House of Commons Hansard #385 of the 44th Parliament, 1st session. (The original version is on Parliament's site.) The word of the day was indigenous.

Topics

line drawing of robot

This summary is computer-generated. Usually it’s accurate, but every now and then it’ll contain inaccuracies or total fabrications.

Access to Parliamentary Precinct Members debate a question of privilege regarding a protest at a parliamentary building. Conservatives allege NDP MPs were involved in obstructing access. NDP members deny organizing the protest, describing it as a peaceful sit-in by Jewish Canadians protesting genocide in Gaza, and criticize the Conservative characterization as offensive and misleading, calling the privilege question frivolous. 3100 words, 25 minutes in 2 segments: 1 2.

Reference to Standing Committee on Procedure and House Affairs Members debate a Conservative motion on the government's failure to provide documents about Sustainable Development Technology Canada (SDTC). Conservatives allege cronyism and corruption in SDTC funding. Liberals defend their record and criticize Conservative policies. The NDP criticizes both parties for the impasse, stating it prevents debate on issues like the cost of living. 6900 words, 45 minutes.

Opposition Motion—Federal Sales Tax on New Homes Members debate the housing crisis and a Conservative motion to eliminate the federal sales tax (GST) on new homes sold under $1 million. Conservatives argue this increases affordability; Liberals defend programs like the housing accelerator fund, criticizing the Conservative plan. Bloc members raise provincial jurisdiction concerns, while NDP members advocate for non-market housing and structural change. 14100 words, 2 hours in 2 segments: 1 2.

Statements by Members

Question Period

The Conservatives criticize the government for doubling the national debt, exceeding the $40-billion deficit guardrail, and increasing taxes like the carbon tax. They demand an end to inflationary spending and taxes. They repeatedly question what the Liberals promised the NDP for their continued support and call for a carbon tax election. They also raise concerns about violent crime and bail reform.
The Liberals highlight their economic record and upcoming Fall Economic Statement. They emphasize measures to support Canadians, including a GST holiday, Canada Child Benefit, dental care, and affordable housing. They also point to investments in AI and border security, while criticizing the Conservatives for opposing these initiatives and muzzling MPs.
The Bloc questions the government's approach to secularism in Quebec and its impact on integration. They criticize CBSA fiascos like the CARM app, calling for an audit, and urge closing the 14-day loophole exploited by illegal border crossers.
The NDP criticize the government for excluding vulnerable groups like seniors from a $250 cheque. They raise concerns about the housing crisis, its impact on survivors, and favouring private investors over affordability, as well as the growing need for food banks.
The Greens call for restoring Canada Council for the Arts funding and ensuring communities get their fair share.

Oral Questions Members debate points of order concerning House decorum, disruptive behaviour, and the Speaker's rulings on the relevance of Question Period questions, with multiple parties raising concerns. 1300 words, 10 minutes.

Indigenous and Northern Affairs Members debate housing affordability, focusing on the third report of the Indigenous and Northern Affairs Committee on Indigenous housing. Conservatives criticize Liberal policies as failing, proposing to build the homes by eliminating federal sales tax on new homes under $1 million and tying municipal funding to housing targets. Liberals defend their investments, including the Housing Accelerator Fund, and criticize the Conservative record. NDP members highlight the crisis's impact on Indigenous peoples, linking it to gender-based violence and the Indian Act, advocating for Indigenous-led solutions. Bloc Québécois supports initiatives like Yänonhchia' and calls for federal funding transfer to provinces. 21500 words, 3 hours.

Adjournment Debate - Housing Mike Morrice argues for an HST exemption for non-profit home builders like Habitat for Humanity. Peter Fragiskatos cites low-interest loans and grants as alternative supports, and defends removing GST on apartment construction to increase housing supply. Morrice questions why the government "forgot" about non-profits when it removed GST from for-profit builders. 1400 words, 10 minutes.

Was this summary helpful and accurate?

Question No.3109—Questions Passed as Orders for ReturnsRoutine Proceedings

4:20 p.m.

NDP

Gord Johns NDP Courtenay—Alberni, BC

With regard to federal funding and reserves and treaty settlement lands within the federal electoral district of Courtenay—Alberni, between the 2005-06 fiscal year and the current fiscal year: what are the federal capital investments and funding contributions for infrastructure projects, including, but not limited to, projects related to water and wastewater facilities, solid waste management, roads, bridges, connectivity, structural or disaster mitigation, fire protection, health facilities, cultural and recreation facilities, education facilities, housing, energy systems, and band administration buildings, invested in or transferred to (i) Ahousaht First Nation, (ii) Hesquiaht First Nation, (iii) Huu-ay-aht First Nation, (iv) Hupacasath First Nation, (v) Qualicum First Nation, (vi) Tla-o-qui-aht First Nations, (vii) Toquaht First Nation, (viii) Tseshaht First Nation, (ix) Uchucklesaht First Nation, (x) Ucluelet First Nation, broken down by fiscal year, project, total contribution, funding program, and type of funding?

(Return tabled)

Question No.3110—Questions Passed as Orders for ReturnsRoutine Proceedings

4:20 p.m.

NDP

Gord Johns NDP Courtenay—Alberni, BC

With regard to the communities which comprise the federal electoral district of Courtenay—Alberni, since the 2005-06 fiscal year: (a) what have been the federal investments and funding contributions for housing projects, including loans and direct transfers provided by the Canada Mortgage and Housing Corporation (CMHC), invested in or transferred to the municipalities of (i) Tofino, (ii) Ucluelet, (iii) Port Alberni, (iv) Parksville, (v) Qualicum Beach, (vi) Cumberland, (vii) Courtenay, (viii) Deep Bay, (ix) Dashwood, (x) Royston, (xi) French Creek, (xii) Errington, (xiii) Coombs, (xiv) Nanoose Bay, (xv) Cherry Creek, (xvi) China Creek, (xvii) Bamfield, (xviii) Beaver Creek, (xix) Beaufort Range, (xx) Millstream, (xxi) Mount Washington Ski Resort, broken down by fiscal year, project, total contribution, funding program, and type of funding; (b) what have been the federal investments and funding contributions for housing projects, including loans and direct transfers provided by the CMHC, invested in or transferred to the regional districts of (i) Comox Valley, (ii) Nanaimo, (iii) Alberni-Clayoquot, (iv) Powell River, broken down by fiscal year, total expenditure, and project; and (c) what have been the federal investments and funding contributions for housing projects, including loans and direct transfers provided by the CMHC, invested in or transferred to the Island Trusts of (i) Hornby Island, (ii) Denman Island, (iii) Lasquetti Island, broken down by fiscal year, project, total contribution, funding program, and type of funding?

(Return tabled)

Question No.3111—Questions Passed as Orders for ReturnsRoutine Proceedings

4:20 p.m.

NDP

Gord Johns NDP Courtenay—Alberni, BC

With regard to national parks, national urban parks, and national marine conservation areas in Canada, broken down by fiscal year and park or area since 2005-06: (a) how many visitors accessed each national park, national urban park, and national marine conservation area; and (b) how much funding did each national park, national urban park, and national marine conservation area receive for (i) operating expenses, (ii) capital expenses?

(Return tabled)

Question No.3118—Questions Passed as Orders for ReturnsRoutine Proceedings

December 9th, 2024 / 4:20 p.m.

Conservative

Cheryl Gallant Conservative Renfrew—Nipissing—Pembroke, ON

With regard to the government's approach to fentanyl: (a) when did the government first become aware that Canada's domestic supply of fentanyl was surpassing the demand; (b) how much fentanyl does the government estimate has been exported out of the country, broken down by year for the last five years; (c) what are the circumstances, if any, in which fentanyl is permitted to be included as a "safer supply" drug; (d) how much fentanyl does the government estimate has been distributed through "safer supply" programs, broken down by year for the last five years; and (e) has the government analyzed the impact of Canada becoming a net exporter of fentanyl on any other aspect related to the government, such as Canada's international trade, and, if so, what are the details of what was analyzed and what were the results?

(Return tabled)

Question No.3119—Questions Passed as Orders for ReturnsRoutine Proceedings

4:20 p.m.

Conservative

Dan Albas Conservative Central Okanagan—Similkameen—Nicola, BC

With regard to the government's Oil to Heat Pump Affordability Program: (a) how many applications for funding have been (i) received, (ii) granted; (b) how many heat pumps have been installed through the program; and (c) what is the breakdown of (a) and (b) by province or territory?

(Return tabled)

Question No.3120—Questions Passed as Orders for ReturnsRoutine Proceedings

4:20 p.m.

Conservative

Garnett Genuis Conservative Sherwood Park—Fort Saskatchewan, AB

With regard to the government's Procurement Strategy for Indigenous Business, since November 4, 2015, and broken down by department or agency which participates in the strategy: (a) what individuals are responsible for reviewing adherence to Indigenous procurement requirements, specifically broken down by who is responsible for enforcing adherence to the (i) rules regarding proper identification of an Indigenous business, (ii) rules regarding subcontracting, (iii) rules regarding joint ventures, (iv) other rules; (b) of the total number of contracts allocated under the Indigenous procurement set-aside, what percentage went to businesses with (i) no employees, (ii) two or fewer employees, (iii) 10 or fewer employees; (c) of the total number of contracts allocated under the Indigenous procurement set-aside, what percentage went to companies that are not listed in the Indigenous business directory of any organization other than the federal government; (d) what is the percentage of times in which the procurement rules were followed, particularly broken down by (i) rules regarding proper identification of an Indigenous business, (ii) rules regarding subcontracting, (iii) rules regarding joint ventures, (iv) other rules; (e) of the total number of contracts allocated under the Indigenous procurement set-aside, what percentage went to shell companies; (f) looking at companies who received contracts under the Indigenous procurement set-aside up until one year ago, what percentage of them are still in operation; (g) looking at companies who have received contracts under the Indigenous procurement set-aside, what percentage of them received their contract through a joint venture with a non-Indigenous company; (h) looking at companies who have received contracts under the Indigenous procurement set-aside, what percentage of them were founded (i) before 2015, (ii) before 2018, (iii) before 2020, (iv) before 2023; and (i) looking at companies who have received contracts under the Indigenous procurement set-aside, what percentage of them were identified as Indigenous on the basis of having ownership that is (i) First Nations, (ii) Inuit, (iii) Métis?

(Return tabled)

Question No.3121—Questions Passed as Orders for ReturnsRoutine Proceedings

4:20 p.m.

Conservative

Raquel Dancho Conservative Kildonan—St. Paul, MB

With regard to firearms statistics held by the government, broken down by year since January 1, 2022: (a) how many firearms were seized by (i) the RCMP, (ii) the Canada Border Services Agency (CBSA), (iii) other police forces, broken down by source (domestic or foreign); (b) how many firearms were seized and traced by (i) the RCMP, (ii) the CBSA, (iii) other police forces; (c) how many firearms seized by other police jurisdictions were traced by a police jurisdiction other than the RCMP; (d) how many (i) long-guns, (ii) handguns, (iii) restricted firearms, (iv) prohibited firearms, were traced by all police services, broken down by source (domestic or foreign); (e) how many (i) long-guns, (ii) handguns, (iii) restricted firearms, (iv) prohibited firearms, were traced by the RCMP, broken down by source (domestic or foreign); (f) how many (i) long-guns', (ii) handguns', (iii) restricted firearms', (iv) prohibited firearms', sources (domestic or foreign) could not be traced across all police services; and (g) how many of the (i) long-guns', (ii) handguns', (iii) restricted firearms', (iv) prohibited firearms', sources could not be traced by the RCMP?

(Return tabled)

Questions Passed as Orders for ReturnsRoutine Proceedings

4:20 p.m.

Liberal

Kevin Lamoureux Liberal Winnipeg North, MB

Madam Speaker, I would ask that all remaining questions be allowed to stand.

Questions Passed as Orders for ReturnsRoutine Proceedings

4:20 p.m.

The Assistant Deputy Speaker Carol Hughes

Is that agreed?

Questions Passed as Orders for ReturnsRoutine Proceedings

4:20 p.m.

Some hon. members

Agreed.

The House resumed consideration of the motion.

Indigenous and Northern AffairsCommittees of the HouseRoutine Proceedings

4:20 p.m.

Conservative

Scott Aitchison Conservative Parry Sound—Muskoka, ON

Madam Speaker, before I begin, I just want to take a moment at the top to acknowledge the good folks of Parry Sound—Muskoka, particularly on the south end of Muskoka, who have endured a pretty brutal welcome to winter. It is my first opportunity to do this in this place. Not last week, but the weekend before, the area of Gravenhurst received just over five feet of snow in two days. It was a pretty tough time. Highway 11 is the main corridor in and out of the eastern side of Muskoka, and it was closed both northbound and southbound for more than 24 hours.

I just want to take a moment to thank all those frontline workers. We had Muskoka paramedics, the OPP, the fire department, Hydro One workers and municipal operations crews, who were all on the front lines. We did not lose a soul, which is amazing. The mayor, Heidi Lorenz, had to declare a state of emergency in Gravenhurst. They got through it. It is still snowing a bit, but it is a little more manageable now. I think we are going to get through it. I just wanted to give that quick shout-out to all those frontline workers. I know we appreciate them in all of our ridings; they can quite literally save lives. They certainly did over the last few days in Parry Sound—Muskoka.

During this study on indigenous peoples, indigenous people shared some pretty alarming experiences related to housing in their communities. They emphasized the housing shortage. Its effects are well known. Numerous studies have been conducted and we keep studying the issue, even though the situation is one in which we need action. This is a pretty common theme with the government, really. After nine years under the Prime Minister, housing problems are fairly well known, not just on first nations but also across the country. Rents, mortgages and house prices have doubled, and indigenous peoples are still suffering from inadequate housing. We see it all over the place. Here we are: Let us have another study and see how bad the situation is.

I do not think we need any more studies. We need action. I think back to the good folks in Muskoka and just imagine if, in the face of those horrible weather events, we decided to do a study instead of acting. This is a crisis. In crises, we act, but we are not acting. We need action on housing.

In March, the Auditor General released a report covering housing in first nations communities. They found that, overall, since 2018, the government has supported only 4,379 completed housing units. That is about 700 per year. Here are some headlines, some real key quotes from the report: “Indigenous Services Canada and the [CMHC] had not provided the [housing] support needed by First Nations” and “Indigenous Services Canada and the [CMHC] have made little progress in improving housing conditions in First Nations communities.” Here is another one: “The department and the corporation were not on track to meet the government's commitment to close the housing gap by 2030.” Another finding was that indigenous services and the CMHC have made little progress in supporting first nations to improve housing conditions in their community.

This sounds awfully familiar in terms of what we have been hearing at our HUMA committee over the last little while, as well as from MPs all over the country. We have heard back that the CMHC is really difficult to work with. It is a broken institution. It is a lot of paperwork and a lot of bureaucracy, and it takes forever to get responses. In many cases, particularly for smaller community groups that have their ducks in a row, they go to the CMHC and just give up. In many cases, the CMHC seems to be the place where projects go to die. We heard that the government does not have a strategy.

Another quote from the report said, “We found that Indigenous Services Canada and the [CMHC] accepted the Assembly of First Nations' 2021 estimate of the housing gap. However, the department and the corporation did not have a strategy to support First Nations in closing the housing gap by 2030.”

There was a lack of collaboration between the department and the CMHC. We heard from this report that there are 13 programs at the CMHC alone and that this cumbersome application process continues to be a problem. This is not only for the small community groups we hear from in our ridings but also, certainly, for first nations. Another quote from the report says, “We found that a significant challenge for First Nations communities in general was navigating the different application and reporting requirements of the many programs”.

This is a pattern with the government. The bureaucracy put in place by the government has been expanded dramatically. It obstructs homebuilding.

Many MPs have heard from organizations in their communities that are trying to get housing built. It is often impossible to get an answer. There is so much red tape and bureaucracy that they often give up, and it is no different in first nations communities. The CMHC has also created a whole new consulting class, it seems, of high-priced consultants who are hired to fill out these applications. People need a degree in filling out government applications to get answers. Sometimes, organizations spend years stuck at the CMHC, waiting for an answer to their applications; sometimes, the rules change partway through the process.

Conservatives have a different approach. We will reform the Canada Mortgage and Housing Corporation from a bureaucracy of policy, paperwork and painfully slow approaches to a “get homes built” corporation. We will do it by putting executive bonuses and salaries on the chopping block unless a 60-day response requirement is met. People will get a response in 60 days.

Another thing we heard about in this report was that housing on reserve may not be built according to building codes. Here is another important bit of information: “Indigenous Services Canada and the [CMHC] did not have assurance that all housing units built and repaired with the support of their funding programs met applicable building code standards.”

This is another interesting one. We have heard at HUMA as well that, in some cases, CMHC forces builders, community groups and housing providers to go above and beyond the national and provincial building codes. This often comes in the form of additional energy efficiency requirements. The cost can be as high as $30,000 per door. Of course, this means Canadians are paying that price. In this case, the housing that was constructed may not have met the current building codes, never mind going beyond.

There can be no doubt that we need building code reform in this country. Our building code has been developed over decades without any consideration of affordability. However, at the same time as we need that reform, we have to be sure that the homes Canadians live in are safe. That is certainly true for first nations communities as well. Indigenous communities have incredible potential to really drive the change that they need to see. Indigenous people are the leaders in their community, and they know what they need.

I have met with Justin Marchand, the CEO of Ontario Aboriginal Housing Services. He has become a good friend, and we have met a number of times. Just recently, we met in my office, and he was telling me that OAHS has expanded; it now manages 3,000 units. That is an asset base of about $320 million. This makes it one of the premier indigenous housing providers in this country. When Mr. Marchand was in my office the other day with one of his other team members, we talked about how burdensome and painful the red tape at the federal level can be in terms of getting housing built. Interestingly enough, he also spoke quite favourably about the Conservative plan to make available 15% of the federal real estate portfolio to get housing built and get it built quickly.

He pointed out that his group would prefer, instead of some kind of lease, to own the land. There are a couple of reasons for that. The first one is that, as he pointed out, indigenous people do not need some bureaucrat here in Ottawa to tell them how to do things and get things done, and all the red tape and conditions are the last things they need. The other point is that if the OAHS owns the land, then it can use the asset to leverage the asset and leverage the projects it builds to get the next ones built. It could actually get more units built, which makes complete sense. Ontario Aboriginal Housing Services has demonstrated it can do that and do it very well. Mr. Marchand pointed out that, in some cases, the best thing for aboriginal people is to get the government out of the way. We really see that across the country; there are lots of statistics and data about what is going on. What we see in this report is a mirror of what is going on in the rest of the country; of course, in many ways, it is worse.

We have talked a lot about housing. The government members have talked a lot about their national housing strategy. It is an $80-billion strategy that, in the end, has had precisely the opposite effect of what we needed to have. It cannot be this way any longer. It takes Canadians too much of their hard-earned money to buy or rent a home. When 30% of the cost of every new home in this country is government, that is a problem. Nobody makes more money on housing than governments. One of the most effective ways we can get the cost of housing down is to get government out of the way. Conservatives would actually do that by reforming the Canada Mortgage and Housing Corporation; however, most importantly, we would eliminate the federal sales tax on the sale of homes under $1 million, which could save Canadians $50,000.

Indigenous and Northern AffairsCommittees of the HouseRoutine Proceedings

4:30 p.m.

Liberal

Francis Scarpaleggia Liberal Lac-Saint-Louis, QC

Madam Speaker, the member's speech did not deal specifically with this, but the previous member's speech did. The bill by the Leader of the Opposition on housing was discussed in an article in The Globe and Mail not long ago by Campbell Clark. The headline was about a town in my riding. It was, “Pointe-Claire demonstrates the nonsense in [the Leader of the Opposition]'s housing formula”.

Under the Leader of the Opposition's bill, a municipality where the housing stock rose by 15% vis-à-vis the previous year would get some kind of bonus, but one where the rate of increase did not exceed 15% would be penalized. The problem is that it really hurts municipalities that have built a lot of homes in the previous year because they have to exceed that by so much more. There is an example in the article, in which they talk about the city of Kirkland. This is a small municipality next to the city of Pointe-Claire that only built one unit in 2022. This means that Kirkland only has to build two homes the following year to get the incentive, whereas a bigger city would have to build so many more homes to get the incentive or not be penalized. I would like to hear the hon. member's views on that.

Indigenous and Northern AffairsCommittees of the HouseRoutine Proceedings

4:30 p.m.

Conservative

Scott Aitchison Conservative Parry Sound—Muskoka, ON

Madam Speaker, I guess there was not really a question, but the language around that is designed to identify areas in this country where it is particularly expensive and slow to get homes built. Our point in this discussion is that, right now, governments make too much money on housing. They charge too much and, at the local level, they take far too long to approve the development of new housing.

When it can take six years to get a piece of property zoned to precisely what is on either side, it costs money. In the real world, time is money, and that makes housing more expensive. That is not the case around here, of course; this place is ridiculous.

The fact of the matter is that we need to reduce the cost of government on every new home. The way we are going to do that is not by shovelling more money out the door and hoping municipalities do better; there have to be consequences.

Indigenous and Northern AffairsCommittees of the HouseRoutine Proceedings

4:30 p.m.

Bloc

Andréanne Larouche Bloc Shefford, QC

Madam Speaker, this is an interesting debate. Housing in indigenous communities is a real problem. Several of the Standing Committee on the Status of Women's reports on housing mention it, particularly how housing issues disproportionately affect indigenous women and girls and prevent them from escaping the cycle of violence.

That said, I would like to talk to my colleague about a very simple solution. Along with other members of the Bloc Québécois, I had the opportunity to meet with representatives of the Yänonhchia' initiative. Basically, those representatives are asking for $150 million. The initiative has been tested in certain communities, and it works. It has been a resounding success. It is a model where indigenous people meet their own needs.

I would like my colleague to tell us about that. Does he agree that the Yänonhchia' initiative needs that $150 million?

Indigenous and Northern AffairsCommittees of the HouseRoutine Proceedings

4:35 p.m.

Conservative

Scott Aitchison Conservative Parry Sound—Muskoka, ON

Madam Speaker, I am sorry; I did not really understand what the question was. I was listening, but I did not quite catch the program the member was speaking of specifically, so I cannot answer the question. I am happy to talk about it, but I do not know what she was saying.

Indigenous and Northern AffairsCommittees of the HouseRoutine Proceedings

4:35 p.m.

NDP

Matthew Green NDP Hamilton Centre, ON

Madam Speaker, I recognize the hon. member as the former mayor of Huntsville. His party's leader has gone on the record calling mayors incompetent and saying that they are the major roadblock for housing.

Could the hon. member please rise and share whether he agrees that small-town mayors like himself are the problem and that their incompetence led to this housing crisis?

Indigenous and Northern AffairsCommittees of the HouseRoutine Proceedings

4:35 p.m.

Conservative

Scott Aitchison Conservative Parry Sound—Muskoka, ON

Madam Speaker, in many cases they are. The fact of the matter is municipalities charge way too much and take too long.