Mr. Speaker, I am actually very encouraged by the member opposite's response, because I think I agree with him. My own view is that this case is dealing with tariffs that were imposed under the IEEPA legislation. In fact, the industries that are most hard hit, which as the member mentioned are steel, aluminum, lumber and autos, have nothing to do with IEEPA. With steel, aluminum and autos, those are section 232 tariffs, and on lumber, of course, there are also anti-dumping and countervailing duties.
As such, I am glad to hear the member agrees. Maybe he could just confirm his view that even if the court strikes down the President's authority under the IEEPA legislation, that would do nothing and provide no relief for our hardest-hit industries.