House of Commons photo

Crucial Fact

  • His favourite word was made.

Last in Parliament May 2004, as Liberal MP for Ottawa South (Ontario)

Won his last election, in 2000, with 51% of the vote.

Statements in the House

Job Creation And Economic Growth December 5th, 1994

Madam Speaker, before beginning my speech, I would like to join the Deputy Prime Minister, who spoke earlier, in wishing the leader of the opposition and his family a lot of courage on his way to recovery.

Today on behalf of my Cabinet colleagues, I am putting forward the next key part of the government's jobs and growth agenda. This plan introduces over 30 concrete measures involving ten Ministers and their departments "to help create a climate where business can create more jobs for Canadians", if I may quote the Prime Minister.

But before I turn to what we will do next, let us revisit where we were just over a year ago when this government took office.

We were faced with an unemployment rate when we took office of 11 per cent. Business confidence was volatile and consumer confidence was very low. After two years of a half-hearted jobless recovery, fewer Canadians were working and the economy was producing fewer goods and services than at the beginning of the decade.

As a government our first order of business was to work with other levels of government and the private sector to get the recovery moving. Our first weeks in office were characterized by decisive action, including the launching of the national infrastructure program. The reward for leadership and action has been a continuing rise in confidence and improvement in the overall economic conditions of the country.

Most important of all, more Canadians have jobs. Since taking office 414,000 jobs have been created by Canadians for Canadians. Only a year ago people were talking about unemployment rates in excess of 10 per cent to the year 2000. As of last Friday we broke the 10 per cent barrier and Canada's unemployment rate stands at 9.6 per cent. But the government believes it has to do better than just recover from the last recession.

The cycles of recession and recovery over the last three decades have shown some disturbing trends. Decade over decade average unemployment rates have risen, productivity growth has fallen and with it real incomes of Canadians have stagnated.

The time has come to reverse these trends. The time has come to get average unemployment rates down permanently. The time has come to increase productivity, thereby increasing real incomes. But you cannot do this simply by wishing or declaring it to be so. What is required is decisive action by government, wise investment by business and labour, and a new model of co-operation and partnership.

The government is taking decisive action. That is why we have launched a root and branch review of our social programs. That is why the Minister of Finance has set out a new framework for economic policy. That is why we are reviewing every program in every department and agency of the federal government. That is why the government is committed to reducing the deficit to 3 per cent of GDP, come hell or high water. That is why I am introducing Building a More Innovative Economy.

At the outset let me say that this plan will disappoint some. It will disappoint those who believe that government can and should do everything. That approach defined the success of economic programs by bigger budgets, not better government. That is an approach I reject.

This plan will also disappoint those who believe that the best thing government can do is nothing. That is not our view. We believe that economic leadership by government can contribute to economic success.

The fundamental premise behind Building a More Innovative Economy is that it is the private sector, not government, that creates jobs. What government can do is to improve the climate for the private sector to create those jobs.

Where can good government make a difference? The first priority is building a healthier marketplace. Business needs better access to the financing required to help it grow. It needs a labour-management environment that is more co-operative, less adversarial. It needs fewer and more focused government programs. It needs regulations that makes sense. It needs fewer demands from government to fill out forms and shuffle paper.

Tomorrow the President of the Treasury Board will announce the details of our plans for regulatory reform and paper burden reduction. We will use the power of government purchasing as a strategic tool for small and aboriginal business development and growth. My colleague, the Minister of Public Works and Gov-

ernment Services, will soon announce the details of this initiative.

Our second strategic priority is trade. The challenges here are crucial for all Canadians. For jobs, incomes and prosperity we depend more on trade than almost any other country does. Yet we are not the nation of traders that we could be.

That is why my first priority as Minister of Industry was to achieve Canada's first internal trade agreement-the beginning of a process that will bring down interprovincial trade barriers.

And that is why in the early days of its mandate, the government moved quickly and decisively to improve Canada's international trading arrangements both in North America and elsewhere in the world.

[English]

That is also why the Prime Minister has made international trade a personal priority. The recent Team Canada trip to China was an unprecedented success, showing how Canada can succeed in global markets when we work together. We will build on this momentum.

This plan introduces a variety of steps we will take to improve Canada's trading performance. For example, my colleague, the Minister for International Trade, will introduce measures to help develop globally minded businesses. Our challenge as a government is to equip more and more Canadian firms to win in the fiercely competitive international marketplace.

We will focus on support to small businesses that are entering export markets for the first time and target resources for exporter preparation.

We will improve export financing measures.

Taken together, these measures will quickly enable more Canadian firms to meet the challenge of international trade.

Also, a large component of our balance of trade accounts is in tourism. Tourism is big business in Canada and, for the last ten years, we have done a pathetic job promoting ourselves to the rest of the world. That is why last year, Canada suffered a travel account deficit of almost $8 billion.

That is why the Prime Minister announced we will be establishing a Canadian tourism commission to work with other governments and the tourism industry to be more aggressive in marketing Canada as a safe, beautiful and sophisticated destination, meeting the needs of almost every traveller.

Our third strategic priority is infrastructure, both physical and intellectual. This is an area of comparative advantage over which we have control. In this area the government is working on several fronts. The Minister of Transport is producing a new direction for transportation in Canada to meet the needs of the 21st century. The Canada infrastructure works program is well under way and will create a further 65,000 direct jobs.

Today I am announcing that the government will proceed with phase II of CANARIE, the Canadian network for the advancement of research, industry and education. This commitment will accelerate progress on the Canadian information highway.

In addition, I am announcing a continuation of the SchoolNet program which will see all of Canada's 16,500 schools and 3,400 libraries connected to the information highway by 1998, a full two years before the target set by vice-president Gore for the United States.

Our fourth strategic priority for building an innovative economy is science and technology.

In the world today, virtually all product innovation is science-based, the result of research and development. And nothing is more important than product innovation for businesses to maintain and improve market share, thus contributing to economic growth and productivity.

Therefore, nothing is more important for jobs. I believe that no one will dispute the importance of the federal government's role in science, technology, research and development. The need to be more strategic and to ensure that our investment in this area supports Canada's social, economic and environmental goals led to the launching of a comprehensive science and technology review last June.

This review is nearing completion and will set the stage for a clear articulation of a renewed science and technology strategy for Canada.

Building a more innovative economy lays out specific initiatives to do just that: build a more innovative economy. My plan is a series of over 30 initiatives involving ten ministers and their departments-a truly government-wide effort in responding to the challenges of economic leadership.

It is not a panacea. Panaceas do not exist. It is a co-ordinated plan of action, responsive to the real needs of the private sector, a result of consultation, a commitment to a work plan and the accountability that comes with it.

The challenge before us is clear, to push the limits of this recovery and to achieve real and sustained jobs and growth. We will not decree an innovative economy. That simply means we must work together to build one piece by piece. I believe we can do that by acting together, by focusing on real results and by targeting our programs and reducing our spending to meet our deficit commitment.

We said in the red book: "Dynamic economies constantly re-invent themselves and grow through innovation. Innovation and experimentation inevitably entail risk and the possibility of failure. It is the job of government not to protect entrepreneurs against all failure but rather to create the best economic conditions and institutions to allow entrepreneurs to get on with the job".

Building a more innovative economy is a plan of action to implement this vision.

The Economy December 5th, 1994

Madam Speaker, under Standing Order 32(2), I am tabling a document, in both official languages, entitled "Building a more Innovative Economy".

I will have remarks to make apropos this document.

Regional Development December 5th, 1994

Mr. Speaker, let us try to keep some perspective on what we are trying to accomplish here.

The member will know the concern I have about assistance to business is that it be very strategic in target. That is in line with the strategy other ministers who have responsibility for economic development are pursuing.

As the member will know, we need to make sure our investment in economic development is strategic. It is targeted and focused. It recognizes the need to recognize those sectors in which high risks are prominent, in which other countries are providing assistance to their businesses, in which the markets for goods and services being produced are international and therefore subject to the discipline of international marketplaces.

Those are criteria that apply to regions. Those are criteria that apply to sectors. We have been very consistent in seeking to put our assistance to business programs on that kind of footing.

Regional Development December 5th, 1994

Mr. Speaker, not only have I not made the statement the member alludes to but I would say to him that he has made a startling allegation and it is incumbent upon him to provide facts, dates, numbers and names. We will be happy to look at them.

Let me say also that a key component of an economic development strategy has to be one that recognizes the differences that exist among and between the regions of this country. We have a very large country with quite a varied economy.

The role played by the federal government in understanding the differences among regions, in meeting the needs and requirements of sectors as diverse as those in natural resources as well as those in the manufacturing and new advanced technology sectors is one which requires a great deal of co-ordination across government. That is what we are endeavouring to do.

Small Business Loans December 5th, 1994

Let me say, Mr. Speaker, that I am sure the member will agree with the thrust of the document which we will be tabling today. It does recognize the fact that the key to continued economic growth and job creation is going to be the private sector and that it is important for government to do as much as it can to stay out of the way of the growth and job creation potential of the private sector.

That is how we intend to move the economy forward so that as the cycles go up and down overall we see a general gain in employment levels as well as in productivity and the economy. That is the key to it.

Do we need to reduce spending? Yes, we need to reduce spending. That was the purpose behind the consultation process that my colleague, the Minister of Finance, launched in this House and in the finance committee a few weeks ago. It is toward that end that we will be working in this February's budget.

Small Business Loans December 5th, 1994

Mr. Speaker, there are really two questions there. The first one is why should there be a Small Businesses Loans Act program in the first place. The answer to that is very simply that the primary reason for getting loan capital to many small businesses is to provide some government guarantee, thereby offsetting the fact that many small businesses lack the security they require in order to otherwise borrow from the banks.

In answer to the question about subsidies, I would like to assure the hon. member that we are proposing changes to the SBLA program and further review which will move that program to one which is fully cost recoverable because I agree with him that it should not be an indirect subsidy to the banks.

Government Spending December 5th, 1994

Mr. Speaker, because one of the happiest days of my life so far was the day I was told I was not Minister of Finance.

Government Spending December 5th, 1994

Mr. Speaker, I will not disclose that. As the member knows we are involved in an ongoing process of program review which is in effect, as the Prime Minister announced in September in Quebec City, a basic review of each and every program in every department and agency of the Government of Canada from bottom up.

I believe this review is important. It is a vital part of our own plan in order to achieve our objective of reaching 3 per cent of GDP as the level of the deficit by the third year of the mandate. In the industry department we are prepared to make the changes that, as the member indicates, will result in an overall budget decrease of almost 50 per cent by the third year of the mandate.

Government Of Canada December 5th, 1994

Mr. Speaker, the point is being missed here. Most of the matters I have seen reported in the newspapers today were matters which were debated and discussed in various fora over quite a number of months. In many ways what we see today is the culmination of many months of consultation, of discussion and of thought which have been engaged in among members of Parliament as well as in the House.

I know the member is concerned about this because he recognizes the strategic importance of this document. I hope for that reason he will take the opportunity afforded to him to study it, to read it, to make further suggestions. I believe it plays an important part in the gradual unfolding of an active government policy on economic development in Canada.

Government Of Canada December 5th, 1994

Mr. Speaker, I have a certain amount of experience with fitting diapers. We always preferred the reusable rather than the disposable in our household.

I assure the hon. member it would be of very great concern if information were leaked that could either affect the markets or could lead to somebody prospering inadvertently or indirectly. In the case of the information I have seen published as a result of these documents having reached the public domain, no such case will occur.

I assure him that the participation of members of Parliament in discussion coming from the proposals we put forward in the action plan is of great importance to us.