House of Commons Hansard #21 of the 45th Parliament, 1st session. (The original version is on Parliament's site.) The word of the day was citizenship.

Topics

line drawing of robot

This summary is computer-generated. Usually it’s accurate, but every now and then it’ll contain inaccuracies or total fabrications.

Citizenship Act Second reading of Bill C-3. The bill amends the Citizenship Act to restore citizenship for "lost Canadians" and ensure "equal treatment for adopted children" born abroad. It also expands citizenship by descent beyond the first generation, requiring a "substantial connection" of 1,095 non-consecutive days in Canada. While Liberals, NDP, and Bloc support it as "charter-compliant", Conservatives argue it "devalues" citizenship, lacks security/language checks, and "strains public services". 47300 words, 5 hours in 2 segments: 1 2.

Statements by Members

Question Period

The Conservatives criticize the government for broken promises and double the deficit. They highlight soaring grocery prices, unaffordable homes due to bureaucracy, and increased crime from a broken justice system. They also condemn immigration system failures and the use of temporary foreign workers while Canadians lose jobs.
The Liberals emphasize improving affordability for Canadians through tax cuts and significant housing investments like "build Canada homes," alongside reducing the GST for homebuyers. They are focused on building the strongest economy in the G7, strengthening public safety with bail reform, and ensuring sustainable immigration levels. They also highlight investments in the military and a buy Canadian program.
The Bloc criticizes the government's failing trade relationship with the U.S., highlighting the need to restore trust and the Prime Minister's lack of engagement with Washington. They also condemn the government's environmental policy, particularly Bill C-5, for undermining progress and disregarding environmental assessments.
The NDP express concern about rising unemployment and recession, opposing the government's austerity budget and demanding job creation.

Petitions

Youth Unemployment Conservative MP Garnett Genuis requests an emergency debate on Canada's deepening youth unemployment crisis, citing 14.5% youth unemployment. He states "Liberal policies" are responsible and criticizes the government's inaction. 400 words.

Members' Access to Federal Penitentiary Conservative MP Frank Caputo raises a question of privilege, alleging obstruction during a visit to Fraser Valley Institution. He claims an assistant warden's constant escort interfered with his ability to speak freely with staff and inmates, hindering his parliamentary duties. Caputo argues this breached his privilege to prepare for proceedings in Parliament, proposing referral to a committee. The Speaker will review the matter. 2800 words, 20 minutes.

Adjournment Debates

The 2025 federal budget Cheryl Gallant criticizes the Liberal government's fiscal policy, predicting a large deficit and accusing them of economic recklessness. Ryan Turnbull defends the government's actions, highlighting tax cuts for the middle class and investments in infrastructure and housing, while promising a comprehensive budget in the fall.
Canadian housing crisis Melissa Lantsman criticizes the government's handling of the housing crisis, citing rising costs and declining construction. Caroline Desrochers defends the government's plan, highlighting tax reductions, incentives for builders, and the "build Canada homes" initiative, and emphasizes the scope and ambition of the government's plan.
Stricter bail laws for offenders Andrew Lawton criticizes the Liberal government for prioritizing offenders' rights over victims', citing crime headlines. Ryan Turnbull says the government is committed to stricter bail laws for violent and organized crime and has introduced legislation to combat illegal drugs. Lawton asks if the government will repeal Bill C-75.
Was this summary helpful and accurate?

Question No.111—Questions on the Order PaperRoutine Proceedings

3:25 p.m.

Conservative

Jamil Jivani Conservative Bowmanville—Oshawa North, ON

With regard to the Temporary Foreign Worker Program during the 2024-25 fiscal year: (a) how much was spent administering the program, in total and broken down by type of expense; (b) how many employees were assigned to the program, in total and broken down by type of assignment (processing applications, compliance, etc.); and (c) how much did the government spend promoting or advertising the program abroad, in total and broken down by country?

Question No.111—Questions on the Order PaperRoutine Proceedings

3:25 p.m.

Vimy Québec

Liberal

Annie Koutrakis LiberalParliamentary Secretary to the Minister of Jobs and Families

Mr. Speaker, in response to part (a) of the question, for the 2024-25 fiscal year, the cost of ESDC activities relating to the direct administration, which excludes internal services in support of the Temporary Foreign Worker, or TFW, Program totaled $139,004,775. This includes operating expenditures of $105,099,587, transfer payments of $18,750,934 for the Migrant Worker Support Program, or MWSP, contribution to employee benefits of $15,109,254, and refund of previous year revenues of $45,000.

In terms of part (b) of the question, for the 2024-25 fiscal year, a total of 1,144 Full-Time Equivalent employees, or FTEs, at ESDC were assigned to the direct administration of the TFW Program.

Of these, 513 FTEs were assigned to Labour Market Impact Assessment, or LMIA, application processing activities, 304 FTEs were assigned to employer-compliance-verification activities,16 FTEs were assigned to Employer Contact Centre regional activities, 6 FTEs were assigned to MWSP contribution delivery activities, and 305 FTEs were assigned to National Headquarters to provide strategic and policy direction, systems support, operational guidance, and oversight in support of program delivery.

Lastly, with respect to part (c) of the question, for the 2024-25 fiscal year, ESDC did not spend any money promoting or advertising the TFW Program abroad.

Question No.118—Questions on the Order PaperRoutine Proceedings

3:25 p.m.

Conservative

Scot Davidson Conservative New Tecumseth—Gwillimbury, ON

With regard to the government’s announcement in budget 2024 that they will create a new “capstone research funding organization”: (a) what will be the purpose of this organization; (b) how much money has been allocated to, or is projected to be required by, this organization to date and over each of the next five fiscal years; (c) what specific gaps, deficiencies, or coordination challenges in the current federal research support system is this new capstone organization intending to address; (d) what is expected to be achieved by the organization in the (i) short, (ii) medium, (iii) long, term; (e) how will capstone fit in organizationally with the (i) Canadian Institutes of Health Research, (ii) Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada, (iii) Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council; (f) will the new capstone organization have any funding authority or influence over any of the entities in (e), and, if so, what are the details; (g) how will the government avoid duplication between the work of capstone and the other entities in (e); (h) what impact, if any, will the establishment and funding of capstone have on the funding of the other entities in (e); (i) what metrics will be used to assess the impact of the new capstone organization, and whether or not the government is receiving value for its money; (j) how often will the assessments in (i) take place, and how will the results be made public; (k) what will be the composition of the board, or other governing body of the capstone, and how much will they be paid; and (l) on what date is capstone expected to be fully operational?

Question No.118—Questions on the Order PaperRoutine Proceedings

3:25 p.m.

Ahuntsic-Cartierville Québec

Liberal

Mélanie Joly LiberalMinister of Industry and Minister responsible for Canada Economic Development for Quebec Regions

Mr. Speaker, Budget 2024 announced the Government’s intent to create a new capstone research funding organization. The creation of this new organization is intended to increase the impact of federal funding through better coordination and stronger connections among diverse actors, with a view to driving collaboration and harnessing Canadian research to better meet and address emerging challenges.

The Canadian Institutes of Health Research, the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council, and the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council would continue to exist within the new organization, with a focus on supporting excellence in investigator-driven research, including linkages with the Health portfolio, and contributing to the collective and strategic direction of the new organization.

Through the capstone organization, the government is delivering on the observation of the Advisory Panel on the Federal Research Support System that more coordination is needed to effectively support the collaborative, international and interdisciplinary approaches increasingly necessary to address complex societal challenges and respond to emerging opportunities.

As committed to in the 2024 Fall Economic Statement, further details will be announced in the coming months.

Question No.120—Questions on the Order PaperRoutine Proceedings

3:25 p.m.

Conservative

William Stevenson Conservative Yellowhead, AB

With regard to the statement made by Andrew Campbell, Senior Vice-President, Operations for Parks Canada, at the Standing Committee on Environment and Sustainable Development's meeting on the Jasper wildfires, where he stated "we do not take notes at my operations team meeting": (a) is this a standard practice at all operations team meetings, and, if so, why and when did this become standard practice; (b) when did the Minister of Environment and Climate Change become aware of this practice; (c) did the Minister of Environment and Climate Change, or anyone from his office, encourage this practice in any way; and (d) how does this practice comply with government record-keeping obligations?

Question No.120—Questions on the Order PaperRoutine Proceedings

3:25 p.m.

Laurier—Sainte-Marie Québec

Liberal

Steven Guilbeault LiberalMinister of Canadian Identity and Culture and Minister responsible for Official Languages

Mr. Speaker, with regard to (a), operations team meetings allow open discussion and are primarily used for sharing information and updates related to a variety of regional and national issues. Formal agency decisions are taken through a governance process whereby documents are maintained in compliance to the Government of Canada records management standards.

With regard to (b), I was not, and am not routinely, updated or engaged on the note-taking practices at internal Parks Canada meetings.

With regard to (c), neither I, nor anyone from my office, provided any input into the note-taking practices at internal Parks Canada meetings.

With regard to (d), as per Government of Canada information management best practices, all decisions and actions of business value are kept and maintained in official records.

Question No.122—Questions on the Order PaperRoutine Proceedings

3:25 p.m.

Conservative

Jeremy Patzer Conservative Swift Current—Grasslands—Kindersley, SK

With regard to the government’s efforts to control inflation: (a) does the government have a target rate specifically for food price inflation, and, if so, what is the current target rate; (b) since the new cabinet was sworn in on May 14, 2025, what measures, if any, have been put in place to reduce food price inflation; and (c) which Ministers, departments or agencies has the Prime Minister tasked with lowering food price inflation, and what specific measures is each doing to lower food price inflation?

Question No.122—Questions on the Order PaperRoutine Proceedings

3:25 p.m.

Saint-Maurice—Champlain Québec

Liberal

François-Philippe Champagne LiberalMinister of Finance and National Revenue

Mr. Speaker, the rise in food prices in recent years has been a global phenomenon, driven primarily by supply constraints and shortages faced during the pandemic, compounded by commodity price increases due to the Russian invasion of Ukraine and subsequent global geopolitical events. Indeed, the peak rise in food price inflation in Canada, at 10.6 percent in January 2023, was the second lowest in the G7 next to Japan. Moreover, food price inflation has moderated significantly since that peak, averaging just 1.8 percent on average over the first four months of 2025, again, second lowest in the G7.

The Government of Canada is committed to a policy of low, stable and predictable total inflation. This policy is achieved through a joint agreement between the Government of Canada and the Bank of Canada, the latter of which has as its central objective for monetary policy to target an annual rate of 2 percent for All-Items Consumer Price Index inflation. This has contributed to a more stable economic environment relative to previous decades and allowed households and businesses to make better long-term financial plans.

The government has taken several steps to address food price inflation and affordability, including implementing a middle-class tax cut by reducing the first personal income tax rate from 15 percent to 14 percent, effective July 1, 2025, which will provide tax relief for nearly 22 million Canadians and save families up to $840 annually starting in 2026, the first full year when the tax rate will be 14 percent; launching the National School Food Program, which will save the average participating family with two children up to $800 per year; together with provinces and territories, establishing Canada’s first-ever industry-led Grocery Sector Code of Conduct, which came into effect on June 1, 2025; creating a Food Price Data Hub, to provide Canadians a centralized location to view detailed information on food prices and help consumers make informed decisions about their food purchases; and amending the Competition Act to enhance competition and gave the Competition Bureau more power to crack down on unfair practices.

Food price inflation is influenced by many complex factors, such as extreme weather events, global supply chain disruptions, exchange rate, energy and transportation costs, and competitive environment to name just a few. Therefore, several federal government portfolios contribute to lowering food price inflation, including Innovation, Science and Economic Development Canada, Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, and Crown-Indigenous Relations and Northern Affairs Canada, which specifically addresses food costs in remote northern communities through the Nutrition North Canada program.

Question No.126—Questions on the Order PaperRoutine Proceedings

3:25 p.m.

Conservative

Andrew Lawton Conservative Elgin—St. Thomas—London South, ON

With regard to legal services and the Department of Justice: what are the total legal costs incurred by the government, broken down by (i) Canadian Frontline Nurses and Kristen Nagle v. Attorney General of Canada, (ii) Canadian Civil Liberties Association v. Attorney General of Canada, (iii) Canadian Constitution Foundation v. Attorney General of Canada, (iv) Jeremiah Jost, Edward Cornell, Vincent Gircys and Harold Ristau v. Governor in Council, His Majesty in right of Canada, Attorney General of Canada, and Minister of Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness?

Question No.126—Questions on the Order PaperRoutine Proceedings

3:25 p.m.

Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel Québec

Liberal

Patricia Lattanzio LiberalParliamentary Secretary to the Minister of Justice and Attorney General of Canada

Mr. Speaker, with respect to the legal costs incurred by the Government for the cases Canadian Frontline Nurses and Kristen Nagle v. Attorney General of Canada, Canadian Civil Liberties Association v. Attorney General of Canada, Canadian Constitution Foundation v. Attorney General of Canada, and Jeremiah Jost, Edward Cornell, Vincent Gircys and Harold Ristau v. Governor in Council, His Majesty in right of Canada, Attorney General of Canada, and Minister of Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness, to the extent that the information that has been requested is or may be protected by any legal privileges, including solicitor-client privilege, the federal Crown asserts those privileges. In this case, it has only waived solicitor-client privilege, and only to the extent of revealing the total legal costs, as defined below.

The total legal costs, namely the actual and notional costs, associated with Federal Court and Federal Court of Appeal files related to Canadian Frontline Nurses and Kristen Nagle v. Attorney General of Canada, Canadian Civil Liberties Association v. Attorney General of Canada, Canadian Constitution Foundation v. Attorney General of Canada, and Jeremiah Jost, Edward Cornell, Vincent Gircys and Harold Ristau v. Governor in Council, His Majesty in right of Canada, Attorney General of Canada, and Minister of Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness, amount to approximately $3,645,000.00. The services targeted here are litigation services provided in these cases by the Department of Justice, as well as litigation support services. Department of Justice lawyers, notaries and paralegals are salaried public servants and therefore no legal fees are incurred for their services. A “notional amount” can, however, be provided to account for the legal services they provide. The notional amount is calculated by multiplying the total hours recorded in the files for the relevant period by the applicable approved internal legal services hourly rates. Actual costs represent file related legal disbursements and legal agent fees, as the case may be. The total amount mentioned in this response is based on information contained in Department of Justice systems, as of June 6, 2025.

Question No.129—Questions on the Order PaperRoutine Proceedings

3:25 p.m.

Bloc

Simon-Pierre Savard-Tremblay Bloc Saint-Hyacinthe—Bagot—Acton, QC

With regard to goods imported into Canada with ties to Xinjiang: (a) what goods are entering the Canadian market after being refused entry into the United States, and in what quantities; (b) how many of these goods did not comply with the United States’ Uyghur Forced Labor Prevention Act; and (c) what goods and materials entering Canada have ties to Xinjiang, and in what quantities?

Question No.129—Questions on the Order PaperRoutine Proceedings

3:25 p.m.

La Prairie—Atateken Québec

Liberal

Jacques Ramsay LiberalParliamentary Secretary to the Minister of Public Safety

Mr. Speaker, the Customs Act only requires importers to identify the country of origin, for example, “China”, of their goods, not the region. The region where goods originate within a country is not a data element that is mandatory; importers do not have the obligation to report it. However, the CBSA can report that from January 1, 2024 to June 25, 2025, of the 34 shipments that have been intercepted for suspected ties to forced labour, goods contained in one of those shipments were subsequently determined to have been produced wholly or in part by forced labour and were originating from the Xinjiang region.

Establishing that goods have been produced by forced labour requires significant research, analysis and supporting information. CBSA works closely with the key government departments such as Employment and Social Development Canada and Global Affairs Canada to identify goods of concern related to forced labour. Canada also cooperates and exchanges information and best practices with US Customs and Border Protection related to the enforcement of the forced labour import ban.

When a shipment is detained, importers have the opportunity to provide information that will be analyzed by the CBSA in order to inform the final decision of the officer. The officer is then required to make a tariff classification determination on the imported goods, based on the information provided by the importers. If the officer determines that the goods were produced by forced labour, the officer will prohibit the goods from entering Canada.

Question No.130—Questions on the Order PaperRoutine Proceedings

3:25 p.m.

Bloc

Simon-Pierre Savard-Tremblay Bloc Saint-Hyacinthe—Bagot—Acton, QC

With regard to products containing polysilicon that are imported into Canada: (a) how many of these products are linked to Xinjiang; (b) what percentage of all imported products containing polysilicon do the products in (a) account for; and (c) how many were previously denied entry to the United States because they were not compliant with the United States' Uyghur Forced Labor Prevention Act?

Question No.130—Questions on the Order PaperRoutine Proceedings

3:25 p.m.

La Prairie—Atateken Québec

Liberal

Jacques Ramsay LiberalParliamentary Secretary to the Minister of Public Safety

Mr. Speaker, the Customs Act only requires importers to identify the country of origin, for example, “China”, of their goods, not the region. The region within a country where goods originate is not a data element that is mandatory; importers do not have the obligation to report it. As such, the CBSA cannot provide the information requested specific to Xinjiang. However, the Canada Border Services Agency, or CBSA, can report that from January 1, 2024, to June 25, 2025, 34 shipments were intercepted for suspected ties to forced labour. Based on a manual search of our records, 32 of those shipments were products containing polysilicon imported from China, but none of the 32 shipments appear to have originated in Xinjiang.

Establishing that goods have been produced by forced labour requires significant research, analysis and supporting information. CBSA works closely with the key government departments such as Employment and Social Development Canada and Global Affairs Canada to identify goods of concern related to forced labour. Canada also cooperates and exchanges information and best practices with US Customs and Border Protection related to the enforcement of the forced labour import ban.

When a shipment is detained, importers have the opportunity to provide information that will be analyzed by the CBSA in order to inform the final decision of the officer. The officer is then required to make a tariff classification determination on the imported goods, based on the information provided by the importers. If the officer determines that the goods were produced by forced labour, the officer will prohibit the goods from entering Canada.

Question No.132—Questions on the Order PaperRoutine Proceedings

3:25 p.m.

Conservative

Tamara Kronis Conservative Nanaimo—Ladysmith, BC

With regard to the $5 million promised by the government to the Nanaimo Loaves and Fishes Community Food Bank in December of 2024: (a) how much of the funding has been delivered to date; (b) on what dates was funding delivered to the food bank and how much was delivered on each date; and (c) what are the dates and amounts of future payments by the government to the food bank which have not yet occurred?

Question No.132—Questions on the Order PaperRoutine Proceedings

3:25 p.m.

Ajax Ontario

Liberal

Jennifer McKelvie LiberalParliamentary Secretary to the Minister of Housing and Infrastructure

Mr. Speaker, in response to part (a) of the question, with regard to the $5 million proposed in the government’s December 2024 Fall Economic Statement, or FES, the FES represents proposed funding and a contribution agreement with Loaves and Fishes does not exist.

Part (b) of the question is not applicable, as no funding has been delivered.

As for part (c), no information is available regarding dates and amounts of future payments.

Question No.133—Questions on the Order PaperRoutine Proceedings

3:25 p.m.

Conservative

Tamara Kronis Conservative Nanaimo—Ladysmith, BC

With regard to the Canada Revenue Agency during the 2024 calendar year: (a) how many registered charities existed; (b) of the charities in (a), how many and what percentage were religious charities or charities whose primary purpose is related to the advancement of religion; (c) how many and what percentage of charities were audited; and (d) how many and what percentage of religious charities, or charities whose primary purpose is related to advancement of religion, were audited?

Question No.133—Questions on the Order PaperRoutine Proceedings

3:25 p.m.

Saint-Maurice—Champlain Québec

Liberal

François-Philippe Champagne LiberalMinister of Finance and National Revenue

Mr. Speaker, with respect to my colleague’s question, here is the response from the Canada Revenue Agency, or CRA, as of June 9, 2025, the date of question.

The CRA’s data is maintained by fiscal period, from April 1 to March 31. As such, the CRA is providing the data for the 2024-2025 fiscal period.

With regard to (a), as of March 31, 2025, there were 85,315 registered charities in Canada.

With regard to (b), as of March 31, 2025, 32,078 charities were included under the charitable category “Advancement of religion,” which represents approximately 38% of registered charities.

At the time of registration, the CRA assigns all registered charities’ category and sub-category codes that reflect their purposes and activities. The CRA’s publiclyavailable databases retain this information, including its list of charities and certain other qualified donees, available at https://www.canada.ca/en/revenue-agency/services/charities-giving/list-charities/list-charities-other-qualified-donees.html, which identifies each registered charity’s category and sub-category code.

The category code generally identifies the category under which a charity’s purposes are classified. It is important to note that category codes may not always reflect the full extent of a charity’s activities. A charity may have religious motivations or associations without being categorized under an “advancement of religion” category code. For example, a charity with religious motivations that operates a food bank could be categorized under a “relief of poverty” category code. Another example could be a charity whose directors are members of the clergy, who operate the charity based on religious principles, but who offer humanitarian relief programs.

If a charity changes its programs over time, its category code is not automatically updated. The charity must inform the CRA of any such changes for this code to be revised.

With regard to (c), during the 2024-2025 fiscal period, the CRA audited 220 registered charities, which represents approximately 0.3% of registered charities. Through its understanding of the charitable sector population, the CRA has developed and implemented a risk-based and multi-streamed approach involving audits and various non-audit interventions. The risk-based and multi-streamed approach is designed to provide the appropriate balance of compliance treatments, which include an array of activities ranging from reminder and nudge letters, to conducting audits, which can result in outcomes ranging from education letters, to sanctions, and revocations. This approach is based on the understanding of how risk is distributed through the charitable sector population. A priority of the CRA, through its risk-based approach, is to address high-risk non-compliance, which has a severe negative impact on the charitable sector.

With regard to (d), the confidentiality provisions of the Income Tax Act prevent the CRA from commenting on specific cases. The CRA’s actions can only be made public when an audit results in a charitable registration being revoked, annulled, or suspended, or when a charity is penalized. However, the CRA can confirm it does not select registered charities for audit based on factors such as faith or denomination, nor would such factors influence the outcome of an audit.

Question No.138—Questions on the Order PaperRoutine Proceedings

3:25 p.m.

Conservative

Jim Belanger Conservative Sudbury East—Manitoulin—Nickel Belt, ON

With regard to the Economic Development Initiative for Northern Ontario for 2024-25: what metrics are being used to determine whether funding has achieved Economic Development Initiative objectives and expected results, including objectives to (i) demonstrate participation and support of the Francophone community, (ii) respond to a priority and need of the Francophone community?

Question No.138—Questions on the Order PaperRoutine Proceedings

3:25 p.m.

Vimy Québec

Liberal

Annie Koutrakis LiberalParliamentary Secretary to the Minister of Jobs and Families

Mr. Speaker, with regard to the Economic Development Initiative for Northern Ontario in 2024–25, the metrics used to determine whether funding has achieved the initiative’s objectives and expected results are drawn from the horizontal performance measurement strategy led by Innovation, Science and Economic Development Canada.

The Economic Development Initiative supports the sustainable economic growth of Official Language Minority Communities and is part of Innovation, Science and Economic Development Canada’s commitment under the Official Languages Act and the Action Plan for Official Languages 2023–2028.

Performance is assessed through a common logic model applied across all Regional Development Agencies, including metrics such as for part (i) of the question, the number of Official Language Minority Communities businesses and organizations supported; the jobs created or maintained in Official Language Minority Communities; the partnerships established or strengthened with Francophone organizations; for part (ii), the capacity-building activities that respond to identified community needs; and the evidence of new expertise, services, or market access for Francophone entrepreneurs.

Progress is reported through annual data and narrative reporting that contributes to horizontal evaluations and official languages accountability. Metrics also assess how projects demonstrate meaningful participation by the Francophone community and address identified priorities and needs.

Question No.148—Questions on the Order PaperRoutine Proceedings

3:25 p.m.

Conservative

David Bexte Conservative Bow River, AB

With regard to the government's policy on pipeline approvals: (a) what is the government's policy, including which specific parties or entities must agree or consent before an approval is given; and (b) how long will it take for the government to approve or reject any new pipeline proposal?

Question No.148—Questions on the Order PaperRoutine Proceedings

September 15th, 2025 / 3:25 p.m.

Markham—Thornhill Ontario

Liberal

Tim Hodgson LiberalMinister of Energy and Natural Resources

Mr. Speaker, with regard to (a), the Canadian Energy Regulator Act, or CER Act, establishes the Canada Energy Regulator, or CER, as the federal body that oversees the regulation of pipelines that cross provincial or international boundaries. The CER Act can be found at https://laws-lois.justice.gc.ca/eng/acts/c-15.1/index.html.

The CER’s mandate, responsibilities and powers are established under the CER Act and a number of other Acts and Regulations, which are found at https://www.cer-rec.gc.ca/en/about/acts-regulations/list-acts-regulations/index.html.

The Commission of the CER is an independent entity within the governance structure of the CER, authorized under the CER Act and other relevant legislation to adjudicate pipelines and other energy projects. The Commission adheres to the purpose and provisions of the CER Act when assessing whether a pipeline application should be approved, balancing factors that are set out in the CER Act such as: impacts to the environment; impacts to the rights and interests of Indigenous Peoples; the need for the project; economic impacts; job creation; and whether it can be built and operated safely. The CER Act requires the Commission to establish fair, inclusive, transparent, and efficient regulatory processes for assessing applications. Prior to making a recommendation or decision about a project, the Commission considers the views of the people and communities who may be potentially impacted by the project.

When making recommendations and decisions, the Commission is required to consider a number of factors including any adverse effects that a project may have on the rights of the Indigenous Peoples of Canada recognized and affirmed by section 35 of the Constitution Act, 1982.

The CER uses a cooperative and respectful approach to engagement with Indigenous Peoples. The UN Declaration, including its provisions regarding free, prior and informed consent, provides important context for this work and can be a relevant consideration for the Commission when designing its hearing processes for the purpose of making decisions or recommendations for new pipeline projects.

With regard to (b), the CER Act mandates that all applications must be dealt with as expeditiously as the circumstances and procedural fairness and natural justice permit and sets out legislated time limits for how long assessment processes can take. In addition, the Commission has established service standards that identify specific delivery targets for processing applications. Information about the CER’s time limits and service standards can be found at: https://www.cer-rec.gc.ca/en/about/who-we-are-what-we-do/cer-time-limits-and-service-standards.html.

These time limits and service standards vary according to the size and complexity of the proposed project. Pursuant to the time limits set out in the CER Act, pipelines that are 40 km in length or under must be processed by the Commission within 130 – 300 calendar days, and these are generally processed faster, within service standards of between 40 and 120 days, depending on complexity. Applications for pipelines that are over 40 kilometres in length must be processed by the Commission within a 15-month time limit. For these projects, the Commission makes a recommendation about whether a project should be approved, but the final decision is then made by the Governor in Council.

The CER has achieved the time limit for 99% of the thousands of applications assessed under the CER Act for which time limits apply.

Pipeline projects that meet the thresholds in Physical Activities Regulations, available at https://laws-lois.justice.gc.ca/eng/regulations/SOR-2019-285/FullText.html, go through an impact assessment or integrated review process, led by the Impact Assessment Agency of Canada and a decision is made by the Governor in Council.

Question No.149—Questions on the Order PaperRoutine Proceedings

3:25 p.m.

Conservative

Scott Anderson Conservative Vernon—Lake Country—Monashee, BC

With regard to the Minister of Public Safety: (a) on what date did the minister complete the Canadian Firearms Safety Course; and (b) if the minister has not yet completed the Canadian Firearms Safety Course, has he signed up to take the course, and, if not, why not?

Question No.149—Questions on the Order PaperRoutine Proceedings

3:25 p.m.

La Prairie—Atateken Québec

Liberal

Jacques Ramsay LiberalParliamentary Secretary to the Minister of Public Safety

Mr. Speaker, completion of the Canadian Firearms Safety Course, or CFSC, is a prerequisite to apply for a Possession and Acquisition Licence.

The topics covered in the CFSC include the evolution of firearms, major parts, types and actions, basic firearms safety practices, ammunition, operating firearm actions, safe handling and carry procedures, firing techniques and procedures, care of non-restricted firearms, responsibilities of the firearms owner/user, and safe storage, display, transportation and handling of non-restricted firearms.

In accordance with Section 26 of the Privacy Act, the RCMP cannot provide any information on individuals who have enrolled or participated in the CFSC.

Question No.151—Questions on the Order PaperRoutine Proceedings

3:25 p.m.

Conservative

Rachael Thomas Conservative Lethbridge, AB

With regard to the $11,985 contract between the Canadian Broadcasting Corporation and GCStrategies Inc., which was noted in the June 2025 report of the Auditor General: (a) what was the contract for; (b) on what date was it signed; (c) who at the Canadian Broadcasting Corporation decided to award this contract to GCStrategies Inc.; (d) what specific work was done and what results were achieved by GCStrategies Inc.; and (e) did GCStrategies Inc. approach the Canadian Broadcasting Corporation to initiate this contract or did the Canadian Broadcasting Corporation approach GCStrategies Inc. to initiate this contract, and which individuals approached which individuals?