Agreed.
On division.
House of Commons Hansard #386 of the 44th Parliament, 1st session. (The original version is on Parliament's site.) The word of the day was conservatives.
House of Commons Hansard #386 of the 44th Parliament, 1st session. (The original version is on Parliament's site.) The word of the day was conservatives.
This summary is computer-generated. Usually it’s accurate, but every now and then it’ll contain inaccuracies or total fabrications.
Oral Questions—Speaker's Ruling The Speaker clarifies the rules of Question Period, emphasizing questions must relate to the government's administrative responsibility, not attack the opposition, to maintain government accountability. 900 words.
Public Accounts Members debate report 8 of the Standing Committee on Public Accounts, specifically regarding "Pandemic Preparedness, Surveillance, and Border Control Measures". The focus is on border control, with Conservatives raising concerns about fentanyl and opioid trafficking and immigration visa issues. The Liberals defend their record, pointing to increased funding and staffing for border services, and accuse the Conservatives of hypocrisy and of amplifying false narratives that damage Canada's trade relationship with the U.S. The NDP accuse the Conservatives of cutting border positions while in power and of undermining Canada to benefit Donald Trump. 25200 words, 3 hours.
Industry and Technology Members debate splitting Bill C-27, arguing that separating the privacy and AI components would allow for better scrutiny and faster progress. The NDP proposes the split due to concerns that the bill, in its current form, compromises Canadians' privacy for consumer interests and undermines the Privacy Commissioner. The Liberal Party opposes splitting the bill, emphasizing a holistic approach and highlighting investments in AI safety. 6200 words, 45 minutes.
Access to Parliamentary Precinct MP Gazan responds to accusations from the Conservative MP for Thornhill, refuting claims of organizing a demonstration and breaching parliamentary privilege, defending her support for Jewish protesters against genocide in Gaza, and criticizing attempts to stifle dissent. 1000 words, 10 minutes.
Opposition Motion—Repeal of Bill C-5 Members debate Conservative leader Poilievre's motion calling for action to address the fentanyl crisis. The debate focuses on Bill C-5 and its impact on drug-related crime, border security, mandatory minimum sentences, and harm reduction strategies. The NDP proposed an amendment to the motion which was not agreed to. 12900 words, 2 hours.
Supplementary Estimates (B), 2024-25 First reading of Bill C-79. The bill grants sums of money to the federal public administration for the fiscal year ending March 31, 2025; it passes through first reading, second reading, committee of the whole, concurrence, and third reading. 400 words, 10 minutes.
Some hon. members
Agreed.
On division.
Some hon. members
Agreed.
On division.
Ruby Sahota Liberal Brampton North, ON
Mr. Speaker, I believe that if you seek it, you will find agreement to apply the results from the previous vote to this vote, with Liberal members voting in favour.
Chris Warkentin Conservative Grande Prairie—Mackenzie, AB
Mr. Speaker, Conservatives agree to apply the vote, with Conservatives voting against.
Kristina Michaud Bloc Avignon—La Mitis—Matane—Matapédia, QC
Mr. Speaker, the Bloc Québécois agrees to apply the result of the previous vote to this vote and will vote in favour of the motion.
Heather McPherson NDP Edmonton Strathcona, AB
Mr. Speaker, the New Democrats agree to apply the vote and will be voting yes.
Mike Morrice Green Kitchener Centre, ON
Mr. Speaker, the Green Party agrees to apply the result of the previous vote to this vote and will vote in favour of the motion.
Kevin Vuong Independent Spadina—Fort York, ON
Mr. Speaker, I agree to apply the result of the previous vote, voting nay.
Ruby Sahota Liberal Brampton North, ON
Mr. Speaker, I believe that if you seek it you will find agreement among the parties to apply the result of the previous vote to this vote, with Liberal members voting in favour.
Chris Warkentin Conservative Grande Prairie—Mackenzie, AB
Mr. Speaker, the official opposition agrees to apply the vote, with Conservatives voting against.
Kristina Michaud Bloc Avignon—La Mitis—Matane—Matapédia, QC
Mr. Speaker, the Bloc Québécois agrees to apply the result of the previous vote to this vote and will vote in favour of the motion.
Heather McPherson NDP Edmonton Strathcona, AB
Mr. Speaker, the NDP agrees to apply the result of the previous vote to this vote and will vote in favour of the motion.
Mike Morrice Green Kitchener Centre, ON
Mr. Speaker, the Greens agree to apply the vote and will be voting in favour.
Kevin Vuong Independent Spadina—Fort York, ON
Mr. Speaker, I agree to apply the result of the previous vote, voting nay.
Message from the SenateGovernment Orders
The Speaker Greg Fergus
I have the honour to inform the House that a message has been received from the Senate informing this House that the Senate has passed the following bill, to which the concurrence of the House is desired: Bill S-230, an act to amend the Corrections and Conditional Release Act.
Kevin Lamoureux Liberal Winnipeg North, MB
Mr. Speaker, I suspect that, if you were to canvass the House, you would find unanimous consent to see the clock at 7:07 p.m.
