Mr. Speaker, the member explained to us how passionate and inspired she was by the much-touted Alto high-speed rail project.
I did not quite understand her position on the motion being debated today. It makes me wonder. What we are criticizing is that the people of Mirabel were not part of the consultations, first of all. We are criticizing the unceremonious strategies used in Bill C‑15 to fast-track processes outside the usual laws.
That said, at the end of the day, the motion we are debating today calls for an apology to the people of Mirabel. The member agreed that what was done to the people of Mirabel in the past was wrong.
How would apologizing to the people of Mirabel compromise the project that she cares so much about?