House of Commons Hansard #92 of the 45th Parliament, 1st session. (The original version is on Parliament's site.) The word of the day was iran.

Topics

line drawing of robot

This summary is computer-generated. Usually it’s accurate, but every now and then it’ll contain inaccuracies or total fabrications.

Export and Import Permits Act Second reading of Bill C-233. The bill aims to amend the Export and Import Permits Act to close dangerous loopholes in Canada's arms export regime, particularly the exemption for exports to the United States. Supporters argue it ensures Canada's international obligations and prevents human rights violations. Opponents, including the Bloc and Conservatives, warn it is too rigid, could harm Canadian industry, and strain alliances and the crucial defence relationship with the U.S. 6900 words, 1 hour.

Government Business No. 6—Proceedings on Bill C-9 Members debate a motion to expedite Bill C-9, which aims to combat hate propaganda, hate crimes, and protect access to religious sites. Liberals and the Bloc Québécois support the motion, citing Conservative filibustering and the urgent need to address rising hate-motivated violence. Conservatives oppose limiting debate, arguing the bill, particularly the removal of the religious exemption, threatens freedom of religion and expression, and that the government is censoring discussion on a "censorship bill." 15800 words, 2 hours.

Statements by Members

Question Period

The Conservatives criticize the Liberal government's economic policies, including the fuel standard and industrial carbon tax, for driving record inflation and shrinking the economy. They demand action on rising food costs. The party also raises concerns about national security, calling for the deportation of IRGC members and supporting energy development.
The Liberals emphasize Canada's strong economy and its role as an energy superpower, citing record oil production and critical mineral investments. They promote affordability through tax cuts, social programs like child care and the Canada groceries and essentials benefit, and modernizing benefit delivery. The party also addresses national security and the removal of IRGC members.
The Bloc criticizes the Cúram software for its cost overruns, impacting 85,000 seniors, and demands an independent public inquiry. They also seek social licence for rail expropriations.
The Greens criticize Canada's foreign policy for supporting illegal attacks by the United States and Israel against Iran.

Canada Post Corporation Act First reading of Bill C-262. The bill aims to modernize and standardize direct-to-consumer shipping of Canadian wine, beer, and spirits across provincial borders, creating a national framework to replace current provincial rules. 300 words.

Petitions

Build Canada Homes Act Second reading of Bill C-20. The bill aims to establish Build Canada Homes, a Crown corporation, to increase affordable housing supply and promote efficient building techniques. The Liberal government states it will fast-track construction, use federal lands, and leverage partnerships, backed by a $13 billion investment. Conservatives criticize it as a fourth bureaucracy that will not solve the housing crisis, citing past Liberal failures and proposing tax cuts and reduced red tape instead. The Bloc Québécois argues housing is provincial jurisdiction and advocates for unconditional federal transfers to Quebec. 26100 words, 3 hours.

Iran and the Middle East Members debate the hostilities in Iran and the Middle East and their impact on Canadians abroad. The Liberals emphasize de-escalation, civilian protection, and consular support for Canadians, while Conservatives criticize the government's "incoherent and contradictory" position on U.S. air strikes. The Bloc Québécois stresses the importance of consulting allies and preparing contingency plans, and the NDP condemns the strikes as illegal under international law, urging a return to diplomacy. 31600 words, 4 hours.

Was this summary helpful and accurate?

Iran and the Middle EastGovernment Orders

6:45 p.m.

Liberal

Anita Anand Liberal Oakville East, ON

Mr. Speaker, for the benefit of my hon. colleague and this House, I will reiterate that Canada has long spoken out against Iran's nuclear proliferation. We strongly support nuclear non-proliferation internationally. Therefore, we will continue to reiterate that Iran must not have nuclear weapons.

In addition, the clarity of our foreign policy in terms of international law must be underscored. We are a country of international law. We believe that the international legal rules relating to engagement bind all parties. We support preventing Iran from obtaining a nuclear weapon. We support international law.

We are focused on de-escalation, including the numerous calls I have had with G7 counterparts and my colleagues. We will continue to support de-escalation. That is a clear statement of Canadian foreign policy.

Iran and the Middle EastGovernment Orders

6:45 p.m.

Bloc

Simon-Pierre Savard-Tremblay Bloc Saint-Hyacinthe—Bagot—Acton, QC

Mr. Speaker, my question will be short and clear. I would like the answer to be short and clear too, ideally a yes or no.

We know that a lot of countries have been getting ready to offer proper consular services for a long time. Yes or no, does Canada have a contingency plan for providing consular services?

Iran and the Middle EastGovernment Orders

6:45 p.m.

Liberal

Anita Anand Liberal Oakville East, ON

Mr. Speaker, of course we do. We have a very robust approach to ensuring we are bringing Canadians home and have already arranged for hundreds of Canadians to return home.

I will specifically underline the three particular means of bringing Canadians home: first, through charter flights; second, through blocked bookings on commercial airlines; and third, through buses that transport Canadians to countries where they can safely book onward travel.

Just this weekend, our government arranged a charter flight that arrived in Toronto from Dubai with nearly 190 seats for Canadians. We continue to book seats on commercial airlines, bringing up to 300 Canadians home per day.

Canada remains vigilant as this conflict evolves. We are deploying consular services across borders in the region to ensure that we are supporting—

Iran and the Middle EastGovernment Orders

6:50 p.m.

The Speaker Francis Scarpaleggia

The hon. member for Saanich—Gulf Islands may ask a very brief question.

Iran and the Middle EastGovernment Orders

6:50 p.m.

Green

Elizabeth May Green Saanich—Gulf Islands, BC

Mr. Speaker, a former senior commander of the Canadian Forces, retired Major-General Denis Thompson, has said on the record that he thinks it is “highly likely” that Canadian exchange officers in the region knew in advance.

Does the minister have any comment on that?

Iran and the Middle EastGovernment Orders

6:50 p.m.

Liberal

Anita Anand Liberal Oakville East, ON

Mr. Speaker, I want to reiterate that the Canadian Armed Forces have been supporting our consular services and supporting diplomatic efforts throughout the world, including in the region, over the last number of decades. In particular, I will say that they take it very seriously to ensure that we are, wherever possible, protecting civilians.

Our position on that matter could not be more clear: Innocent civilians must be protected—

Iran and the Middle EastGovernment Orders

6:50 p.m.

The Speaker Francis Scarpaleggia

Unfortunately, this segment has come to its conclusion.

The hon. Leader of the Opposition.

Iran and the Middle EastGovernment Orders

6:50 p.m.

Battle River—Crowfoot Alberta

Conservative

Pierre Poilievre ConservativeLeader of the Opposition

Mr. Speaker, when the world faces upheaval, when war breaks out, and when energy and food supplies are interrupted, we must zero in on what matters most at home and on what we control. We work for Canada and its people. Here is our home. We want this country to be affordable at home, safe at home, and strong at home, so that we can be unbreakable abroad. Put in more academic terms, we must put Canada's national interests first and foremost as we look at this war, what it means and where we stand.

We are working for Canada and for Canadians here at home, because we want a Canada that is affordable, safe and strong, at home. This is how we are going to become masters of our own destiny, capable of defending our interests and values internationally.

That principle should guide us in the present war in the Middle East, so let us start with the regime itself. This is the most prolific terrorist regime in the world, a regime that routinely murders, harasses and intimidates Canadians. The regime killed 55 Canadian citizens and 30 permanent residents when it fired an unprovoked missile at a passenger plane PS752, for which there has been no subsequent justice by the regime.

Further, let me chronicle the unprovoked aggressions this regime has taken against our country. In 2023, a year-long Global News investigation found that there are “700 regime [backed agents] operating on Canadian soil [for the purposes of intimidating] and threatening” dissidents who fled the regime. Victims' families and Canadians protesting the regime have reported harassment and surveillance on Canadian soil, according to the RCMP, which has received numerous “reports of foreign interference by...the Islamic Republic of Iran.”

In 2024, two Canadians were indicted in the U.S. for their role in an alleged murder-for-hire plot on behalf of Iranian intelligence. In 2024, agents of Iran attempted to assassinate former Canadian justice minister Irwin Cotler. According to a CSIS report in 2024, “the regime is one of the main perpetrators of foreign interference and espionage” in Canada. “CSIS assesses that Iran will continue to use proxies, such as individuals involved in transnational crime networks” when its perceived enemies are active in other countries.

According to CSIS, “as of late 2023, Iran-aligned cyber actors [such as the IRGC-linked CyberAv3ngers] have been targeting Western critical infrastructure... including [and this is important] healthcare and public health, government, information technology, engineering... sectors.” In other words, they have been attempting to mess with our technological capability to deliver health care to our people through foreign attacks on our cyber networks.

The Hogue Commission lists “Iran as a considerable transnational threat because it is likely monitoring, influencing, collecting information on, harassing and intimidating the Iranian diaspora community to prevent criticism of Iran” and the national security committee found that Iran is one of “the primary perpetrators of repression against ethnocultural communities in Canada”. This list only chronicles the direct harm the regime has done to Canada itself. Forget that this regime is the single biggest sponsor of terrorism in the world, that it orchestrated the attacks of October 7, 2023, that it has killed countless of its own citizens, including 30,000 in the last month alone. All of these moral atrocities only compound the regime with the evil that the regime has done to our country.

In other words, it is in our national interest for this regime to be defeated and replaced by the Iranian people with a peaceful democracy. We need strong leadership that takes a stand, maintains that stand, stays consistent at home and abroad, and shows up in this House of Commons to do what is right and speak for the Canadian people. That is what we do here today. We as Conservatives make it clear that it is in our national interest that the regime in Iran, which has infiltrated our country, murdered at least 55 of our citizens, and harassed countless others, be removed. That is why I supported the Prime Minister's initial support of the U.S. and Israeli air strikes.

Since that time, the Prime Minister has flipped and flopped more than four times, having four contradictory positions in as many days. First, he said he was for the attack. Then he regretted his support for the attack. Then he said that his support for the attack was illegal under international law. He said he would consider sending troops for the attack, which he supported but regretted supporting, and then said that it was illegal under international law. His party says one thing to one group and the opposite to another, confusing our allies and dividing Canadians.

Some of the Prime Minister's own Liberal MPs said in the newspaper today, “What the hell” when it comes to his stance on the war in the Middle East, and now he has gone into hiding, having failed to speak a single word in tonight's debate. In this time of crisis, Canadians deserve to know where the Prime Minister stands. Indeed, they deserve to know where the Prime Minister is.

This is a security and affordability crisis. This is an international war on which the Prime Minister has already flip-flopped four times. He should speak out here in the House of Commons, in front of Canadians, instead of hiding. Where is the Prime Minister?

We have been clear and unwavering, Conservatives support the right of the Iranian people to remove their terrorist regime, a regime that has murdered countless Canadians and targets our people on our soil, in order to bring forth a peaceful democracy in Iran.

We must turn our attention, though, to our own country. What does this war mean for Canada? First, we must be safe at home. Canada has become more dangerous under the Liberal government. There have always been wars in the Middle East, but they have never spilled onto Canadian streets. However, after 10 years of Liberal immigration, Liberal catch-and-release laws and Liberal incompetence, we are seeing violence and terrorism normalized in Canada, synagogues shot at, dissidents targeted and regime officials using our country as a safe haven.

As of February 5, only one of the 28 individuals identified by CBSA as illegal foreign regime officials has been kicked out. That does not take into account that, according to Global News, there have been as many as 700 of these regime, terrorist-linked officials who are making Canada their personal hotel. Why has the Prime Minister not moved to have these people deported from our country? The Prime Minister has not made any changes to the Criminal Code to kick the terrorists out, lock the criminals up or stop new ones from coming in.

We need a plan to deport all the regime officials. They need to be identified, they need to be arrested and they need to be deported. There is no room for IRGC or Iranian regime officials in our country. Kick them out.

We need to ensure that Canada is safe for its Persian and Jewish communities, and we need a real action plan to protect synagogues and other places of worship that have come under attack. The government has failed to keep Jews, Persians and other Canadians safe in this country. Enough is enough. We are a very welcoming people, but we will not put up with foreign wars and other forms of terrorism spilling onto our streets. This is Canada, and every Canadian has the right to feel safe living in this country.

We must be affordable at home. Oil prices are spiking due to the blockage of the Strait of Hormuz, which transports about a fifth of the globe's oil. The government cannot control global oil prices, but it can control domestic taxes and policies allowing domestic production.

The Prime Minister has brought in a new tax, the fuel standard, and has blocked domestic production of our oil. We need a plan to unlock affordable energy to supply not only ourselves but the entire world. We need to repeal anti-energy laws such as Bill C-69 and Bill C-48, and the industrial carbon tax, to unblock and unlock our resources, shipping them off our coasts in order to fuel our friends and power our paycheques. In this way, we can make the country both more affordable and more autonomous.

That must be our mission. We work for Canada. That is our job in this place. We must be a country that is affordable at home, safe at home and strong at home so we can defend our interests and be unbreakable abroad. We are here for our country and our people.

Iran and the Middle EastGovernment Orders

7 p.m.

Châteauguay—Les Jardins-de-Napierville Québec

Liberal

Nathalie Provost LiberalSecretary of State (Nature)

Mr. Speaker, we are discussing a very important situation today. The Leader of the Opposition is talking about the threat to Canadians and how serious the risk of domestic terrorism is.

I am a new member here, but I have been told about an important security clearance, which is an official clearance granted by the Canadian government that allows access to classified information that is necessary to be a strategic participant in these matters.

However, I gather that, to date, the Leader of the Opposition does not have that information, does not have access to it and is not willing to seek it out himself. I would like to know whether he thinks he can seek out the security clearance himself and get involved, with all the information on these issues at his disposal.

Iran and the Middle EastGovernment Orders

7 p.m.

Conservative

Pierre Poilievre Conservative Battle River—Crowfoot, AB

Mr. Speaker, the Prime Minister gave a good answer to that question a few days ago. The media asked him a question about foreign interference here in Canada. He said that he could not answer because he had received briefings that prevented him from talking about it openly and answering questions.

I will not be muzzled. I will hang onto my freedom of expression. An opposition leader should be able to speak freely, and I will not let anyone in the government stop me from doing my job and speaking out against foreign interference to protect Canadians.

Iran and the Middle EastGovernment Orders

7 p.m.

Conservative

Garnett Genuis Conservative Sherwood Park—Fort Saskatchewan, AB

Mr. Speaker, I come from the Edmonton region, where so many families continue to grieve the losses that came when the IRGC shot down flight PS752. Over 50 Canadian citizens were murdered that day, many with connections to my region. The regime promptly bulldozed the crash site and even harassed the relatives of victims who spoke out.

When so many Canadians are murdered, this is an attack on us, on our people, on our nation, on our home. Some members of the House seem to have forgotten these events, forgotten the attacks on our country and our people and the continuing attacks on our country through foreign interference that underline the justification and need for this response.

I know that the Leader of the Opposition has engaged directly with flight PS752 families, so I wonder if he can speak to those conversations and what we can do specifically to deliver justice and solace for these Canadian victims of the regime.

Iran and the Middle EastGovernment Orders

7:05 p.m.

Conservative

Pierre Poilievre Conservative Battle River—Crowfoot, AB

Mr. Speaker, I thank the member for leading the charge to achieve justice for the families of the victims of this terrorist attack directed at Canadians. These were our people: 55 Canadian citizens and 30 permanent residents mercilessly killed by a missile targeting a passenger plane, and then their remains bulldozed by the regime, which has done nothing to bring justice to those who fired that missile.

That was an attack on every single Canadian, yet it took four years after that attack for the Liberal government to even list the IRGC, which fired the missile, as a terrorist entity, allowing this group to walk and operate freely on Canadian soil, terrorizing our people. To this day, the Liberal government and the Liberal Prime Minister refuse to deport the terrorist officials who are known to be on our soil. We must kick them out, we must seize their assets and we must bring justice for the Canadian victims of this regime.

Iran and the Middle EastGovernment Orders

7:05 p.m.

Bloc

Alexis Brunelle-Duceppe Bloc Lac-Saint-Jean, QC

Mr. Speaker, the opposition leader says that the Iranians should choose their own future. I could not agree with that statement more. I wish for that with all my heart. I hope that will happen someday.

In the same breath, he also says that he unreservedly supports the American offensive in Iran. As such, he supports President Trump 100% in this offensive. President Trump also said that in the wake of this offensive, it will be up to him to choose the next leader of Iran. He said that himself.

Does the opposition leader understand that this kind of issue should be approached with great nuance? It is very complex. By unilaterally supporting the military offensive by Israel and President Trump, he is effectively supporting that same president's choice for the next leader. Does he realize that?

Iran and the Middle EastGovernment Orders

7:05 p.m.

Conservative

Pierre Poilievre Conservative Battle River—Crowfoot, AB

Mr. Speaker, no, that is not true. I support the Iranian people and their right to choose their own government. That is why I agreed with the Prime Minister when he spoke out in favour of this mission. Now, we do not know where the Prime Minister is physically or what his position is—

Iran and the Middle EastGovernment Orders

7:05 p.m.

The Speaker Francis Scarpaleggia

The Leader of the Opposition can talk about a member's position on an issue, but he cannot refer to a member's physical presence in the House. It really is important to stick to that rule.

The Leader of the Opposition may continue his answer.

Iran and the Middle EastGovernment Orders

7:05 p.m.

Conservative

Pierre Poilievre Conservative Battle River—Crowfoot, AB

Mr. Speaker, I was saying that this is why I agreed. However, I do not know whether the Liberal members agree with their own leader on that.

The Bloc member says that he wants Iranians to be able to choose their president and their government, but how are they going to do that without removing the current regime? Does the member really think that dictatorships are just going to give in and voluntarily hand their power over to the people? No, this is a terrorist regime and it needs to be overthrown.

Iran and the Middle EastGovernment Orders

7:05 p.m.

Green

Elizabeth May Green Saanich—Gulf Islands, BC

Mr. Speaker, I addressed this question earlier to the official opposition with some trepidation because it is information I have from friends within the Vancouver area who are also, like me, associated with the Anglican Church and are very concerned that some members of the Iranian national guard may be obtaining a baptismal certificate to hide their real background and intentions in this country. I second the member's call that we absolutely look for any members of the Iranian national guard who are masquerading as real refugees. I want to ask him if he has heard similar concerns.

Iran and the Middle EastGovernment Orders

7:05 p.m.

Conservative

Pierre Poilievre Conservative Battle River—Crowfoot, AB

Yes, Mr. Speaker, that is an excellent question from the hon. member. In fact we are getting anecdotes all the time from the Persian community. There is a police chief from Tehran who was spotted in a Richmond Hill gym, working out, enjoying himself, enjoying all the plunder that he and his friends stole from the Iranian people. All over parts of the GTA and the Lower Mainland of British Columbia, the Persian community will tell us that they see known members of the regime living in mansions, enjoying the good life here with all the money they stole from the people of Iran.

They are not citizens. They are not permanent residents. They are easy to identify. It is time for the government to arrest these monsters and kick them out of Canada for good.

Iran and the Middle EastGovernment Orders

7:10 p.m.

Winnipeg North Manitoba

Liberal

Kevin Lamoureux LiberalParliamentary Secretary to the Leader of the Government in the House of Commons

Mr. Speaker, in recognizing the very serious nature of what is happening in the Middle East, the Minister of Foreign Affairs made very clear the government's actual position on what is taking place. It seems to me that the Conservatives have the motivation of trying to portray misinformation to Canadians, when in fact the government is being clear.

Does the leader of the official opposition recognize that the Conservative Party of Canada does have a role to play and that providing misinformation at times does more harm to a very serious issue that we are having to face today in the Middle East?

Iran and the Middle EastGovernment Orders

7:10 p.m.

Conservative

Pierre Poilievre Conservative Battle River—Crowfoot, AB

Mr. Speaker, the member seems to suggest that we are misrepresenting the position of the Liberal Prime Minister on this conflict. My question is this: Which position is that?

Iran and the Middle EastGovernment Orders

7:10 p.m.

Bloc

Alexis Brunelle-Duceppe Bloc Lac-Saint-Jean, QC

Mr. Speaker, we can agree on that. My question for the leader of the official opposition is very simple. On day one, the Prime Minister took the same position that the Conservatives are taking today, which is that he unequivocally supported the Trump-Israel military offensive.

If the leader of the official opposition had been prime minister instead of the current Prime Minister, would he not have consulted his allies before making such a statement? Would he have followed the example of France, Germany or Norway, which stated with nuance that they did not necessarily support the offensive because they wanted it to comply with international law?

What would he have done? Would he have aligned himself with European allies or would he have done what his own party is doing today, which is unilaterally supporting Donald Trump's American offensive?

Iran and the Middle EastGovernment Orders

7:10 p.m.

Conservative

Pierre Poilievre Conservative Battle River—Crowfoot, AB

Mr. Speaker, I would have done neither. Yes, we would have consulted with our allies, but we do not work on behalf of foreign governments, whether they are in Washington, the capitals of Europe or elsewhere. We work for Canadians.

This regime has killed Canadians. It has launched missiles to kill 55 Canadian citizens and 30 permanent residents. It continues to harass our citizens and sponsors terrorism on our soil. That is why we are taking action to support our interests here in Canada and to support the freedom of the Iranian people.

Iran and the Middle EastGovernment Orders

7:10 p.m.

Bloc

Yves-François Blanchet Bloc Beloeil—Chambly, QC

Mr. Speaker, allow me to quote a rather old but very relevant saying: The absent are always in the wrong. This saying takes on a very special meaning today. Let us hope that, together, we can see reason.

Perhaps some people would have preferred to see certain others here. Everyone will come to their own judgment. However, a certain someone's presence would certainly have helped to clarify things and reassure the public, and that is a fundamental function that comes with certain titles.

More than six months ago, Iran supposedly had its nuclear capability permanently taken away. President Trump boasted about that with all the subtlety we have come to expect from him. However, he has been criticized for everything he has and has not done for the past year and even prior to that. Suddenly, without consulting anyone, he unleashed hell on Iran.

We can all agree on certain fundamental truths that have been repeated for a long time now. Iran's nuclear program must be dismantled. We must put an end to a regime of terror that oppresses women first and foremost. We must stop the Iranian regime's sponsorship of terrorism.

However, can we question the approach, once these objectives have been clearly established? Is it really healthy and normal to automatically rule out the international institutions that act as safeguards against the inappropriate behaviour we have seen, which has an impact on the entire planet? Is it normal not to inform the usual allies, even if we understand that the UN Security Council was basically hamstrung? Is it normal to accept not having been consulted by the person or country that is supposed to be our main ally? Spontaneously, however, we suddenly support the U.S. and Israeli attack on Iran.

First, they give their unconditional support. Then, the minister and the Prime Minister procrastinate. Next, they have a sudden epiphany and defer to international law. Then they say that Canada will not get involved. Then they say that it might get involved, depending on the conditions.

Finally, today, we are being offered a position, a sort of belated conversion that has the virtue of being clearer: Canada was not consulted, Canada does not agree, and Canada will not participate. It is a belated conversion, but at least it is clear. We are not the only ones interested in this, because Canada is a member of NATO and a member of the G7. It took a long time to understand this, and we are not immune to further changes in position.

It must be said that the trade agreements the Prime Minister is signing all over the place are a long way off from free trade agreements. He is signing a piece of paper at the end of every visit because he does not want to get on the plane empty-handed. There is nothing in those documents that will change the economic reality of Quebec or Canada in the foreseeable future of the next several years.

It is more or less the same thing. No matter what figures Canada or the Prime Minister says, Canada would not even be able to spend the promised amounts anytime soon. Canada is not going to become a major military power overnight. This is the starting point for that reality.

In Davos, the Prime Minister touted co-operation between middle powers. Surprisingly, he did so two days after more or less making a pact with the Chinese empire. Did he speak with the middle powers he is referring to? Right now, the so-called middle powers in the west are moving in a very disordered way, around, beside and behind the American initiative, unable to settle on a common path.

Let us take a look at the effects here in Quebec and Canada, because this war will change people's lives. We already had a tariff crisis, which is still going on and has been getting worse for the past year. We already had a trade crisis so bad that anytime the U.S. President even bothers to take the Prime Minister's call, everyone goes crazy and it is front-page news. Canada and the U.S. are nowhere near reaching an agreement.

We were already living with the threat of a recession, and now the price of a barrel of oil is skyrocketing, with obvious short-term inflation and a possible recession spiral. The effects are significant: purchasing power, especially for the most vulnerable, the likely rise in interest rates, access to home ownership and job losses. These all threaten us.

Proposals have been made for short-term measures in a spirit of collaboration. I am talking about measures to preserve purchasing power, especially for seniors. These also include proposals to improve processing within our borders and reduce vulnerability to threatened trade agreements. They also include measures related to productivity and wage subsidies.

Today, we are exposing ourselves to another monstrous deficit in the fall of 2026, with no long-term effect and no time to put any measures in place. Heaven knows that implementing effective measures quickly is not what the Liberals are best known for after 10 years. Despite that kind of deficit, none of the measures that people need will have been put in place.

If this war drags on, and if the threat surrounding the Strait of Hormuz persists, this fall will be a complicated time in Canada. Once again, the most vulnerable will pay the price. I am calling on the Prime Minister to present a clear plan for taking care of people. His main role is to take care of people. Canada, Quebec and likely Terrebonne are waiting to hear what he has to say.

Above all, the Prime Minister must do three things: relaunch tariff and trade negotiations, deploy short-term measures to support the economy and people's needs, and stand firm by partnering with other middle powers to save as many lives as possible during this war, which is no reality TV show. It is a war and people are dying.

Iran and the Middle EastGovernment Orders

7:20 p.m.

Conservative

Jeff Kibble Conservative Cowichan—Malahat—Langford, BC

Mr. Speaker, over 100,000 Canadians are caught in the growing crisis in the Middle East, and they deserve more than vague assurances and last-minute contingency planning. As the threat from the Iranian regime escalated, the government says it deployed consular staff, updated travel advisories and explored possible airspace access. Those are preparatory steps, but Canadians in the region need action.

In past times of war and crisis, the Canadian government has organized emergency support and assisted in departures, such as Haiti in 2024 and Operation Lumen in support of potential evacuations in Lebanon in 2023. To date, Canada's response to the Iranian crisis has been reactive instead of proactive. When warning signs of impending crisis had been visible for months, plans and preparations should have already been in place.

Does the leader of the Bloc Québécois agree with my call for the government to work with allies and regional partners to secure safe departure operations without delay; to ensure that needed military personnel, aircraft and consular resources are in place; and to support the thousands of Canadians caught in the Middle East and the over 3,500 Canadians looking for extraction, including those within Iran?

Iran and the Middle EastGovernment Orders

7:20 p.m.

The Speaker Francis Scarpaleggia

I will ask members to keep their questions and answers fairly succinct.

The hon. member for Beloeil—Chambly.