House of Commons Hansard #77 of the 45th Parliament, 1st session. (The original version is on Parliament's site.) The word of the day was benefit.

Topics

line drawing of robot

This summary is computer-generated. Usually it’s accurate, but every now and then it’ll contain inaccuracies or total fabrications.

Canadian Multiculturalism Act Second reading of Bill C-245. The bill proposes to exempt Quebec from the Canadian Multiculturalism Act, allowing Quebec to apply its own model of interculturalism. Bloc Québécois members argue this respects Quebec's distinct nationhood and linguistic identity. Liberal members counter that multiculturalism is a shared Canadian value that strengthens diversity and can coexist with French in Quebec. Conservative members criticize Liberal policies but emphasize unity within multiculturalism. 7200 words, 1 hour.

Protecting Victims Act Second reading of Bill C-16. The bill aims to reinstate mandatory minimums, strengthen victims' rights, and address gender-based and intimate partner violence, and child protection. Conservatives argue it contains a "poison pill" allowing judges to override mandatory sentences and criticize Liberal "soft-on-crime policies" for rising crime rates. Liberals accuse Conservatives of "filibustering". The Bloc raises concerns about federal funding for provincial justice administration, while the Green Party questions the effectiveness of mandatory minimums. 8600 words, 1 hour.

Canada Groceries and Essentials Benefit Act Second reading of Bill C-19. The bill, Canada Groceries and Essentials Benefit Act, proposes to replace the existing GST credit with a more generous benefit to help low- and modest-income Canadians afford groceries and essentials. The Liberal government states it will increase the benefit by 25% for five years starting in July 2026 and provide a one-time payment equivalent to a 50% increase this year. Conservatives argue the bill is a "band-aid solution" that fails to address the root causes of food inflation, which they attribute to government policies and taxes. The Bloc Québécois supports the measure for vulnerable families but suggests monthly payments and questions the bill's timing and impact on seniors' benefits. 32300 words, 4 hours in 2 segments: 1 2.

Statements by Members

Question Period

The Conservatives criticize the government's failure to address Canada's highest food inflation and rising cost of living, blaming Liberal taxes like the carbon and fuel standard taxes. They also highlight stagnant economic growth, the housing crisis impacting young Canadians, and auto worker job losses, urging the Liberals to cut taxes and bureaucracy.
The Liberals focus on affordability measures, including the groceries and essentials benefit for 12 million Canadians, and childcare. They highlight Canada's strong economic growth and job creation. Key initiatives include Build Canada Homes and a first-time homebuyers' tax break. They also discuss modernizing seniors' benefits, dementia support, and the auto sector.
The Bloc criticizes government over delays in Old Age Security benefits caused by Cúram software glitches and its cost overruns. They also raise concerns about expropriation threats in Mirabel for a high-speed train and the lack of consultations for residents.
The NDP calls for support of Bill C-233 to prevent Canada's complicity in horrific acts abroad.

Voting Procedures in the House—Speaker's Ruling The Speaker rules on voting procedures, clarifying that an electronic vote counts if an in-person vote is invalid due to the member not being in their seat. The Speaker emphasizes proper decorum during recorded divisions. 500 words.

Requirement of a Royal Recommendation for Bill C-222—Speaker's Ruling The Speaker rules Bill C-222 requires a royal recommendation and clarifies voting procedures, stating electronic votes can be valid if in-person votes are not legitimate, prompting discussion among Members on decorum and rules. 1100 words, 10 minutes.

Petitions

Adjournment Debates

Canada-United States relations Jacob Mantle questions the government's approach to the United States, suggesting it damages the relationship. Patricia Lattanzio argues the government is diversifying trade and defending Canadian interests amid global protectionism, citing efforts to address trade irritants and open new markets.
Carbon tax on fertilizer Cathay Wagantall argues that the Liberal's carbon tax and other policies increase food costs for Canadians. Wade Grant defends industrial carbon pricing as fair, necessary for economic responsibility, and not a burden on families or farmers. Wagantall insists Canadian farmers are penalized, while Grant says carbon pricing aligns Canada with global markets.
Criminal justice and bail reform Andrew Lawton criticizes Liberal justice priorities, saying they focus on "thought crime" instead of bail reform. Patricia Lattanzio accuses Conservatives of obstructing a bill to combat hate, and says they delayed bail reform. Lawton denies this, and Lattanzio urges the committee to pass Bill C-14 quickly.
Was this summary helpful and accurate?

Bill C-16 Protecting Victims ActGovernment Orders

1 p.m.

Conservative

Frank Caputo Conservative Kamloops—Thompson—Nicola, BC

Mr. Speaker, I thank my colleague from Quebec for the question.

I actually have something here regarding Jordan. I have a great deal of time for my colleague.

As somebody who practised criminal law for 15 to 18 years, my view is that the Jordan issue is a substantial one. It has to be addressed by the House of Commons for the reasons my colleague mentioned. The other reason is disclosure. In 1988, I think, when the Stinchcombe case came out, which is the leading case on disclosure, it was not addressed. The House needs to address disclosure, and it needs to address Jordan.

Judicial vacancies are a huge problem, and something we discussed at our convention.

Bill C-16 Protecting Victims ActGovernment Orders

February 2nd, 2026 / 1 p.m.

Conservative

Ellis Ross Conservative Skeena—Bulkley Valley, BC

Mr. Speaker, my colleague's speech was correct. As we know, the Conservatives are not putting up many speakers here, but we would like to get this issue resolved.

As a new MP, I have heard all of the stories here about the victims, the testimony and what our citizens are going through, but the Liberals seem to want to debate the rights of offenders or how we should not debate the bill. All of us want to debate it to be fair to all Canadians.

Can the member expand on exactly what the protecting victims act would do, and how we would get there?

Bill C-16 Protecting Victims ActGovernment Orders

1 p.m.

Conservative

Frank Caputo Conservative Kamloops—Thompson—Nicola, BC

Mr. Speaker, I am not going to drop it. I would love to drop the bill, because it is thick, but it would make a thud, and I do not want to hurt the interpreters' ears.

It is an expansive bill. The Liberals say we are filibustering. Should we not be talking about a bill of this substance? It is a bill that would do a lot of things, yet forgets a lot of things, like addressing parts of Bill C-75 with respect to bail and parts of Bill C-5 that say people who do drive-by shootings or commit extortion with a firearm or robbery with a firearm can serve their sentences on house arrest.

Bill C-16 Protecting Victims ActGovernment Orders

1 p.m.

Some hon. members

Oh, oh!

Bill C-16 Protecting Victims ActGovernment Orders

1 p.m.

Conservative

Frank Caputo Conservative Kamloops—Thompson—Nicola, BC

The Liberals are laughing at that, Mr. Speaker. Is it not wonderful that the Liberals think drive-by shootings, robbery with a firearm and things like that are funny?

My time is up. Let us get this done.

Bill C-16 Protecting Victims ActGovernment Orders

1 p.m.

The Assistant Deputy Speaker John Nater

The question is on the motion.

If a member participating in person wishes that the motion be carried or carried on division, or if a member of a recognized party participating in person wishes to request a recorded division, I would invite them to rise and indicate it to the Chair.

Bill C-16 Protecting Victims ActGovernment Orders

1 p.m.

An hon. member

On division.

Bill C-16 Protecting Victims ActGovernment Orders

1 p.m.

The Assistant Deputy Speaker John Nater

I declare the motion carried on division. Accordingly, the bill stands referred to the Standing Committee on Justice and Human Rights.

(Motion agreed to, bill read the second time and referred to a committee)

Bill C-19 Canada Groceries and Essentials Benefit ActGovernment Orders

1 p.m.

Saint-Maurice—Champlain Québec

Liberal

François-Philippe Champagne LiberalMinister of Finance and National Revenue

moved that Bill C‑19, Canada Groceries and Essentials Benefit Act, be read the second time and referred to a committee.

Mr. Speaker, I can see the enthusiasm on both sides of the House. My Conservative colleagues too are brimming with enthusiasm this Monday morning.

I am pleased to rise today to start the debate on Bill C‑19, Canada groceries and essentials benefit act. A lot of important things are getting done in the House, but I would say that this bill is equally important—crucial, even—to Canadian families.

This is the third piece of legislation I have had the honour to introduce as the Minister of Finance and National Revenue. The first, members will recall, was Bill C-4, which put more money in the pockets of Canadians with the middle-class tax cuts. The second, Bill C-15, was the budget implementation act—

Bill C-19 Canada Groceries and Essentials Benefit ActGovernment Orders

1 p.m.

Some hon. members

Oh, oh!

Bill C-19 Canada Groceries and Essentials Benefit ActGovernment Orders

1:05 p.m.

The Assistant Deputy Speaker John Nater

Order.

I will invite the member to stop the heckling. The speech has just started. There will be a full 10 minutes for questions and comments when the speech is completed.

Bill C-19 Canada Groceries and Essentials Benefit ActGovernment Orders

1:05 p.m.

Some hon. members

Oh, oh!

Bill C-19 Canada Groceries and Essentials Benefit ActGovernment Orders

1:05 p.m.

The Assistant Deputy Speaker John Nater

Order.

I am going to ask both sides to refrain from heckling at this moment.

The hon. Minister of Finance.

Bill C-19 Canada Groceries and Essentials Benefit ActGovernment Orders

1:05 p.m.

Liberal

François-Philippe Champagne Liberal Saint-Maurice—Champlain, QC

Mr. Speaker, let me start again. I see the Conservatives are full of enthusiasm this afternoon, but I want to make sure that they clearly understand what we are doing in the House.

The second bill, as I was saying, was Bill C-15, the budget implementation act, which would help lay the groundwork for the generational investments that have been included in budget 2025. In other words, we have a long-term vision. It is one that is focused on building a strong and resilient Canadian economy while, at the same time, remaining focused on the more immediate needs of Canadian families and Canadian workers.

All of this is part of our response to a rapidly changing and increasingly uncertain world. We know, for example, that while inflation has cooled off since its postpandemic peak, food inflation remains stubbornly high for Canadian families. Global supply chain shocks caused by tariffs, geopolitical disruptions and climate change have all caused food prices to rise around the world.

That is why I am pleased to inform the House that the Canada groceries and essentials benefit will put hundreds of dollars into the bank accounts of more than 12 million Canadians. That is very significant. Everyone in the House should rejoice that we are going to meet the moment for Canadian families.

We know that affordability is a priority for Canadians, and it is a priority for our government. I would like to believe that it is a priority for everyone here, and I urge all members of the House to work in collaboration with us and help pass the bill in the swiftest manner one can imagine. The Canada groceries and essentials benefit will deliver real help to Canadians who are struggling with the cost of groceries and everyday essentials.

This new benefit will replace the GST credit, but more importantly, it will be more generous. As a refresher, the GST credit is a non-taxable payment made four times a year to help low- and modest-income individuals and families. It is a way of making our tax system more equitable. However, for many Canadians, this assistance is no longer sufficient as a result of rising food costs. We are therefore proposing to increase this benefit by 25%.

In addition, this year we will add a one-time payment equal to 50% of the current benefit, because what people need is immediate support. Since 2020, food inflation has added an average of $782 to household budgets. That is precisely what we are seeking to offset. People understand our long-term vision for growing the Canadian economy, but they also need immediate relief. That is why we are stepping up.

Right now, a person living alone who is eligible for the GST credit can receive a maximum of $443 per year. That same person would get approximately $950 in total from the one-time payment during the 2026-27 benefits year, thanks to the changes we are proposing. This is material, this is timely and this is important for Canadian families. For a couple with two children, the amount would increase from approximately $1,086 to $1,890. That is $800 more in the pockets of Canadian families.

It is right that members of the House are rejoicing, and I know my Conservative colleagues are rejoicing in their hearts at being able to support Canadian families.

Making life more affordable for Canadians is the right thing to do. This is part of Canadian values. When times are tough, Canadians rise up and help each other. That is why the first thing we did with Bill C-4 was cut the income tax for 22 million Canadians. Some 22 million Canadians have received a tax cut. This is significant and, in fact, it was the first act of our government. This represents savings of up to $840 for a two-income family.

With that same legislation, we will formally cancel the federal consumer carbon pricing, bringing down gasoline prices by approximately 18¢ a litre in most provinces and territories. We are also lowering the upfront costs of buying a new home by eliminating the GST for first-time homebuyers, saving them up to $50,000.

This is a government that understands Canadians and responds to Canadians' needs.

We are also continuing to lower the cost of child care, ensuring that 900,000 children and their families can save thousands of dollars every year. We have also made Canada's national school food program permanent so that we can feed up to 400,000 children a year and save participating families with two children an average of $800 a year. Canadian families across the country welcome this kind of help. We are implementing automatic federal benefits for 5.5 million individuals by 2028 so that Canadians can easily and reliably receive the assistance they are entitled to.

We are leaving no stone unturned when it comes to making life more affordable for Canadians. Affordability must be a central measure of our country's economic success. Affordable housing helps workers live near their job. Accessible child care enables more parents to fully participate in the workforce. National school food programs help families and children get ahead, and less expensive groceries and food security mean that Canadians can afford a healthy meal. They mean not having to choose between eating well and other basic needs.

The new Canada groceries and essentials benefit is going to really improve the lives of those who need it most. That is what is in this bill, so I urge all members of the House to support it. I know my colleagues care about this legislation because it helps Canadian families at a time when they need it most. This is one step we are taking to make Canadians' grocery bills more affordable. However, as I said, it is not the only one.

As the Prime Minister announced last week, we will also be implementing long-term solutions that will help us tackle food security and build more resilient supply chains.

For example, we will capitalize on the strategic response fund, the purpose of which, I would remind the House, is to help the sectors affected by tariffs adapt, diversify and grow. We are committing $500 million from this fund to help food businesses expand capacity and increase productivity.

We will be spending $150 million specifically to help small and medium-sized enterprises through the regional tariff response initiative. This funding will prioritize investments that expand capacity and increase productivity in order to increase the food supply and ease price pressures. I want to take this opportunity to thank the president of the Union des producteurs agricoles du Québec for the insight he gave us into measures that the government could be taking to help farmers.

In order to take the pressure off food banks, we will also be investing $20 million in the local food infrastructure fund.

All of these investments will help us improve food security in Canada. I know that this is an issue many Canadians across the country are worried about.

To lower the cost of food production in Canada, the Prime Minister also announced that we are introducing immediate expensing for greenhouse buildings. This measure would support increased domestic supply and investment in food production over the medium and long term. We will develop a national food security strategy to make food more affordable, and we will work with the provinces and territories to standardize unit price labelling so that Canadians can shop and compare prices easily in this era of shrinkflation. I think this is something we should all be rejoicing about.

We are taking action on several fronts to address a complex issue that is very real for Canadians and Canadian families. There are several causes of the food price inflation we are currently seeing, many of which are outside Canada. We cannot control what other countries do, but we can control how we respond here in Canada. This bill is our response: support for food production here in Canada, stronger supply chains and help for people who need it most. This bill is part of our commitment to build a stronger, more resilient Canadian economy and make life more affordable for Canadians.

In fact, we are already seeing progress. Some everyday expenses such as gas prices at the pump, child care fees and cellphone bills have come down. Wages are growing faster than inflation and have been growing so for 33 consecutive months. Those are the facts. This is the Canadian economy, which any commentator has said is resilient.

Currently, the price of groceries and other necessities continues to be high. That is why we are taking action in a targeted and responsible manner. We are protecting the most vulnerable Canadians while remaining fiscally responsible. That is what Canadians expect. Our goal is clear. We want an economy that works for everyone. We want real economic growth that is shared by all. We want an economy where costs are reasonable and where help is available when Canadians need it.

We want to make sure that Canadians feel the benefits of our country's economic growth in their wallets and at the kitchen table, not just hear about them in economic reports. That starts with everyone being able to put good food on the table. That is how we build Canada strong, and that is what we are doing.

Canada is strongest when all Canadians are strong. That is why we are acting: because we believe in every Canadian. We believe in every Canadian family, and we believe in Canada.

Bill C-19 Canada Groceries and Essentials Benefit ActGovernment Orders

1:15 p.m.

Conservative

Jasraj Singh Hallan Conservative Calgary East, AB

Mr. Speaker, Liberal math is giving Canadians the highest food inflation in the entire G7. Then they give Canadians their money back, after they have taxed it, and say that this is the solution.

I have a simple question for the minister: How much will grocery prices go down after this benefit is adopted?

Bill C-19 Canada Groceries and Essentials Benefit ActGovernment Orders

1:15 p.m.

Liberal

François-Philippe Champagne Liberal Saint-Maurice—Champlain, QC

Mr. Speaker, I like my colleague, but the Conservatives have to be disconnected from reality; maybe it is because they are coming back from their convention over the weekend.

Canadians have said that the two things that matter most for them now are the price of groceries and the price of rent. We have been acting on both to make sure that life is more affordable for Canadians, and we will continue to do so.

Bill C-19 Canada Groceries and Essentials Benefit ActGovernment Orders

1:15 p.m.

Bloc

Maxime Blanchette-Joncas Bloc Rimouski—La Matapédia, QC

Mr. Speaker, what great news we are getting today from the Minister of Finance. Members of the Bloc Québécois support a measure that is designed to help the most vulnerable among us, finally.

However, I would like to remind the minister what he said a few months ago. He said that the government did not have the money to fix an injustice of its own making. I am referring to the OAS increase for persons aged 65 to 74.

How is it that the minister can come up with $3 billion today for a measure intended to buy votes, but cannot provide direct assistance to seniors who are suffering daily?

I would be grateful if he gave me an honest answer.

Bill C-19 Canada Groceries and Essentials Benefit ActGovernment Orders

1:15 p.m.

Liberal

François-Philippe Champagne Liberal Saint-Maurice—Champlain, QC

Mr. Speaker, I am surprised that my Bloc Québécois colleague is not rising to applaud a measure specifically designed to help our country's farmers, especially those in Quebec.

As a matter of fact, in an effort to do the right thing and consult stakeholders, I spoke with the president of the Union des producteurs agricoles du Québec. Not only are we offering credit to families now, we are also going to offer structural assistance that will increase production in Canada. This will allow us to fund things like animal processing facility modernization, which will boost food production in Canada. Food security is among Quebeckers' leading concerns and I know that my Bloc Québécois colleague is going to vote for the measure because he fundamentally knows that it is good.

Bill C-19 Canada Groceries and Essentials Benefit ActGovernment Orders

1:20 p.m.

Winnipeg North Manitoba

Liberal

Kevin Lamoureux LiberalParliamentary Secretary to the Leader of the Government in the House of Commons

Mr. Speaker, I wonder if the Minister of Finance can amplify why this legislation is so important. I know the feedback that I have received and the feedback from many of our colleagues is that affordability is an important issue. Canadians are genuinely concerned about grocery prices.

Can the minister give a clear statement of why every member of the Conservative Party should be making it very clear that they support the legislation?

Bill C-19 Canada Groceries and Essentials Benefit ActGovernment Orders

1:20 p.m.

Liberal

François-Philippe Champagne Liberal Saint-Maurice—Champlain, QC

Mr. Speaker, this is a very learned question from a colleague who has been a very esteemed member of the House. He understands the reality of Canadians. I know that my Conservative colleagues understand too, because if we go to any part of the country, like I said, we would know that the two things that Canadians face in terms of costs are the cost of rent and the cost of food. Obviously, there is also their cellphone bills and, for those who have a family, child care. That is why not only has the government been ensuring food security for Canadians, but we have been acting on a number of fronts to make life more affordable for Canadians.

Yes, this is about a boost and a bridge, because Canadians understand that we have a vision to grow our Canadian economy to be the strongest in the G7, but what they need now is the House to support them at this time of need.

Bill C-19 Canada Groceries and Essentials Benefit ActGovernment Orders

1:20 p.m.

NDP

Gord Johns NDP Courtenay—Alberni, BC

Mr. Speaker, New Democrats agree with any supports to help people with the cost of living, but one thing we have never heard from the Liberals and will never hear from Conservatives is about the runaway, out-of-control corporate greed. We are seeing big grocery stores post record profits. There is no mechanism so that the big grocery stores do not increase prices the day before this benefit comes into play. All the Liberals need to do is charge an excess profit tax on big grocery stores.

Is there a threshold for the Liberals on the out-of-control corporate greed that is now becoming normalized?

We see Loblaws with $2 billion in profits last year alone. The minister says that there is nothing we can do here in Canada. Well, there is: an excess profit tax.

Bill C-19 Canada Groceries and Essentials Benefit ActGovernment Orders

1:20 p.m.

Liberal

François-Philippe Champagne Liberal Saint-Maurice—Champlain, QC

Mr. Speaker, I welcome the support of my colleague. He is an esteemed colleague of the House, and he understands well the needs of Canadians.

In my previous role as minister of industry, we raised the temperature on the big chain grocers across the nation. Remember that competition is the best way to make sure that we protect consumers, and we will make sure there is more competition in the country. Another thing that is going to help is the structural change we are doing to increase food production in the country and the food supply.

I am very pleased to see the NDP with us in supporting Canadians. They understand where we need to be on this.

Bill C-19 Canada Groceries and Essentials Benefit ActGovernment Orders

1:20 p.m.

Conservative

Warren Steinley Conservative Regina—Lewvan, SK

Mr. Speaker, it is ironic that today is Groundhog Day, because I have heard this speech before. It was in October 2023, when the minister promised to have groceries lowered by Thanksgiving 2023. He gave this exact same speech. It is recycled, and the Liberals are good at recycling speeches.

This is about $3 billion in taxpayers' money. Sylvain Charlebois said the government collects $7 billion to $8 billion in GST on food. Did the Minister of Finance think about dropping GST on all food, so it could help all Canadians?

Bill C-19 Canada Groceries and Essentials Benefit ActGovernment Orders

1:20 p.m.

Liberal

François-Philippe Champagne Liberal Saint-Maurice—Champlain, QC

Mr. Speaker, my colleague is a very learned member of the House and he knows well, for those watching at home, that most food products in Canada are zero-rated when it comes to GST. He knows this measure is good. I bet the member is going to go back to his riding and talk about it, and he is going to say the House has done the right thing. This is not about politics. This is about policy. This is about helping Canadians where they are.

We are all members of Parliament in the House. We have been sent to the House with one function: to support Canadians in their time of need. This is in line with Canadian values. This is meeting the moment. This is making sure that everyone in this country will benefit from growth in our economy. We are going to be there for Canadians.

Bill C-19 Canada Groceries and Essentials Benefit ActGovernment Orders

1:20 p.m.

Bloc

Maxime Blanchette-Joncas Bloc Rimouski—La Matapédia, QC

Mr. Speaker, the Prime Minister is supposedly a financial expert. Meanwhile, we just had to wait 20 months for a budget, which is not something that has happened very often in history. Another thing that has not happened very often in history is having the largest deficit in Canadian history with a financial expert as Prime Minister.

Now, we have a finance minister who is patting himself on the back today. We are talking about $11 billion over six years for Bill C-19, when the government has just posted a record deficit. Was he not inclined to even attempt to make the budget credible and consistent?

My question for the minister is simple: Are there other $11-billion dollar surprises like this one that we are not aware of?