House of Commons Hansard #333 of the 44th Parliament, 1st session. (The original version is on Parliament's site.) The word of the day was election.

mental health

Topics

line drawing of robot

This summary is computer-generated. Usually it’s accurate, but every now and then it’ll contain inaccuracies or total fabrications.

Excise Tax Act Third reading of Bill C-323. The bill aims to exempt psychotherapy and counselling from GST/HST. It was amended to include massage therapy. Parties generally support the goal of making these services more affordable, though some raise concerns about definitions and universal access, noting similar measures in government bills C-59 and C-69. 6200 words, 40 minutes.

Bill C-69—Time Allocation Motion Members debate a motion to limit time on Bill C-69, the budget implementation act. The government highlights budget investments in social programs and economic development, citing opposition delays. Other parties criticize the budget's spending, economic impact, capital gains tax, and the use of time allocation. 4600 words, 35 minutes.

Budget Implementation Act, 2024, No. 1 Report stage of Bill C-69. The bill implements provisions of the 2024 budget. Debate focuses on government spending, debt, and their impact on inflation and affordability. Measures for housing, social programs like dental care and school food, and changes to taxes like capital gains are discussed. Opposition criticizes the budget's economic effects and lack of support for farmers and defence, while the government highlights fairness and investments. 41500 words, 5 hours in 2 segments: 1 2.

Statements by Members

Question Period

The Conservatives blast the government's carbon tax, alleging a cover-up of its $30 billion annual cost and demanding the Environment Minister resign. They criticize the capital gains tax hike, arguing it harms small businesses, farmers, and home builders. They blame the government's spending and the Bloc Québécois's support for worsening the housing crisis.
The Liberals promote their economic plan and capital gains tax changes. They strongly defend carbon pricing and their record on climate change. They highlight actions on affordable housing, combatting auto theft and foreign interference, addressing indigenous priorities like boil water advisories, and protecting abortion rights.
The Bloc criticizes the government's handling of foreign interference, particularly the Prime Minister's lack of action and trust. They condemn funding for dirty oil despite rising temperatures and climate change impacts in Quebec, and demand the cancellation of cuts to workforce training in the province.
The NDP criticize slow progress on Truth and Reconciliation and government inaction on Indigenous identity fraud. They raise concerns about toxic ship breaking in BC waters and delays in providing aid to Afghans facing gender apartheid.

Record of the Proceedings of the House—Speaker's Ruling The Speaker rules on a question of privilege about an editorial change in the Debates. A Member's word was changed after he admitted misspeaking. The Speaker accepts editors' reason for coherence and finds no breach of privilege. 1100 words.

Bill C‑65—Time Allocation Motion Members debate Bill C-65, An Act to amend the Canada Elections Act. The government invokes time allocation [/debates/2024/6/17/steven-mackinnon-2/] to advance the bill, citing dilatory tactics [/debates/2024/6/17/dominic-leblanc-6/]. Opposition criticizes this, arguing the date change primarily benefits MPs' pensions [/debates/2024/6/17/michael-cooper-1/] and disrupts municipal elections [/debates/2024/6/17/kristina-michaud-4/]. Debate also covers making voting more accessible [/debates/2024/6/17/lisa-marie-barron-1/], online registration risks, and indigenous language ballots. 2900 words, 20 minutes.

Bill C-65—Time Allocation Motion Members debate Bill C-65, legislation aiming to enhance voter accessibility for groups like students and persons with disabilities. Liberals support the measures, citing democratic benefits. Conservatives criticize the bill, arguing its main purpose is to change the election date to benefit Liberal MPs' pensions and calling for an immediate election. The NDP supports accessibility but plans an amendment regarding the election date. 1600 words, 10 minutes.

Alleged Premature Release of Speaker's Ruling on Social Media—Speaker's Ruling The Speaker apologizes for a premature tweet about a ruling and addresses an MP's profanity. An MP (Leah Gazan) questions why her language is addressed while racist language is tolerated. 400 words.

Electoral Participation Act Second reading of Bill C-65. The bill amends the Canada Elections Act, proposing changes to increase voter participation and election integrity, such as addressing disinformation and party privacy. Opposition parties strongly criticize a provision to change the election date, alleging it primarily serves for MP pensions. 9000 words, 1 hour in 2 segments: 1 2.

Adjournment Debates

ArriveCan app hourly rate Garnett Genuis asks if Randeep Sarai believes $2,600 per hour was a reasonable rate for Kristian Firth's work on the ArriveCAN app. Sarai avoids a direct answer, stressing the government is addressing procurement issues and holding companies accountable, but Genuis presses him to answer directly.
Foreign interference investigation Kevin Vuong accuses the Liberal government of withholding documents related to foreign interference, protecting implicated party members. Randeep Sarai defends the government's transparency, citing support for the Hogue commission, and emphasizes the importance of cabinet confidences to protect Canada's democratic institutions.
Was this summary helpful and accurate?

Democratic InstitutionsAdjournment Proceedings

June 18th, 12:10 a.m.

Surrey Centre B.C.

Liberal

Randeep Sarai LiberalParliamentary Secretary to the Minister of Veterans Affairs and Associate Minister of National Defence

Madam Speaker, it is my pleasure to rise today to speak to the vital, ongoing work that the Government of Canada is doing to protect Canada's democratic institutions.

As all members of this House are aware, threats to Canada's democracy do not affect only some Canada; they affect all Canadians. That is why the enhancements to safeguard Canada's democratic systems and processes against foreign interference that are set out in Bill C-70 are supported across party lines.

Indeed, the Government of Canada's ongoing work to protect Canada's electoral systems and democratic institutions includes efforts to maximize public transparency while protecting what and how government documents are shared. This is because the nature of some records and how they are intended to be used is fundamental to the functioning of our democratic system of government.

I would like to take this opportunity to make clear what cabinet confidences are and why they are treated so carefully by the government so that any misunderstanding along these lines can be put to an end.

Cabinet confidences are documents that are prepared for members of cabinet. They include memoranda to cabinet, discussion papers, records of cabinet deliberations, records of communications between ministers, records to brief ministers and draft legislation.

The Canadian government is, and has been since Confederation, a Westminster system of government. This means that the principle of keeping cabinet confidences secret is older than Canada itself. It originates from the United Kingdom's Westminster Parliament, which dates back many centuries.

Cabinet confidences are central to how the Westminster system functions because of another foundational principle called cabinet collective responsibility. These principles complement each other, as members of cabinet consider all material at their disposal, deliberate, and even disagree freely around the cabinet table. Once the deliberations are finished, cabinet makes a collective decision, and all members are responsible for it.

The secrecy of these deliberations and of the materials that are used to make cabinet decisions is therefore paramount to the system functioning as designed. This has been long understood by successive Canadian governments, which have upheld the principle of cabinet confidences. In addition to the government, the Supreme Court of Canada has recognized, “Cabinet confidentiality is essential to good government.”

Protecting Canada's democracy also means protecting our democratic institutions and ensuring that they can function as intended. Protecting cabinet confidences is not a nefarious act, but rather a fulfillment of the government's duty to uphold the long-established principles of Canada's system of government.

While fulfilling this duty, the Government of Canada continues to support the ongoing work of the public inquiry into foreign interference. Since the inquiry was established last year, the set of cabinet confidences specified in the terms of reference for the commission have already been provided during the commission's first phase of work. Those terms of reference were developed and agreed to by all recognized parties in the House. As it has done all along, the government will continue to provide thousands of classified documents to the commission and will continue to make government witnesses available to answer the commission's questions.

The Government of Canada looks forward to the commission's final report in December and will consider how its recommendations can further help to enhance Canada's measures against foreign interference in its electoral systems and democratic institutions.

As spoken

Democratic InstitutionsAdjournment Proceedings

June 18th, 2024 / 12:15 a.m.

Independent

Kevin Vuong Independent Spadina—Fort York, ON

Madam Speaker, Canadians deserve to know the truth. Canadians deserve to know who was involved, who profited politically and/or financially and how they will be brought to justice for their actions, just as much as those who have conducted foreign interference operations in our country.

Why is there such a reluctance by the government to provide Canadians with evidence of foreign interference? Why is it that when the Prime Minister went on CBC earlier today and was asked if there were any Liberal MPs on the NSICOP list who had betrayed Canada, he stammered and could not answer for over 10 seconds? What is the basis for that? Is the Liberal Party afraid of where this will end if they release the names?

As spoken

Democratic InstitutionsAdjournment Proceedings

June 18th, 12:15 a.m.

Liberal

Randeep Sarai Liberal Surrey Centre, BC

Madam Speaker, the Government of Canada continues to support the important work of the public inquiry into foreign interference, as it has done since the inquiry was established last year. The government continues to provide thousands of classified documents and to make government witnesses available to meet with the commission to answer its questions. While supporting the commission's work, the government will continue its ongoing work to protect Canada's democratic institutions.

Protecting Canada's democracy is not a partisan activity. It requires constant vigilance and ongoing effort to meet the ever-changing threats to our democratic systems and processes. The Government of Canada takes this duty seriously and welcomes the efforts of all parliamentarians who are committed to this important work.

As spoken

Democratic InstitutionsAdjournment Proceedings

June 18th, 12:15 a.m.

The Assistant Deputy Speaker (Mrs. Alexandra Mendès) Alexandra Mendes

The motion that the House do now adjourn is deemed to have been adopted. Accordingly, the House stands adjourned until later this day at 10 a.m., pursuant to Standing Order 24(1).

(The House adjourned at 12:17 a.m.)

As spoken