Mr. Speaker, I listened with great interest to my colleague's speech, just as I have been listening to all of our colleagues' speeches for a while now, but there is something that I do not understand.
Our motion is written in three parts. Regarding the apology to the those whose land was expropriated in Mirabel, the Liberals tell us that it has been done and that they agree with it. As for acknowledging the trauma, they tell us that it has been done and that they agree with it. As for not undertaking such expropriations again without public consultation, social licence and appropriate compensation, they tell us that that is fine and that they are already doing that.
Why are they not voting in favour of the motion if they agree with everything?