Mr. Speaker, in the member's 10-minute diatribe, I heard very few relevant talking points to support the government's position. In fact all I heard repeatedly, was reference to a non-binding motion, that it is our solution, that we do not have any talking points and that we are not creating any opportunities for the government to pass legislation.
Perhaps the member needs a little bit of a history lesson. In the 44th Parliament, the Conservative Party of Canada tabled 22 criminal justice PMBs that the member voted against every time in the House, and nine in the Senate. In the 45th Parliament, there were 14 criminal justice PMBs in the House and five in the Senate. When they were brought to a vote, the member voted against them.
We are talking about obstructionists. Why do the member and his party continue to obstruct their own legislation?