House of Commons Hansard #105 of the 45th Parliament, 1st session. (The original version is on Parliament's site.) The word of the day was c-22.

Topics

line drawing of robot

This summary is computer-generated. Usually it’s accurate, but every now and then it’ll contain inaccuracies or total fabrications.

Lawful Access Act, 2026 Second reading of Bill C-22. The bill proposes a lawful access framework meant to modernize investigative tools for law enforcement in the digital age. Liberals argue the legislation is essential for combating modern crimes, while Conservatives contend it is an improved version of the failed Bill C-2. Members across party lines debate the balance between public safety and privacy, with opposition parties specifically highlighting concerns regarding regulatory overreach, data retention, and the legal thresholds for accessing information, urging thorough committee review. 16300 words, 2 hours in 2 segments: 1 2.

Statements by Members

Question Period

The Conservatives emphasize that rising costs of essentials like gas and food are causing widespread financial whiplash. They demand the government axe the tax and criticize CRA payments to fraudsters while honest citizens are mistreated. Additionally, they highlight concerns about private property rights, the Bill C-21 gun law, and capital fleeing the country.
The Liberals emphasize affordability through fuel tax relief and the groceries benefit. They discuss investing in housing, GST breaks for homebuyers, and foreign investment. The party also focuses on protecting the Charter, tax system integrity, a school food program, men’s health, and private property rights.
The Bloc denounces federal plans to constrain the notwithstanding clause, viewing them as an attack on Quebec’s democracy and societal choices. They also demand active transport funding for municipalities struggling with lengthy delays.
The NDP criticizes the government’s climate performance and perceived apathy toward emissions targets. They also call for the enforcement of the Canada Health Act to prevent private, two-tiered health care from undermining public services.

Petitions

Admissibility of Committee Amendments to Bill C-11 Liberal MP Arielle Kayabaga argues that six amendments adopted by the Standing Committee on National Defence regarding Bill C-11 are inadmissible, claiming they exceed the bill's scope or violate the parent act rule. 900 words.

National Framework on Sickle Cell Disease Act Second reading of Bill S-201. The bill proposes a framework to coordinate research, improve clinical care, and increase awareness regarding sickle cell disease. While Liberals argue the legislation addresses critical health inequities, opposition members express concerns about potential jurisdictional overreach into provincial health systems and possible program duplication. All parties agree to study the proposal further at committee to address these concerns and clarify costs. 8000 words, 1 hour.

Was this summary helpful and accurate?

Indigenous AffairsOral Questions

11:50 a.m.

Northwest Territories Northwest Territories

Liberal

Rebecca Alty LiberalMinister of Crown-Indigenous Relations

Mr. Speaker, we are working with the City of Richmond and will be providing a response to the letter.

The Conservatives are trying to re-litigate this very serious court case using partisan political attacks, which could seriously undermine the legal process and the work we are doing. They are taking the longest civil court case in Canadian history, over 500 days, and boiling it down to a social media clip. While they are focused on party politics, we are focused on appealing this decision and advancing all legal arguments to protect private property where it matters, in front of—

Indigenous AffairsOral Questions

11:50 a.m.

Conservative

Tamara Kronis Conservative Nanaimo—Ladysmith, BC

Mr. Speaker, there is secrecy, uncertainty and anxiety. Between the Cowichan Tribes decision and the Musqueam agreement, the Liberals and NDP have managed to throw private property rights into question for thousands of British Columbians. We need a game plan in this country on how we are going to get from where we are today to reconciliation in an affordable, reasonable manner, but the Cowichan Tribes decision is going to take years to wend its way up to the Supreme Court, while Canadians are left wondering whether their homes are truly theirs.

I ask the Prime Minister, what is the plan to restore confidence in fee simple home ownership, and when are we going to have genuine resolution and—

Indigenous AffairsOral Questions

11:55 a.m.

The Deputy Speaker Tom Kmiec

The hon. parliamentary secretary to the minister.

Indigenous AffairsOral Questions

11:55 a.m.

Vancouver Granville B.C.

Liberal

Taleeb Noormohamed LiberalParliamentary Secretary to the Minister of Artificial Intelligence and Digital Innovation

Mr. Speaker, let us be clear about a few things. First of all, our government has been opposed to the B.C. Supreme Court decision, which is why we are appealing that decision. However, let us also understand a few other things. Not a single negotiation, not a single agreement with a first nation since the 1970s has resulted in a single Canadian losing any of their private property.

The Conservatives are fearmongering, they are spreading misinformation and they are causing disruption in the economy of British Columbia.

Indigenous AffairsOral Questions

11:55 a.m.

Conservative

Tamara Kronis Conservative Nanaimo—Ladysmith, BC

Mr. Speaker, the member says he disagrees with the decision and is appealing, but appeals are not do-overs, as the minister should have been told by her lawyers. The “raise it or lose it” principle is a core feature of how our legal system works. One cannot raise a new argument on appeal if one did not raise it at trial. My dad used to refer to this as the “you snooze, you lose” rule. In Cowichan Tribes, the Liberals instructed government lawyers not to argue that fee simple title supersedes all other kinds.

Can the minister explain how the government is going to win an appeal with an argument it is not entitled to make?

Indigenous AffairsOral Questions

11:55 a.m.

Northwest Territories Northwest Territories

Liberal

Rebecca Alty LiberalMinister of Crown-Indigenous Relations

Mr. Speaker, preserving the certainty and stability of private property is of utmost importance, and that is why we will advance all legal arguments to protect them. We disagree with the B.C. Supreme Court's ruling, and that is why we appealed this back in September. This is being appealed by the federal government, the province, the city of Richmond, the Musqueam first nation, the Tsawwassen first nation and the Cowichan first nation.

However, as a government, we always prefer to negotiate instead of going to court. I can tell this House that in all of our negotiations dating back to the 1970s, no agreement between the federal government and first nations—

Indigenous AffairsOral Questions

11:55 a.m.

The Deputy Speaker Tom Kmiec

The hon. member for Honoré‑Mercier.

SportOral Questions

11:55 a.m.

Liberal

Eric St-Pierre Liberal Honoré-Mercier, QC

Mr. Speaker, with less than two months to go before the 2026 FIFA Men's World Cup kicks off, Canadians from coast to coast to coast are feeling the excitement.

Can the Parliamentary Secretary to the Secretary of State for Sport tell the House how our government is helping communities across the country take part in this historic moment?

SportOral Questions

11:55 a.m.

Thérèse-De Blainville Québec

Liberal

Madeleine Chenette LiberalParliamentary Secretary to the Minister of Canadian Identity and Culture and Minister responsible for Official Languages and to the Secretary of State (Sport)

Mr. Speaker, I thank my athletic hon. colleague for his question. The year 2026 is Canada's year of sport, and we are bringing the excitement of the World Cup to communities across the country. Through the “Canada Celebrates” tour, communities from coast to coast to coast will share in this moment of national pride. Our government is also investing to support the host cities and deliver a safe and welcoming World Cup.

Go, Canada, go. This summer, let us celebrate sport in every city and encourage our young people to get active.

Rail TransportationOral Questions

11:55 a.m.

Conservative

Michael Barrett Conservative Leeds—Grenville—Thousand Islands—Rideau Lakes, ON

Mr. Speaker, yesterday, the transport minister said that anyone who speaks out against the land expropriation, environmental devastation or sham consultation in its $90-billion Alto project should be ashamed. I will tell this House that I am proud to stand with people like Dave Brown, his wife Carole, the Brown's Marina and the people of Chaffey's Lock, Rideau Lakes and Eastern Ontario who are rightly fearful for their family homes, their farms, their businesses and their way of life.

The Liberals have an opportunity to do the right thing and to cancel a project that's going to devastate communities as well as families, just like Dave and Carole.

Rail TransportationOral Questions

11:55 a.m.

Sydney—Glace Bay Nova Scotia

Liberal

Mike Kelloway LiberalParliamentary Secretary to the Minister of Transport and Internal Trade

Mr. Speaker, make no mistake about it, this is a transformational project initiative for Quebec and Ontario, putting thousands of people to work, using Canadian workers, Canadian companies and Canadian businesses. At the same time, in terms of this large-scale project, we take consultation very seriously. We have met with 10,000 stakeholders. We will do more because it is the right thing to do. We will work with all Canadians to make this project happen.

Rail TransportationOral Questions

11:55 a.m.

Conservative

Michael Barrett Conservative Leeds—Grenville—Thousand Islands—Rideau Lakes, ON

Mr. Speaker, the minister said, “We're going to...move that train as fast as we can”, and he said the quiet part out loud.

The Liberal government is going to breeze right past the very real concerns of families, farmers, small businesses and people who just want to live the way that they thought they could in eastern Ontario, but instead we are seeing a project that is going to devastate the environment in areas like the Frontenac Arch Biosphere and UNESCO-recognized world heritage sites.

Why are these Liberals disregarding the rights of Canadians for a vanity project? They should do the right thing and cancel the $90 billion.

Rail TransportationOral Questions

April 17th, 2026 / noon

Sydney—Glace Bay Nova Scotia

Liberal

Mike Kelloway LiberalParliamentary Secretary to the Minister of Transport and Internal Trade

Mr. Speaker, make no mistake about it, when it comes to nation-building projects, the Conservatives practise fear and loathing while we practise hope and action. We do that by consultation with each and every stakeholder group in Ontario and Quebec. Why? It is the right thing to do. They are a part of the solution. In urban Canada, we think big. In rural Quebec and in rural Ontario, we are also thinking big.

EthicsOral Questions

Noon

Conservative

Michael Cooper Conservative St. Albert—Sturgeon River, AB

Mr. Speaker, the finance minister's spokesperson said, “The minister fully respects the screen, meaning he is neither implicated in nor party to any discussions, decisions, or votes related to Alto.” Yet the minister introduced, defended and voted on legislation to direct billions of tax dollars to Alto on at least 14 occasions.

How do the Liberals reconcile the statement of the spokesperson for the minister with the minister's actions?

EthicsOral Questions

Noon

Sydney—Glace Bay Nova Scotia

Liberal

Mike Kelloway LiberalParliamentary Secretary to the Minister of Transport and Internal Trade

Mr. Speaker, the minister and others have spoken about this, but I will say this, and I will use an Atlantic Canadian analogy, “This is a rather large fishing expedition.” In Atlantic Canada we would describe it as “There is no fishing bait, there is no fishing line and there is no fishing pole.”

HealthOral Questions

Noon

Liberal

Greg Fergus Liberal Hull—Aylmer, QC

Mr. Speaker, men and boys across Canada are facing a health crisis. They feel their physical and mental health issues are overlooked, misunderstood or ignored. Stress and injury are normalized and vulnerability is stigmatized. Too many men and boys suffer in silence, and they are wary of asking for help.

Can the Parliamentary Secretary to the Minister of Health inform this House about what the government is doing to help men and boys across Canada live healthier lives?

HealthOral Questions

Noon

Don Valley North Ontario

Liberal

Maggie Chi LiberalParliamentary Secretary to the Minister of Health

Mr. Speaker, supporting the health of men and boys means stronger families, stronger community and a stronger Canada.

That is why the Minister of Health has launched consultation for Canada's first-ever national conversation on men and boys' health. We want to hear directly from Canadians about the challenges men and boys face, and the solutions that could improve lives. I encourage colleagues across the aisle to engage their communities and help shape a strategy that truly reflects Canadians' needs.

Agriculture and Agri-FoodOral Questions

Noon

Conservative

David Bexte Conservative Bow River, AB

Mr. Speaker, this week I introduced Bill C-273, the FARM act, to cut red tape and get farmers faster access to proven tools already deemed safe and approved by trusted jurisdictions.

The bill reflects recommendations made by the ag committee on regulatory reform in response to industry concerns about costly delays and lack of access that leave our farmers at a disadvantage. It is a practical, no-cost solution that maintains oversight by delivering results.

Will the Liberals support this common-sense legislation, listen to the recommendations from committee and industry, and get farmers faster access to the tools they need?

Agriculture and Agri-FoodOral Questions

Noon

Pontiac—Kitigan Zibi Québec

Liberal

Sophie Chatel LiberalParliamentary Secretary to the Minister of Agriculture and Agri-Food

Mr. Speaker, it is very important. Across Canada, we heard farmers, and they want reduced red tape.

I have good news for my colleague. We are doing that. The all-government effort is to reduce red tape, including in agri-food and in agriculture. In committee, we just worked on a report that has several recommendations for our government, and we will be acting upon it.

Climate ChangeOral Questions

Noon

NDP

Alexandre Boulerice NDP Rosemont—La Petite-Patrie, QC

Mr. Speaker, every year, Canada has to inform the UN of its performance on greenhouse gases, or GHGs. Usually there is at least one press release, but with this year's shameful performance, we have heard nothing.

Yes, it is shameful because the Liberals reduced GHGs by a paltry 10% when the 2030 target is 45%. That is three and a half years down the road. It is impossible. The Liberals also want to ramp up natural gas pipeline projects like Marinvest. This makes no sense at all.

Are the Liberals finally about to prove that they really do not give a shit?

Climate ChangeOral Questions

Noon

Some hon. members

Oh, oh!

Climate ChangeOral Questions

Noon

The Deputy Speaker Tom Kmiec

The hon. member used a word the that is not permitted in the House.

I am asking the hon. member to withdraw the unparliamentary word.

Climate ChangeOral Questions

12:05 p.m.

NDP

Alexandre Boulerice NDP Rosemont—La Petite-Patrie, QC

Mr. Speaker, I withdraw my remark and instead I will say that the Liberals do not give a damn.

Climate ChangeOral Questions

12:05 p.m.

The Deputy Speaker Tom Kmiec

I am going to ask the hon. member to withdraw these remarks after question period.

The hon. Parliamentary Secretary to the Minister of Energy and Natural Resources.

Climate ChangeOral Questions

12:05 p.m.

LaSalle—Émard—Verdun Québec

Liberal

Claude Guay LiberalParliamentary Secretary to the Minister of Energy and Natural Resources

Mr. Speaker, Canadians voted to strengthen our economy and develop our natural resources while also fighting climate change. We are supporting innovation, we are strengthening our competitiveness and we are making billions of dollars in new investments to achieve net zero. We are going to turn Canada into a clean and conventional energy superpower while reducing our emissions at the same time.