Agreed.
On division.
House of Commons Hansard #386 of the 44th Parliament, 1st session. (The original version is on Parliament's site.) The word of the day was conservatives.
House of Commons Hansard #386 of the 44th Parliament, 1st session. (The original version is on Parliament's site.) The word of the day was conservatives.
This summary is computer-generated. Usually it’s accurate, but every now and then it’ll contain inaccuracies or total fabrications.
Oral Questions—Speaker's Ruling The Speaker rules that questions in Question Period must relate to government administrative responsibility. Question Period's purpose is government accountability, not attacking opposition parties who lack the same response opportunity. The Speaker will enforce this. 900 words.
Public Accounts Members debate a Public Accounts report on pandemic border measures, focusing on current border security. Conservatives raise concerns about lax controls, increased fentanyl trafficking, illegal crossings, and potential U.S. tariffs, criticizing the government's record. Liberals defend their border investments, accusing Conservatives of amplifying misinformation and past cuts. NDP members also criticize Conservative border cuts and accuse them of undermining Canada by echoing U.S. rhetoric. Bloc members criticize federal border management and call for CBSA administrative supervision. 25200 words, 3 hours.
Industry and Technology NDP moves to split Bill C-27 into privacy/tribunal and AI components. They argue the bill is poorly drafted and compromises privacy, seeking to pass the privacy component and protect the Privacy Commissioner. Liberals argue for a holistic approach, are open to amendments, and accuse parties of obstruction. 6200 words, 45 minutes.
Access to Parliamentary Precinct NDP MP Leah Gazan responds to a Conservative MP's question of privilege, denying involvement in an event that allegedly breached privilege and defending her support for "Jews Against Genocide" demonstrators against accusations. 1000 words, 10 minutes.
Opposition Motion—Repeal of Bill C-5 Members debate a Conservative motion claiming Liberal drug policies and Bill C-5 contribute to 47,000 deaths. Conservatives propose reversing C-5, increasing sentences, and enhancing border security. Liberals, Bloc, and NDP counter that C-5 addressed unconstitutional mandatory minimums and simple possession, argue Conservatives cut border security, and advocate for harm reduction and treatment. 12900 words, 2 hours.
Supplementary Estimates (B), 2024-25 First reading of Bill C-79. The bill grants sums of money for federal public administration for the fiscal year ending March 31, 2025. It passes all readings with support from Liberals, Bloc, NDP, and Green parties; Conservatives and one Independent vote against. 400 words, 10 minutes.
Some hon. members
Agreed.
On division.
Some hon. members
Agreed.
On division.
Bill C-79 Supplementary Estimates (B), 2024-25Government Orders
December 10th, 2024 / 6:55 p.m.
Liberal
Ruby Sahota Liberal Brampton North, ON
Mr. Speaker, I believe that if you seek it, you will find agreement to apply the results from the previous vote to this vote, with Liberal members voting in favour.
Chris Warkentin Conservative Grande Prairie—Mackenzie, AB
Mr. Speaker, Conservatives agree to apply the vote, with Conservatives voting against.
Kristina Michaud Bloc Avignon—La Mitis—Matane—Matapédia, QC
Mr. Speaker, the Bloc Québécois agrees to apply the result of the previous vote to this vote and will vote in favour of the motion.
Heather McPherson NDP Edmonton Strathcona, AB
Mr. Speaker, the New Democrats agree to apply the vote and will be voting yes.
Mike Morrice Green Kitchener Centre, ON
Mr. Speaker, the Green Party agrees to apply the result of the previous vote to this vote and will vote in favour of the motion.
Kevin Vuong Independent Spadina—Fort York, ON
Mr. Speaker, I agree to apply the result of the previous vote, voting nay.
Ruby Sahota Liberal Brampton North, ON
Mr. Speaker, I believe that if you seek it you will find agreement among the parties to apply the result of the previous vote to this vote, with Liberal members voting in favour.
Chris Warkentin Conservative Grande Prairie—Mackenzie, AB
Mr. Speaker, the official opposition agrees to apply the vote, with Conservatives voting against.
Kristina Michaud Bloc Avignon—La Mitis—Matane—Matapédia, QC
Mr. Speaker, the Bloc Québécois agrees to apply the result of the previous vote to this vote and will vote in favour of the motion.
Heather McPherson NDP Edmonton Strathcona, AB
Mr. Speaker, the NDP agrees to apply the result of the previous vote to this vote and will vote in favour of the motion.
Mike Morrice Green Kitchener Centre, ON
Mr. Speaker, the Greens agree to apply the vote and will be voting in favour.
Kevin Vuong Independent Spadina—Fort York, ON
Mr. Speaker, I agree to apply the result of the previous vote, voting nay.
Message from the SenateGovernment Orders
The Speaker Greg Fergus
I have the honour to inform the House that a message has been received from the Senate informing this House that the Senate has passed the following bill, to which the concurrence of the House is desired: Bill S-230, an act to amend the Corrections and Conditional Release Act.
Kevin Lamoureux Liberal Winnipeg North, MB
Mr. Speaker, I suspect that, if you were to canvass the House, you would find unanimous consent to see the clock at 7:07 p.m.
