work on urgent issues, such as the rising cost of food, the cost of housing and the cost of the Prime Minister. Perhaps stopping these discussions at a crucial time when Canadians want a carbon tax election is exactly what the Prime Minister and his elitist friends had in mind.

As Canadians continue to live through this unprecedented crisis of government waste and Canadian suffering, today, instead of addressing critical issues that Canadians are struggling with, we find ourselves talking about the government's ongoing negligence, incompetence and continued corruption. Imagine being a taxpayer who is struggling to pay for food, lining up at the food bank with children and then hearing that billions of hard-earned tax dollars are not only being wasted by the government, but being given to Liberal friends.

I have heard from many of my constituents in Edmonton who are struggling to afford to heat their homes, to fill up their car with gas and to feed their families. People in Canada are dumpster diving to feed themselves. We never thought that could happen here in this great country. This is what life in Canada looks like for many who work and are still unable to pay their bills.

These hard-working Canadians are shocked that the taxes they pay simply disappear in a web of Liberal corruption scandals, bogus apps, useless infrastructure banks and endless corruption, supported by the NDP. Despite all of this, the NDP's support continues to prop up the Liberal Prime Minister, allowing the disgusting misuse of taxpayer funds to persist.

The 2024 HungerCount report shows that food banks saw a record of over two million visits in March 2024 alone. That is up 6% from last year and a staggering 90% since 2019. Many of these people used to donate to the food bank and now are lining up at the food bank to help support their families. Over a quarter of these visits were by children. Because of this high demand, nearly 30% of food banks have reported running out of food over the past year.

Unemployment and economic misery continue to rise while paycheques are shrinking. It is the Prime Minister's inflationary spending that has driven up the price of groceries, gas and heating. To make matters worse, his endless tax hikes drive businesses, jobs and investments out of our country. Billions of dollars of investment have left Canada and, along with it, all of the jobs that it would have created.

Those in the middle class, once secure, are now struggling to keep a roof over their heads, and life has become an uphill battle for Canadian families. This is not just a temporary hardship. It is a fundamental shift in what it means to live and work in Canada.

Today, life costs more under the Prime Minister, and hard work no longer provides the security it once did. Canadian families with two working parents cannot afford to buy a home anymore in Canada. Nine years ago, this would have been shocking to hear.

Since 2015, the cost of housing has skyrocketed. Rent has doubled, mortgage payments have doubled and the down payment needed to buy a home has doubled. In fact, housing costs have risen more in these nine years than all of the previous decades combined. Canada, a country with vast, open land, now has the highest housing costs and one of the fewest homes per capita among all G7 countries. At the same time, life has never been better for Liberal insiders and elites, who are filling their pockets with hard-earned Canadian taxpayer dollars. One government project and one government scandal at a time, they are lining their pockets.

Despite a House order to provide documents for the green slush fund, the government has chosen self-interest over the best interests of Canadians. Rather than doing what is right, the Liberals have failed to show leadership, transparency and accountability, showing the House and all Canadians that they will do anything to cover up their multitude of scandals, including this $400-million corruption scandal.

How did we get here? Let us review what the green slush fund is and why the Liberal government is hiding key documents that would aid the RCMP in this investigation.

Sustainable Development Technology Canada was created as a billion-dollar fund with support across party lines to help green technology start-ups tackle climate and environmental issues. This program ran smoothly until about 2017, under the Prime Minister's newly appointed Liberal board chair.

After a Conservative motion led to an audit by the Auditor General, it was revealed that $400 million of taxpayer funds were misused, with 80% of reviewed cases showing conflicts of interest. The Auditor General's findings only scratched the surface. She reviewed a sample of cases, finding that 80% contained legal violations. Those central to the scandal, who were Liberal-appointed board members, had even managed to secure other government positions. One SDTC board member, Andrée-Lise Méthot, acknowledged multiple conflicts of interest involving funds directed to companies that she was financially invested in. The current environment minister, before his cabinet role, was an adviser at Cycle Capital, the venture firm Méthot founded, which received SDTC funding during her board tenure.

As these revelations surfaced, Méthot was appointed to the board of the $35-billion Canada Infrastructure Bank, where McKinsey consultants with Liberal ties were heavily involved. Despite the conflicts of interest in funding companies tied to her financial interests, she transitioned to this new role. Ms. Méthot has been directly implicated in mismanaging $42 million of taxpayer money to benefit companies she was financially linked to. Despite clear violations to benefit her own company, the government saw fit to appoint her to the Canada Infrastructure Bank, which is another example of its waste and negligence. This is what the blatant misuse of Canadians' trust looks like: when individuals who repeatedly violate conflict of interest rules are rewarded with prime government positions due to their Liberal connections.

Speaking of the Canada Infrastructure Bank, this is another glaring misuse of taxpayer dollars and another project riddled with similar issues of mismanagement and conflicts of interest. Just as with the green slush fund, the Canada Infrastructure Bank has become a haven for Liberal insiders and politically connected firms that are more interested in securing lucrative contracts than delivering real value to Canadians.

The Canada Infrastructure Bank, presented as the Liberal government's flagship initiative, has proven to be a costly disappointment. Instead of delivering the infrastructure that Canadians desperately needed, the Canada Infrastructure Bank has squandered taxpayer monies on excessive overhead, high-priced consultants and generous CEO payouts, spending far more on salaries and bonuses than actual projects. Nearly $1 million was wasted on consulting and legal fees for an electricity project that never even came to fruition. With a budget of $35 billion allocated seven years ago, Canadians were promised a return on investment of up to four times from private sector company contributions, as well as an ambitious multiplier effect of 11:1. Yet, seven years later, those promises remain unfulfilled.

The Standing Committee on Transport, Infrastructure and Communities has concluded that the CIB is beyond repair and recommended its abolition, citing expert testimony from stakeholders who highlighted its inefficiency, lack of transparency and inability to attract private sector investment.

At a time when Canadians are grappling with record high inflation and rising costs of living, they cannot afford these expensive government initiatives that fail to deliver anything that they promised to Canadians. Once again, the Liberal government's mismanagement of the CIB exemplifies a broader pattern of waste under the Prime Minister.

Since June, the government has demonstrated complete disregard for Parliament's authority and its duty to uphold Canadian democratic principles. Conservatives had introduced a motion demanding transparency. We called on the government to release all the files, communications and financial records on their green slush fund to Parliament, which would then turn the documents over to the RCMP for a much-needed investigation.

However, after the motion passed, the 30-day deadline for compliance was ignored by the Prime Minister. The government has openly disrespected Canadians and this House's authority when some of their departments provided heavily redacted documents and others outright refused to provide any documents at all.

The Speaker of this place ruled that this refusal showed contempt, quoting that only partial disclosures were made, owing either to redactions or the withholding of documents. Some met the order with complete refusal. The Department of Justice alone withheld 10,000 pages, violating Parliament's demand for evidence so that the RCMP could proceed with its investigation.

This is not a political debate. The RCMP is not investigating this matter at the direction of the Conservatives. The RCMP found credible grounds for a Criminal Code investigation. It will review the documents, and it will determine if charges are warranted. The RCMP will proceed as it sees fit.

The House of Commons represents the people of Canada with absolute powers under our Constitution to oversee the actions of the government and the actions of the Prime Minister.

In Canada, no one is above the law and everyone must abide by our Constitution, even the Prime Minister and his wealthy buddies. By consistently dismissing Parliament's authority, the Liberal government demonstrates open contempt for this balance of power, undermining the very institution that checks executive actions. Our democratic strength rests on the House's authority to hold the government accountable, investigate breaches and protect Canadians' interests.

We cannot let the actions of the Liberal government dilute the power of Parliament and the integrity of our democracy. What exactly is the Liberal government trying to hide in this case? Why is it so determined to keep these documents from Canadians? Just how far does this corruption reach?

The government's embarrassment over the mismanagement of the green slush fund has driven it to shut Parliament down, yet this does nothing to excuse the actions of those involved in the slush fund to relieve the government of its duty to Canadians. It owes Canadians, Parliament and the RCMP a full explanation of what happened, when and just how deep this scandal goes.

This House could get back to business today if the Liberals showed the integrity to hand over those documents, yet we know that they will not. These documents would expose the extent of the Liberal corruption and exactly how high this goes. It is clear the NDP-Liberals are not worth the cost, the crime or the corruption. Canadians deserve better than a government that prioritizes its own pockets over the well-being of the people.

It is time for the NDP-Liberals to stop hiding the evidence, hand over the documents and let Parliament get back to work for Canadians.

Reference to Standing Committee on Procedure and House AffairsPrivilegeOrders of the Day

1:35 p.m.

Winnipeg North Manitoba

Liberal

Kevin Lamoureux LiberalParliamentary Secretary to the Leader of the Government in the House of Commons

Mr. Speaker, this is nothing more than a multi-million dollar game that the Conservative Party continues to play at great expense to Canadians.

As opposed to the government listening to the Conservatives, we are listening to the RCMP, the Auditor General of Canada, the former law clerk and other stakeholders who say the tactic the Conservatives are using is wrong. One expert even indicated that it is virtually abusive. If anything, the leader of the Conservative Party, the leader of an opposition party, is virtually in contempt with what is taking place in the House. That should not surprise any of us because he was the parliamentary secretary to Stephen Harper, the only prime minister to ever be held in contempt of Parliament in the Commonwealth.

Does the member opposite not agree that the Conservative leader needs to start putting Canadian interests ahead of his own personal interests and the interests of the Conservative Party? Let us allow the Conservative motion to be voted on.

Reference to Standing Committee on Procedure and House AffairsPrivilegeOrders of the Day

1:40 p.m.

Conservative

Tim Uppal Conservative Edmonton Mill Woods, AB

Mr. Speaker, one thing I will agree with the member on is that this is a very expensive scandal. Canadians know that over $400 million of hard-earned Canadian taxpayer money was funnelled through a Liberal-appointed chair to Liberal-connected companies that they lined their own pockets with. Canadians deserve answers. Canadians deserve justice in this case.

This Parliament and the Speaker decided that those documents should be presented to the RCMP. We in the opposition are here to make sure that happens.

Reference to Standing Committee on Procedure and House AffairsPrivilegeOrders of the Day

1:40 p.m.

Bloc

René Villemure Bloc Trois-Rivières, QC

Mr. Speaker, the current situation is so serious that listening to the cacophony of the debate makes it almost impossible to do anything but laugh. Ha, ha! Done. It is absurd, ludicrous, Kafkaesque even. Public interest in this debate is being completely snuffed out. There are documents that must be produced. There is sufficient evidence to support the seriousness of the matter. The documents must be handed over, but the party opposite has set a condition that it knows cannot be met, namely, that the documents be turned over to the RCMP. In fact, the RCMP freely admits that, to avoid compromising its investigation, it does not want the documents. This leaves us with a paradox, namely a debate based on the weakness of the human spirit.

Will my colleague finally see reason? Will he quit repeating empty slogans and phrases and let the debate move on?

Reference to Standing Committee on Procedure and House AffairsPrivilegeOrders of the Day

1:40 p.m.

Conservative

Tim Uppal Conservative Edmonton Mill Woods, AB

Mr. Speaker, Conservatives will not back down from protecting Canadians and Canadians' best interests. Some $400 million was funnelled to Liberal insiders. They stole that money. Canadians deserve to get it back and know what happened and the RCMP should get all of those documents so it can bring criminal charges on all the people involved in this case.

Reference to Standing Committee on Procedure and House AffairsPrivilegeOrders of the Day

1:40 p.m.

NDP

Peter Julian NDP New Westminster—Burnaby, BC

Mr. Speaker, we support the motion. We want to get to the bottom of things, and NDP MPs were key in getting to the bottom of the SNC-Lavalin scandal and the WE Charity.

However, my colleague said that we need to get answers for Canadians and he also talked about what is a considerable amount of money, $400 million, tied up with the SDTC scandal. What he did not mention was that the Conservative scandals under the Harper regime were even bigger. I am talking about the $400 million for the ETS scandal and the $1 billion for the G8 scandal.

We remember the misspending that took place at that time. The Phoenix pay scandal was $2.2 billion. With the anti-terrorism funding, the Conservatives simply lost the paper trail. It was $3.1 billion. The Conservatives were much worse, in terms of the massive amounts of corruption and misspending under the Harper regime. The Conservatives misspent a lot more, and we have never had an apology from a single Conservative member. No one has acknowledged the fact that they shut down all the parliamentary inquiries into these spending scandals.

My question is simply this to my colleague: If $400 million is bad, why is the $5.2 billion that Conservatives misspent not so much worse?

Reference to Standing Committee on Procedure and House AffairsPrivilegeOrders of the Day

1:40 p.m.

Conservative

Tim Uppal Conservative Edmonton Mill Woods, AB

Mr. Speaker, right on cue, there is a New Democrat standing up to protect his Liberal buddies, and this is what we have seen all along right here. In Parliament they will continue to stand up for this Prime Minister. The NDP-Liberal government is doing nothing but protecting itself.

We are here for accountability and for transparency. The House of Commons has voted for these documents to be turned over the RCMP, and we will make sure that happens.

Reference to Standing Committee on Procedure and House AffairsPrivilegeOrders of the Day

1:40 p.m.

Conservative

Warren Steinley Conservative Regina—Lewvan, SK

Mr. Speaker, I will leave the NDP comments where they stand.

The NDP members talk about some of the scandals, but one thing I find fascinating is the fact that this Prime Minister is the first prime minister who has ever been in a conflict of interest, not once and not twice. How many cabinet ministers have also been found in conflict of interests?

I would like my friend to answer the question of whether we know how many times Liberal cabinet ministers and the Prime Minister have violated the Conflict of Interest Act?

Reference to Standing Committee on Procedure and House AffairsPrivilegeOrders of the Day

1:45 p.m.

Conservative

Tim Uppal Conservative Edmonton Mill Woods, AB

Mr. Speaker, I think it is part of the Liberals' strategy, that they continue to have so many scandals and so many conflict of interest violations that they are just hoping Canadians forget about them, but we will not forget. We are on the side of Canadians. We are going to make sure that the Liberals are held accountable for their actions and held accountable for every single scandal that they have had, especially this one. This is $400 million of Canadians' hard-earned taxpayer money. We are going to get it back for them.

Reference to Standing Committee on Procedure and House AffairsPrivilegeOrders of the Day

1:45 p.m.

Liberal

Kevin Lamoureux Liberal Winnipeg North, MB

Mr. Speaker, I believe that member is number 98 in terms of the number of Conservatives who have spoken on the Conservative filibuster, and there are still a lot more to come. There is no doubt about that.

I want to take the member to an issue that is very serious here in Canada today and get his comment. The issue of foreign interference is very real. It is something that Canadians are concerned about, and there is only one leader in the House of Commons who has made the decision not to get the security clearance. That begs the question as to why it is that the leader of the Conservative Party continues to not get the security clearance.

Many, including myself, believe that he actually has something to hide and that there is something that he should be telling Canadians, but he is choosing not to do that, and that is the reason he has made the decision not to get the security clearance, unlike every other leader in the House of Commons.

Does the member not agree that the leader of the Conservative Party should put his personal interest to the side, come clean and share with Canadians why he does not feel he should have to get the security clearance?

What is he hiding?

Reference to Standing Committee on Procedure and House AffairsPrivilegeOrders of the Day

1:45 p.m.

Conservative

Tim Uppal Conservative Edmonton Mill Woods, AB

Mr. Speaker, this is the debate today: What are the Liberals hiding? That really is the question, because they will go to any lengths to talk about anything except what we are debating today, which is 400 million hard-earned taxpayer dollars being funnelled to Liberal insiders. The RCMP needs to look into the situation. The RCMP needs those documents. This House of Commons voted for those documents to be turned over to the RCMP.

We will continue to push for justice.

Reference to Standing Committee on Procedure and House AffairsPrivilegeOrders of the Day

1:45 p.m.

Bloc

Nathalie Sinclair-Desgagné Bloc Terrebonne, QC

Mr. Speaker, I have a question for my hon. colleague. I have not really gotten an answer to this question so far.

Does the Conservative Party promise to keep funding green technology and sustainable development companies, and effectively this time? That was not the case with SDTC, but we know that funding is necessary for a just green transition.

Reference to Standing Committee on Procedure and House AffairsPrivilegeOrders of the Day

1:45 p.m.

Conservative

Tim Uppal Conservative Edmonton Mill Woods, AB

Mr. Speaker, what we are committed to is ensuring that in this place there is accountability and transparency from the government. It now has a whole range of scandals; it is hard to keep track of how many there are and of all the conflict of interest breaches, of which there are over 186 in just the one case. That is in addition to what the Prime Minister and other ministers have gone through.

We will continue to hold the government to account; that is why we need a carbon tax election to change this.

Reference to Standing Committee on Procedure and House AffairsPrivilegeOrders of the Day

1:45 p.m.

Conservative

The Deputy Speaker Conservative Chris d'Entremont

Is the House ready for the question?

Reference to Standing Committee on Procedure and House AffairsPrivilegeOrders of the Day

1:45 p.m.

Some hon. members

Question.

Reference to Standing Committee on Procedure and House AffairsPrivilegeOrders of the Day

1:45 p.m.

Conservative

The Deputy Speaker Conservative Chris d'Entremont

The question is on the subamendment.

If a member participating in person wishes that the subamendment be carried or carried on division, or if a member of a recognized party participating in person wishes to request a recorded division, I would invite them to rise and indicate it to the Chair.

Reference to Standing Committee on Procedure and House AffairsPrivilegeOrders of the Day

1:50 p.m.

Conservative

Warren Steinley Conservative Regina—Lewvan, SK

Mr. Speaker, we request a recorded vote, please.

Reference to Standing Committee on Procedure and House AffairsPrivilegeOrders of the Day

1:50 p.m.

Conservative

The Deputy Speaker Conservative Chris d'Entremont

Pursuant to Standing Order 45, the division stands deferred until later this day at the expiry of the time provided for Oral Questions.

The House resumed from October 1 consideration of the motion.

Request for Witness to Attend at the Bar of the HousePrivilegeOrders of the Day

1:50 p.m.

Conservative

Michael Cooper Conservative St. Albert—Edmonton, AB

Mr. Speaker, who is Randy? That is the central question before the House as a result of the Speaker's ruling that found a prima facie question of privilege after the Minister of Employment's business partner Stephen Anderson refused to disclose to the ethics committee who Randy is.

The ethics committee's probe into Randy began when Global News reported that the Minister of Employment was involved in a shady PPE company called Global Health Imports with Stephen Anderson. According to Global News, the minister had been a partner at Global Health Imports along with Stephen Anderson up until the time he had been elected in 2021, and that he continued to maintain a 50% ownership stake with Anderson.

Global News reported that the company was mired in allegations of fraud and ripping off clients. Indeed, multiple judgments have been issued against the minister's company by Alberta courts, which have ordered the minister's company to pay back clients $7.8 million for ripping them off.

Global Health Imports faces a litany of other lawsuits, including a lawsuit commenced by California-based company the Ghaoui Group. The Ghaoui Group, like other clients of the minister's company, purchased PPE. The PPE was never delivered, but the Ghaoui Group was on the hook for half a million dollars, having transferred a half-a-million-dollar deposit to the minister's company.

One of the excuses provided by Stephen Anderson for the failure to deliver PPE was that the Global Health Imports warehouse burned down; amazingly, it was two weeks after Global Health Imports received the half a million dollars. Anderson was then reported to have told the Ghaoui Group that once it collected the insurance money, maybe then he would be in a position to repay the half-a-million-dollar deposit. The Edmonton police, in their investigation of the fire, concluded that in all likelihood it was arson, just by coincidence.

A minister is involved in a shady company mired in allegations of fraud and ordered by Alberta courts to pay back clients $7.8 million. There are allegations or evidence of potential arson and insurance fraud. I would submit that this alone ought to have been enough for the Prime Minister to tell the Minister of Employment that he is fired, that he is out of cabinet.

However, there is more. Global News reported that someone named Randy connected with Global Health Imports was involved in shaking down the Ghaoui Group for the half-a-million-dollar deposit. That was evidenced in text messages. Among the text messages that Global News uncovered was a message from Stephen Anderson to the Ghaoui Group, leading up to the shakedown, in which he says, “What is going on? I just received this from Randy!”

He then copied and pasted the message he had received from Randy, which states, “Anderson, it's 13:14 MST and 15:14 EST it literally takes 10 seconds to complete a transfer, I am telling you we are not allocating like this...it's midday and nothing is completed, I am calling Felix to discuss. Be available in 15 for a partner call.”

Why are the text messages so significant? Very simply, if the minister is the Randy in those text messages, then the minister broke the law. The Conflict of Interest Act is clear: A minister of the Crown shall not be involved in the operations of a business. If the minister is the Randy in question, then the minister was involved in the operations of the business working to secure a half-a-million-dollar deposit for Global Health Imports, not to mention participating in a partners meeting.

That is why the ethics committee launched its investigation. We brought the minister to committee at the beginning of June, and the minister was adamant he was not the Randy in question. How convenient that is, except for a few inconvenient facts for the minister.

First of all, the Ghaoui Group believed at all times that the Minister of Employment was the Randy in the text messages. When Global News reached out to Anderson to inquire who the Randy in the text messages was, he said that it was not the minister but the VP of logistics. When Global News inquired as to who the VP of logistics was, it found out it was not a Randy but one Edward Anderson, the father of Stephen Anderson. Stephen Anderson later admitted before the ethics committee that he had lied to Global News.

Global News undertook a further investigation. It could not find a trace of another Randy at Global Health Imports. I would further add that the Randy referenced in the text messages was a partner. The minister had been a partner, along with Anderson, up until his election. He had a 50% stake in the company at the time of the text messages. According to his own evidence at committee, the minister admitted that it was a small operation and that there were a handful of people in the company: him, Anderson and a few others.

In the face of that, without a trace of another Randy and without any explanation for who the other Randy could be, there is only one reasonable inference that can be drawn, which is that the Minister of Employment is the Randy in the text messages. He is the Randy who was involved in the shakedown of the Ghaoui Group and who is involved in allegations of wire fraud, and he is the Randy who, as minister, contravened the Conflict of Interest Act.

The minister's story does not add up. Everyone knows that he is the Randy in question, and that is why Conservatives have been consistent in calling for the disgraced minister to resign from cabinet. For months he has refused to do so, so we have called on the Prime Minister to fire the disgraced minister. However, of course the scandal-plagued, conflict-ridden Prime Minister, who has been found guilty not once but twice of violating the Conflict of Interest Act, is standing behind his corrupt minister.

It is an absolute disgrace. It underscores why the government cannot be replaced soon enough and why this country needs a carbon tax election now.