House of Commons Hansard #385 of the 44th Parliament, 1st session. (The original version is on Parliament's site.) The word of the day was indigenous.

Topics

line drawing of robot

This summary is computer-generated. Usually it’s accurate, but every now and then it’ll contain inaccuracies or total fabrications.

Access to Parliamentary Precinct Members debate a question of privilege raised regarding an anti-Israel demonstration at the Confederation Building. The Conservative party accuses NDP MPs of organizing and supporting the protest, alleging it obstructed parliamentarians. NDP members deny these claims, characterizing the event as a peaceful sit-in led by Jewish Canadians, and accuse the Conservatives of hypocrisy and misrepresenting the event as an "occupation". 3100 words, 25 minutes in 2 segments: 1 2.

Reference to Standing Committee on Procedure and House Affairs Members debate a motion regarding the government's failure to fully provide documents related to Sustainable Development Technology Canada (SDTC), as ordered by the House in June 2024. A Conservative MP criticizes Liberal cronyism and corruption in SDTC's funding allocation. Other MPs discuss housing, contaminated sites, and legislative gridlock. 6900 words, 45 minutes.

Opposition Motion—Federal Sales Tax on New Homes Melissa Lantsman introduces a Conservative motion to eliminate the GST on new homes under $1 million, aiming to save homebuyers up to $50,000. She critiques the Liberal government's housing policies, citing rising costs and ineffective programs, advocating for incentivizing housing construction and tying infrastructure funding to building results. Liberals defend their housing initiatives like the housing accelerator fund, while the Bloc Québécois questions federal jurisdiction and proposes amendments. The NDP raises concerns about the Conservative plan's details and consistency. Pierre Poilievre supports the GST cut, promising to eliminate the housing accelerator fund and reduce bureaucracy. 14100 words, 2 hours in 2 segments: 1 2.

Statements by Members

Question Period

The Conservatives strongly criticize the Liberal government's economic management, highlighting the doubled national debt and accusing them of breaking their promise to keep the deficit under $40 billion. They blame government policies for increased housing costs and food bank usage, particularly criticizing the carbon tax. A significant focus is on the NDP's support of the Liberals, questioning the terms of their agreement and the NDP leader's credibility. They also raise concerns about public safety and rising crime.
The Liberals champion their economic record, citing low inflation, interest rate cuts, and a strong debt-to-GDP ratio. They highlight investments in affordable housing, including new apartment complexes, and the GST holiday tax break for Canadians. They criticize the Conservatives' anti-worker history and opposition to tax cuts, while emphasizing their support for seniors and families with the Canada Child Benefit.
The Bloc questions the federal government's approach to Quebec secularism and criticizes Canadian multiculturalism. They denounce the CARM app fiasco and its business impacts, calling for an audit and CBSA supervision. They also raise concerns about the 14-day loophole in the safe third country agreement impacting asylum claims.
The NDP criticize the government for neglecting seniors and those with disabilities in cost of living support, while prioritizing cheques for higher earners. They raise concerns about the housing crisis, its impact on vulnerable women, and private investment making Montreal housing unaffordable. They also call for food bank funding.
The Greens raise concerns about cuts to arts funding and advocate for equitable distribution across all communities.

Oral Questions Members debate the Speaker's handling of question period, particularly regarding questions' relevance to government business and perceived bias towards certain parties, amid accusations of disruptive behavior and lack of decorum. 1300 words, 10 minutes.

Indigenous and Northern Affairs Members, primarily Conservatives and Liberals, debate housing affordability and indigenous housing in Canada, addressing a report from the Standing Committee on Indigenous and Northern Affairs. Conservatives propose eliminating the federal sales tax on new homes under $1 million and requiring municipalities to meet construction targets. The Liberals defend their housing accelerator fund and criticize the Conservatives' record on housing. The NDP and Bloc Québécois emphasize social housing and indigenous-led solutions like the Yänonhchia' initiative. 21500 words, 3 hours.

Adjournment Debate - Housing Mike Morrice calls for an HST exemption for Habitat for Humanity to build more affordable homes, suggesting it could be funded by ending tax exemptions for REITs. Peter Fragiskatos cites low-interest loans and grants as alternative support methods, and defends removing GST on apartment construction to increase supply. 1400 words, 10 minutes.

Was this summary helpful and accurate?

Innovation, Science and IndustryOral Questions

3:10 p.m.

Saint-Maurice—Champlain Québec

Liberal

François-Philippe Champagne LiberalMinister of Innovation

Mr. Speaker, AI is, in fact, the defining technology of our time. It is going to have an impact on every industry and every sector of the economy, and it is going to help with productivity.

Just last week, we announced our Canadian sovereign AI compute strategy to help build more data centres in Canada, to build essential infrastructure and to make sure that small and medium-sized businesses can access compute capacity.

We are going to work on this side of the House to make sure that we continue to be a leader in AI, and responsible AI, attracting investment and talent. Let us celebrate Canada.

HousingOral Questions

3:10 p.m.

NDP

Alexandre Boulerice NDP Rosemont—La Petite-Patrie, QC

Mr. Speaker, with help from the Liberals and private investors, the Norgate apartments purchase has gone through. It is the biggest housing purchase in Quebec this year. Given the raging housing crisis, this news has a lot of people worried, because the Liberal government has turned its back on them.

Montrealers cannot afford the rents they are paying now. Instead of lining the pockets of private investors, the Liberals could have ensured that those apartments remained truly affordable.

Why put the interests of private investors ahead of the interests of Montrealers?

HousingOral Questions

3:10 p.m.

Hochelaga Québec

Liberal

Soraya Martinez Ferrada LiberalMinister of Tourism and Minister responsible for the Economic Development Agency of Canada for the Regions of Quebec

Mr. Speaker, I thank my colleague for his question. It gives me the opportunity to tell him, in case he does not know already, that we just announced, precisely in my riding, that 720 housing units would be saved and taken off the market.

One of the challenges we face is not only to build affordable and social housing, but also to ensure the long-term sustainability of affordable housing and to take thousands of units off the market.

That is exactly what we are going to do.

Canadian HeritageOral Questions

3:10 p.m.

Green

Mike Morrice Green Kitchener Centre, ON

Mr. Speaker, the Canada Council for the Arts has not only had its funding cut in recent years, but significant inequities remain, leaving communities like mine dramatically underfunded.

Today, MPs from four parties in the House have co-signed a letter again bringing this to the attention of the minister and calling for action.

Will the Minister of Canadian Heritage commit to working with all interested MPs to restore federal arts funding and ensure all communities get their fair share?

Canadian HeritageOral Questions

3:15 p.m.

Vancouver Granville B.C.

Liberal

Taleeb Noormohamed LiberalParliamentary Secretary to the Minister of Canadian Heritage

Mr. Speaker, whether it is funding for the Fringe Festival in Vancouver or the Mermaid Theatre in Kings—Hants, our government will always be there to support the arts. I want to assure the member that we will work with him and any members who are interested in ensuring long-term sustainable funding for the cultural sector in our country.

This afternoon, I will be meeting with the CEO of the Canada Council for the Arts. We will take this conversation up as well.

Unlike Conservatives who believe that arts are only an elite topic, our party, and on this side of the House, believes that arts are the soul of the nation, and we will be there to support artists and the culture sector at every turn.

Presence in GalleryOral Questions

3:15 p.m.

The Speaker Greg Fergus

I wish to draw the attention of hon. members to the presence in the gallery of Ms. Ellen Johnson Sirleaf, a joint recipient of the 2011 Nobel Peace Prize.

Presence in GalleryOral Questions

3:15 p.m.

Some hon. members

Hear, hear!

The House resumed from December 5 consideration of the motion.

Opposition Motion—Confidence in the Prime Minister and the GovernmentBusiness of SupplyGovernment Orders

3:15 p.m.

The Speaker Greg Fergus

It being 3:16 p.m., the House will now proceed to the taking of the deferred recorded division on the motion of the member for Carleton related to the Business of Supply.

Call in the members.

Before the taking of the vote:

Opposition Motion—Confidence in the Prime Minister and the GovernmentBusiness of SupplyGovernment Orders

3:15 p.m.

The Speaker Greg Fergus

Before the House proceeds to the taking of this deferred recorded division, I wish to remind hon. members of the following passage from House of Commons Procedure and Practice, third edition, at page 587 under the heading “Decorum During the Taking of a Vote”: “from the time the Speaker begins to put the question until the results of the vote are announced” members are not “to enter, walk out of or across the House”, nor may they “make any noise or disturbance.”

I am sure that hon. members will follow this instruction to ensure that our work proceeds in an orderly manner.

The question is on the motion.

Shall I dispense?

Opposition Motion—Confidence in the Prime Minister and the GovernmentBusiness of SupplyGovernment Orders

3:15 p.m.

Some hon. members

No.

Opposition Motion—Confidence in the Prime Minister and the GovernmentBusiness of SupplyGovernment Orders

3:15 p.m.

The Speaker Greg Fergus

[Chair read text of motion to House ]

(The House divided on the motion, which was negatived on the following division:)

Vote #913

Business of SupplyGovernment Orders

3:30 p.m.

The Speaker Greg Fergus

I declare the motion defeated.

The hon. Leader of the Opposition is rising on a point of order.

Business of SupplyGovernment Orders

3:30 p.m.

Conservative

Pierre Poilievre Conservative Carleton, ON

Mr. Speaker, you went out of your way before the vote to point out that members are not allowed to come and go during the vote. I did note that the NDP leader came in right in the middle of the vote, having missed the fact that the vote was on his own words.

Would you please call the NDP leader to order for having had his team vote against his own words?

Business of SupplyGovernment Orders

December 9th, 2024 / 3:30 p.m.

The Speaker Greg Fergus

The hon. member for New Westminster—Burnaby is also rising on a point of order.

Business of SupplyGovernment Orders

3:30 p.m.

NDP

Peter Julian NDP New Westminster—Burnaby, BC

Mr. Speaker, that is very rich coming from the Leader of the Opposition, who has left the House during his own motions on opposition days and refused to vote. As we know, it is proper—

Business of SupplyGovernment Orders

3:30 p.m.

Some hon. members

Oh, oh!

Business of SupplyGovernment Orders

3:30 p.m.

The Speaker Greg Fergus

I very patiently listened to the leader of the official opposition. I would like to hear the hon. member for New Westminster—Burnaby; I did not catch the last bit of his comment.

Business of SupplyGovernment Orders

3:30 p.m.

NDP

Peter Julian NDP New Westminster—Burnaby, BC

Mr. Speaker, the hypocrisy from the leader of the official opposition is a bit rich. As you know, in virtual Parliament, we have the right to vote remotely and come in for a second vote. That is indeed what has happened in this case.

Business of SupplyGovernment Orders

3:30 p.m.

The Speaker Greg Fergus

I would say the fault is mine, as Speaker, for not making it clear for the purposes of electronic voting. There is a possibility, with the advent of electronic voting, as all members know, and members have from time to time exercised that privilege, to come in.

The hon. member for Argenteuil—La Petite-Nation is rising on a point of order.

Business of SupplyGovernment Orders

3:30 p.m.

Liberal

Stéphane Lauzon Liberal Argenteuil—La Petite-Nation, QC

Mr. Speaker, you took the time to explain the rules before the first vote to ensure that there was no movement in the House.

I would like the video footage to be checked, because the Leader of the Opposition stood up during the first vote, left his seat and sat down again before the vote was finished.

Business of SupplyGovernment Orders

3:35 p.m.

The Speaker Greg Fergus

I thank the hon. member for his intervention.

The hon. member for Portneuf—Jacques-Cartier is rising on a point of order.

Business of SupplyGovernment Orders

3:35 p.m.

Conservative

Joël Godin Conservative Portneuf—Jacques-Cartier, QC

Mr. Speaker, on the screen earlier, we saw a member addressing the House virtually without her headset. Is that acceptable?

I think the instructions are very clear out of respect for our interpreters. The rules must apply to everyone.

Business of SupplyGovernment Orders

3:35 p.m.

The Speaker Greg Fergus

The hon. member for Portneuf—Jacques-Cartier would be quite right if this happened during a debate, but the member was confirming a vote because of technical problems. That is another practice. Under our rules, members may address the clerks without having the microphones and headsets required to participate in the debate.