Madam Speaker, earlier, I asked the leader of the official opposition whether he was aware that no proponents are interested in this project right now. He referred many times to the government's imaginary pipeline. His answer was to tell me that if the government gets out of the way, then a proponent will come forward. We know that this project is not viable. In order to be viable, the pipeline would have to be in use for 40 years. It seems unlikely that we will still be using oil 40 years from now.
I would like my colleague, who is an engineer, to tell me how she can see any practical advantages in something that even her own leader thinks is far-fetched.