Mr. Speaker, I am wondering if my colleague across the way could describe why he continues to obstruct after there has been the introduction of a “for greater certainty” clause that would address the concerns that Canadians have and clarify that it would absolutely not be prohibited to read scripture, to preach or to read a religious text under this legislation.
Why does the member opposite continue to obstruct this bill when we have clearly set out that the religious exemption and religious teachings have been protected in this bill?