House of Commons Hansard #318 of the 44th Parliament, 1st session. (The original version is on Parliament's site.) The word of the day was atlantic.

newfoundland and labradornova scotiaoffshore windrenewable energynine yearsatlanticred tapeliberalhull aylmergoingaround the worldc-49fall economic statementhousingprojectssupreme courtdevelopmentpartisanliberalsprojectindustryactuallyconservativeconservativeshowever

Topics

line drawing of robot

This summary is computer-generated. Usually it’s accurate, but every now and then it’ll contain inaccuracies or total fabrications.

Building Homes Not Bureaucracy Act Second reading of Bill C-356. The bill, introduced by the Conservative leader, proposes tying federal funding for municipalities to a 15% annual increase in housing starts, selling federal lands, and axing taxes on homebuilding to address the housing crisis. Critics argue it blames municipalities, interferes with provincial jurisdiction, and fails to address affordable housing needs. 8500 words, 1 hour.

Bill C‑49—Time Allocation Motion Members debate a motion to limit further debate on Bill C-49, which facilitates offshore renewable energy development under the Atlantic Accords. The government and NDP urge quick passage for Atlantic Canada's economic future. Conservatives oppose the motion, citing fishing industry concerns and ignored amendments, and accuse the government of muzzling debate. 4700 words, 35 minutes.

Canada–Newfoundland and Labrador Atlantic Accord Implementation Act Third reading of Bill C-49. The bill amends Atlantic Accord Acts to include offshore renewable energy alongside oil and gas. Supporters say it creates green jobs and growth, backed by provinces. Conservatives argue it includes unconstitutional elements from Bill C-69, creating uncertainty, harming the fishing industry, and delaying investment. The Bloc opposed the bill after amendments for robust environmental reviews were rejected. 38900 words, 5 hours in 2 segments: 1 2.

Statements by Members

Question Period

The Conservatives criticize the Liberal-NDP government's impact on the cost of living, citing rising mortgage payments, rent, and a surge in hunger and homelessness. They blame government spending and advocate for measures like axing the carbon tax to provide relief.
The Liberals defend programs like dental care, child care, the Canada child benefit, and the carbon rebate, arguing they support vulnerable Canadians and reduce poverty. They criticize the Conservatives' "cut, cut, cut" approach and alleged lack of a plan, particularly on housing, accusing them of voting against key measures. They also discuss immigration and the situation in Rafah.
The Bloc raises concerns about the unequal distribution of asylum seekers, Canada's large per capita contribution to climate change driven by oil production like Trans Mountain, and the federal government being the worst workplace for working in French, contributing to the decline of French in Quebec.
The NDP demand action on the horror in Rafah and preventing genocide. They criticize the rising cost of groceries, corporate profits, and the Liberals' failure to make them pay. They warn of the climate crisis due to broken promises and highlight youth poverty and funding delays.
The Greens highlight the surge in homelessness, contrasting inadequate funding with corporate subsidies.

Alleged Breach of Speaker's Impartiality—Speaker's Ruling The Deputy Speaker rules on a question of privilege about the Speaker's alleged lack of impartiality due to outside partisan activity, finding it warrants immediate consideration distinct from conduct in the House. 1000 words.

Request for Office of Speaker to be Vacated Members debate a Conservative motion to remove the Speaker for alleged ongoing partisan conduct outside the Chamber, citing multiple incidents. Conservatives and Bloc Québécois argue the Speaker has lost the House's trust and lacks judgment. Liberals and NDP defend the Speaker, arguing the latest incident was the party's mistake and accusing opposition of disrupting Parliament to delay legislation and serve a partisan communication strategy. 21200 words, 3 hours.

Fall Economic Statement Implementation Act, 2023 Third reading of Bill C-59. The bill implements provisions from the fall economic statement and budget. Liberals state it provides supports for Canadians like rebates, dental care, and housing, and invests in green jobs. Conservatives oppose it, citing concerns about affordability, the carbon tax, spending, crime, and military readiness. The Bloc criticizes fossil fuel subsidies and federal housing jurisdiction. Greens support the bill for measures like mental health and clean energy credits but oppose carbon capture subsidies. 10500 words, 1 hour.

Adjournment Debates

B.C. drug decriminalization pilot Tako Van Popta criticizes the B.C. drug decriminalization pilot project, citing increased deaths and public disorder. Lisa Hepfner defends the program as a public health approach and notes B.C. requested it. Van Popta says the data proves it isn't working; Hepfner argues that multiple approaches are needed.
ArriveCan app controversy Garnett Genuis criticizes the ArriveCan app's development and cost, highlighting alleged corruption and the use of GC Strategies. Lisa Hepfner defends the app's importance during the pandemic, emphasizes the government's commitment to transparency and accountability, and mentions that improvements are being made to the contracting process.
Carbon tax rural top-up Scot Davidson says York—Simcoe is unfairly excluded from the rural carbon tax rebate, despite being mostly rural. Lisa Hepfner defends the carbon tax and rebates as key to fighting climate change and says that it benefits most families, especially low and medium-income ones. Davidson says that the current system doesn't make sense.
Was this summary helpful and accurate?

Bill C-59 Fall Economic Statement Implementation Act, 2023Government Orders

7:30 p.m.

Some hon. members

Agreed.

As spoken

Questions on the Order PaperGovernment Orders

7:30 p.m.

Winnipeg North Manitoba

Liberal

Kevin Lamoureux LiberalParliamentary Secretary to the Leader of the Government in the House of Commons

Madam Speaker, the following questions will be answered today: Nos. 2517 and 2523.

As spoken

Question No.2517—Questions on the Order PaperGovernment Orders

7:30 p.m.

Conservative

Gerald Soroka Conservative Yellowhead, AB

With regard to the impact of the carbon tax on school boards, divisions, and educational institutions across Canada, since 2019: (a) how many school boards, divisions, and educational institutions have been consulted or met regarding the impact of the carbon tax on their financial situation, and what are the details of each such consultation, including (i) the date, (ii) who did the consultation, (iii) who was consulted, (iv) the location, (v) the type of consultation; (b) of the 10% of carbon tax revenues earmarked for funding programs aimed at reducing emissions, how much has been allocated to school boards, divisions, and educational institutions, broken down by (i) province and territory, (ii) year, (iii) recipient, (iv) project description; (c) what is the total amount of carbon price revenues collected from school boards, divisions, and educational institutions since 2019, broken down by (i) province and territory, (ii) year; (d) what is the government's estimate of the annual amount of carbon tax collected on gasoline or fuel purchased for school buses; (e) if the government does not have any estimate for (d), why has this not been studied; and (f) has the government conducted any analyses to determine the total financial net cost of the carbon tax on school boards, divisions, and educational institutions, and, if so, what are the details, including, for each, (i) the name of the study, (ii) who conducted the study, (iii) the date, (iv) the findings?

Question No.2517—Questions on the Order PaperGovernment Orders

7:30 p.m.

University—Rosedale Ontario

Liberal

Chrystia Freeland LiberalDeputy Prime Minister and Minister of Finance

Mr. Speaker, climate action is critical to Canada’s long- term health and economic prosperity. Carbon pricing is widely recognized as the most efficient means of reducing our greenhouse gas, GHG, emissions, which is why the Government of Canada continues to make sure that it is not free to pollute in Canada.

Pollution pricing applies broadly throughout Canada. The federal fuel charge is generally paid by fuel distributors.

The federal price on pollution is revenue-neutral for the federal government; the direct proceeds from the federal carbon pricing system remain in the province or territory where they are collected. Put simply, every dollar collected from the carbon price is returned.

In provinces where the federal fuel charge applies, over 90% of projected direct proceeds are returned to residents of those provinces through the quarterly Canada carbon rebate. Most households receive more in rebates than the costs they face from the federal pollution pricing system. The other projected fuel charge proceeds are used to support small and medium- sized businesses and indigenous governments. Proceeds relating specifically to the use of natural gas and propane by farmers are returned directly to farmers via a refundable tax credit.

Question No.2523—Questions on the Order PaperGovernment Orders

7:30 p.m.

Conservative

Rosemarie Falk Conservative Battlefords—Lloydminster, SK

With regard to the government's response to the April 1, 2024, “Axe the Tax” rallies across Canada: (a) did the Minister of Public Safety issue any directives or advice to the RCMP or other police agencies in relation to the rallies, and, if so, what are the details, including the directive or advice; and (b) did the RCMP issue any directives or advice to RCMP officers assigned to the rallies and, if so, for each instance, (i) who provided the directive or advice, (ii) what was the directive or advice, (iii) what location or locations was the directive or advice intended for?

Question No.2523—Questions on the Order PaperGovernment Orders

7:30 p.m.

Pickering—Uxbridge Ontario

Liberal

Jennifer O'Connell LiberalParliamentary Secretary to the Minister of Public Safety

Mr. Speaker, in response to (a), the Minister of Public Safety did not issue any directives or advice to the RCMP in relation to the rallies.

In response to (b), the RCMP did issue directives and advice to RCMP officers assigned to the rallies.

In response to (i), the director general and acting director of national criminal operations, contract and indigenous policing, RCMP national headquarters, did provide advice and directives.

In response to (ii), the advice and directives were the following: (a) Command for the “Axe the Tax” rally response will be led by the appropriate commander of the RCMP in the province or territory where the RCMP have police of jurisdiction status and in accordance with their local situational factors; operational direction will not be issued by RCMP national headquarters; (b) national criminal operations will facilitate communications between RCMP provincial and territorial commanders as well as their external police counterparts in order to share information and best practices; (c) national criminal operations facilitated the dissemination of legal advice produced by the legal services unit, RCMP; the content of that advice is protected by solicitor-client privilege; (d) national criminal operations facilitated the dissemination of intelligence and information across various RCMP jurisdictions in real time.

In response to (iii), the directives and advice were intended for the RCMP who have police of jurisdiction status in British Columbia, Yukon, Northwest Territories, Alberta, Saskatchewan, Manitoba, Nunavut, New Brunswick, Nova Scotia, Prince Edward Island, and Newfoundland and Labrador. However, the RCMP in Ontario and Quebec also participated in the communications in order to maintain situational awareness in participation with their external police counterparts.

Questions Passed as Orders for ReturnsGovernment Orders

7:30 p.m.

Winnipeg North Manitoba

Liberal

Kevin Lamoureux LiberalParliamentary Secretary to the Leader of the Government in the House of Commons

Madam Speaker, furthermore, if the government's responses to Questions Nos. 2509 to 2516, 2518 to 2522, 2524 and 2525 could be made orders for return, these returns would be tabled in electronic format immediately.

As spoken

Questions Passed as Orders for ReturnsGovernment Orders

7:30 p.m.

As spoken

Questions Passed as Orders for ReturnsGovernment Orders

7:30 p.m.

Some hon. members

Agreed.

As spoken

Question No.2509—Questions Passed as Orders for ReturnsGovernment Orders

7:30 p.m.

NDP

Matthew Green NDP Hamilton Centre, ON

With regard to the Public Service Pension Plan, as of January 1, 2024: (a) what is the number of (i) public sector employees, (ii) retirees, (iii) former employees, in Group 1 of the Public Service Pension Plan; (b) what is the number of (i) public sector employees, (ii) retirees, (iii) former employees, in Group 2 of the Public Service Pension Plan; (c) what is the projected surplus in the Public Service Pension Plan; (d) what percentage of the plan is funded; and (e) what plans, if any, does the government have to distribute funds over the permissible surplus level?

(Return tabled)

Question No.2510—Questions Passed as Orders for ReturnsGovernment Orders

7:30 p.m.

Conservative

Branden Leslie Conservative Portage—Lisgar, MB

With regard to Environment and Climate Change Canada (ECCC): (a) what is the total amount of grants and contributions provided by ECCC to (i) not-for-profit organizations or charities, (ii) academia, (iii) international non-governmental organizations, broken down by year since 2019; and (b) what are the details of each grant or contribution in (a), including, for each, the (i) date, (ii) amount, (iii) recipient, (iv) purpose of the funding?

(Return tabled)

Question No.2511—Questions Passed as Orders for ReturnsGovernment Orders

7:30 p.m.

NDP

Peter Julian NDP New Westminster—Burnaby, BC

With regard to the Deficit Reduction Action Plan, between January 1, 2011, and January 1, 2016: how many jobs were cut or eliminated from the federal public service, broken down by (i) province and territory, (ii) department and agency, (iii) job type?

(Return tabled)

Question No.2512—Questions Passed as Orders for ReturnsGovernment Orders

7:30 p.m.

NDP

Peter Julian NDP New Westminster—Burnaby, BC

With regard to federal investments in Canada’s telecommunications sector, since January 1, 2006: how much federal funding has been provided to (i) Rogers Communications Inc., (ii) BCE Inc., (iii) Telus Mobility, broken down by company, year and type of funding?

(Return tabled)

Question No.2513—Questions Passed as Orders for ReturnsGovernment Orders

7:30 p.m.

Conservative

Andrew Scheer Conservative Regina—Qu'Appelle, SK

With regard to bonuses paid out at government departments or agencies in the 2023-24 fiscal year, broken down by department or agency: (a) what was the total amount paid out in bonuses; (b) how many and what percentage of officials (i) at or above the executive (EX) level or equivalent, (ii) below the EX level or equivalent, received bonuses; and (c) of the amount paid out in bonuses, how much went to officials (i) at or above the EX level or equivalent, (ii) below the EX level or equivalent?

(Return tabled)

Question No.2514—Questions Passed as Orders for ReturnsGovernment Orders

May 27th, 2024 / 7:30 p.m.

Conservative

Andrew Scheer Conservative Regina—Qu'Appelle, SK

With regard to bonuses paid out at Crown corporations in the 2023-24 fiscal year, broken down by Crown corporation: (a) what was the total amount paid out in bonuses; (b) how many and what percentage of officials (i) at or above the executive (EX) level or equivalent, (ii) below the EX level or equivalent, received bonuses; and (c) of the amount paid out in bonuses, how much went to officials (i) at or above the EX level or equivalent, (ii) below the EX level or equivalent?

(Return tabled)

Question No.2515—Questions Passed as Orders for ReturnsGovernment Orders

7:30 p.m.

Conservative

Glen Motz Conservative Medicine Hat—Cardston—Warner, AB

With regard to the Canada Revenue Agency, broken down by month since January 2022: (a) how many requests for technical assistance have been received by (i) income tax service providers, (ii) the general public; and (b) of the requests in (a), what is the breakdown by the (i) type of tax filer, (ii) type of issue requiring assistance, (iii) forms, (iv) tax measures involved?

(Return tabled)

Question No.2516—Questions Passed as Orders for ReturnsGovernment Orders

7:30 p.m.

Conservative

Glen Motz Conservative Medicine Hat—Cardston—Warner, AB

With regard to reports, studies, assessments, and evaluations (hereinafter referred to as "deliverables") prepared for the government, including any department, agency, Crown corporation or other government entity, by McKinsey & Company since December 1, 2020: what are the details for each deliverable, including the (i) date that the deliverable was finished, (ii) title, (iii) summary of recommendations, (iv) file number, (v) website where the deliverable is available online, if applicable, (vi) value of the contract related to the deliverable?

(Return tabled)