Madam Speaker, I know that my hon. colleague is a strong advocate for concrete action to reduce emissions and to reduce pollution. This is what we need more than ever in this country, and especially in the House of Commons. We need to have people who are more concerned with concrete action than big announcements. Unfortunately, with regard to this fund that we are talking about, which we have to identify as the green slush fund, in the last five years, the government used it as a fund to give gifts to some of their supporters. That is not the way to deal with it.
As I said earlier, this is coming from the top, when we have seen the Prime Minister twice recognized as not respecting the ethics rules. If the example is coming from the top, unfortunately, it will fall, with all the dirty stuff, to other administrative corps. That is exactly what we have seen in this. It is not me who is saying that. This is the Auditor General, who published a report saying that 186 times they did not act correctly, which means that $390 million was not invested correctly out of $500 million, so $4 out of $5 were not treated correctly. This is the Liberal heritage. Shame on them.