House of Commons Hansard #134 of the 45th Parliament, 1st session. (The original version is on Parliament's site.) The word of the day was elections.

Topics

line drawing of robot

This summary is computer-generated. Usually it’s accurate, but every now and then it’ll contain inaccuracies or total fabrications.

Government Business No. 11—Proceedings on Bill C-26 Members debate Bill C-26, which authorizes $1.7 billion for housing, and a programming motion to expedite its passage. Proponent Gregor Robertson (Liberal) emphasizes the urgency of addressing the housing crisis through provincial partnerships. Conservative opponents, including Dan Albas, label the bill a political fig leaf that bypasses scrutiny. Brad Vis (Conservative) argues the government’s plan lacks parliamentary accountability and fails to address the structural causes of the current housing affordability failure. 25500 words, 3 hours.

Statements by Members

Question Period

The Conservatives discuss the killing of an officer and condemn wasteful inflight catering costs while Canadians face record food bank usage. They criticize federal overreach into provincial jurisdiction, demand action on rising prison violence, and highlight unfilled ombudsman positions. They also call for better rural cell service and transparency regarding carbon tax refunds.
The Liberals mourn the passing of an officer and highlight investments in housing and dental care. They discuss Canada’s international trade efforts and infrastructure projects in Quebec. Additionally, they champion cultural funding, the FIFA World Cup, and cellular connectivity while defending social safety nets and forced labour protections.
The Bloc criticizes the government for sacrificing francophone culture to appease Donald Trump on tax and CUSMA issues. They also urge delaying New Horizons reforms to protect seniors' community projects.
The NDP calls for ship recycling infrastructure to handle hundreds of derelict and end-of-life vessels impacting B.C.’s coast.

Business of the House Members debate the House of Commons sitting schedule and legislative agenda before the upcoming adjournment, with the Conservative MP questioning the government's plans and the Liberal House Leader outlining upcoming business and priorities. 600 words.

Bill C-25—Time Allocation Motion Members debate Bill C-25, as Liberal Minister Steven MacKinnon introduces a time allocation motion to limit further discussion. Conservative MPs strongly oppose the measure, arguing the government is stifling necessary parliamentary debate. The discussion subsequently broadens to encompass concerns regarding electoral riding sizes, potential democratic reforms, and the ongoing challenge of addressing foreign interference within federal elections. 4200 words, 1 hour.

Strong and Free Elections Act Third reading of Bill C-25. The bill amends the Canada Elections Act to enhance election integrity by addressing excessively long ballots, foreign interference, and digital disinformation. While many parliamentarians support these efforts to strengthen democratic processes, some Conservative and Bloc critics argue the legislation leaves significant campaign financing loopholes. Following debate, the House of Commons passed the legislation. 14500 words, 2 hours in 2 segments: 1 2.

National Framework on the Durability of Electronic Products and Essential Home Appliances Act Second reading of Bill C-267. The bill aims to establish a national framework to improve product durability. Proponents from the Liberal and Bloc parties contend this combats planned obsolescence and environmental waste. Conversely, Conservative members oppose the legislation, citing concerns regarding increased bureaucracy, rising consumer costs, and federal overreach into provincial jurisdiction, preferring to focus on targeted, less intrusive repair measures. 7500 words, 1 hour.

Combatting Hate Act Bill C-9. The bill amends the Criminal Code regarding hate propaganda and crimes. Liberals argue naming the noose and creating a stand-alone hate crime offence provide essential protections against anti-Black hate. Conservatives characterize the bill as "dangerous legislation", arguing it infringes on civil liberties and removes long-standing protections for religious speech, leading them to formally move for the bill's withdrawal. 11700 words, 1 hour.

Adjournment Debates

Fentanyl trafficking and bail reform Jeremy Patzer criticizes the government's "soft-on-crime" approach, citing the release of fentanyl traffickers as evidence of a failed justice system. Karim Bardeesy defends the government's record, highlighting legislative reforms like Bill C-14 to address organized crime, bail, and sentencing, while emphasizing operational investments in public safety.
Support for scientific research Elizabeth May criticizes the government for cutting scientific funding, eliminating the science minister role, and failing to engage the chief science adviser. Karim Bardeesy defends the government's record, highlighting historic budget investments in research institutions, new doctoral fellowships, and various sector strategies as evidence of their commitment to science.
Was this summary helpful and accurate?

Canadian Identity and CultureOral Questions

2:25 p.m.

Bloc

Martin Champoux Bloc Drummond, QC

Mr. Speaker, the word in French is not “programme”. The correct word is “émission” or “série”. While our media outlets continue to lose millions of dollars in revenue, the Prime Minister tried to placate Donald Trump by ending a decade-long campaign by the cultural sector to ensure that the tech giants pay their fair share. In response, Donald Trump has issued additional threats regarding CUSMA.

I would like to read a quote from a Quebec filmmaker, a certain Mr. Falardeau. I do not think the Prime Minister knows him. Mr. Falardeau said, “If you lie down, they will stomp on you. If you remain standing and resist, they will hate you, but they will call you ‘sir’.”

Is the Prime Minister not the least bit tempted to take that advice so he might actually be called “sir”?

Canadian Identity and CultureOral Questions

2:30 p.m.

Ville-Marie—Le Sud-Ouest—Île-des-Soeurs Québec

Liberal

Marc Miller LiberalMinister of Canadian Identity and Culture and Minister responsible for Official Languages

Mr. Speaker, I would first like to thank the member opposite for the quality of his French. I would also like to point out that Mr. Falardeau was funded by the National Film Board of Canada.

JusticeOral Questions

2:30 p.m.

Conservative

Alex Ruff Conservative Bruce—Grey—Owen Sound, ON

Mr. Speaker, the NSICOP Act mandates that it must be reviewed before October 6, 2022.

Unlike in his response on January 29, could the House leader please provide the date the government intends to initiate the long-overdue review of the act? Further, will the Liberals support my motion, which would establish a joint committee to ensure that Parliament abides by this law?

JusticeOral Questions

2:30 p.m.

Scarborough—Guildwood—Rouge Park Ontario

Liberal

Gary Anandasangaree LiberalMinister of Public Safety

Mr. Speaker, let me thank my colleague for the work he has been doing as part of NSICOP. As we are aware, it is a body of Parliament that ensures review of our security practices, and we look forward to the review that we will undertake starting this year.

Aerospace IndustryOral Questions

2:30 p.m.

Conservative

John Brassard Conservative Barrie South—Innisfil, ON

Mr. Speaker, $200 million is what Liberals gave a near-bankrupt company of well-connected Liberal insiders and family members for now three failed launches from a concrete slab spaceport. While Canadians pay for the most expensive science fair project in history, the only successful thing taking off is the bank accounts of Liberal insiders such as Sasha Jacob, who turned worthless shares of the company into a $1.8-million personal windfall after Liberals lit the fuse.

Will the Prime Minister just admit that this was all about greasing the palms of well-connected Liberal insiders?

Aerospace IndustryOral Questions

2:30 p.m.

Ottawa South Ontario

Liberal

David McGuinty LiberalMinister of National Defence

Mr. Speaker, our investments in Canada's space capabilities, the member will know, will translate into new jobs, stronger supply chains, greater industrial capacity and a more resilient Canadian economy. We are taking decisive action to strengthen our security and sovereignty, and to reinforce the resilience and long-term strength of the country. We are strengthening Atlantic Canada's industrial capacity, growing Nova Scotia's role in Canada's defence industry and giving Canada the capability it needs to respond to evolving global security challenges, while supporting long-term economic growth.

Agriculture and Agri-FoodOral Questions

2:30 p.m.

Conservative

John Barlow Conservative Foothills, AB

Mr. Speaker, well, that is no answer from the minister. We have 30 more of those. I sure hope they upped their game with the answers.

The CEO of Farm Credit Canada last year, Justine Hendricks, spent more than $213,000 just on travel. She spent another $53,000 on hospitality, including one meal for more than $6,500. This is more than a third of what a family of four spends on groceries for an entire year.

Can the minister tell me how much more out-of-control spending he is going to approve this year?

Agriculture and Agri-FoodOral Questions

2:30 p.m.

LaSalle—Émard—Verdun Québec

Liberal

Claude Guay LiberalParliamentary Secretary to the Minister of Energy and Natural Resources

Mr. Speaker, FCC is an independent Crown corporation and operates at arm's length.

With that said, what I can say is that farmers and agriculture stakeholders around the country appreciate the good work that is done by FCC. We are working hard to grow the agriculture sector and the strongest economy in the G7, and FCC is an important part of our effort.

Agriculture and Agri-FoodOral Questions

2:30 p.m.

Conservative

James Bezan Conservative Selkirk—Interlake—Eastman, MB

Mr. Speaker, the Liberals themselves are warning that public investment in ag research and development has fallen by 15%. Private sector R and D outsourced to universities is down 77%. The number of firms conducting research in Canada has dropped by 30%. However, the Liberal agriculture minister is slashing $115 million in agriculture research. Science took the hit for 75% of the cuts in his department.

Did the agriculture minister personally approve these cuts, yes or no?

Agriculture and Agri-FoodOral Questions

2:30 p.m.

LaSalle—Émard—Verdun Québec

Liberal

Claude Guay LiberalParliamentary Secretary to the Minister of Energy and Natural Resources

Mr. Speaker, we are spending less to invest more, and we are making—

Agriculture and Agri-FoodOral Questions

2:30 p.m.

Some hon. members

Oh, oh!

Agriculture and Agri-FoodOral Questions

2:35 p.m.

The Speaker Francis Scarpaleggia

We will start from the top.

The hon. parliamentary secretary.

Agriculture and Agri-FoodOral Questions

2:35 p.m.

Liberal

Claude Guay Liberal LaSalle—Émard—Verdun, QC

Mr. Speaker, we are spending less to invest more. We are maintaining our presence in every single province and remain the largest agricultural researcher in the country. By streamlining research and development, we can build a strong, collaborative science system that supports producer-strengthened competitiveness and positions Canadian agriculture for long-term success. That is what we are doing.

The EconomyOral Questions

2:35 p.m.

Conservative

Eric Duncan Conservative Stormont—Dundas—Glengarry, ON

Mr. Speaker, that was not even close to an answer.

New documents reveal that the Prime Minister has spent $1 million on inflight catering since taking office last year. That is enough money to feed a Canadian family for 55 years. Let us look at the list: luxury butter cups, crème brûlée, Scottish salmon and smoked Gouda.

With millions of people lined up at the food banks, would the Liberals agree to stop their luxurious inflight catering bills?

The EconomyOral Questions

2:35 p.m.

Thunder Bay—Superior North Ontario

Liberal

Patty Hajdu LiberalMinister of Jobs and Families and Minister responsible for the Federal Economic Development Agency for Northern Ontario

Mr. Speaker, the Conservatives fail to recognize that when times are tough, what Canadians really want is a government that will stand up for them. In fact, that is exactly what we have done time and again, by cutting taxes for 22 million people, by making sure that people can have access to quality child care for a fraction of the price, by making sure people can access training programs and by making sure the social safety nets are there for when people are facing job loss.

These are all things, by the way, that Conservatives vote against. If they really want to help Canadians, why do they not stop voting against them?

Fisheries and OceansOral Questions

2:35 p.m.

Conservative

Mel Arnold Conservative Kamloops—Shuswap—Central Rockies, BC

Mr. Speaker, again that was an answer that was not even close to the question.

All parties acknowledge that the salmon allocation policy must be aligned with the Ahousaht decision. However, while all Canadians have the right to fish, the minister keeps the public's lives and livelihood on hold, waiting for her to decide whether the public's current priority allocation for chinook and coho, before non-indigenous commercial, will be retained.

Will she confirm, today, that this priority will remain?

Fisheries and OceansOral Questions

2:35 p.m.

St. John's East Newfoundland & Labrador

Liberal

Joanne Thompson LiberalMinister of Fisheries

Mr. Speaker, I thank the member for the opportunity for me to once again say that I have met with stakeholders in B.C., across all perspectives. We are working on the decision. There is space for recreational fishing and commercial, and the need for indigenous harvesting. We will balance the decision.

Northern AffairsOral Questions

2:35 p.m.

Conservative

Jamie Schmale Conservative Haliburton—Kawartha Lakes, ON

Mr. Speaker, northern indigenous communities paid the Liberal carbon tax when they bought their fuel in bulk. The tax has now been repealed, yet a year later these communities are still waiting for their refund.

On what date will these communities receive their money? I would like just the date, please.

Northern AffairsOral Questions

2:35 p.m.

Churchill—Keewatinook Aski Manitoba

Liberal

Rebecca Chartrand LiberalMinister of Northern and Arctic Affairs and Minister responsible for the Canadian Northern Economic Development Agency

Mr. Speaker, we are working with northerners on solving all the issues in the north, including affordability, and we will continue to do so. I am happy to work with the member opposite on finding some solutions.

SeniorsOral Questions

2:35 p.m.

Bloc

Andréanne Larouche Bloc Shefford, QC

Mr. Speaker, the reform of the New Horizons program is putting community projects for seniors at risk. Our organizations have one month to submit their projects. In the meantime, Ottawa now requires them to register as a business, which can take up to 10 months. In addition, the criteria exclude small groups like some local FADOQs and Cercles de fermières; their parent organizations are registered, but they are not. Ottawa needs to give organizations time to meet the requirements and ensure that none of them are disqualified due to the new criteria.

Will the government postpone its reform?

SeniorsOral Questions

2:35 p.m.

Esquimalt—Saanich—Sooke B.C.

Liberal

Stephanie McLean LiberalSecretary of State (Seniors)

Mr. Speaker, in April, we introduced changes to the new horizons for seniors program, including requiring a CRA business number. For most seniors organizations, this change delivers clearer, fairer standards that increase the program's integrity. For organizations that do not have this number, Service Canada is available to assist all applicants. Members of Parliament are also available to assist applicants. That is why we provided a session to all members of Parliament, so that they could ask their questions, a session that, unfortunately, the hon. member did not attend.

SeniorsOral Questions

2:35 p.m.

Bloc

Andréanne Larouche Bloc Shefford, QC

Mr. Speaker, July 14 is just around the corner. No one asked for this New Horizons reform. This is a complete nightmare for volunteers working to improve the well-being of seniors. Community organizations that still do not have a business number will not have time to register by July 14, and that is not to mention the hundreds of others at the local level who simply cannot register because of their structure. That is something else we learned at the briefing. This reform is not designed to address the reality facing Quebec organizations and seniors.

Will the government extend the deadline so that the new criteria do not adversely affect seniors' projects?

SeniorsOral Questions

2:40 p.m.

Esquimalt—Saanich—Sooke B.C.

Liberal

Stephanie McLean LiberalSecretary of State (Seniors)

Mr. Speaker, prior to these changes, the new horizons for seniors program was the only grant within the Government of Canada that was not subject to these integrity measures. We are putting this program in line with all other grants and contributions across the Government of Canada. By looking at the clock, I can see that it is June 11. There is lots of time for organizations, and we are there to help them. We will make sure they have what they need to apply for these programs because we want nothing more than to ensure that seniors have access to the important programs that prevent social isolation.

Rail TransportationOral Questions

June 11th, 2026 / 2:40 p.m.

Conservative

Jacques Gourde Conservative Lévis—Lotbinière, QC

Mr. Speaker, the Alto train is not a gift. It places a perpetual burden on the backs of future generations. Yesterday, the Minister of Transport opened the door to the possibility of cost overruns, so the minister is prepared for it to cost far more than $90 billion and far exceed its budget.

Is the Liberal transport minister prepared to pour money down a bottomless pit?

Rail TransportationOral Questions

2:40 p.m.

Gatineau Québec

Liberal

Steven MacKinnon LiberalMinister of Transport and Leader of the Government in the House of Commons

Mr. Speaker, the answer is no, and it will always be no.