House of Commons Hansard #60 of the 45th Parliament, 1st session. (The original version is on Parliament's site.) The word of the day was industry.

Topics

line drawing of robot

This summary is computer-generated. Usually it’s accurate, but every now and then it’ll contain inaccuracies or total fabrications.

International Day for the Elimination of Violence Against Women Members debate the International Day for the Elimination of Violence Against Women, marking the start of 16 days of activism against gender-based violence. They highlight the ongoing femicide crisis, particularly affecting Indigenous women and 2SLGBTQI+ individuals. While the Liberal government outlines funding and legislative measures, Conservatives and Bloc Québécois criticize budget cuts and the Prime Minister's abandonment of feminist foreign policy. New Democrats also call for greater action on MMIWG2S+ recommendations. 4400 words, 35 minutes.

Budget 2025 Implementation Act, No. 1 Second reading of Bill C-15. The bill implements Budget 2025, addressing economic impact through investments in housing, infrastructure, and social programs like the national school food program. Opposition parties criticize the bill's omnibus nature and the government's fiscal approach, arguing it drives up debt and creates a "productivity crisis." Debate also covers the repeal of the luxury tax and concerns about Veterans Affairs funding. 52200 words, 6 hours in 2 segments: 1 2.

Statements by Members

Question Period

The Conservatives criticize the Prime Minister's conflicts of interest with Brookfield, accusing him of benefiting from its deals. They highlight his failure to reduce US tariffs on Canadian goods, citing his "who cares?" attitude. The party also attacks the government's inaction on pipelines and soaring living costs, particularly food inflation and fuel taxes.
The Liberals highlight their success in securing trade deals and attracting $70 billion in foreign investment to create jobs and grow the economy. They defend Budget 2025 and investments in major infrastructure, supporting vulnerable sectors and criticizing the opposition for voting against Canadian progress.
The Bloc accuses the Liberals of rigging the 1995 referendum by fast-tracking citizenship and manipulating the immigration system. They also criticize the government for abandoning the fight against climate change by approving two pipelines for dirty oil.
The NDP focuses on upholding disability rights and protecting public health care from privatization.

Criminal Code Second reading of Bill C-220. The bill proposes to amend the Criminal Code to prohibit judges from considering a non-citizen's immigration status when sentencing, aiming to ensure that non-citizens convicted of serious crimes face deportation consequences. Conservatives argue this will prevent a two-tiered justice system and uphold the value of Canadian citizenship. Liberals and the Bloc Québécois express concerns about judicial independence, proportionality, and the impact on individuals' lives, suggesting the bill is ill-conceived and not evidence-based. 8600 words, 1 hour.

Softwood Lumber Industry Members debate the ongoing softwood lumber dispute with the U.S., where tariffs have tripled to 45%, leading to mill closures and job losses. The government details financial supports, legal challenges, and domestic demand initiatives. Opposition criticizes "10 years of failure," demanding immediate action, a negotiated deal, and exploring options like buying back duties or a national working table to protect communities. 35400 words, 4 hours.

Was this summary helpful and accurate?

Bill C-15 Budget 2025 Implementation Act, No. 1Government Orders

12:55 p.m.

Liberal

John-Paul Danko Liberal Hamilton West—Ancaster—Dundas, ON

Mr. Speaker, affordability for seniors and families is central to this budget. This budget meets a specific moment in time when we are redefining the entire Canadian economy for the next century. Those investments are critical in making sure that seniors, families and young people have the opportunities they deserve in their communities. This requires focus and investment from the federal government, and I am proud to be part of that.

Bill C-15 Budget 2025 Implementation Act, No. 1Government Orders

12:55 p.m.

Bloc

Andréanne Larouche Bloc Shefford, QC

Mr. Speaker, I would like to pick up on the question that my Conservative colleague asked. It is true that the government is bragging about helping everyone, but it is clear that many people and businesses have been left behind. I spoke about this earlier in my questions, but my colleague raised the issue of seniors just now.

The government does not seem to realize just how badly it has let them down. People aged 65 to 74 are still not entitled to the increase in old age security that those aged 75 and above received. We talk about inflation and people who are having trouble making ends meet on a fixed income, and seniors are among them. Why is this government so obstinate about this? I had discussions with representatives of FADOQ and the AQDR, which advocate for seniors in Quebec, and they feel that this government has completely forgotten about them.

How can the government brag about helping seniors when it is not heeding their demand to increase pensions for people aged 65 to 74 as it did for those aged 75 and above? There is nothing for seniors in this budget.

Bill C-15 Budget 2025 Implementation Act, No. 1Government Orders

12:55 p.m.

Liberal

John-Paul Danko Liberal Hamilton West—Ancaster—Dundas, ON

Mr. Speaker, as I said, this budget would strengthen the systems that families, seniors and people rely on, such as providing affordable child care, helping families enter the workforce, saving families money, making school food programs permanent, making sure that all students have the ability to learn on a full stomach and increasing old age security.

My kids happen to be 17 and 19. I am very concerned about what their future will look like. I am also entering that stage when I am concerned about where my parents are going to live and about their success for years to come. This budget would set the foundation for what they need in their future.

Bill C-15 Budget 2025 Implementation Act, No. 1Government Orders

1 p.m.

Kings—Hants Nova Scotia

Liberal

Kody Blois LiberalParliamentary Secretary to the Prime Minister

Mr. Speaker, it was interesting to watch the exchange between the member for King—Vaughan and my hon. colleague. She made the claim that there is nothing for seniors in the budget. I see $5 billion for health care infrastructure. Public health is important for everyone, but certainly for seniors. I think about the fact that our programs have maintained support for dental care. I have talked to countless numbers of seniors in Kings—Hants who have benefited from that program. I think about the introduction of pharmacare.

Those are all things the Conservative Party voted against. The member, in her role as the shadow critic, needs to take a closer look at the budget to see the things that we, as the Liberal Party, have put on the table. The fact is that the government is maintaining these programs.

I look to the Bloc. It says in one breath that the budget was too expensive, notwithstanding that we are recalibrating spending, but then asks for billions of dollars for programs without taking targeted approaches to lower-income seniors, which is the way we have handled our affairs.

Does the member care to comment on that as a way to finish this off?

Bill C-15 Budget 2025 Implementation Act, No. 1Government Orders

1 p.m.

Liberal

John-Paul Danko Liberal Hamilton West—Ancaster—Dundas, ON

Mr. Speaker, certainly, there are programs in the budget that specifically address the needs of seniors. One of the issues facing seniors, especially those on a fixed income, is increasing municipal property taxes. When they are in their home and on a fixed income, they cannot afford year-over-year property tax increases. This budget would address that by directly funding municipal infrastructure, which would offset some of the costs that would otherwise be downloaded to municipalities and passed on to seniors.

Bill C-15 Budget 2025 Implementation Act, No. 1Government Orders

1 p.m.

Conservative

Clifford Small Conservative Central Newfoundland, NL

Mr. Speaker, it is a great honour to stand here in this place as a member of Parliament representing Newfoundland and Labrador, and especially the riding that sent me here, now known as Central Newfoundland.

I stand today to talk about Bill C-15, the budget implementation act, and the impacts it would have on ordinary Canadians, Newfoundlanders and the folks from Central Newfoundland, as well as the impacts it would have on industry in Canada. This is my take on this budget, as the shadow minister for fisheries and oceans.

Budget 2025 lays out a $78-billion deficit. There is a Liberal spending problem in this country. The Liberals have increased our national debt by as much as all of the governments in Canada that preceded this one, and they have done it in just 10 years.

How do we pay for that debt? Where does the money come from? One simple way is by selling bonds and paying interest to the bondholders, but who is really paying the lease on those new printed dollars? It is ordinary Canadians, and the cost is $55 billion. That $55 billion could be giving relief to Canadians and lowering their cost of living. It is more than the amount spent on health care by the federal government or collected in HST. This big debt is breaking Canadians, and half of that $55 billion in interest is due to the Liberal government.

Printing money devalues a nation's currency. We recall pictures of Germany in World War II, when it took a wheelbarrow full of money to buy a loaf of bread. Inflation here is not quite that bad yet, but it is getting up there with the doubling of food bank usage since the Liberals came to power.

We are really reaping what we have sown in Canada. Let me rephrase that. We are reaping what the Liberals have sown since 2015. Not only do they have a spending problem; they now have a revenue problem. We have lost billions of dollars in revenue in mining and oil and gas, and we are feeling that now. Canada is a country with a vast social net for citizens, but it has to be paid for. If we cannot harvest our resources properly, we are leaving revenue on the table.

In the case of Newfoundland and Labrador, in the last three years, we have not had one bid on an offshore lease for oil and gas. No one wants to take a chance on investing in an exploration program in Newfoundland and Labrador's offshore with the unconstitutional Bill C-69. In the case of Newfoundland and Labrador and Nova Scotia, we have Bill C-49, which industry experts tell me is an even bigger drag on investment in Newfoundland and Labrador's offshore than Bill C-69. The last little piece here is the emissions cap, but I am told it is not as crippling as Bill C-49.

How many billions of dollars are we losing in royalty revenue? In the case of Bay du Nord, which took almost 1,300 days for permitting, for every day that project is not producing, $333 million in royalties is stranded. I hope that paints a little picture.

There is continued crippling of the oil and gas and mining industries by the Liberal government, and false narratives are being spun. Liberals talked in the budget about how the emissions caps may go one of these days if A, B, C, D, E, F and G are all done, but there is no guarantee that emissions caps will be gone. They will not be gone based on what is in the budget, because it is all hypothetical, yet Liberals and certain media in Newfoundland and Labrador have touted the budget as being the end of emissions caps or production caps. It is a false narrative that has been spun.

The Prime Minister talks a big talk about national projects, but in the meantime, billions and billions of dollars continue to flee Canada, and it is not going to stop until the crippling red tape I outlined earlier gets cut. The resource industry-killing pieces of legislation desperately need to be changed. It is more important for resource provinces to have proper legislation in place than it is to continue to keep them on the dole, to keep them waiting for handouts, always beholden to Ottawa.

I will speak a little about how the budget relates to the fishery. I just alluded to the misleading nature of the Prime Minister. In the election, the Liberals promised a $250-million expansion of the small craft harbours budget. There is nothing in the budget except mentioning money that was promised. In fact in one instance, and I do not know who proofread the budget, it refers to 2022 and 2023 small craft harbours money. It is unbelievable.

Continuing on down to the shoreline on the fishery, a big report just came out of the Marine Institute at Memorial University, which talked about the amount of predation by seals on the fish stocks. This new study says that 24 times more fish are consumed by harp seals alone than in the fisheries catch rates. The harp seal accounts for only about half of the biomass of seals in the Atlantic Ocean, considering it is only one of five species.

Since 2010, Canada's fishing industry has had its GDP shrink. In the meantime, Norway's GDP in the fishery has increased 4.5-fold in the same length of time. I see the pittances put in the budget, about $20 million a year for agricultural food and seafood product marketing, and it is a joke. It is a slap in the face for the fishing industry. For folks in Nova Scotia, Newfoundland and Labrador, P.E.I., New Brunswick and Quebec, which have seen tariffs due to China, the China fiasco that is on the go, it has cost the industry about $100 million this year.

I will not be supporting the budget. It is an amateur scrapbook job.

Bill C-15 Budget 2025 Implementation Act, No. 1Government Orders

1:10 p.m.

Winnipeg North Manitoba

Liberal

Kevin Lamoureux LiberalParliamentary Secretary to the Leader of the Government in the House of Commons

Mr. Speaker, I would like to compare Conservatives, and the member in particular, to the Liberal government. Let us think of the national school food program, a program that feeds children. What does the member specifically have to say about that program? He was very clear that the national school food program was “garbage”. Wow. That is what he said.

I believe that the member owes an apology to all Canadians with respect to the school food program. Will he stand up today and apologize on behalf of himself and the Conservative Party for their approach on this national program that is there to care for our children?

Bill C-15 Budget 2025 Implementation Act, No. 1Government Orders

1:10 p.m.

Conservative

Clifford Small Conservative Central Newfoundland, NL

Mr. Speaker, if there is anyone in the House who needs to apologize, it is the bigmouth from Winnipeg who is always spinning that false Liberal narrative.

Fewer than 10% of schools in Canada can take advantage—

Bill C-15 Budget 2025 Implementation Act, No. 1Government Orders

1:10 p.m.

NDP

Gord Johns NDP Courtenay—Alberni, BC

Mr. Speaker, I rise on a point of order. There has to be some decorum in the House, please. The insults are not acceptable. Canadians are counting on us to have good debate about important issues. I think the member's comment is out of line. I have a deep respect for both members. I want to highlight that.

Bill C-15 Budget 2025 Implementation Act, No. 1Government Orders

1:10 p.m.

The Deputy Speaker Tom Kmiec

That is a great reminder. The Standing Orders for decorum still apply, so I remind the member for Central Newfoundland to be careful with his words.

I will let the member finish, and then we will continue with debate.

Bill C-15 Budget 2025 Implementation Act, No. 1Government Orders

1:10 p.m.

Conservative

Clifford Small Conservative Central Newfoundland, NL

Mr. Speaker, I am sorry. I will say, “an overused and extremely loud mouth from the other side”.

The Liberals continue to tout the social programs they come out with that just do not work.

Bill C-15 Budget 2025 Implementation Act, No. 1Government Orders

1:10 p.m.

Bloc

Mario Simard Bloc Jonquière, QC

Mr. Speaker, I hope my question does not upset my colleague, because I do not want to be known as the loudmouth from Saguenay. I hope he will not be too offended.

In the budget, there is a line that specifically mentions Pathways Plus, a carbon capture and sequestration project. The federal government is going to give the greedy oil and gas sector tax credits so that it can reduce the carbon footprint of oil. That makes absolutely no sense when you consider the fact that all those oil and gas companies made record profits from 2021 to 2024 and most of the money paid out in dividends goes to the United States.

Does my colleague agree with me that it is unrealistic to try to reduce the carbon footprint of the oil and gas sector, and that taxpayers should not have to pay for that?

Bill C-15 Budget 2025 Implementation Act, No. 1Government Orders

1:15 p.m.

Conservative

Clifford Small Conservative Central Newfoundland, NL

Mr. Speaker, we do not have another energy source on this planet that is proven and that has the infrastructure in place to replace petrochemicals and fossil fuels. It is just not feasible. I know that the Bloc Québécois is completely against oil and gas, but for the foreseeable future, that is where we are, and the world is not pulling away from it in a way that is going to make that party happy.

Bill C-15 Budget 2025 Implementation Act, No. 1Government Orders

1:15 p.m.

Conservative

William Stevenson Conservative Yellowhead, AB

Mr. Speaker, I would like the member to comment on this. We have heard a few speeches in the House today, and one of the Liberals said that the Liberals decided to take out the unused housing tax because it had “unintended” consequences. This was a recurring theme of theirs in 2024 when they came up with this at the eleventh hour to get rid of the changes they had made for trusts.

I wonder whether the member could tell me if there are any other issues that he could say have unintended consequences that we might be able to bring to the attention of the Liberals to change some of their ways.

Bill C-15 Budget 2025 Implementation Act, No. 1Government Orders

1:15 p.m.

Conservative

Clifford Small Conservative Central Newfoundland, NL

Mr. Speaker, we have some issue with the Prime Minister's conflict of interest with Brookfield. A lot of Canadians think that Brookfield properties are going to stand to gain a tremendous amount of money because of the housing crisis we have right now. A number of folks have come to me asking if it is it possible that the Liberals manufactured the crisis so their insider friends could actually benefit from it.

Bill C-15 Budget 2025 Implementation Act, No. 1Government Orders

1:15 p.m.

Outremont Québec

Liberal

Rachel Bendayan LiberalParliamentary Secretary to the Prime Minister

Mr. Speaker, I am honoured to rise today to speak about Bill C‑15.

I want to begin by acknowledging that today is November 25. Like every year, today marks the International Day for the Elimination of Violence Against Women. I must stress the importance of our efforts to address violence against women, including domestic violence.

In an increasingly uncertain world, it is up to us to adapt our economy, strengthen our supply chains and adapt to the new geopolitical reality of uncertainty. Budget 2025 provides a plan for building a stronger, safer, more resilient Canada.

The budget implementation act would make strategic investments in our country to build out our economy to build out our infrastructure, protect Canadian jobs, protect our Arctic, protect our national sovereignty and empower Canadians to think bigger, to grow bigger and to realize their full potential. The legislation would, for example, double the pace of affordable homebuilding over the next decade through the new Build Canada Homes. This unprecedented investment in housing construction in budget 2025 constitutes the most ambitious plan for housing in a generation.

When I think of our plan to build strategic national infrastructure and when I envision the Canada of tomorrow, I think of our high-speed rail project linking Toronto, Ottawa, Montreal and Quebec City. It involves building Canada's first real high-speed train, capable of reaching speeds of 300 kilometres an hour or more, on nearly 1,000 kilometres of new dedicated, fully electrified tracks in the country's most densely populated corridor, home to roughly 18 million Canadians. With the bill before the House, we are taking a decisive step toward building this modern, clean and fast network; it is future-oriented infrastructure that will forever transform how we travel.

About 10 days ago, I stood alongside the Prime Minister to inaugurate the main segment of another train, our magnificent REM, which now connects the south shore to the north shore, passing through downtown Montreal and the middle of my riding of Outremont at Édouard Montpetit station. With a top speed of 100 kilometres an hour, it is not quite the 300 kilometres an hour of the future high-speed train, but it is truly a transformative project that has been supported from day one by the federal government and represents the biggest expansion of public transit in Quebec in over half a century.

Our national strategy to modernize our modes of transportation, from the REM to the future high-speed rail, is closely tied to our climate competitiveness strategy. The fight against climate change is not just a moral obligation, but it is also an economic imperative. Investments in clean energy are already outpacing investments in fossil fuels. The clean-tech market is set to triple within 10 years. Our government remains fully committed to meeting our greenhouse gas reduction targets. Our bill strengthens this commitment by improving and expanding the suite of investment tax credits that support clean technologies and clean manufacturing, providing Canadian businesses with the certainty they need to invest and innovate.

Our budget strengthens Canada's climate competitiveness by enhancing industrial carbon pricing with a long-term price trajectory; strengthening methane regulations for the oil, gas and landfill sectors; updating clean electricity and clean fuel standards; and incentivizing clean-tech investments. The legislation before the House would ensure that it is Canadian workers who will build the clean industries the world is demanding from us.

Building out a clean economy means investing in the next generation of workers who are going to power it. I was proud to join the Minister of Environment last Saturday in Mile End in my riding to confirm and to celebrate the launch of Canada's first-ever youth climate corps, an initiative championed by so many people across the country, so many young people in particular.

I want to stop to thank Climate Action Network for its passionate and professional advocacy.

A year ago, just outside this chamber, outside those doors, I met with a young constituent of mine named Shir, who had travelled all the way to Ottawa from my riding to push for this very idea. Back then, it was just that, an idea. Many conversations later with Malaika, Bushra, Caroline Brouillette, their executive director, and so many more, it is here in black and white, in the federal budget. It is a new program for youth job placement, for skills training, for concrete and real action on climate created by young Canadians, for young Canadians.

To all the young people in our country who have an idea, who care about an issue, the youth climate corps was the dream of a few and then the dream of many; now it is a national program in this country. We should never underestimate the power of one. We should never underestimate what can be accomplished here in Canada.

I will now very quickly address research innovation and entrepreneurship. The business community has rightly hailed the scope and potential of our new productivity superdeduction, designed to make it more attractive for businesses to invest in machinery and equipment, in technology and productivity-enhancing assets.

I also want to highlight two other measures that did not get as much airtime. First, the legislation before us would deliver a major expansion to the SR&ED tax credit, the scientific research and experimental development tax incentive. This tax credit encourages Canadian innovators to develop and commercialize cutting-edge ideas here at home. Our small and medium-sized businesses and entrepreneurs have asked us to expand this fabulous program, which they rely on, and the federal government has listened.

Another piece that is critical to our economic growth in the new economy is to build Canadian intellectual property. Strong IP is essential to building Canadian innovation that competes and wins on the global stage. That is why our federal government is extending support for Canada's entrepreneurs to secure patents, helping small businesses leverage and commercialize their intangible assets and ensuring that our businesses can protect their IP in global markets. We are also launching a comprehensive review of Canada's IP performance to strengthen our capacity to turn Canadian ideas into Canadian wealth. In short, we are making sure that when Canadians invent the future, Canadians own it and Canadians reap the benefit from it.

The budget also cracks down on financial fraud and scams, and it implements open banking to give consumers more control over their financial data. It is a little-known fact, but one measure that will have an impact on many vulnerable Canadians in this country is that the legislation before us would increase the amount immediately available after depositing a cheque from $100 to $150.

The bill before the House also reaffirms the key role that culture plays as a vital driving force behind our collective identity. Our government is there to support our artists, our creators, our authors, our musicians and all of our cultural industries so that they can keep telling our stories and be the voice of Canadians at home and abroad.

What immediately comes to my mind is the power of music to bring people together, to connect regions and generations, and to remind us of everything that unites us. The Canada Music Fund plays a particularly important role in this regard. It is administered in part by Musicaction, an outstanding organization based in Le Plateau-Mont-Royal, in my riding, which supports homegrown talent and propels them to reach new heights.

I look forward to celebrating the tens of millions of dollars in federal government funding that Musicaction is going to receive. Our message is clear: To invest in culture is to invest in what Canada is all about.

I will end by saying that this is more than a budget or a piece of implementing legislation. It is a decision to throw down the gloves and build this country; to build the housing, the high-speed rail and the infrastructure; to protect the vulnerable, our innovation through IP, our borders and our sovereignty through a new defence industrial strategy; and to empower consumers through greater choice, empower entrepreneurs to grow and innovate, empower the business community to invest here and, yes, empower young people to dream in a Canada where absolutely anything is possible.

Bill C-15 Budget 2025 Implementation Act, No. 1Government Orders

1:25 p.m.

Conservative

Kelly DeRidder Conservative Kitchener Centre, ON

Mr. Speaker, my colleague mentioned the SR&ED tax credit and that it is to support innovation in Canada, which I agree with. It is intended to support Canadian companies with research and innovation in Canada.

Can the member explain why Huawei, a non-Canadian, Chinese company, got $100 million back in this credit?

Bill C-15 Budget 2025 Implementation Act, No. 1Government Orders

1:25 p.m.

Liberal

Rachel Bendayan Liberal Outremont, QC

Mr. Speaker, I am pleased the Conservatives have noticed we have expanded SR&ED. SR&ED is an integral part of the budget because it is going to encourage small and medium-sized businesses to do more research and development. We are going to help them invest and reinvest into their companies, because that is what we know needs to happen in order to grow this economy.

Bill C-15 Budget 2025 Implementation Act, No. 1Government Orders

1:25 p.m.

Bloc

Andréanne Larouche Bloc Shefford, QC

Mr. Speaker, in her speech, my colleague talked about culture. I would like to come back to that point.

When it comes to ensuring discoverability, particularly for Quebec's French-language culture, the web giants are not helping us much. The government could have used the budget to tax the web giants, but, unfortunately, it dropped this measure and the chance to collect revenue. This does not contribute to the discoverability of French-language content either.

From the Bloc Québécois's perspective, this tax could have been used as a fund to help not only Radio-Canada, but also, in terms of culture and discoverability, community and private media that enable this discoverability.

Why did my colleague completely leave out this aspect of our culture, namely community and private media?

Bill C-15 Budget 2025 Implementation Act, No. 1Government Orders

1:25 p.m.

Liberal

Rachel Bendayan Liberal Outremont, QC

Mr. Speaker, I think this is the first time I have heard the Bloc Québécois talk about the significant investment we have made in culture in this budget. This is very important, and it should be noted that the Quebec caucus, which now has 44 members, worked hard to secure these investments in culture.

My colleague referred to local media. That is certainly something to be considered.

However, let us talk about the investments in CBC/Radio-Canada, as well as those in Musicaction, which I discussed in my speech, not to mention the many theatres and live art shows that will benefit from the investments in this budget.

I think we have been clear. The government has listened to Quebeckers when it comes to investments in culture.

Bill C-15 Budget 2025 Implementation Act, No. 1Government Orders

November 25th, 2025 / 1:25 p.m.

Liberal

Bardish Chagger Liberal Waterloo, ON

Mr. Speaker, I really appreciated the comments that were shared by the member and the contribution she makes in so many different ways. I really appreciated her opportunity to also talk about IP, intellectual property, which is really important in the riding of Waterloo. The University of Waterloo is notorious for ensuring that research academics actually own their IP so that they have a vested interest. I would love to hear from the member, the Parliamentary Secretary to the Prime Minister, in regard to the benefits of the budget. Constituents in the riding of Waterloo are really asking for constructive debate, ensuring that more Canadians can benefit. They recognize that the official opposition has just been dialing it in. They do not want to be constructive in their feedback. They do not want to be part of the solution.

We would love to hear what she feels the budget can deliver for Canadians and how it will actually benefit constituents in the riding of Waterloo, her constituents and Canadians from coast to coast to coast.

Bill C-15 Budget 2025 Implementation Act, No. 1Government Orders

1:30 p.m.

Liberal

Rachel Bendayan Liberal Outremont, QC

Mr. Speaker, Waterloo, in many ways, resembles a piece of my riding in the Mile End, which has enormous potential for economic growth because it contains so many small start-ups and so much new innovation. The budget really answers the call for those entrepreneurs and those individuals who want to be part of the economy of the future. The productivity superdeduction is there, of course, but there are also a lot of smaller measures that are going to help small businesses and entrepreneurs throughout the country in order to develop their ideas and in order to protect their ideas. As I mentioned and the member mentioned, Canadian intellectual property is extremely important, and we are going to build that out in order to ensure that Canadians own the ideas of the future.

Bill C-15 Budget 2025 Implementation Act, No. 1Government Orders

1:30 p.m.

NDP

Gord Johns NDP Courtenay—Alberni, BC

Mr. Speaker, as my colleague knows, there are 1.6 million Canadians living with a brain injury in this country. In the last Parliament, Bill C-277 was passed unanimously to report stage.

It was not in the budget to support a national brain injury strategy. Will she—

Bill C-15 Budget 2025 Implementation Act, No. 1Government Orders

1:30 p.m.

The Deputy Speaker Tom Kmiec

I have to give a chance to the parliamentary secretary to respond. She has about 15 or 20 seconds.

Bill C-15 Budget 2025 Implementation Act, No. 1Government Orders

1:30 p.m.

Liberal

Rachel Bendayan Liberal Outremont, QC

Mr. Speaker, in the short time I have, I would like to say how important that member's advocacy has been on brain injuries. I look forward to meeting with him and Brain Injury Canada later this evening. I look forward to working with him in order to create a national strategy in this country.