House of Commons Hansard #388 of the 44th Parliament, 1st session. (The original version is on Parliament's site.) The word of the day was pension.

Topics

line drawing of robot

This summary is computer-generated. Usually it’s accurate, but every now and then it’ll contain inaccuracies or total fabrications.

Declaration of Emergency Members present reports from the Special Joint Committee on the Declaration of Emergency. Conservatives dissent, citing government overreach. The NDP requests further reflection to address transparency, accountability, and public trust. 800 words.

Veterans Affairs Members debate a report from the Standing Committee on Veterans Affairs concerning survivor pension benefits for spouses who married veterans after the age of 60, an issue that stems from a 1901 "gold digger clause". The debate focuses on the need to eliminate this discriminatory rule, ensure veterans are informed about the implications of marrying after 60, and address the disproportionate impact on women. MPs discuss the government's 2019 allocation of $150 million for affected survivors, none of which has been distributed. Arguments are made regarding financial implications and the broader treatment of veterans. The debate also touches on the political context and historical actions of different parties regarding veterans' affairs. 23400 words, 3 hours.

Petitions

Alleged Misleading Statements by Member in Committee Report Motz argues that the former Minister of Public Safety, the member for Eglinton—Lawrence, deliberately misled the special joint committee on the invocation of the Emergencies Act, giving rise to a prima facie contempt. Julian requests factual correctness. Lamoureux will review the matter. 4400 words, 30 minutes.

Access to Parliamentary Precinct Mr. Julian argues that a Conservative MP misused a question of privilege to obstruct an NDP opposition day, citing delayed timing and false allegations, while contrasting this with a past inaction regarding parliamentary disruptions. 1000 words.

Statements by Members

Question Period

The Conservatives accuse the Prime Minister of losing control of spending and his cabinet, highlighting the Minister of Finance's promised $40-billion deficit guardrail which they claim is being broken. They suggest the Prime Minister is bullying the Finance Minister and plans to replace her with Mark Carney, framing this as hypocritical "fake feminism". They argue this reckless spending will harm the economy and worry even Liberal MPs.
The Liberals focused on positive economic news, highlighting the recent interest rate cut and the upcoming GST tax break on essentials. They touted Canada's strong economic growth within the G7 and defended their fiscal management. They also attacked the Conservatives' feminist credentials, while promoting their dental care plan and commitment to supply management.
The Bloc defends supply management via Bill C-282 against Senate amendments. They denounce reports as attacks on Quebec's secularism, and question the rising costs of the CARM app, calling it a fiasco.
The NDP champions supply management and equitable healthcare access, opposing privatization in Alberta. They condemn settlement service funding cuts and underfunding of friendship centres, while demanding a Canadian jobs plan amid tariff threats.
The Independent MP highlights the difficulties businesses face renewing work permits for temporary foreign workers due to the lowered 10% threshold, asking for government measures.

Business of the House Members exchange Christmas and holiday greetings, express gratitude to parliamentary staff, and the Government House Leader announces the upcoming fall economic statement. 800 words.

Alleged Withholding of Documents from the Special Joint Committee on the Declaration of Emergency Brock argues the House should compel the government to release the legal opinion justifying the use of the Emergencies Act, claiming the government stonewalled the Special Joint Committee by citing solicitor-client privilege. He asserts parliamentary privilege supersedes this, citing historical precedents and concerns that the government acted without proper legal basis. The Speaker will review the arguments. 3600 words, 35 minutes.

Reference to Standing Committee on Procedure and House Affairs Members debate the SDTC green slush fund and the government's refusal to comply with the Speaker's order to release documents to the RCMP. The discussion focuses on alleged mismanagement and conflicts of interest, with Conservatives claiming the Liberals directed funds to their supporters. They also criticize the net-zero accelerator initiative and the carbon tax's effectiveness. The NDP accuses Conservatives of voting against supports for Canadians, while Liberals defend their environmental policies and question the Conservatives' motives and credibility. 20200 words, 2 hours.

Adjournment Debates

Trans Mountain pipeline expansion Elizabeth May accuses the government of bribing Burnaby to stay silent about fire risks associated with the Trans Mountain pipeline. Francis Drouin states that the government was unaware of the agreement, and he claims the mayor of Burnaby has confirmed that no gag order exists.
Future of the Carbon Tax Dan Mazier asks if the government will commit to not raising the carbon tax above $170 per tonne. Francis Drouin does not answer directly, but states the government has already announced its commitment. He criticizes the opposition for lacking an environmental plan.
Oil and gas production cap Greg McLean questions the Liberal government's proposed cap on oil and gas production, citing potential economic damage and job losses. Francis Drouin defends the cap as necessary for reducing emissions and transitioning to net-zero, emphasizing technological innovation and a cap-and-trade system.
Was this summary helpful and accurate?

Dental CareOral Questions

3:10 p.m.

Québec Québec

Liberal

Jean-Yves Duclos LiberalMinister of Public Services and Procurement

Mr. Speaker, I thank our colleague from Ottawa—Vanier for her excellent question.

The bad news is when we ask the Leader of the Opposition why he is against the Canadian dental care plan, he says it is because it does not exist and he discourages seniors from registering for it.

The good news for Canadians is this deception is not working. More than one million Quebeckers and three million Canadians are already successfully registered for the Canadian dental care plan, which is saving them on average $750 a year since they registered.

That is very good news for all Quebeckers. It is bad news for the Conservative leader.

FinanceOral Questions

3:10 p.m.

Conservative

Greg McLean Conservative Calgary Centre, AB

Mr. Speaker, the Prime Minister has lost control of spending and his cabinet. A former adviser to two prime ministers, Robert Asselin, has said the rising debt burden limits Canada's ability to act during future economic slowdowns and unforeseen circumstances. The Minister of Finance set a fiscal guardrail of a $40.1-billion deficit in her last budget, which looks drastically off the rails. This is not just a number. It is a glaring sign of systemic overspending and poor fiscal planning.

The Liberals' choice now is clear. Will they heed their former adviser or drive Canada's deficit off of a cliff?

FinanceOral Questions

3:10 p.m.

Saint-Maurice—Champlain Québec

Liberal

François-Philippe Champagne LiberalMinister of Innovation

Mr. Speaker, this member is so off the rail that he forgot that Canada actually is the land of opportunity and possibilities. Members do not need to ask me. They can talk to CEOs who have invested in this country. Just in 2023, we landed the largest investment in Dow's history in Fort Saskatchewan, Alberta.

I think the Conservatives should all rejoice. It is Christmas. I hope they are going to put that in their Christmas cards to their constituents and thank the Liberal government for bringing jobs to Alberta.

FinanceOral Questions

3:10 p.m.

Conservative

Greg McLean Conservative Calgary Centre, AB

Mr. Speaker, that is a minister who has never seen a cheque he did not want to sign of Canadian taxpayer dollars. Former Liberal adviser Robert Asselin also stated, “You can't pick and choose fiscal anchors as you go, and renege on a commitment you made only a year ago”. There is a huge disconnect here. The Prime Minister wants to spend his way to popularity and the finance minister is trying to hang on to a shred of fiscal accountability.

Liberals are famous for taking no lessons, but this one is an obvious choice. How far past the guardrails is the Prime Minister pushing the finance minister's credibility?

FinanceOral Questions

3:10 p.m.

Saint-Maurice—Champlain Québec

Liberal

François-Philippe Champagne LiberalMinister of Innovation

Mr. Speaker, actually, there is more good news for the Conservatives to share in their Christmas cards. Let me talk about another investment in Canada. This time, BHP, the largest mining company in the world has made the largest investment in its history in Saskatchewan. It is close to $20 billion, the largest investment in its history.

I hope again that, in the Christmas cards they are going to send to their constituents, they are going to thank the Liberal government for bringing jobs to western Canada, growing our energy sector and making sure that Canada is—

FinanceOral Questions

3:15 p.m.

The Speaker Greg Fergus

The hon. member for South Shore—St. Margarets.

FinanceOral Questions

3:15 p.m.

Conservative

Rick Perkins Conservative South Shore—St. Margarets, NS

Mr. Speaker, the Liberal minister is so informed, he does not even know that Canada Post is on strike. He is another lost cabinet minister.

More leaking Liberals are speaking out about the economic disaster of the Prime Minister, who has decided to crash through his $40-billion deficit guardrail promise, an obscene number on its own. The Liberal MP for Saint John—Rothesay said that Liberals “need to show fiscal restraint”, like that is going to happen.

Crashing through his promised $40-billion deficit will increase the cost of food. If the deficit guardrail is broken and driven right through, will the Prime Minister allow his Liberal MPs a free vote?

FinanceOral Questions

3:15 p.m.

Gaspésie—Les-Îles-de-la-Madeleine Québec

Liberal

Diane Lebouthillier LiberalMinister of Fisheries

Mr. Speaker, we have already answered that question.

I would like my colleague from Atlantic Canada across the way to tell me how the Conservatives could have voted against investing in small craft harbours. How could they have voted against investing in the Coast Guard? In the supplementary estimates, how could they have voted against investing in gasoline so that the Coast Guard can go help and rescue our fishers when they run into problems at sea?

It is shameful.

National DefenceOral Questions

3:15 p.m.

Liberal

Viviane LaPointe Liberal Sudbury, ON

Mr. Speaker, from supporting the wildfire response here in Canada to deterring aggression through our multinational battle group in Latvia, members of our armed forces have continuously stepped up to keep Canadians safe so that we can live in a more secure and peaceful world. For our armed forces members who are separated from their families while on deployment, this can be a hard time of the year.

Can the Minister of National Defence tell us how our government continues to support our armed forces so they can do the crucial work of keeping us safe at home?

National DefenceOral Questions

3:15 p.m.

Scarborough Southwest Ontario

Liberal

Bill Blair LiberalMinister of National Defence

Mr. Speaker, I would like to begin by thanking the member for Sudbury for her hard work on our very hard-working defence committee.

As we head into the holiday season, I would like to take this opportunity to express our sincere gratitude to all members of the Canadian Armed Forces and to the entire defence team. They have answered the call to serve and defend their country, and they have our confidence, our pride and our gratitude. I also wish to extend our thanks to their families and all those who support them in this essential work.

I wish all members of the Canadian Armed Forces happy holidays and a happy new year.

Indigenous AffairsOral Questions

3:15 p.m.

NDP

Gord Johns NDP Courtenay—Alberni, BC

Mr. Speaker, for 70 years, friendship centres have served as vital community hubs for urban indigenous people. Now they are on the front line of Canada's mental health crisis, the toxic drug crisis and catastrophic climate events like floods and forest fires, but federal funding has not kept up. The National Association of Friendship Centres is clear in that it needs $62 million of federal funding annually to meet demands.

The Liberals keep letting indigenous people down with their chronic underfunding. Will the government finally provide friendship centres with long-term, sustainable funding?

Indigenous AffairsOral Questions

3:15 p.m.

York Centre Ontario

Liberal

Ya'ara Saks LiberalMinister of Mental Health and Addictions and Associate Minister of Health

Mr. Speaker, I agree with the member. Friendship centres provide essential services to some of the most vulnerable people in our communities. Their network offers culturally appropriate, mindful support to navigate health care systems, find safe shelter and learn indigenous languages, and they support our indigenous communities when they go into urban centres and provide mental health services. With this work, $32 million goes to them every year, and our government has committed an additional $60 million through budget 2024.

There is more work to do. Friendship centres do incredible work across communities in Canada, and we will work with them.

EmploymentOral Questions

3:15 p.m.

Independent

Alain Rayes Independent Richmond—Arthabaska, QC

Mr. Speaker, many businesses in my region are having a hard time renewing work permits for their temporary foreign workers because they have exceeded the new threshold, which was lowered to 10% by the current government. With unemployment at its lowest, the survival of these businesses hangs in the balance, not to mention this is also about people. Indeed, these workers and their families will have to leave the country through no fault of their own.

What measures is the Prime Minister considering to help these businesses hold on to their essential workers while complying with immigration rules?

EmploymentOral Questions

3:20 p.m.

Moncton—Riverview—Dieppe New Brunswick

Liberal

Ginette Petitpas Taylor LiberalMinister of Employment

Mr. Speaker, since taking office, this government has made significant changes to this program. The temporary foreign worker program must meet actual labour market needs for Canadians. We are adjusting the program to reflect changes in the labour market. We are listening to what Canadians need, and we are going to take effective action.

John HorganOral Questions

3:20 p.m.

The Speaker Greg Fergus

Colleagues, following discussions among representatives from all parties, I understand that there is an agreement to observe a moment of silence in memory of John Horgan, former premier of British Columbia.

I invite hon. members to rise.

[A moment of silence observed]

John HorganOral Questions

December 12th, 2024 / 3:20 p.m.

Liberal

Arif Virani Liberal Parkdale—High Park, ON

Mr. Speaker, I rise on a point of order.

Regarding Bill C-63, if you seek it, I believe you will find unanimous consent for—

John HorganOral Questions

3:20 p.m.

Some hon. members

No.

John HorganOral Questions

3:20 p.m.

Conservative

Michelle Rempel Conservative Calgary Nose Hill, AB

Mr. Speaker, if you seek it, you will find unanimous consent for the following motion, given that Bill C-63, the so-called—

John HorganOral Questions

3:20 p.m.

Some hon members

No.

The House resumed consideration of the motion, and of the motion that the question be now put.

Veterans AffairsCommittees of the HouseRoutine Proceedings

3:20 p.m.

The Speaker Greg Fergus

It being 3:24 p.m., the House will now proceed to the taking of the deferred recorded division on the previous question to the motion to concur in the ninth report of the Standing Committee on Veterans Affairs.

Call in the members.

(The House divided on the motion, which was agreed to on the following division:)

Vote #924

Committees of the HouseRoutine Proceedings

3:35 p.m.

The Speaker Greg Fergus

I declare the motion carried.

The next question is on the motion to concur in the ninth report of the Standing Committee on Veterans Affairs.

If a member participating in person wishes that the motion be carried or carried on division, or if a member of a recognized party participating in person wishes to request a recorded division, I would invite them to rise and indicate it to the Chair.

Committees of the HouseRoutine Proceedings

3:35 p.m.

NDP

Peter Julian NDP New Westminster—Burnaby, BC

Mr. Speaker, on this important motion governing the gold diggers clause, which has disrespected so many of Canada's veterans and their spouses, we would ask for a recorded vote.

(The House divided on the motion, which was agreed to on the following division:)

Vote #925