House of Commons photo

Crucial Fact

  • His favourite word was chair.

Last in Parliament April 2025, as Bloc MP for Rivière-des-Mille-Îles (Québec)

Lost his last election, in 2025, with 33% of the vote.

Statements in the House

Privilege October 21st, 2024

Mr. Speaker, there is clearly a lot to unravel in the SDTC file. There is likely some fraud, embezzlement and so on involved, but I would like to ask our Conservative colleague a question.

Some people have resigned, including a prestigious business leader, Annette Verschuren. Her companies received a lot of money and, interestingly enough, she was Stephen Harper's economic adviser from 2008 to 2015.

It is easy to blame the government. The Conservatives are right and we are correct to blame the government for this situation. However, can our Conservative friends do a little navel-gazing and give us some background on Ms. Verschuren?

Privilege October 10th, 2024

Madam Speaker, I would like to ask the same question that the Liberal member just asked my colleague.

Does she believe that this request for documents is problematic from the perspective of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms?

Privilege October 7th, 2024

Mr. Speaker, I would like to ask my colleague if she agrees with the following statement. On the one hand, the Conservatives are trying to stop Parliament from functioning and are holding every member of this Parliament hostage. On the other hand, the Liberals are unable to find a way out of this deadlock.

In my opinion, this situation is partly to blame for making Parliament totally dysfunctional over the past two weeks. Would my colleague agree with that statement?

Privilege October 7th, 2024

Mr. Speaker, on September 16, the House leader of the official opposition questioned the Auditor General of Canada's role in this matter. He made several accusations against her and blatantly challenged what she had said and written on this matter.

Since the Auditor General is a highly respectable and respected individual within this Parliament, I would like my colleague to tell me whether he condones the Conservative House leader's comments.

At the same time, are disparaging remarks like these not responsible for the creeping dysfunction within this Parliament?

Privilege October 7th, 2024

Mr. Speaker, from what I understand, 10 out of 58 projects were ineligible. About $59 million went to projects that do not meet the requirements of the agreements between the government and the foundation. That is my understanding.

I hear the Conservatives emphasizing that. They are right, and this requires an investigation. The government needs to face the facts and ensure that the documents are produced. I would like to ask my colleague if he could explain the difference between a conflict of interest, possible negligence and corruption. What I am hearing this morning is that this is corruption. We do not have the documents and we do not know why.

I agree that the government is wrong to refuse to do what is being asked, but I am just wondering why the Conservatives are emphasizing the word “corruption”.

Online Harms Act September 23rd, 2024

Mr. Speaker, I thank my colleague for her speech, which was very clear.

Does she think that Imam Charkaoui should have faced criminal charges after calling for hatred and violence last October?

Canada Labour Code September 23rd, 2024

Mr. Speaker, I rise today to speak to Bill C‑378, which was introduced by our Conservative colleague from Bellechasse—Les Etchemins—Lévis.

Before I begin, I would like to take a moment to thank my staff, since this is the first time that I am rising since the House resumed. Like every other MP's staff, they help us improve our work, give better speeches and better carry out our duties, but most importantly, they help us to provide very important services to our constituents when we are away from our ridings. I am talking here about my political staffers, Daniel Lavallée and Sonia St-Amand, my communications manager, Corinne Guimont, my head of representational work, Michel Kieffer, and my photography and videography manager, Vincent Yergeau. This whole team is managed by an exceptional director, Arianne Collin-Gascon. I tip my hat to them and sincerely thank them for all the work they do behind the scenes to support me in my duties.

Back to Bill C‑378, which would amend the Canada Labour Code by extending the timeframe to file a complaint for harassment or violence in a federally regulated workplace from three months to two years, even after the individual ceases to be employed. The Bloc Québécois supports this initiative to better protect workers who have suffered abuse. Extending the deadline is a significant step forward for people who may not have the strength or support they need to act quickly in the wake of incidents involving harassment or violence.

The Bloc Québécois has always been a staunch defender of workers and always will be. We believe that this bill is a step in the right direction. The Bloc Québécois is delighted to see the Conservative Party suddenly taking an interest in workers. We hope that this is not just electioneering and that the Conservatives will continue to put workers first in the coming months. Let us hope that if they do come to power, they will be able to keep from targeting them in the cutbacks they plan to make.

In short, giving victims two years to report incidents of violence or harassment recognizes that victims of trauma may need more time before they are ready to file a complaint and take action. This is about respect for trauma victims. These people may, in some cases, need more time to finally be able to speak out. They often experience psychological and physical pain in the months following an incident of this kind, and they often do not have the strength to take action or defend themselves. Some may even need to seek medical attention, which obviously makes it even more difficult to file a complaint.

There have recently been some very positive developments for workers under federal jurisdiction, with the historic and unanimous vote in favour of Bill C‑58 prohibiting the use of scabs. By extending the statute of limitations, we are showing kindness and understanding towards those who have experienced these hardships. It shows concern for the victims, a sense of empathy that should always guide our decisions and legislation as legislators.

It is worth remembering that, in 2018, the government passed Bill C‑65, which strengthened the provisions on workplace harassment and violence. Updated definitions were added to control this kind of unacceptable behaviour more effectively. The definitions in question include any action, conduct or comment, including of a sexual nature, that causes offence, humiliation or other physical or psychological injury or illness to an employee. That encompasses all types of harassment and violence, even domestic violence.

I would now like to raise a matter of concern to me. Federal public services and Crown corporations are the sectors where incidents of harassment and violence occur the most often.

In 2023, the Department of Employment and Social Development tabled its annual report entitled “2021 Annual Report: Taking Action against Harassment and Violence in Work Places under Canadian Federal Jurisdiction”. I will talk about that later.

The Department of Employment and Social Development identified 4,950 reported incidents in 2021. The federal public sector and the banking sector alone account for nearly half of the reported cases, which is a very significant proportion. These numbers are troubling, if not alarming. That is why it is so critical that this limitation period be extended.

Before I conclude my speech, I would like to talk about an article I saw in this morning's newspaper. Maka Kotto, a former Parti Québécois minister, wrote this very moving article, which aptly summarizes what is happening in the House. He talked about the sometimes disgraceful comments and gestures that are made and the totally inappropriate attitude sometimes shown by members of the House, or certain members.

One point he made in the article was that bringing back dignified debates, where differences are expressed respectfully, is the only way to restore public confidence in our institutions. Everyone should read this article by Maka Kotto, a former Parti Québécois minister.

To wrap up, this bill is an important step toward greater justice for victims. It is time to recognize psychological wounds, which are not always obvious, and to take time to heal them. It is also time to recognize that federal workers deserve all the protection we can offer them with this legislative adjustment.

Military Justice System Modernization Act September 19th, 2024

Madam Speaker, I am very much in favour of giving sexual misconduct victims in the military the possibility of being heard in our civilian justice system. However, I hear that some victims are asking to have the option of choosing between the civilian justice system and the military justice system. I am a bit surprised, to be honest.

What does my colleague think of the possibility of letting the victims choose?

Military Justice System Modernization Act September 19th, 2024

Madam Speaker, I really enjoyed the speech by my colleague from Scarborough—Guildwood. He is a wise man.

When he says that the example has to come from the top, I would remind him that former chief of the defence staff Vance was appointed in 2015 by the Conservatives and then protected by the Liberals. He was never charged during his entire tenure, but matters of sexual misconduct in his file shadowed him the entire time.

My question is this. The first report in 2015, the Deschamps report, covered essentially the same sexual misconduct information. In 2022, Ms. Arbour was asked to prepare a report. Her report said exactly the same thing. Ms. Arbour also said that she failed to understand why another report on this matter was even necessary when one had already been released.

Can my colleague explain why we are dealing with this issue today, after such a long time, and in such an important file?

Benoît Roy September 16th, 2024

Mr. Speaker, today, I would like to pay tribute to Benoît Roy, a defender of Quebec and the French language, who was named a knight of the Ordre de la Pléiade de la Francophonie on July 8.

Benoît has been advocating for Quebec sovereignty and defending Quebec culture through various organizations since 1974. In 2000, he founded the Rassemblement pour un Pays Souverain, a movement that seeks to achieve independence for Quebec and protect the French language. Today, he still chairs that organization, which, in just a few months, will be celebrating its 25th anniversary. Over those 25 years, Benoît has had the opportunity to give out 117 awards.

What is more, in 2005, he launched an annual gala dinner to celebrate national patriots day, in tribute to those who work for Quebec's political freedom and independence.

His unwavering commitment makes him a key player in the promotion of Quebec's identity and the francophonie. I want to congratulate Benoît and thank him for all that he does for my riding and for Quebec.