House of Commons photo

Crucial Fact

  • His favourite word was quebec.

Last in Parliament November 2005, as Bloc MP for Saint-Maurice—Champlain (Québec)

Won his last election, in 2004, with 55% of the vote.

Statements in the House

Supply May 7th, 2002

Madam Speaker, I have listened to the minister and to my colleague from Jonquière and I am appalled to hear that he has done everything he could and that, for example, EI is there to help those who will lose their job.

We all know that this is not true. Nowadays, with what has been happening in the employment insurance sector, no seasonal worker is covered. At the most 42% of workers are eligible for employment insurance. This is complete nonsense.

I ask him to withdraw what he said and to tell the truth.

Guaranteed Income Supplement May 2nd, 2002

Mr. Speaker, yesterday the Minister of Human Resources Development slammed the door on full and total retroactivity for the guaranteed income supplement. When I toured Quebec, I heard many examples, including a lady in Sherbrooke living below the poverty line who has been deprived of what would be $90,000 in today's dollars.

Does the minister not have a duty to do right by the seniors who have been disadvantaged by the system, such as the lady I have just referred to, and to allow them full retroactivity?

Excise Act, 2001 April 26th, 2002

Madam Speaker, I do not know if I will be able to express my thoughts in three minutes, but I think the hon. member will get my drift.

The longer a member sits in this House, the more he or she realizes that, for justice to be done, one has to be big, strong and in collusion with the government. We see the case of microbreweries, which the hon. member for Saint-Hyacinthe—Bagot has explained; in my opinion, this is scandalous.

The hon. member talks about employment insurance. I think of the $3 billion the government saved at the expense of the least well off in society, that is the elderly who were eligible to the guaranteed income supplement; this money will to used to pay the debt of the rich. I find this outrageous.

Does the member agree with me, or will be contradict me on this point?

Old Age Security Act April 26th, 2002

moved for leave to introduce Bill C-449, an act to amend the Old Age Security Act.

Madam Speaker, the purpose of this bill is to correct a significant inequity in the treatment of the poorest seniors, first by making accessibility to the guaranteed income supplement more automatic and, second, by making the government meet the same conditions when it owes money to the poorest members of society as when it is owed money, which is by applying full retroactivity.

(Motions deemed adopted, bill read the first time and printed)

Guaranteed Income Supplement April 26th, 2002

Mr. Speaker, the government members have been with us all the way. They supported the committee report, they simplified the forms and they adjusted government advertising. Now all that is left for them to do is recognize that all retired people deserve full retroactivity.

When will the minister take action?

Guaranteed Income Supplement April 26th, 2002

Mr. Speaker, the Minister of Human Resources Development recently boasted that 16,000 of 23,500 retired people who were sent a simplified form returned it, and will soon receive the guaranteed income supplement to which they are entitled.

Does the minister realize that the job is not yet done and that there are still hundreds of thousands of retired people who need to be contacted?

Supply April 25th, 2002

Madam Speaker, we are debating a very important issue, which should also be of great interest for the workers of Quebec. Sometimes, I wonder if the people across the way are listening; we have to say things over and over to get our point across.

My colleague from Rosemont--Petite-Patrie quoted some figures. Does he know that Quebec buys between 25% and 28% of all automobiles in Canada? Quebec also buys 28% of all auto parts used in Canada. Quebec builds slightly less than 5% of the automobiles and barely 3% of all auto parts made in Canada.

We have a plant in Boisbriand that is economically viable, we have skilled workers, we have a union which is ready to do everything necessary for the plant to stay open and which is flexible on the social justice front. When I hear such petty comments as those a Tory colleague made earlier, it makes me very sad.

From a social justice point of view, I think it would be normal for the federal government and the Quebec government to press the case in order that a minimum percentage of the automobiles bought in Quebec be built in Quebec, especially since we are among the most skilled workers in the industry. It is clear that the Boisbriand workers have a good reputation within the company. It is clear that these people are doing their duty.

From a social justice standpoint, I would like my colleague to tell me what he thinks of the fact that, not only do we not have our fair share of the industry, but we are about to give up the small share we have, which gives us hope for a better future in that area.

Guaranteed Income Supplement April 19th, 2002

Mr. Speaker, we do not need any red herrings here. All that is required is for a single line to be added to the letter, saying “As a recipient of the guaranteed income supplement, you will be entitled to full retroactive benefits”.

Can these seniors expect to find this addition in the next communique they get from the Liberal MPs?

Guaranteed Income Supplement April 19th, 2002

Mr. Speaker, in response to pressure from the Bloc Quebecois, we have the members of the Liberal caucus coming on board now, and sending letters to eligible seniors inviting them to apply for the guaranteed income supplement.

Do these seniors have to wait for the support of the Liberal MPs before getting the full retroactive benefits to which they are entitled?

Guaranteed Income Supplement April 18th, 2002

Mr. Speaker, it would have been nice if this had been done eight years ago.

Why is the government limiting retroactivity for the guaranteed income supplement to 11 months, when it is prepared to go back much further when it comes to collecting money from taxpayers?

Will the Liberal members from Quebec join me again in forcing the government to treat senior citizens fairly, and allow full retroactivity?