House of Commons photo

Crucial Fact

  • Her favourite word was justice.

Last in Parliament March 2011, as Liberal MP for Notre-Dame-de-Grâce—Lachine (Québec)

Lost her last election, in 2011, with 32% of the vote.

Statements in the House

Quebec Referendum November 19th, 1998

Mr. Speaker, the PQ has a very unusual conception of a referendum debate. A future referendum would be a winning referendum only for the PQ. This is a strange way to preserve democracy. By preparing for another referendum, the PQ would once again lead Quebec on the road to uncertainty and insecurity. This is a dangerous approach that looks like intellectual fraud. It is an approach that looks like contempt for Quebeckers.

It is hard to be more biased than the PQ. We are talking here about the future of a society, not a PQ convention.

Election Campaign In Quebec November 18th, 1998

Mr. Speaker, there is no doubt about it now: a PQ government would keep working for another four years at preparing the next referendum and promoting Quebec's separation.

It is clear. The leaders debate enlightened Quebeckers on the future of Quebec. On the PQ side, there is this will to hold a referendum and to work hard to make it happen. They want to expend time, effort and money to this end and ultimately achieve separation, even if it goes against the interests of Quebeckers, who object to a referendum.

So, let us be clear: a vote for the PQ is a vote for holding a referendum. And a vote for the Liberal Party is a vote for economic growth and a better quality of life in Quebec.

Status Of Women November 16th, 1998

Mr. Speaker, my question is for the Secretary of State for the Status of Women.

Everyone in this House knows that the Canadian government has always been a great financial support for women's groups. The National Action Committee on the Status of Women is claiming this government is unwilling to fund it. I would like to hear from the secretary of state as to what the government's position is with respect to funding NAC.

Quebec Premier November 2nd, 1998

Mr. Speaker, this past weekend, the premier of Quebec accused the leader of the Quebec Liberal Party of not loving Quebec.

In doing so, Lucien Bouchard is insulting all Quebeckers who do not share his views. In fact, with this statement he is finally putting thoughts he has had for some time into words. The sovereignist leader is cultivating division by insulting all those who believe Quebec should remain within Canada.

The PQ leader has decided to stir up dissent—let him go ahead and do so!

Quebeckers will have a chance on November 30 to give him a frank answer by voting Liberal, by backing Jean Charest.

Personal Information Protection And Electronic Documents Act October 30th, 1998

What is the short title?

Personal Information Protection And Electronic Documents Act October 30th, 1998

With high marks on the bar exam.

Personal Information Protection And Electronic Documents Act October 30th, 1998

Mr. Speaker, I find it interesting that the Bloc Quebecois makes the statement that the minister has dropped consumer interests over industry interests with this legislation.

I remind the House that the Bloc voted against government legislation like that of Bill C-20, amendments to the Competition Act intended to fight deceptive telemarketers. This legislation was intended to protect Canadians from coast to coast. Our seniors are a particularly vulnerable population who are targeted by telemarketers and consumers in general. The Bloc voted against that legislation.

On Bill C-54 I remind the House and the hon. member from across the way, and the divide is pretty big on this legislation between the two sides of the House, that without consumer confidence in electronic commerce industry that industry cannot grow. Canada has an interest in seeing that it is one of the players in the electronic commerce industry nationally, across North America and internationally.

The government understands that the key to successful electronic commerce is to establish trust with consumers. That is one of the main objectives of this piece of legislation. It will do it.

This legislation will create the condition so that there will be consumer confidence in this budding electronic commerce industry in Canada and will then allow us to become a major player internationally. We have to put the person back into personal information, and this legislation does that.

Let me inform the hon. member from that wide divide across the other side of the House that there are quite a number of organizations that promote consumer interest.

Those consumer organizations, to name a few, are the Public Interest Advocacy Centre, La Fédération nationale des associations des consommateurs de Québec, the British Columbia Civil Liberties Association and Option consommateurs from Quebec, my native province.

When it comes to the use, collection and disclosure of personal information this bill represents concrete action, something this government is known for doing. We take concrete action. We deal with issues one at a time but we deal with them. We do not let them live on, destroy confidence of investors, of Canadians, of Quebecers like the PQ government does in Quebec with the referendum issue. But I digress. Let me come back to the main point.

I am a Quebecer. Quebecers already have good legislation in Quebec on this issue. This legislation is not impeding on that legislation. It complements that legislation.

The opposition, particularly the Bloc, does not want to say that because, as the PQ, it wants to muddy the waters in order to push its agenda forward, whether or not that agenda is in the best interests of the people of Quebec and the people of Canada. We see it again here. It is muddying the waters, distorting information. If I were a journalist and those members were journalists we would call it yellow journalism. But they are not journalists.

These amendments will create consumer confidence in Canada in our budding electronic commerce industry. This legislation complements the legislation which exists already in the province of Quebec, my home province, my place of birth.

This legislation will also complement the actions which are already being taken by community organizations and public interest groups. This legislation will allow them to do their job better. This is concrete action to ensure Canada has the real opportunity of becoming a leader in the electronic commerce industry today and tomorrow.

Petitions October 30th, 1998

Mr. Speaker, I am tabling a second, rather large, petition calling on the Canadian government and the United Nations to take action to oppose human rights violations against ethnic Chinese living in Indonesia. This petition is signed by several thousand citizens.

Petitions October 30th, 1998

Mr. Speaker, I have two petitions to table in the House today.

The first one is a petition signed by more than 300 people asking for mandatory labeling and comprehensive inspection of genetically modified foods.

Quebec Election Campaign October 30th, 1998

Mr. Speaker, the next election in Quebec is of paramount importance.

Quebeckers will have an opportunity to vote in favour of a constantly improving federalism. Quebec can finally put an end to the political uncertainty that has prevailed over the past four years. The constant pussyfooting around the referendum issue hurts all of Quebec.

Those who support a united Canada are well aware of the progress made in recent years. Several federal-provincial issues were settled, including manpower and linguistic school boards, and the outcome was positive for Quebec.

In short, a Liberal vote is a vote for improving the quality of life in Quebec. It is also a vote for a federalism that evolves and in which Quebec has its rightful place. Let us not forget that the leader of the Bloc Quebecois was very clear yesterday when he said that a vote for the PQ is a vote for a referendum—