House of Commons photo

Crucial Fact

  • His favourite word was regard.

Last in Parliament November 2005, as Conservative MP for North Okanagan—Shuswap (B.C.)

Won his last election, in 2004, with 46% of the vote.

Statements in the House

Forest Fires September 21st, 1998

Mr. Speaker, lightening started more than 50 forest fires around my riding of Okanagan—Shuswap.

One month ago a fire like one of these got whipped up by 90 kilometre winds into an inferno. It moved so fast that many escaped with nothing but their lives and the clothes on their backs.

The Salmon Arm fire caused the biggest evacuation in the history of British Columbia, with more than 7,000 people moved on a 10 minute alert.

Today I want to say thank you to all the people from communities near and far who took in the evacuees, who donated or volunteered, who worked above and beyond the call of duty.

I also want to issue a solemn warning. Although 200 troops from Edmonton came to B.C. to help, they had to travel and then get up to two days of training before they could staff the fire lines. It is totally irresponsible for this government to abandon British Columbia with no land forces base since it closed Chilliwack.

Petitions June 12th, 1998

Mr. Speaker, it is my pleasure to table a petition from 38 constituents who are opposed to possible new definitions of marriage.

They ask the House to enact Bill C-225, an act to amend the Marriage Act to ensure that marriage could only be entered into between a single male and a single female, an issue very essential for preserving the basic building block of society which is the family.

Aboriginal Affairs June 12th, 1998

Mr. Speaker, the minister of Indian affairs has stood in this House and has said that the B.C. treaty process is working. She knows full well that when she met with the interior chiefs they said no to the B.C. treaty process due to the supreme court decision in the Delgamuukw case.

I would like the minister to state in this House today whether she believes that that supreme court decision is creating great uncertainty in the province of British Columbia, not only with the investment sector but also with all the Indian bands in B.C.

British Columbia June 9th, 1998

Mr. Speaker, the minister does not seem to get it. The Delgamuukw decision has directly impacted on all economic sectors of British Columbia as well as of Canada. It is chasing investors out of Canada as well as jobs due to lack of land tenure.

How long will the Canadian public have to put up with the minister not making a decision with regard to the Delgamuukw case?

Supply May 26th, 1998

Mr. Speaker, I listened to the member's speech with interest. I have a couple of questions for him.

As I travelled around my constituency back home in Okanagan—Shuswap, I had occasion to drop into the schools every now and then. I am finding more and more often as I visit the schools and talk to the young people that they themselves are afraid. They are afraid of a few people of their generation who have some of them living in fear, fear of wearing certain clothes to school and fear sometimes of taking money to school in case it is taken from them.

I would like to know if the member has run into that type of situation as he has travelled around his constituency. Is this also going on in his area?

Supply May 26th, 1998

Mr. Speaker, I do not understand why the government would not give unanimous consent but so be it.

I listened to the member's speech. He made some excellent points. I would like to ask the member a question. I was always taught to believe that when a government is elected its foremost responsibility is to the law-abiding citizens of the country. At least that was always my belief. Since I have been in parliament I no longer doubt that it is the case, but I know that it is no longer the case with the government.

I would like to get the opinion of the member. It seems that the criminal element of our country has far more rights than the victims do today. We had a case in my constituency a little while ago where a husband stabbed his wife to death. He stabbed her 37 times. He was only given three years. What kind of a message does that send to our youth and to the rest of the Canadian citizens who are looking for some kind of leadership from this government which they have yet to receive? Does the member see the same problem? Does the criminal element of this country seem to have far more rights than the victims?

Budget Implementation Act, 1998 May 25th, 1998

Mr. Speaker, I rise today to debate Bill C-36.

What we are talking about here is the so-called millennium fund, about $2.5 billion set up for scholarships. I have to question this. No doubt many of us here in the House remember quite well, as it was not that long ago, when this same government decided to rip the provinces off to the tune of $7 billion right out of health and education. Now it turns around and says it will give back $2.5 billion in a millennium fund. That is like ripping your arm off and giving you back the finger. This government is very good at it.

I have news for the government. It is not its money. It is taxpayers' money. We are the most heavily taxed nation in the G-7. It is our money. It is not the government's money. When I see something like this put in place, I know for a fact it has nothing at all to do with education.

It has to do with trying to make the Prime Minister look good. It has to do with the members on the opposite side, the so-called government of this country, able to pat themselves on the back and say look what we have done for you, the people. We rip it out of your education fund. We rip it out of your health fund. But we will give you back peanuts. We will give you back enough that maybe one in seven of your children might qualify for it, and if they do we will tax it back off them.

That is what this government is so proud of. That is why this government has decided all of a sudden that it will put time allocation on this bill, a budget bill.

It was not that long ago when I felt sorry for the Liberals when they were in opposition and the Conservatives decided to put time allocation, closure, on everything. I can well remember the pleading and the whining and the crying from the Liberal caucus of the day. Not any more. These people well learned the fine art of dictatorship. It did not take a trip over to Cuba to learn that, I am quite sure.

We look at what is going on. I mentioned taxes. I would like to give a brief outline of where Canada sits now. Canada has the highest tax burden of all the G-7 countries. Our total tax burden is 28% higher than the G-7 average and 48% higher than our neighbour next door, the United States.

This government has a habit of standing up in this House and saying we are the greatest country in the world to live in. We are the sharing, caring country of the world. I have news for the government. It is killing everything in this country. It is running the entrepreneurs out of this country. It is forcing unemployment. Unemployment today is at an all time high. We have bankruptcies at record levels.

We have people who are truly suffering. What is the government's answer to this? A $2.5 billion millennium fund so it and the Prime Minister can feel good in case there is an election within a year after that. Shame on them.

I see from some of the people nodding on the other side that I must be hitting a soft spot. They know it is true. The people out there know it is true. They know they are being taxed to death to supply nothing. The auditor general has raised grave concerns about what is going on with this fund. What does the government do? Nothing. It pays no attention to the auditor general. It does not even address his concerns about how this is being funded, about the discrepancy and about the argument on how the bookkeeping has taken place in order to create this so-called fund.

I would say these boys make the James boys look like kids in the candy store. They know full well how to rip off the Canadian taxpayer and get away with it. They have had years of experience.

Let us have another look at what is going on. In 1993 when the Liberals took office the tax revenue totalled $116.5 billion or approximately $8,951 per working Canadian. This year this government will collect $160 billion or $11,335 per working Canadian. That is an increase of 26% in five years. I know many stock promoters who would love to have that kind of increase. I know many people who hold investments would love to have that kind of increase in their portfolio. That is what this government is doing, 26% in five years.

To put it into perspective, the overall result according to Statistics Canada is that any improved family earnings acquired largely to the government between 1989 and 1995, the real after tax income of the average Canadian family fell by $3,461. Are they not proud of that? It fell from $41,084 to $37,623. Are they ever doing a wonderful job over there. They are for themselves but certainly not for the law-abiding taxpaying citizens of this country.

This is a continuing process. It goes on. In 1977 in the midst of the Trudeau years the government collected $7,044 from every working Canadian. By 1986, two years after Mulroney, the take was $14,593. By 1996 after this government took over, it reached $22,792. That is a really a record to be proud of. It takes from the poor. It takes from anybody it can, it keeps on taking and it gives back a so-called millennium fund. Then it has the gall to say it is going to help our students.

Our students want jobs. They want to be able to work in this country. They want a better education. They do not like being taxed to death when they finally have it. They do not like the debt they owe when they get out. They have just cause to be worried about that. It is about time the government started to worry about what is going on and what is there for these kids when they get out. An education is fine, maybe one of the finest things there is. But if there is nothing out here when they come out it is of no use to anybody. We well know that. Maybe it is time this government started to realize that.

This is a total farce. It is a farce on Canadian taxpayers. It is a farce on the people who were elected to come back here and have a say when we have a government that decides you will keep your mouth shut, sit here and just be quiet.

Environment May 7th, 1998

Mr. Speaker, Alberta's energy minister says that he will not sign the Kyoto deal until he gets some solid facts and figures on how this will directly impact on ordinary Canadians' lives.

When the federal minister was in Kyoto she betrayed the provinces by unilaterally raising the scale. How does the minister expect the provinces to sign on to any agreement after the way she treated them at the Kyoto conference?

Canada Labour Code May 7th, 1998

Mr. Speaker, this is a very important debate and I see a very, very pale attendance from the other side. I would like a quorum call, please.

Petitions May 7th, 1998

Mr. Speaker, it is a pleasure to table this petition from 50 of my constituents who state that over 90% of Canadians do not believe stricter gun laws are a solution to violent crime. They also cite opposition from police on the streets and many provincial and territorial governments. They therefore ask parliament to repeal Bill C-68 and instead spend the high cost it will require on more effective measures to cut crime and improve public safety.