House of Commons Hansard #301 of the 44th Parliament, 1st session. (The original version is on Parliament's site.) The word of the day was firth.

firthgc strategiesextortionnine yearspublic servantscriminal codepersons with disabilitiesauditor generalorganized crimecontracts were awardedquestionmandatory minimum sentencesarrivecandisability benefitcontract

Topics

line drawing of robot

This summary is computer-generated. Usually it’s accurate, but every now and then it’ll contain inaccuracies or total fabrications.

Statements by Members

Question Period

The Conservatives focus on the cost of living, criticizing $50-billion inflationary spending, high debt interest payments, and the carbon tax. They highlight the housing affordability crisis, particularly doubled rents, and call government plans failures. A significant portion addresses the ArriveCAN scandal, including GC Strategies' payments and the witness's RCMP raid.
The Liberals focus on their new budget, emphasizing [fairness for every generation] by [asking the wealthiest to pay more] to fund [investments in Canadians]. They highlight efforts to address the [housing crisis], support [young people], and fund programs like [dental care] and [child care], contrasting their approach with Conservative austerity.
The Bloc criticizes the federal government's interference in Quebec's jurisdictions, accusing them of abusing the fiscal imbalance. They heavily scrutinize the ArriveCAN scandal, focusing on GC Strategies' payments, procurement flaws, apparent collusion, and gifts to public servants.
The NDP focuses on the cost of living, blaming corporate greed and criticizing government handouts to corporations while demanding an increased Canada disability benefit. A major focus is the ArriveCAN scandal, scrutinizing procurement flaws, restricted criteria, the witness's testimony about meetings with officials, value for money, and questioning commissions and personal earnings.
The Green Party addresses the inadequacy of disability benefits and funding disparities. They heavily scrutinize the ArriveCAN scandal, focusing on GC Strategies' procurement failures and witness testimony, questioning if he is ashamed or acknowledged misleading Parliament.

Protection Against Extortion Act Second reading of Bill C-381. The bill amends the Criminal Code regarding extortion, proposing mandatory minimum sentences. Supporters argue it combats rising crime and soft-on-crime policies by targeting organized crime and using arson as an aggravating factor. Opponents contend mandatory minimums are ineffective, disproportionate, and hinder efforts to prosecute organized crime leaders, while the Bloc suggests alternatives. 7900 words, 1 hour.

Adjournment Debates

Carbon Tax on Farmers Pat Kelly accuses the government of increasing food costs by taxing farmers. Élisabeth Brière defends the carbon tax as essential for fighting climate change, noting rebates offset costs for most families. Kelly maintains farmers don't get rebates, and Brière reiterates the government's commitment to sustainability and affordability.
Canada disability benefit Mike Morrice criticizes the proposed Canada disability benefit of $200/month as inadequate and performative, citing disappointment from the disability community. Iqra Khalid defends the benefit as a first step and highlights the government's investments and commitment, while acknowledging the need for further progress and continued consultation.
Impact of the carbon tax Jeremy Patzer criticizes the carbon tax, arguing that it increases costs for farmers and municipalities, ultimately burdening ratepayers. Élisabeth Brière defends carbon pricing, stating that it contributes only a small amount to inflation and that the Canada carbon rebate helps families. Patzer says the tax still drives up grocery prices.
Was this summary helpful and accurate?

Sitting ResumedHouse of CommonsOral Questions

5:25 p.m.

Partner

Kristian Firth

Mr. Speaker, sorry, I do not understand the question.

As spoken

Sitting ResumedHouse of CommonsOral Questions

5:25 p.m.

The Speaker Greg Fergus

We will stop the clock.

I will invite the member for La Prairie to ask his question again.

Translated

Sitting ResumedHouse of CommonsOral Questions

5:25 p.m.

Bloc

Alain Therrien Bloc La Prairie, QC

Mr. Speaker, earlier, the member for Terrebonne asked whether Mr. Firth has ever given any money, benefits in kind, gifts to public servants. The witness said that he had, but only after the contracts were awarded.

Is that accurate?

Translated

Sitting ResumedHouse of CommonsOral Questions

5:25 p.m.

Partner

Kristian Firth

Mr. Speaker, we do not give gifts and do bribes to win contracts.

As spoken

Sitting ResumedHouse of CommonsOral Questions

5:25 p.m.

Bloc

Alain Therrien Bloc La Prairie, QC

Mr. Speaker, the witness mentioned earlier that he had picked up the tab at restaurants or things like that for public servants, but he did that after the contracts were awarded.

Is that true?

Translated

Sitting ResumedHouse of CommonsOral Questions

5:25 p.m.

Partner

Kristian Firth

Mr. Speaker, that is correct. Once the contract has been awarded, one wants to have a relationship with the client to understand if one's resources are doing a good job, or, if they are not, to try to pivot and move as fast as possible to replace them. The fact that the invitation went out and the officials showed up suggested that they followed the code of conduct and that they had already asked permission from their superiors.

As spoken

Sitting ResumedHouse of CommonsOral Questions

5:25 p.m.

Bloc

Alain Therrien Bloc La Prairie, QC

Mr. Speaker, to the witness, the public servant is the client.

Is that it?

Translated

Sitting ResumedHouse of CommonsOral Questions

5:25 p.m.

Partner

Kristian Firth

Mr. Speaker, if we are doing government business, that is correct.

As spoken

Sitting ResumedHouse of CommonsOral Questions

5:25 p.m.

Bloc

Alain Therrien Bloc La Prairie, QC

Mr. Speaker, is it possible that when emoluments are given after a contract, they are given before another contract?

Translated

Sitting ResumedHouse of CommonsOral Questions

5:25 p.m.

Partner

Kristian Firth

Mr. Speaker, I believe it would be before another contract, but that does not mean it is for me.

As spoken

Sitting ResumedHouse of CommonsOral Questions

5:25 p.m.

Bloc

Alain Therrien Bloc La Prairie, QC

Mr. Speaker, there was mutual support between several people like the witness. Is that it?

Translated

Sitting ResumedHouse of CommonsOral Questions

5:25 p.m.

Partner

Kristian Firth

Mr. Speaker, it was inaudible for the translator.

As spoken

Sitting ResumedHouse of CommonsOral Questions

5:25 p.m.

The Speaker Greg Fergus

I will stop the clock and ask the member to ask the question again.

Translated

Sitting ResumedHouse of CommonsOral Questions

5:25 p.m.

Bloc

Alain Therrien Bloc La Prairie, QC

Mr. Speaker, if I may, I will draw a conclusion based on what we have heard today.

There is nothing unusual in having the Canada Border Services Agency do business with GC Strategies and give it $19 million, without ascertaining that GC Strategies' employees have any exceptional skills or the skills needed to obtain or disclose a contract.

We also have to consider it acceptable for public servants to receive gifts, although it is unclear whether this occurs before or after the contracts are awarded. We also have to accept that GC Strategies helps draft calls for tenders because the Canada Border Services Agency lacks the skill to identify its own needs and criteria when it comes to developing calls for tenders. That is very disturbing. We are being asked to believe that paying someone $84,000 for nothing is normal. The witness actually said that he had not done anything to earn this $84,000, but that it was normal.

Now people are wondering whose fault it is. Perhaps the Canada Border Services Agency is to blame. This may be the tip of the iceberg, but it is not normal. The Auditor General noted that it was the worst record-keeping she had ever seen. That is not normal. Now the Canada Border Services Agency is working on an import registration system, known as CARM. The House of Commons committee has found a number of irregularities. It is worrisome that this agency is continuing its work after what we have heard today.

Let us focus more on the Canada Border Services Agency and the government's responsibility to ensure that that agency is put under third-party management and that steps are taken to recover the taxpayer money that was spent for reasons we do not understand.

Translated

Sitting ResumedHouse of CommonsOral Questions

5:30 p.m.

The Speaker Greg Fergus

Although there might not have been a question, if you would like to make a comment I will allow you to do so at this time.

As spoken

Sitting ResumedHouse of CommonsOral Questions

5:30 p.m.

Partner

Kristian Firth

Mr. Speaker, I am good.

As spoken

Sitting ResumedHouse of CommonsOral Questions

5:30 p.m.

NDP

Peter Julian NDP New Westminster—Burnaby, BC

Mr. Speaker, now that Mr. Firth is aware of the powers of Parliament, I wanted to ask whether he regrets not answering the questions that were asked of him, not once, not twice, but three times at the government operations committee.

As spoken

Sitting ResumedHouse of CommonsOral Questions

5:30 p.m.

Partner

Kristian Firth

Mr. Speaker, absolutely. I sent that in writing to, I believe, all members of Parliament prior to coming here, with apologies for that.

As spoken

Sitting ResumedHouse of CommonsOral Questions

April 17th, 2024 / 5:30 p.m.

NDP

Peter Julian NDP New Westminster—Burnaby, BC

Mr. Speaker, I would like to know this: Did Mr. Firth meet with any members of Parliament during the process for the RFP for the contract for ArriveCAN or during the contract process?

As spoken

Sitting ResumedHouse of CommonsOral Questions

5:30 p.m.

Partner

Kristian Firth

Mr. Speaker, no, I did not.

As spoken

Sitting ResumedHouse of CommonsOral Questions

5:30 p.m.

NDP

Peter Julian NDP New Westminster—Burnaby, BC

Mr. Speaker, I would like to know this: Has Mr. Firth, outside the committees where he has been brought formally, ever met or spoken with any members of Parliament, regardless of which party?

As spoken

Sitting ResumedHouse of CommonsOral Questions

5:30 p.m.

Partner

Kristian Firth

Mr. Speaker, can I speak to my counsel for a few seconds, please?

As spoken

Sitting ResumedHouse of CommonsOral Questions

5:30 p.m.

The Speaker Greg Fergus

The clock is stopped.

As spoken

Sitting ResumedHouse of CommonsOral Questions

5:30 p.m.

Partner

Kristian Firth

Mr. Speaker, no, I have not.

As spoken

Sitting ResumedHouse of CommonsOral Questions

5:30 p.m.

NDP

Peter Julian NDP New Westminster—Burnaby, BC

Mr. Speaker, just to be clear, Mr. Firth has not had any private conversations, at any point, with any member of Parliament over the period of the committee hearings. I am not talking about at the committees themselves; I am talking about private conversations, hallway conversations, phone calls or anything of that nature.

As spoken