Debates of May 7th, 2026

House of Commons Hansard #119 of the 45th Parliament, 1st session. (The original version is on Parliament's site.) The word of the day was decision.

Topics

line drawing of robot

This summary is computer-generated. Usually it’s accurate, but every now and then it’ll contain inaccuracies or total fabrications.

Opposition Motion—Protection of Private Property Rights in Canada Members debate a Conservative motion addressing legal uncertainty regarding property rights following the *Cowichan* decision. Conservatives allege failed litigation strategies threaten homeownership. Liberals dismiss these claims as misinformation intended to incite fear, asserting that property rights remain secure through the appeals process. While the Bloc supports the motion in principle to foster greater transparency, the NDP dismisses concerns about threats to property as unfounded, citing established legal precedent for reconciliation. 47900 words, 6 hours in 2 segments: 1 2.

Statements by Members

Right to strike and Bill C-247
Canada's growing plant-based industry
Vaughan—Woodbridge youth advisory council
Multiple Sclerosis Awareness Month
Harvest Hands food distribution
Community support for Ukrainian refugees
Calgary Nagar Kirtan celebrations
Attacks on Jewish schools
Vyshyvanka Day and Ukraine support
Mayor Gérald Savard's career
Celebrating Vyshyvanka Day
High gas prices and taxes
Spring economic update and relief
Criticism of Liberal economic policies
Francophone distance education inclusion
Private property rights security
Cops for Cancer fundraising

Question Period

The Conservatives condemn the government for record youth unemployment and national debt, arguing that "credit card budgeting" worsens the cost of living. They criticize a failed gun grab and alleged insider boondoggles. Additionally, they demand the removal of gas taxes, better protections for property rights, and the preservation of the Snowbirds.
The Liberals emphasize their fiscally responsible record and affordability measures like dental care and the grocery benefit. They highlight green energy projects and new methane regulations to combat climate change. Additionally, they champion youth training for skilled trades, diversifying trade agreements, and military modernization.
The Bloc condemns the government for speeding up pipeline construction and scrapping the regulatory framework. They criticize the bypassing of environmental laws, the prioritizing of dirty fossil fuels, and the restriction of public consultations.
The NDP opposes privatizing ports and airports, warning that foreign ownership compromises security and Canadian sovereignty.

Financial Administration Act Report stage of Bill C-230. The bill (C-230) requires the government to establish a public registry disclosing individual corporate debt write-offs of $2 million or more. Proposed by Adam Chambers (Conservative), the legislation aims to increase CRA transparency and accountability regarding uncollected taxes. Having garnered cross-party collaboration, the House passed the bill at third reading, mandating that the Treasury Board publish details of forgiven, waived, or written-off corporate liabilities. 6800 words, 1 hour.

Adjournment Debates

Public service workforce reductions Elizabeth May criticizes the government's reduction in public service roles, particularly in environmental research and oil spill response, arguing that consultant spending remains high. Tom Osborne defends the cuts as a necessary fiscal reconciliation strategy, emphasizing that the government aims to manage departures fairly through voluntary measures and attrition.
Addressing the cost of living Mel Arnold criticizes Liberal policies and deficit spending for making life unaffordable, calling for tax cuts on fuel and groceries. Tom Osborne defends the government's approach, citing targeted measures like grocery benefits, temporary fuel tax relief, and social programs, while questioning the opposition’s commitment to supporting those in need.
Addressing youth unemployment and training Garnett Genuis argues the government is failing youth with high unemployment and ignores Conservative proposals for parental leave reform and vocational support. Tom Osborne defends the Liberals' $6 billion workforce training investment and youth employment programs, while accusing the Conservatives of obstructing policies that have assisted young families.
Was this summary helpful and accurate?

EmploymentAdjournment Proceedings

May 7th, 2026 / 6:45 p.m.

Liberal

Tom Osborne Liberal Cape Spear, NL

Mr. Speaker, it is interesting to hear the member talk about people who do not listen and who are not tuned into the Canadian public and the needs of Canadians.

It was the Conservative Party that voted against reducing the tax for first-time homebuyers, making it easier for young Canadians. It was the Conservative Party that voted against $10-a-day child care, making it easier for Canadians. It was the Conservative Party that voted against a reduction in income tax, helping 22 million Canadians. It was the Conservative Party that voted against the Canada child benefit.

It is interesting to hear the member talk about people who do not listen. The Conservatives have not listened to the Canadian public on what Canadians need, and vote against every opportunity in this House to make life easier for young Canadians.

EmploymentAdjournment Proceedings

6:45 p.m.

The Assistant Deputy Speaker John Nater

The motion to adjourn the House is now deemed to have been adopted. Accordingly, the House stands adjourned until tomorrow at 10 a.m., pursuant to Standing Order 24(1).

(The House adjourned at 6:47 p.m.)